AJP - Heart  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H1020-H1026, 2005. First published May 6, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00156.2005
0363-6135/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/3/H1020    most recent
00156.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by DiCarlo, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by DiCarlo, S. E.

Acute exercise increases the ventricular arrhythmia threshold via the intrinsic adenosine receptor system in conscious hypertensive rats

Heidi L. Collins and Stephen E. DiCarlo

Department of Physiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan

Submitted 16 February 2005 ; accepted in final form 5 May 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Coronary artery occlusion-induced tachyarrhythmias that culminate in ventricular fibrillation are the leading cause of death in developed countries. The intrinsic adenosine receptor system protects the heart from an ischemic insult. Thus the increased functional demands made on the heart during exercise may produce protective adaptations mediated by endogenous adenosine. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that a single bout of dynamic exercise increases the ventricular arrhythmia threshold (VAT) induced by coronary artery occlusion in conscious hypertensive rats via the intrinsic adenosine receptor system. To test this hypothesis, we recorded the VAT before and on an alternate day after a single bout of dynamic treadmill exercise (12 m/min, 10% grade for 40 min). A single bout of dynamic exercise significantly reduced postexercise arterial pressure ({Delta}–24 ± 4 mmHg) and increased VAT ({Delta}+1.95 ± 0.31 min). Adenosine receptor blockade with the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonists theophylline or aminophylline (10 mg/kg) attenuated the cardioprotective effects of a single bout of dynamic exercise. Results suggest that strategies that increase myocardial ATP requirements leading to adenosine production provide protection against coronary artery occlusion.

coronary artery occlusion; cardioprotective strategies


THE CARDIOVASCULAR RESPONSE to dynamic, whole body exercise places profound demands on the heart. For example, cardiac output can increase four- to fivefold. The increase in cardiac output is primarily mediated by an increase in heart rate (HR) and to a lesser extent by an increase in stroke volume. The increase in stroke volume is primarily mediated by an increase in end-diastolic volume (Frank-Starling mechanism) and, in part, to a reduction in end-systolic volume (increased contractility mediated by adrenergic stimulation). These cardiovascular responses markedly increase myocardial oxygen consumption and accordingly, coronary blood flow can increase four- to fivefold (46). There is a tight relationship between myocardial oxygen consumption and coronary blood flow that suggests that products of metabolism mediate local control of coronary blood flow. Adenosine, a breakdown product of ATP, has been proposed as the major mediator of local coronary blood flow (3). Specifically, adenosine is the vasodilatory metabolite that links coronary blood flow to myocardial metabolism (3).

Adenosine also has an important role as an endogenous determinant of ischemic tolerance by modulating several components of cardiac function (6, 41). For example, adenosine has potent cardiac electrophysiological effects, including a negative chronotropic action on the sinus node and a predominant negative dromotropic action on the atrioventricular (AV) node (48). Adenosine therefore is used as an antiarrhythmic agent for the management of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and other arrhythmias mediated by reentrant mechanisms involving the AV node (8–10, 32). Aminophylline, a nonspecific adenosine receptor antagonist, may have a clinical use in the treatment of ischemia-induced, adenosine-mediated bradysystole (26). Importantly, coronary artery occlusion-induced tachyarrhythmias that culminate in ventricular fibrillation are the leading cause of death in developed countries. Because increases in metabolism stimulate adenosine release and increase cardiac interstitial concentration of adenosine (11, 14, 27), an exercise-induced endogenous release of adenosine may provide protection from coronary artery occlusion-induced ventricular arrhythmias.

An understanding of how the heart responds to coronary occlusion and the role of exercise and the intrinsic adenosine receptor system in cardioprotection may provide strategies for developing novel therapeutic agents in the setting of an ischemic insult. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that a single bout of dynamic exercise increases the ventricular arrhythmia threshold (VAT), induced by coronary artery occlusion, in conscious hypertensive rats via the intrinsic adenosine receptor system. Conscious, chronically instrumented rats were studied to negate the confounding effects of anesthetic agents and surgical trauma (22, 37). The clinical significance of coronary occlusion was hypothesized to document the effects of exercise and the intrinsic adenosine receptor system on cardioprotection.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Design. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a single bout of dynamic exercise increases the VAT induced by coronary artery occlusion in conscious hypertensive rats via the intrinsic adenosine receptor system. To test this hypothesis, the ECG, pulsatile arterial pressure (AP), and HR were recorded continuously during left main coronary artery occlusion under four experimental conditions. Specifically, the VAT was determined on a control day (No exercise, n = 7), after a single bout of dynamic exercise (Postexercise, n = 6), after a single bout of dynamic exercise with nonspecific adenosine receptor blockade (Postexercise Ad-X, n = 6), and after No exercise with nonspecific adenosine receptor blockade (No-exercise Ad-X, n = 5). The order of the experimental protocols was randomized, and each experimental protocol was separated by at least 1 wk.

