AJP - Heart Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H754-H760, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00075.2005
0363-6135/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmqvist, F.
Right arrow Articles by Meurling, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holmqvist, F.
Right arrow Articles by Meurling, C. J.

Rapid fluctuations in atrial fibrillatory electrophysiology detected during controlled respiration

Fredrik Holmqvist,1 Martin Stridh,2 Johan E. P. Waktare,3 Johan Brandt,4 Leif Sörnmo,2 Anders Roijer,1 and Carl J. Meurling1

1Department of Cardiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; 2Department of Electroscience, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden; 3Cardiac Department, Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom; and 4Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

Submitted 25 January 2005 ; accepted in final form 18 April 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Heart rate during sinus rhythm is modulated through the autonomic nervous system, which generates short-term oscillations. The high-frequency components in these oscillations are associated with respiration, causing sinus arrhythmia, mediated by the parasympathetic nervous system. In this study, we evaluated whether slow, controlled respiration causes cyclic fluctuations in the frequency of the fibrillating atria. Eight patients (four women; median age 63 yr, range 53–68 yr) with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and third-degree atrioventricular block treated by permanent pacemaker were studied. ECG was recorded during baseline rest, during 0.125-Hz frequency controlled respiration, and finally during controlled respiration after full vagal blockade. We calculated fibrillatory frequency using frequency analysis of the fibrillatory ECG for overlapping 2.5-s segments; spectral analysis of the resulting frequency trend was performed to determine the spectrum of variations of fibrillatory frequency. Normalized spectral power at respiration frequency increased significantly during controlled respiration from 1.4 (0.76–2.0) (median and range) at baseline to 2.7 (1.2–5.8) (P = 0.01). After vagal blockade, the power at respiration frequency decreased to 1.2 (0.23–2.8) (P = 0.01). Controlled respiration causes cyclic fluctuations in the AF frequency in patients with long-duration AF. This phenomenon seems to be related to parasympathetic modulations of the AF refractory period.

atrial fibrillation; autonomic nervous system; spectrum analysis; noninvasive


CYCLIC FLUCTUATIONS IN HEART rate during sinus rhythm vary in response to a range of physiological regulatory systems. These fluctuations have been utilized to study autonomic regulation of human cardiovascular physiology (2, 12, 28). The origin of variations in the sinus interval is not fully explained but appears to be predominantly determined by interactions between the autonomic nervous system, hormonal efferent systems, and cardiac pacemaker cells (12, 28). Analysis of heart rate variability by spectral methods (frequency domain analysis) is widely used to study autonomic tone and variations thereof. For example, fluctuations in the so-called high-frequency (HF) band (0.15–0.4 Hz) correspond to normal respiratory frequencies and are thought to reflect parasympathetic tone (26). These fluctuations have been shown to be abolished by parasympathetic withdrawal (1, 2, 28).

Although variations in beat-to-beat intervals (i.e., RR intervals) are usually examined in frequency domain analysis studies, it is assumed that during sinus rhythm the variability of heart rate is determined by changes in autonomic input to the sinoatrial node [i.e., it is assumed that variations in the atrioventricular (AV) interval do not significantly influence total heart rate variation]. Studies on heart rate variability in settings outside of sinus rhythm are sparse, but a few studies on atrial tachycardia (15) and atrial fibrillation (AF) (34, 35) have been performed. These studies utilized analyses of RR interval data, which represent a potential significant weakness (8). During AF, rhythmic fluctuations in RR intervals are potentially determined by both AV nodal conduction and atrial input frequency (23). Thus spectral analyses of RR intervals during AF cannot be assumed to reflect solely or predominantly atrial events because it may be primarily determined by AV nodal factors.