Surgical procedures. All surgical and experimental procedures involving animals were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conformed to the American Physiological Society’s "Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Animals." All surgical procedures were performed by using aseptic surgical procedures. Rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (45 mg/kg ip) and supplemental doses (10–20 mg/kg ip) were administered if the rat regained the blink reflex or responded during the surgical procedures. The hearts were approached via a left thoracotomy through the fourth intercostal space. A coronary artery occluder, made from 5.0-gauge atraumatic prolene suture (8720H, Ethicon), which passed through a polyethylene-50 guide tubing (Clay Adams), was passed around the left main coronary artery 2 to 3 mm from the origin by inserting the needle into the left ventricular wall under the overhanging left atrial appendage and bringing it out high on the pulmonary conus (4). The guide tubing with the other end of the occluder was then exteriorized at the back of the neck. The tubing was filled with a mixture of Vasoline and mineral oil to prevent a pneumothorax and plugged with an obturator. At least 1 wk was allowed for recovery (25). During the recovery periods, the rats were handled, weighed daily, and acclimatized to the laboratory, treadmill, and the investigators. Subsequently, the animals were anesthetized as described above, and three insulated stainless steel ECG electrodes were sutured subcutaneously on the ventral side of the thorax. In addition, a telemetry device (Data Sciences International PhysioTel PA-C40) was implanted as previously described (4). The sensor of the telemetry device, located within the tip of the catheter, was inserted into the abdominal aorta for continuous nontethered recording of pulsatile arterial blood pressure via radiotelemetry. At least 1 wk was allowed for recovery (25). Again, during the recovery periods, the rats were handled, weighed daily, and acclimatized to the laboratory, treadmill, and the investigators.

Experimental procedures. Four experimental protocols (randomized and separated by at least 1 wk) were required to test the hypothesis that a single bout of dynamic exercise increases the VAT via the intrinsic adenosine system in conscious hypertensive rats: 1) No exercise, 2) Postexercise, 3) Postexercise Ad-X, and 4) No-exercise Ad-X. The order of the experimental trials was randomly selected. For the No-exercise trial, conscious unrestrained rats were studied in their home cages (~13,350 cm3). Rats were allowed to adapt to the laboratory environment for ~1 h to ensure stable hemodynamic conditions. Subsequently, the left main coronary artery was temporarily occluded by pulling up on the suture around the left main coronary artery (4). A rapid change in the ECG (ST segment elevation or depression), as well as a reduction in systolic AP (Fig. 1), documented coronary artery occlusion. The occlusion was maintained until the onset of ventricular tachycardia but no longer than 6.5 min to prevent myocardial damage (50). If the time to sustained ventricular tachycardia exceeded 6.5 min, the occlusion was stopped, and 6.5 min was used as the VAT. Normal sinus rhythm appeared on termination of the occlusion by gently compressing the thorax. In the rare event when the animal did not resume normal sinus rhythm, cardioversion was achieved (after the rat lost consciousness) with the use of one shock (10 J) of direct current. The VAT was defined as the time from coronary artery occlusion to sustained ventricular tachycardia resulting in a reduction in AP (Fig. 1).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Analog recording of arterial pressure (AP), ECG, and heart rate (HR; bpm, beats/min) immediately before occlusion of the left main coronary artery and at the onset of sustained ventricular tachycardia in an intact, conscious, hypertensive rat. Coronary artery occlusion (arrow) resulted in a rapid change in the ECG (ST segment elevation or depression) and decrease in AP. Occlusion was maintained until the onset of sustained ventricular tachycardia but no longer than 6.5 min to prevent myocardial damage. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was associated with rapid, wide QRS complexes and with decrease in AP.

 
For the Postexercise trial (at least 1 wk later), conscious unrestrained rats were again studied in their home cages. Rats were allowed to adapt to the laboratory environment for ~1 h to ensure stable hemodynamic conditions. Subsequently, the rats ran on a treadmill, without aversive stimuli, at 12 m/min, 10% grade for 40 min. By using this relatively low workload, without aversive stimuli, as well as providing training sessions, we feel that we are truly studying the response to exercise rather than a response to stress. Measurements of ECG, AP, and HR were recorded continuously during the single bout of dynamic exercise. After exercise, the rats were returned to their home cages. Twenty minutes after exercise, when postexercise hypotension and sympathoinhibition are evident (7, 24), the VAT, induced by coronary artery occlusion, was determined as described above.

The No-exercise and Postexercise trials were repeated (at least 1 wk later) after adenosine receptor blockade with the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline or aminophylline (10 mg/kg). Aminophylline is a generically available, nonspecific adenosine receptor antagonist; however, its actions in vivo are consistent with a selective adenosine A1-receptor antagonist (47). Although specific adenosine receptor antagonists have recently been developed, they are not yet approved for clinical use. Therefore, to enhance the clinical significance of this study, aminophylline was used. The effective blocking dose of aminophylline was determined in five rats. Adenosine (25 µg/kg) produced depressor and bradycardic responses (Fig. 2, {Delta}–42 ± 6 mmHg and {Delta}–111 ± 15 beats/min). Aminophylline, 70 min after administration, reduced the responses to adenosine (Fig. 2, {Delta}+6 ± 1 mmHg and {Delta}–24 ± 9 beats/min).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Analog recording of the AP and HR responses to adenosine (25 µg/kg) before (A) and after (B) 70-min nonspecific adenosine receptor blockade with aminophylline (10 mg/kg). Adenosine produced depressor and bradycardic responses ({Delta}–42 ± 6 mmHg and {Delta}–111 ± 15 beats/min). Seventy minutes after administration, aminophylline reduced the responses to adenosine ({Delta}+6 ± 1 mmHg and {Delta}–24 ± 9 beats/min).

 
Determination of ischemic zone. Three days after the conclusion of the studies, the rats were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium. To determine the size of the ischemic risk area, the heart was excised with the occluder intact and perfused via the aorta with 30 ml of 0.9% saline to wash out the blood. Subsequently, the suture around the left main coronary artery was tied. Evans blue dye (300 µl, 1 mg/ml in 0.9% saline, Sigma Chemical) was perfused via the aorta causing the dye to infuse into the nonischemic area of the heart, leaving the ischemic regions unstained. The heart was trimmed leaving only the right and left ventricles, rinsed to remove the excess blue dye, and then weighed. The heart was trimmed again leaving only the ischemic region. The weight of the ischemic zone was expressed as the percentage of total heart weight (4, 5, 51).

Subsequently, to determine whether the occlusion produced a myocardial infarct, the heart was sliced transversally into ~1.0-mm sections and incubated in a 1% solution of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TCC, Sigma) at 37°C for 20 min. The heart sections were placed between two glass slides and immersed in 10% formalin overnight to enhance the contrast of the stain. TCC staining differentiates viable tissue by reacting with myocardial dehydrogenase enzymes to form a brick red stain. Necrotic tissue that has lost its dehydrogenase enzymes does not form a red stain and shows up as pale yellow (4). This stain has been shown to be a reliable indicator of myocardial infarction (15).

Statistical analysis. All data are expressed as means ± SE. A two-way ANOVA with post hoc Fisher protected least significant differences (LSD) test was used to determine differences among preexercise, exercise, and postexercise mean AP (MAP) and HR in the Postexercise and Postexercise Ad-X trials (Fig. 3). A two-way ANOVA with post hoc Fisher LSD test was used to determine differences between VAT across the four experimental trials (Fig. 4) and MAP and HR immediately before the occlusion (preocclusion) and immediately before the onset of ventricular arrhythmia (prearrhythmia) across the experimental trials (Table 1).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Mean AP (MAP) (A) and HR (B) before (preexercise), during (exercise) and after (postexercise) a single bout of dynamic exercise without blockade of adenosine receptors (No Ad-X; closed circles) and with blockade of adenosine receptors (Ad-X; open circles). As expected, postexercise MAP was significantly lower compared with preexercise. There were no differences in MAP between the two trials. Exercise HR was significantly higher compared with preexercise in both trials. Ad-X did not alter preexercise HR; however, HR was significantly higher during exercise and after exercise. *P < 0.05, preexercise vs. exercise; #P < 0.05, No Ad-X vs. Ad-X.