This study set out to explore whether, in patients with AF, vagally induced changes in atrial electrophysiology can be detected during rhythm-controlled respiration. This is a time frame much shorter than previously examined for autonomic influences on refractoriness. We utilized time-frequency analysis (14, 16, 24, 27, 32), which examines atrial electrophysiological changes rather than the RR interval.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Study Population

Patients with permanent AF and complete heart block treated by permanent pacemaker were recruited. Exclusion criteria were pharmacological treatment with sympathomimetic or anticholinergic drugs, AF duration exceeding 3 yr, or clinical conditions that could affect the autonomic nervous system, such as diabetes, hyperthyroidism, alcohol abuse, smoking, or recent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events. All patients gave written, informed consent; this study was approved by the local ethics committee and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Protocol and Data Acquisition

In line with recommended practices for autonomic studies, all studies were performed during the morning, and patients were instructed to abstain from eating for 4 h and from caffeine for 24 h before the study commenced. Cardiovascular drugs, other than direct sympathomimetic or anticholinergic drugs, were not discontinued. On arrival, the patients' pacemakers were programmed to pace at 60 beats/min in unipolar VOO mode for the duration of the study.

After ECG electrodes were attached and other preparations were completed, patients rested supine for 15 min in a quiet, temperature-controlled room. ECG acquisition was then begun, and 5 min of baseline data were acquired. Subsequently, we initiated controlled respiration with 4-s inspiratory and 4-s expiratory phase durations with the use of auditory guidance (i.e., 8-s cycles, respiratory frequency = 0.125 Hz), and a second 5-min period of data for analysis was acquired once the patient was in a stable synchronized respiratory pattern. Finally, full vagal blockade was induced by intravenous administration of atropine (0.02 mg/kg). After a 5-min interval, 0.125-Hz controlled respiration was again commenced and a final 5-min period of ECG for analysis was acquired. Real-time ECG was monitored throughout the study, and blood pressure was manually measured every 1 min.

Data Analysis

ECG acquisition. We acquired standard 12-lead ECG using a custom-made optically isolated PC card (Siemens Elema, Solna, Sweden). The digital signal (1-kHz sampling rate, 16-bit analog-to-digital conversion, 0.6-µV amplitude resolution) was transferred to a personal computer, where the data were written to a file for subsequent off-line processing. ECG signal acquisition was continuous throughout the study, but the periods for subsequent analyses were noted at the time of recording.

Pacing spike and QRST removal. The initial stage comprised identification and digital subtraction of the unipolar pacing spike. Subsequently, QRST cancellation was performed using a spatiotemporal approach (33), which involves multiple templates, allowing an improved matching to each individual complex and leaving less ventricular residua than conventional processing.

In this study, only data from lead V1 were used for further analysis, although V2 and V3 data were used in the QRST cancellation process.

Frequency analysis to detect fluctuations at respiratory cycle lengths. A new method for fibrillatory frequency (FF) trend estimation was used based on the logarithmic Fourier transform of overlapping (one every second) 2.56-s segments of "atrial fibrillatory ECG" (32). An example of the resulting time-frequency distribution is shown in Fig. 1D. The frequency estimation was performed by aligning the spectrum of each new signal segment to a template spectrum with a known main peak position. The advantage of such a procedure is that the entire energy of the signal (both fundamental frequency and harmonic pattern representing the rate and waveform shape of the signal, respectively) is used to obtain detailed frequency estimation. Estimation accuracy was ensured by requiring that both the peak magnitude and the ratio of the peak magnitude to the noise level of the spectrum exceeded certain thresholds. For each new spectrum, a template spectrum was formed by averaging frequency-aligned versions of previous spectra. All frequency estimates were used to provide a time series (see the frequency trend in Fig. 1E) for a second spectral analysis, using the fast Fourier transform to detect fluctuations of the peak frequency value within the band 0.04–0.4 Hz (see Fig. 1F for an example of such modulation spectra). This range was chosen such that it corresponds to the range of the conventionally tested HF and low-frequency (LF) bands (HF: 0.15–0.4 Hz; LF: 0.04–0.15 Hz) examined in heart rate variability studies and contains the frequency of interest (0.125 Hz). The spectra were estimated from segments of 5-min duration from each of the three intervals of interest for analysis, namely, the initial period of quiet rest (baseline), the period of controlled respiration, and the period of controlled respiration postatropine administration.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of the derivation of the modulation spectrum of the ECG, via QRST subtraction and two subsequent fast Fourier transforms. The original ECG (A) is subsequently subjected to pacemaker spike removal (B) and QRST cancellation (C). By repeated measurements of the continuous recording, a time-frequency distribution is obtained (D) from which the frequency trend is extracted (E). A final fast Fourier transform produces the modulation spectra of the different study phases (F). resp, Respiration.