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Ventricular arrhythmia threshold (VAT) induced by coronary artery occlusion (n = 4 experimental trials). In No-exercise trial (No-Exc), the VAT induced by occluding the left main coronary artery was 3.84 ± 0.23 min. Ad-X in the No-exercise condition (No-Exc Ad-X) did not alter the VAT (4.25 ± 0.27 min). Importantly, a single bout of dynamic exercise increased the VAT (Post-Exc, Postexercise; 5.71 ± 0.31 min). Nonselective Ad-X with aminophylline or theophylline (10 mg/kg) in the Postexercise trial (Post-Exc Ad-X) decreased the VAT to 4.37 ± 0.16 min. *P < 0.05, Post-Exc vs. No-Exc, No-Exc Ad-X, or Post-Exc Ad-X.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. MAP and HR immediately before occlusion of left main coronary artery and immediately before onset of ventricular arrhythmias under four experimental conditions

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Figure 3 presents MAP (A) and HR (B) before (preexercise), during (exercise), and after a single bout of dynamic exercise (postexercise) during the Postexercise and Postexercise Ad-X trials. As expected, postexercise MAP was significantly lower than the preexercise value during the trials. There were no differences in MAP between trials. Thus adenosine receptor blockade did not alter the MAP response during or after exercise. Adenosine receptor blockade did not alter preexercise HR; however, HR was significantly higher during exercise and after exercise in the Postexercise Ad-X trial (Fig. 3B).

Figure 4 presents the VAT, induced by coronary artery occlusion, during the four experimental trials. In the No-exercise trial, the VAT induced by the occlusion of the left main coronary artery was 3.84 ± 0.23 min. Adenosine receptor blockade in the No-exercise condition did not alter the VAT (4.25 ± 0.47 min). Importantly, a single bout of dynamic exercise increased the VAT (5.71 ± 0.31 min, {Delta}+66 ± 4%). Nonselective adenosine receptor blockade with aminophylline or theophylline (10 mg/kg) in the Postexercise experimental trial decreased the VAT to 4.37 ± 0.16 min. Finally, two rats during the Postexercise trial exceeded the 6.5-min limit on coronary occlusion and therefore received a VAT of 6.5 min for analysis.

Table 1 presents MAP and HR immediately before the occlusion (preocclusion) and immediately before the onset of ventricular arrhythmia (prearrhythmia) for the four experimental trials. The two-way ANOVA revealed significant group and treatment effects without a significant group by treatment interaction for MAP. These results indicate that MAP was significantly lower in the Postexercise trials. In contrast, MAP was not different between the No-exercise and Postexercise trials following blockade of adenosine receptors. In addition, preocclusion MAP, independent of treatment, was significantly higher compared with prearrhythmia MAP. The two-way ANOVA also revealed significant group and treatment effects without a significant group by treatment interaction for HR. These results indicate that preocclusion HR, independent of treatment, was significantly lower compared with prearrhythmia HR. Finally, the ischemic zone averaged 55 ± 4% of the total heart weight, and there were no signs of myocardial infarction.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, a single bout of dynamic exercise resulted in a postexercise reduction in MAP. These results are consistent with several studies (7). Furthermore, the postexercise responses were associated with an attenuated hemodynamic response to coronary artery occlusion (Table 1) and increased VAT values (Fig. 4). Similarly, Babai et al. (1) documented that a single bout of treadmill exercise reduced the severity of life-threatening arrhythmias, induced by coronary artery occlusion in anesthetized normotensive dogs 24 h after the exercise bout. However, anesthetics have confounding influences on the cardiovascular system, including direct chronotropic effects, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, and/or activation of cardiovascular reflex phenomena (23, 28, 36). We studied conscious chronically instrumented rats to negate the confounding effects of anesthetic agents and surgical trauma (22, 37). Furthermore, we documented that the protective effects of exercise are manifested as early as 20 min after the exercise bout and occur in a model susceptible to life-threatening arrhythmias. Therefore, we have extended previous findings by documenting that a single bout of dynamic exercise increases the VAT in conscious hypertensive rats.