 
Figure 1 illustrates the process from ECG via "residual ECG" to final spectral analyses.

Postprocessing Analyses and Statistics

From each power spectrum, we calculated total power (0.04–0.4 Hz), LF power (0.04–0.15 Hz), HF power (0.15–0.4 Hz; PHF), and power at the frequency of controlled respiration (0.125 Hz; P0.125).

All values are expressed as median and range. Wilcoxon's matched pairs test was used for comparison between paired samples; otherwise, Spearman's ranked correlation coefficient was used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We used STATISTICA for Windows version 6.1 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK) to perform statistical analyses.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Study Population

Eight patients (four women, median age 63 yr, range 53–68 yr) were included. Four patients were taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, one patient was taking a {beta}-blocker and one a calcium channel antagonist, and two patients were not using any heart active drug. Echocardiography demonstrated a median left atrial diameter of 42 mm (32–53 mm) and a median ejection fraction of 55% (35–55%). The median AF duration was 17 mo (range 5–32 mo, defined as the elapsed time since last documented sinus rhythm), and the patients had undergone a median of nine prior cardioversions (range 4–26) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient characteristics

 
Data Availability

All patients were able to satisfactorily perform the rhythm-controlled respiration, and all provided recordings were suitable for analyses.

Population Observations

The median FF of patients at baseline was 6.9 Hz (6.1–8.2 Hz); at controlled respiration, this was 7.0 Hz [6.0–8.2 Hz, P = not significant (NS)], and after atropine injection, this was 6.8 Hz (6.1–8.1 Hz, P = NS). P0.125 rose significantly during controlled respiration, from 0.15 ms2 (0.06–0.25 ms2) at baseline to 0.36 ms2 (0.11–0.58 ms2) (P = 0.01). After vagal blockade, P0.125 decreased to 0.13 ms2 (0.02–0.42 ms2) (P = 0.02), which was not significantly different compared with baseline.

Inspection of full spectra demonstrated that there was considerable but variable leakage of LF noise into the region of interest. To correct for the significant variability in total spectral power, the data were modeled by normalizing for this value. The resultant trends were similar (Table 2). The ratio of P0.125 to PHF (0.15–0.4 Hz) (P0.125/PHF) was found to best reflect actual shifts in power and also corrected for the absolute pollution of the spectrum. P0.125/PHF rose significantly during controlled respiration from 1.4 (0.76–2.0) at baseline to 2.7 (1.2–5.8) (P = 0.01); this ratio fell to 1.2 (0.23–2.8) (P = 0.01) after atropine administration (Fig. 2). There was no significant difference between the baseline and postatropine P0.125/PHF (P = 0.40). There were no significant changes in other measured parameters.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Measured parameters

 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Response to controlled respiration: changes in ratio of power at 0.125 Hz to high-frequency (HF) power. *P = 0.01 and {dagger}P = not significant, via Wilcoxon's matched pairs test. Min-max, difference between minimum and maximum result.

 
Observations in Individual Patients

The response to controlled respiration was heterogeneous. Although all patients showed increased P0.125/PHF during controlled respiration followed by a decrease after vagal blockade, the amount of response was variable (Table 3). A spectrum from a single patient is illustrated in Fig. 3. In this patient, and in some but not all of the other patients, there appears to be significant LF spectral power exhibited in the LF band. Some of this energy might represent artifacts; at present, however, quantification of absolute power in both the LF and HF band, as can be done during sinus rhythm, is not validated. No differences in patient characteristics in terms of age, AF duration, left atrial diameter, previous cardioversions, heart drugs, and other diseases could be found between marked responders and the less responsive patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Changes in power at the frequency of controlled respiration

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Example of modulation spectrum (patient a). Modulation spectra of the three different phases of the study are individually plotted. A clear peak at the frequency of respiration (0.125 Hz) is evident during the controlled respiration (CR) phase. It is not visible at baseline (B); in addition, despite the same respiration pattern, the peak is abolished after atropine administration (PA), suggesting a parasympathetic origin.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Comparison of Dynamic Changes in the Electrophysiological Properties of the Fibrillating Atria to Other Scenarios