Nonselective adenosine receptor blockade with aminophylline prevented the postexercise cardioprotection (Fig. 4). Although the suggested pharmacological effects of aminophylline include the antagonism of adenosine receptors, the inhibition of phosphodiesterase, and the direct and indirect effects on intracellular calcium concentrations, adenosine receptor antagonism is believed to be the dominant mechanism of action of aminophylline when administered in therapeutic doses (47). In fact, aminophylline actions in vivo are consistent with adenosine A1-receptor antagonists (26, 47). The results from the current study are consistent with adenosine A1-receptor antagonists. Specifically, blocking A1 receptors would prevent adenosine-mediated, negative chronotropic action on the sinus node and negative dromotropic action on the AV node and would decrease the VAT, as observed in this study (Fig. 4). Coronary vascular adenosine A2A receptors may also be involved. Blockade of coronary artery A2A receptors would prevent potent coronary artery vasodilation (1, 9) and would decrease the VAT, as observed in this study. In contrast, blocking systemic vasodilator A2A receptors would prevent vasodilatation and eliminate a reflex sympathoexcitation and thereby increase the VAT. Because aminophylline decreased the VAT, the results are consistent with the observation that aminophylline actions in vivo are mediated via local adenosine receptor antagonism. These results suggest that exercise-induced endogenous release of adenosine protects against coronary artery occlusion-induced tachyarrhythmias.

The story of adenosine in the cardiovascular system began in 1929 with Drury and Szent-Györgi’s discovery (12) that extracts from various tissues containing adenosine produced bradycardia, hypotension, and coronary vasodilation. During normoxia in the myocardium, adenosine is released in small amounts at a constant basal rate (44) and is present at low levels due to its rapid removal by three pathways. An imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand results in the net breakdown of ATP, and adenosine release can increase up to 50-fold (31). Upon reaching the blood, adenosine is rapidly taken up in the red blood cells and is degraded. The half-life of adenosine in blood is very short (0.6–1.5 s) (29). Thus endogenous adenosine acts locally at the site where it is produced (44). These facts support a cardiac A1 receptor and coronary artery A2A receptor effect because endogenous cardiac adenosine would not be expected to mediate peripheral vasodilatation. In fact, a 5-min intravenous infusion of adenosine (140 µg·min–1·kg–1) did not alter blood pressure in healthy men (40).

The effects of adenosine are mediated by its interaction with specific G protein-coupled adenosine receptors. Adenosine activates acetylcholine-sensitive K+ current in the atrium, sinus, and AV nodes, resulting in the shortening of action potential duration, hyperpolarization, and the slowing of normal automaticity. Thus adenosine has negative chronotropic and dromotropic effects (2). Adenosine also inhibits the electrophysiological effects of increased intracellular cAMP, which occur with sympathetic stimulation. Because adenosine reduces calcium currents, it can thereby be antiarrhythmic by inhibiting delayed afterdepolarizations elicited by sympathetic stimulation. Adenosine also antagonizes the response to adrenergic stimulation (30, 44). For example, adenosine acts presynaptically to inhibit the release of norepinephrine (38). In 1985, Ely et al. (14) documented that adenosine exerted direct cardioprotective effects on the myocyte during ischemia and reperfusion. Finally, transgenic mice overexpressing adenosine A1 receptors have an increased resistance to ischemia (17). Thus adenosine has a profound cardioprotective effect during imbalance of myocardial oxygen supply and demand.

It is important to note that 50 million Americans are hypertensive or are taking antihypertensive medications (21). The morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular disease, including ventricular arrhythmias, increase exponentially with increasing levels of AP (18). In the United States alone, acute ventricular arrhythmias are associated with over 450,000 sudden deaths each year (19). Therapeutic strategies designed for primary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias are of limited or no success (20, 39). In fact, the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial demonstrated an adverse outcome for many therapeutic strategies (13). Thus interventions, such as exercise, that increase the VAT have the potential to improve the lives of thousands of individuals.

Limitations.

In this study, adenosine receptor blockade with the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonists theophylline or aminophyline attenuated the cardioprotective effects of a single bout of treadmill running. The use of a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist should be considered because these xanthine derivatives are neither selective antagonists for adenosine nor selective for any of the four adenosine receptor subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, A3). With regard to the receptor subtypes, A2B and A3 receptors are documented to be minimally affected by methylxanthines. Therefore, A1 and A2A receptors are likely the main targets for theophylline and aminophylline (16). Activation of A1 receptors mediates negative chronotropic effects (slowing of HR) and negative dromotropic effects (slowing and blocking AV nodal conduction) and inhibits norepinephrine release from cardiac sympathetic nerves. Inhibition of norepinephrine release is mediated through presynaptic adenosine A1 receptors (38). These effects of adenosine A1 receptor-mediated activation reduce myocardial oxygen consumption.

Activation of adenosine A2A receptors mediates potent coronary artery vasodilation (2, 33). Coronary artery vasodilation improves coronary blood flow and increases myocardial oxygen supply. Thus adenosine may be antiarrhythmic by reducing myocardial oxygen consumption (A1 receptor effect) and increasing myocardial oxygen supply (A2A receptor effect). Importantly, Stark et al. (45) documented a profound antiarrhythmic effect for adenosine that was blocked by theophylline. In addition, specific A1 receptor agonist 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine produced comparable antiarrhythmic effects as those observed in the presence of adenosine alone. The authors concluded that the antiarrhythmic effects of adenosine are directly modulated by the A1 receptor (45). In contrast, Schreleck and Richardt (42) concluded that endogenous adenosine is antiarrhythmic during ischemia via the actions on A2A receptors. Thus the precise mechanism and receptor responsible for adenosine-induced cardioprotection are unknown. It is important to note that many receptor agonists and antagonists previously thought to be highly selective are in fact capable of interacting with multiple receptor subtypes at concentrations typically used. Furthermore, there are significant species differences in the pharmacology of adenosine receptors. These facts have added to the confusion regarding the precise receptor mediating the cardioprotective effects of adenosine. Future studies using more specific and selective A1 and A2a antagonists are needed to better define the role of adenosine receptors on exercise-induced increase in the VAT.

The limitation regarding the multiple actions of xanthine derivatives should also be considered. However, although there are several proposed mechanisms of xanthine-induced physiological and pharmacological effects, a large body of evidence suggests that adenosine receptor antagonism is the most important factor responsible for most pharmacological effects of methylxanthines in doses that are administered therapeutically (43).

Finally, there is mounting evidence that adenosine causes several types of ischemia-related bradysystoles (34). Importantly, it has been documented that aminophylline abolishes these bradysystoles that are refractory to atropine and epinephrine (26, 35, 49). Thus aminophylline appears to be a clinically relevant antagonist to block the cardiac effects of endogenous adenosine.