It is well known that fluctuations in heart rate during sinus rhythm are mainly determined by autonomic effects on the sinoatrial node. Specifically increased sympathetic tone increases and parasympathetic tone decreases the depolarization frequency of the specialized atrial pacemaker cells by, respectively, increasing and decreasing the rate of the spontaneous diastolic depolarization (2, 6). However, the situation in the fibrillating atria is fundamentally different. The cycle length is the sum of the atrial myocyte effective refractory period, any possible excitable gap that may exist during AF (3, 19), and the action potential upstroke time, which is related to the conduction velocity. FF is the inverse of the fibrillatory cycle length. Thus rhythmic fluctuations in atrial FF may result from dynamic changes in the refractory period, as well as changes in the conduction velocity or of the excitable gap.

The derived parameter of the method for frequency analysis of the fibrillatory ECG, dominating atrial cycle length (inverse of FF), from lead V1 has been shown to closely correlate to an invasively measured spatial mean of right atrial free wall cycle length (14). This in turn has been shown to reflect atrial refractoriness (7, 18, 36). In this study, FF is used as an index of atrial refractoriness.

Although enhanced parasympathetic tone prolongs the ventricular refractory period (17), it has the opposite effect in the atria during sinus rhythm (17, 21, 31). The effect on atrial myocardium during AF is less studied, but the evidence that exists suggests that acetylcholine and enhanced vagal tone shorten the effective refractory period (16, 34), as occurs during sinus rhythm. Consequently, enhanced vagal tone would lead to a higher FF; however, this could not be verified in this study.

The response of vagal discharge is believed to be inhomogeneous, as the right atrium has more extensive parasympathetic innervation than the left atrium (22, 37). This is consistent with the response of acetylcholine administration or vagal stimulation, demonstrating a more marked shortening of the refractory period in the right atria than in the left atria (31, 37).

Experimental studies are limited, but those available have not shown an effect of acetylcholine on conduction velocity (20, 31).

Mechanism of Shift in Spectral Power in Response to Slow Controlled Respiration and Attenuation by Atropine

Physiologically, the atrial refractory period adapts automatically to changes in heart rate (i.e., depolarization rate). These changes occur immediately (11). The autonomic nervous system and cardioactive drugs may also alter the electrophysiological properties of the atria (24, 31). It has been demonstrated in previous experimental studies that cholinergic stimulation leads to a response within milliseconds, in contrast to the marked delay of response in the sympathetic modulation (30). Moreover, it is well known that the length of the monophasic action potential can show rapid changes (i.e., beat-to-beat changes) even during high rate atrial depolarizations (29). Thus we conclude that it is theoretically possible for the atrial FF (i.e., the atrial refractory period) to be modulated at frequencies corresponding to respiration.

The shifts in spectral power after atropine administration occurred without any changes in respiration pattern, ventricular rate, blood pressure and body posture, or body movements. Finally, although parasympathetic modulation was specifically examined in this study, the human autonomic nervous system is in practice a complex interaction. Simultaneous afferent inputs occur from both sympathetic and parasympathetic limbs and are influenced by the central nervous system modulation. However, the methodology employed has demonstrated a detectable role of parasympathetic efferents during longstanding AF.

Atrial stretch (5) may also have been involved; cyclic changes in left and right atrial pressure would have been accentuated by slow breathing. A direct effect of stretch on atrial electrophysiology was disproved as a mechanism for our observations by its abolition with atropine. This indicates that reflex arches involving cholinergic receptors are involved. It is likely that the efferent limb of these arches is parasympathetic, but an involvement of baroreceptors and sympathetic fibers in the afferent limb cannot be excluded.

Preserved Dynamic Electrophysiological Changes in Chronic AF and Possible Mechanisms for Interpatient Variability

Two very interesting aspects of the present study are 1) the fact that dynamic changes in AF rhythm were detectable among patients with long duration AF and 2) the observed interpatient variation. All patients had long durations of AF; thus, by present understanding, electrical remodeling would be expected to be "complete" (4, 13). The degree of spectral power shift to 0.125 Hz with controlled respiration was variable.

Previous studies have shown that, after pharmacological interventions (and autonomic modulation), the change in FF is more pronounced in those who have a lower initial value (24, 25). This implies that the atrium is only susceptible to modulation if the FF is low. However, there was no such trend seen in the present study.

The present study is too small and the population too heterogeneous to draw conclusions regarding the importance of the above factors, but the variable preservation of responsiveness to autonomic stimuli is an important observation.

Methodological Issues and Study Limitations

Although all patients had long durations of AF and complete heart block, the population was heterogeneous in ways that may be relevant. Complete heart block and AF are associated with, or directly caused by, a range of conditions such as congestive heart failure, other heart diseases, and advanced age. All of these conditions are associated with attenuation of parasympathetic tone (10), some of which were present in our patients. Conversely, half the patients in our study were taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, and blockade of the renin-angiotensin system is known to increase the activity in the LF band and to decrease the fluctuations at respiratory frequencies (1, 2). One patient was taking a {beta}-blocker, which has been shown to shift the frequency distribution toward higher frequencies (9); although the exact effects are complex, the shift may be induced by augmentation of vagal tone.

We excluded conditions and drugs that might have abolished autonomic modulations, but this compromise was made for logistical (patient recruitment) and ethical (inadvisability of drug withdrawal in elderly patients with cardiac comorbidity and without gain from participation in our study) reasons.

In this study, we estimated changes in atrial FF using time-frequency analysis, which is an indirect assessment of atrial refractoriness. This method cannot discriminate between changes in atrial refractoriness and conduction velocity; the latter, however, is unlikely to change after atropine administration. The response of conduction velocity to controlled, slow respiration is uncertain; however, because atropine attenuated the induced change (it is assumed that atropine does not affect the conduction velocity), it is likely that the observed change in atrial refractoriness is genuine.

Time-frequency analysis from the V1 lead correlates to the fibrillatory cycle length of the right atrial free wall; therefore, direct deductions about the rest of the atria cannot be made. Equally, this study recruited patients with longstanding AF. Therefore, inferences about shorter duration AF cannot be made, although it would be expected that the dynamic responsiveness of less remodeled atria would be more pronounced.

The respiration was controlled by the use of auditory guidance, but the definite respiration frequency was not objectively assessed during the study. Therefore, it is possible that the full extent of the parasympathetic modulation of FF via respiration may be larger than that found in the present study.