In summary, a single bout of dynamic exercise produced a postexercise reduction in AP and increased the VAT in hypertensive rats. The mechanisms responsible may involve, in part, the intrinsic adenosine receptor system.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-67713.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: H. L. Collins, Dept. of Physiology, Wayne State Univ. School of Medicine, 540 E. Canfield Ave., Detroit, MI 48201 (e-mail: hcollins{at}med.wayne.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Babai L, Szigeti Z, Parratt JR, and Vegh A. Delayed cardioprotective effects of exercise in dogs are aminoguanidine sensitive: possible involvement of nitric oxide. Clin Sci (Lond) 102: 435–445, 2002.
  2. Belardinelli L, Shryock JC, Song Y, Wang D, and Srinivas M. Ionic basis of the electrophysiological actions of adenosine on cardiomyocytes. FASEB J 9: 359–365, 1995.
  3. Berne RM. Cardiac nucleotides in hypoxia: possible role in regulation of coronary blood flow. Am J Physiol 204: 317–322, 1963.
  4. Collins HL, Loka AM, and DiCarlo SE. Daily exercise-induced cardioprotection is associated with changes in calcium regulatory proteins in hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288: H532–H540, 2005.
  5. Crockett TR, Gray GA, Kane KA, and Wainwright CL. Sarafotoxin 6c (S6c) reduces infarct size and preserves mRNA for the ETB receptor in the ischemic/reperfused myocardium of anesthetized rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 44: 148–154, 2004.
  6. Delgado J, Saborido A, Moran M, and Megias A. Chronic and acute exercise do not alter Ca2+ regulatory systems and ectonucleotidase activities in rat heart. J Appl Physiol 87: 152–160, 1999.
  7. DiCarlo SE, Collins HL, Howard MG, Chen CY, Scislo TJ, and Patil RD. Postexertional hypotension: a brief review. Sports Med Training and Rehab 5: 17–27, 1994.
  8. DiMarco JP. Adenosine and supraventricular tachycardia. Prog Clin Biol Res 230: 271–281, 1987.
  9. DiMarco JP, Sellers TD, Berne RM, West GA, and Belardinelli L. Adenosine: electrophysiologic effects and therapeutic use for terminating paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 68: 1254–1263, 1983.
  10. DiMarco JP, Sellers TD, Lerman BB, Greenberg ML, Berne RM, and Belardinelli L. Diagnostic and therapeutic use of adenosine in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 6: 417–425, 1985.
  11. Drake-Holland AJ, Laird JD, Noble MI, Spaan JA, and Vergroesen I. Oxygen and coronary vascular resistance during autoregulation and metabolic vasodilation in the dog. J Physiol (Lond) 348: 285–299, 1984.
  12. Drury AN and Szent-Györgi A. The physiological activity of adenine compounds with especial reference to their action upon mammalian heart. J Physiol 68: 213–237, 1929.
  13. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, Arensberg D, Baker A, Friedman L, Greene HL, and CAST Investigators. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med 324: 781–788, 1991.
  14. Ely SW, Knabb RM, Bacchus AN, Rubio R, and Berne RM. Measurements of coronary plasma and pericardial infusate adenosine concentrations during exercise in conscious dog: relationship to myocardial oxygen consumption and coronary blood flow. J Mol Cell Cardiol 15: 673–683, 1983.
  15. Fishbein MC, Meerbaum S, Rit J, Lando U, Kanmatsuse K, Mercier JC, Corday E, and Ganz W. Early phase acute myocardial infarct size quantification: validation of the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride tissue enzyme staining technique. Am Heart J 101: 595–600, 1981.
  16. Fredholm BB, Battig K, Holmen J, Nehlig A, and Zvartau EE. Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol Rev 51: 83–133, 1999.
  17. Gauthier NS, Headrick JP, and Matherne GP. Myocardial function in the working mouse heart overexpressing cardiac A1 adenosine receptors. J Mol Cell Cardiol 30: 187–193, 1998.
  18. Gifford RW. The role of multiple risk factors in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Cleve Clin J Med 60: 211–218, 1993.
  19. Huikuri HV, Castellanos A, and Myerburg RJ. Sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 345: 1473–1482, 2001.
  20. Janse MJ. A brief history of sudden cardiac death and its therapy. Pharmacol Ther 100: 89–99, 2003.
  21. Joint National Committee on Detection. The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of high blood pressure (JNC V). Arch Intern Med 153: 154–183, 1993.
  22. Jugdutt BI and Amy RW. Healing after myocardial infarction in the dog: changes in infarct hydroxyproline and topography. J Am Coll Cardiol 7: 91–102, 1986.
  23. Krisna G and Paradise RR. Mechanisms of chronotropic effects of volatile inhalation anesthetics. Anesth Analg 56: 173–181, 1977.
  24. Kulics JM, Collins HL, and DiCarlo SE. Postexercise hypotension is mediated by reductions in sympathetic nerve activity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H27–H32, 1999.
  25. Lawson DM, Duke JL, Zammit TG, Collins HL, and DiCarlo SE. Recovery from carotid artery catheterization performed under various anesthetics in male, Sprague-Dawley rats. Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 40: 18–22, 2001.
  26. Mader TJ and Gibson P. Adenosine receptor antagonism in refractory asystolic cardiac arrest: results of a human pilot study. Resuscitation 35: 3–7, 1997.
  27. McKenzie JE, Steffen RP, and Haddy FJ. Relationships between adenosine and coronary resistance in conscious exercising dogs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 242: H24–H29, 1982.
  28. Merin RG. Effect of anesthetics on the heart. Surg Clin North Am 55: 759–774, 1975.
  29. Moser GH, Schrader J, and Deussen A. Turnover of adenosine in plasma of human and dog blood. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 256: C799–C806, 1989.
  30. Mubagwa K, Mullane K, and Flameng W. Role of adenosine in the heart and circulation. Cardiovasc Res 32: 797–813, 1996.