Conclusions

We found that slow, controlled respiration causes cyclic alterations of AF rhythm at the respiratory frequency in patients with long-lasting AF. The attenuation of this phenomenon by vagal blockade confirms that the observation is genuinely related to parasympathetic modulations of atrial electrophysiology. Our utilization of paced patients with complete heart block excludes any mechanism related to autonomic effects on the AV node, and the cancellation of ventricular components of the ECG outrules contributions of ventricular depolarization to the spectral analysis.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study has been supported by grants from the Lund University, the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, and the Bergquist Foundation. The British Heart Foundation supported J. E. P. Waktare during this work.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Prof. S. Bertil Olsson, Department of Cardiology, Lund University, for valuable guidance in the preparation of the manuscript and Birgit Smideberg, Department of Cardiology, Lund University, for skillful technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. Holmqvist, Dept. of Cardiology, Lund Univ. Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden (e-mail: Fredrik.Holmqvist{at}kard.lu.se)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Akselrod S, Gordon D, Madwed JB, Snidman NC, Shannon DC, and Cohen RJ. Hemodynamic regulation: investigation by spectral analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 249: H867–H875, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel FA, Shannon DC, Berger AC, and Cohen RJ. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 213: 220–222, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Allessie MA, Lammers WJEP, Bonke FIM, and Hollen JM. Experimental evaluation of Moe's multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. In: Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias, edited by Zipes DP and Jalife J. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton, 1985, p. 265–275.
  4. Blaauw Y, Tieleman RG, Brouwer J, Van Den B, De Kam PJ, De Langen CD, Haaksma J, Grandjean JG, Patberg KW, Van Gelder IC, and Crijns HJ. Tachycardia induced electrical remodeling of the atria and the autonomic nervous system in goats. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 22: 1656–1667, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Calkins H, el Atassi R, Leon A, Kalbfleisch S, Borganelli M, Langberg J, and Morady F. Effect of the atrioventricular relationship on atrial refractoriness in humans. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 15: 771–778, 1992.[Medline]
  6. Campbell GD, Edwards FR, Hirst GD, and O'Shea JE. Effects of vagal stimulation and applied acetylcholine on pacemaker potentials in the guinea-pig heart. J Physiol 415: 57–68, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Capucci A, Biffi M, Boriani G, Ravelli F, Nollo G, Sabbatani P, Orsi C, and Magnani B. Dynamic electrophysiological behavior of human atria during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 92: 1193–1202, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chandler ST and Trewby PN. Is respiratory sinus arrhythmia present in atrial fibrillation? A study using two quantitative methods. Med Eng Phys 16: 334–337, 1994.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Cogliati C, Colombo S, Ruscone TG, Gruosso D, Porta A, Montano N, Malliani A, and Furlan R. Acute beta-blockade increases muscle sympathetic activity and modifies its frequency distribution. Circulation 110: 2786–2791, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Coumel P, Hermida JS, Wennerblom B, Leenhardt A, Maison-Blanche P, and Cauchemez B. Heart rate variability in left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure, and the effects of beta-blockade. A nonspectral analysis of heart rate variability in the frequency domain and in the time domain. Eur Heart J 12: 412–422, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Denes P. The effect of cycle length on the atrial refractory period. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 7: 1108–1114, 1984.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Furlan R, Guzzetti S, Crivellaro W, Dassi S, Tinelli M, Baselli G, Cerutti S, Lombardi F, Pagani M, and Malliani A. Continuous 24-hour assessment of the neural regulation of systemic arterial pressure and RR variabilities in ambulant subjects. Circulation 81: 537–547, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Goette A, Honeycutt C, and Langberg JJ. Electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation. Time course and mechanisms. Circulation 94: 2968–2974, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Holm M, Pehrson S, Ingemansson M, Smideberg B, Sörnmo L, and Olsson SB. Non-invasive assessment of the atrial cycle length during atrial fibrillation in man. Introducing, validating and illustrating a new ECG method. Cardiovasc Res 38: 69–81, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Huikuri HV, Poutiainen AM, Makikallio TH, Koistinen MJ, Airaksinen KE, Mitrani RD, Myerburg RJ, and Castellanos A. Dynamic behavior and autonomic regulation of ectopic atrial pacemakers. Circulation 100: 1416–1422, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ingemansson MP, Holm M, and Olsson SB. Autonomic modulation of the atrial cycle length by the head up tilt test: non-invasive evaluation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Heart 80: 71–76, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Inoue H and Zipes DP. Changes in atrial and ventricular refractoriness and in atrioventricular nodal conduction produced by combinations of vagal and sympathetic stimulation that result in a constant spontaneous sinus cycle length. Circ Res 60: 942–951, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kim KB, Rodefeld MD, Schuessler RB, Cox JL, and Boineau JP. Relationship between local atrial fibrillation interval and refractory period in the isolated canine atrium. Circulation 94: 2961–2967, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Konings K, Kirchhof CJHJ, Smeets JRLM, Wellens HJJ, Penn OC, and Allessie MA. High-density mapping of electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation 89: 1665–1680, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Lievre M, Ollagnier M, Timour-Chah Q, Descotes J, and Faucon G. Effects of mild hyperkalemia on conduction velocity and effective refractory period in various parts of the dog heart in situ. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 313: 237–242, 1980.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Liu L and Nattel S. Differing sympathetic and vagal effects on atrial fibrillation in dogs: role of refractoriness heterogeneity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 273: H805–H816, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Löffenholtz K and Pappano AJ. The parasympathetic neuroeffector junction of the heart. Pharmacol Rev 37: 1–24, 1985.[Abstract]
  23. Meijler FL, Jalife J, Beaumont J, and Vaidya D. AV nodal function during atrial fibrillation: the role of electrotonic modulation of propagation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 7: 843–861, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Meurling CJ, Ingemansson MI, Roijer A, Carlson J, Lindholm CJ, Smideberg B, Sörnmo L, Stridh M, and Olsson SB. Attenuation of electrical remodelling in chronic atrial fibrillation following oral treatment with verapamil. Europace 1: 234–241, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Meurling CJ, Waktare JE, Holmqvist F, Hedman A, Camm AJ, Olsson SB, and Malik M. Diurnal variations of the dominant cycle length of chronic atrial fibrillation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H401–H406, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Pagani M, Lombardi F, Guzzetti S, Rimoldi O, Furlan R, Pizzinelli P, Sandrone G, Malfatto G, Dell'Orto S, and Piccaluga E. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympatho-vagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ Res 59: 178–193, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Pehrson S, Holm M, Meurling C, Ingemansson M, Smideberg B, Sörnmo L, and Olsson SB. Non-invasive assessment of magnitude and dispersion of atrial cycle length during chronic atrial fibrillation in man. Eur Heart J 19: 1836–1844, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Pomeranz B, Macaulay RJ, Caudill MA, Kutz I, Adam D, Gordon D, Kilborn KM, Barger AC, Shannon DC, Cohen RJ, and Benson H. Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 248: H151–H153, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Pop T and Fleischmann D. Alternans in human atrial monophasic action potential. Br Heart J 39: 1273–1275, 1977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Randall WC. Sympathetic modulation of normal cardiac rhythm. In: Cardiac Electrophysiology, edited by Rosen MR, Janse MJ, and Wit AL. Mount Kisco, NY: Futura, 1990, p. 889–901.
  31. Rensma PL, Allessie MA, Lammers WJ, Bonke FI, and Schalij MJ. Length of excitation wave and susceptibility to reentrant atrial arrhythmias in normal conscious dogs. Circ Res 62: 395–410, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Stridh M, Sörnmo L, Meurling CJ, and Olsson SB. Sequential characterization of atrial tachyarrhythmias based on ECG time-frequency analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51: 100–114, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Stridh MSL. Spatiotemporal QRST cancellation techniques for analysis of atrial fibrillation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48: 105–111, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  34. Van den Berg MP, Crijns HJ, Haaksma J, Brouwer J, and Lie KI. Analysis of vagal effects on ventricular rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin Sci (Colch) 86: 531–535, 1994.[Medline]
  35. Van den Berg MP, Haaksma J, Brouwer J, Tieleman RG, Mulder G, and Crijns HJ. Heart rate variability in patients with atrial fibrillation is related to vagal tone. Circulation 96: 1209–1216, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Wijffels MCEF, Kirchhof CJHJ, Dorland R, and Allessie MA. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation: a study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation 92: 1954–1968, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Zipes DP, Mihalick MJ, and Robbins GT. Effects of selective vagal and stellate ganglion stimulation on atrial refractoriness. Cardiovasc Res 8: 647–655, 1974.[Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc AHome page
L. Sornmo, M. Stridh, D. Husser, A. Bollmann, and S. B. Olsson
Analysis of atrial fibrillation: from electrocardiogram signal processing to clinical management
Phil Trans R Soc A, January 28, 2009; 367(1887): 235 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Mase, M. Disertori, and F. Ravelli
Cardiorespiratory interactions in patients with atrial flutter
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2009; 106(1): 29 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Bollmann, D. Husser, L. Mainardi, F. Lombardi, P. Langley, A. Murray, J. J. Rieta, J. Millet, S. B. Olsson, M. Stridh, et al.
Analysis of surface electrocardiograms in atrial fibrillation: techniques, research, and clinical applications.
Europace, November 1, 2006; 8(11): 911 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
F. Holmqvist, M. Stridh, J. E.P. Waktare, L. Sornmo, S. B. Olsson, and C. J. Meurling
Atrial fibrillatory rate and sinus rhythm maintenance in patients undergoing cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2006; 27(18): 2201 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmqvist, F.
Right arrow Articles by Meurling, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holmqvist, F.
Right arrow Articles by Meurling, C. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.