  31. Mullane K and Bullough D. Harnessing an endogenous cardioprotective mechanism: cellular sources and sites of action of adenosine. J Mol Cell Cardiol 27: 1041–1054, 1995.
  32. Nagelhout JJ. Adenosine: novel antiarrhythmic therapy for supraventricular tachycardia. AANA J 60: 287–292, 1992.
  33. Olsson RA and Pearson JD. Cardiovascular purinoceptors. Physiol Rev 70: 761–845, 1990.
  34. Ornato JP and Peberdy MA. The mystery of bradyasystole during cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 27: 576–587, 1996.
  35. Perouansky M, Shamir M, Hershkowitz E, and Donchin Y. Successful resuscitation using aminophylline in refractory cardiac arrest with asystole. Resuscitation 38: 39–41, 1998.
  36. Pettinger WA, Tanaka K, Keeton K, Campbell WB, and Brooks SN. Renin release, an artifact of anesthesia and its implications in rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 148: 625–630, 1975.
  37. Reimer KA, Jennings RB, Cobb FR, Murdock RH, Greenfield JC Jr, Becker LC, Bulkley BH, Hutchins GM, Schwartz RP Jr, and Bailey KR. Animal models for protecting ischemic myocardium: results of the NHLBI Cooperative Study. Comparison of unconscious and conscious dog models. Circ Res 56: 651–665, 1985.
  38. Richardt G, Waas W, Kranzhofer R, Mayer E, and Schomig A. Adenosine inhibits exocytotic release of endogenous noradrenaline in rat heart: a protective mechanism in early myocardial ischemia. Circ Res 61: 117–123, 1987.
  39. Roden DM. Risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapy. N Engl J Med 331: 785–791, 1994.
  40. Rongen GA, Brooks SC, Pollard MJ, Ando S, Dajani HR, Notarius CF, and Floras JS. Effect of adenosine on heart rate variability in humans. Clin Sci (Lond) 96: 597–604, 1999.
  41. Rongen GA, Floras JS, Lenders JW, Thien T, and Smits P. Cardiovascular pharmacology of purines (editorial). Clin Sci (Colch) 92: 13–24, 1997.
  42. Schreieck J and Richardt G. Endogenous adenosine reduces the occurrence of ischemia-induced ventricular fibrillation in rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 31: 123–134, 1999.
  43. Serafin WE. Drugs used in the treatment of asthma. In Goodman & Gilmans’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, edited by Hardman JG and Limbird LE. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1995, chapt 28, p. 673.
  44. Sommerschild HT and Kirkeboen KA. Adenosine and cardioprotection during ischaemia and reperfusion–an overview. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44: 1038–1055, 2000.
  45. Stark U, Brodmann M, Lueger A, and Stark G. Antiarrhythmic effects of adenosine on ischemia-induced ventricular fibrillation. J Crit Care 16: 8–16, 2001.
  46. Stone HL. Control of the coronary circulation during exercise. Annu Rev Physiol 45: 213–227, 1983.
  47. Taylor P. Agents acting at the neuromuscular junction and autonomic ganglia. In Goodman & Gilmans’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, edited by Hardman JG and Limbird LE. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1995, chapt 9, p. 177–197.
  48. Tebbenjohanns J, Pfeiffer D, Schumacher B, Korte T, Jung W, and Luderitz B. Exogenous adenosine as an anti-arrhythmia agent. Z Kardiol 85, Suppl 6: 191–199, 1996.
  49. Viskin S, Belhassen B, Roth A, Reicher M, Averbuch M, Sheps D, Shalabye E, and Laniado S. Aminophylline for bradyasystolic cardiac arrest refractory to atropine and epinephrine. Ann Intern Med 118: 279–281, 1993.
  50. Vivaldi MT, Kloner RA, and Schoen FJ. Triphenyltetrazolium staining of irreversible ischemic injury following coronary artery occlusion in rats. Am J Pathol 121: 522–530, 1985.
  51. Werns SW, Shea MJ, and Lucchesi BR. Free radicals in ischemic myocardial injury. J Free Radic Biol Med 1: 103–110, 1985.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. L. Lujan and S. E. DiCarlo
Sex differences to myocardial ischemia and {beta}-adrenergic receptor blockade in conscious rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1523 - H1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. L. Lujan and S. E. DiCarlo
T5 spinal cord transection increases susceptibility to reperfusion-induced ventricular tachycardia by enhancing sympathetic activity in conscious rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3333 - H3339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. L. Lujan, V. J. Kramer, and S. E. DiCarlo
Sex influences the susceptibility to reperfusion-induced sustained ventricular tachycardia and beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in conscious rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2799 - H2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. L. Lujan, V. J. Kramer, and S. E. DiCarlo
Electroacupuncture decreases the susceptibility to ventricular tachycardia in conscious rats by reducing cardiac metabolic demand
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2550 - H2555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. L. Lujan, S. L. Britton, L. G. Koch, and S. E. DiCarlo
Reduced susceptibility to ventricular tachyarrhythmias in rats selectively bred for high aerobic capacity
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2933 - H2941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. A. Kloner, M. B. Forman, R. J. Gibbons, A. M. Ross, R. W. Alexander, and G. W. Stone
Impact of time to therapy and reperfusion modality on the efficacy of adenosine in acute myocardial infarction: the AMISTAD-2 trial
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2006; 27(20): 2400 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/3/H1020    most recent
00156.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by DiCarlo, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by DiCarlo, S. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.