AJP - Heart Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H1889-H1897, 2005. First published June 17, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00340.2005
0363-6135/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/5/H1889    most recent
00340.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerckhoffs, R. C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Arts, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kerckhoffs, R. C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Arts, T.

Electromechanics of paced left ventricle simulated by straightforward mathematical model: comparison with experiments

R. C. P. Kerckhoffs,1 O. P. Faris,2 P. H. M. Bovendeerd,1 F. W. Prinzen,3 K. Smits,4 E. R. McVeigh,2 and T. Arts1,5

1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; 2Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and 3Department of Physiology, Maastricht University, 4Department of Lead Modeling, Medtronic Bakken Research Center, and 5Department of Biophysics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Submitted 5 April 2005 ; accepted in final form 12 June 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Intraventricular synchrony of cardiac activation is important for efficient pump function. Ventricular pacing restores the beating frequency but induces more asynchronous depolarization and more inhomogeneous contraction than in the normal heart. We investigated whether the increased inhomogeneity in the left ventricle can be described by a relatively simple mathematical model of cardiac electromechanics, containing normal mechanical and impulse conduction properties. Simulations of a normal heartbeat and of pacing at the right ventricular apex (RVA) were performed. All properties in the two simulations were equal, except for the depolarization sequence. Simulation results of RVA pacing on local depolarization time and systolic midwall circumferential strain were compared with those measured in dogs, using an epicardial sock electrode and MRI tagging, respectively. We used the same methods for data processing for simulation and experiment. Model and experiment agreed in the following aspects. 1) Ventricular pacing decreased systolic pressure and ejection fraction relative to natural sinus rhythm. 2) Shortening during ejection and stroke work declined in early depolarized regions and increased in late depolarized regions. 3) The relation between epicardial depolarization time and systolic midwall circumferential strain was linear and similar for the simulation (slope = –3.80 ± 0.28 s–1, R2 = 0.87) and the experiments [slopes for 3 animals –2.62 ± 0.43 s–1 (R2 = 0.59), –2.97 ± 0.38 s–1 (R2 = 0.69), and –4.44 ± 0.51 s–1 (R2 = 0.76)]. We conclude that our model of electromechanics is suitable to simulate ventricular pacing and that the apparently complex events observed during pacing are caused by well-known basic physiological processes.

eikonal-diffusion equation; electromechanics; ventricular pacing; finite elements


IN 1957, IT WAS DISCOVERED that by combining a pulse generator with a wire electrode attached directly to the heart of a dog with a conduction block, heart rate could be controlled (39). Soon after that, a pacemaker system was applied successfully to patients with a conduction block. Over the next three decades of clinical pacing much attention was paid to proper thresholds (sensing and stimulation) and proper synchronization between atria and ventricles (24). In 2000, more than 150,000 pacemakers were implanted in the U.S. alone (1). However, it has been known for decades that ventricular pacing reduces ventricular pump function (21). Moreover, in recent years evidence is increasing that ventricular pacing may contribute to the development of heart failure (2).

These effects are most likely due to abnormal and asynchronous electrical activation of the ventricles. When pacing from a site in the ventricles, depolarization spreads more slowly and less uniformly (21, 35, 38) than normal. As a result, the distribution of local amplitude and time course of contraction is affected considerably (22, 38) and was found to vary systematically with increasing distance from the pacing site (6, 19, 22). The goal of this study was to investigate whether the regional time courses of strain, as measured, may be sufficiently explained by coordinated actions of known mechanical, electrical, and structural properties of normal myocardial tissue. For that purpose we compared a simulation of cardiac contraction, based on the latter properties, with direct measurement of cardiac contraction, using MRI tagging in experiments on dogs. Thus we may obtain better insight into mechanisms relevant to pacing, with the final goal of improving ventricular pacing in general.

Several computational models of cardiac electromechanics have been used to investigate the effect of depolarization sequence on cardiac contraction globally in a normal heart (28), regionally in a normal heart (13, 30), during ventricular pacing (15, 32), and with regional ischemia (18). Vetter and McCulloch (37) investigated the influence of stretch on depolarization, but active contraction was not included. Rice et al. (25) and Sachse et al. (27) designed a more comprehensive model of cardiac electromechanics. These investigators coupled a canine (25) and a human (27) cellular ionic model to a model of myofilament activation (26). However, this was not incorporated in the whole heart because of computational demands. In the study of Usyk and McCulloch (31) the influence of biventricular pacing was investigated in a failing heart.

The model used in the present study was originally used to simulate a normal heartbeat (13). Next, we estimated the model's parameter values for electrical conduction by comparing its epicardial depolarization times to measurements (15) for pacing at the right ventricular apex (RVA) and left ventricular (LV) free wall. In the present study we investigated whether the heterogeneous distribution of local amplitude and time course of contraction and reduced pump function during RVA pacing can be simulated realistically by the same model. To that purpose, simulated local circumferential strain in the LV midwall was compared with measured strain, obtained in a MRI tagging experiment. In particular, we focused on strain tracings in early, middle, and late depolarized regions and on the relation between midwall circumferential shortening during ejection and epicardial depolarization time. Results from the present study could be helpful in designing new ways of ventricular pacing.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Experiments

Animal protocols were approved by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Animal Care and Use Committee.

Maps of subepicardial depolarization timing and circumferential midwall strain for RVA pacing were measured in three dogs as described previously (8). In brief, a sock with 128 electrodes was placed over the ventricular epicardium of an anesthetized dog. Anesthesia was induced with an initial intravenous injection of thiopental sodium (25 mg/ml at 0.5 ml/kg) and maintained after endotracheal intubation with isoflurane (0.8–2%; Siemens ventilator 900D). Bipolar epicardial pacing electrodes were sewn onto the right atrium in all dogs. Similar electrodes were sewn onto the right ventricular (RV) apical free wall. RV pacing was done at a pacing rate of 110–125 beats/min, ~10–20% above the intrinsic rate. Pacing current was set to ~20% above that needed for capture. Intrinsic sinus activation was suppressed by simultaneously pacing the right atrium. The animals were positioned in a MR scanner to obtain tagged cine images of the short and long axes of the heart during pacing. To view the onset of systole, the scanner trigger was delivered 40–50 ms before the pacing signal, initiating imaging in late diastole. The first image was captured 12 ms before the pacing signal.

Between image acquisitions, electrical recordings were obtained at an acquisition rate of 1,000 Hz. The animals were then euthanized, and the heart was excised. The coronary arteries were perfused from the aorta with isotonic saline at 50–60 mmHg to induce tissue turgor, and the heart was submerged in an isotonic saline bath to reduce body force deformation. Next, the saline in the LV and RV was displaced with vinyl polysiloxane (3M Express) injected through the corresponding atria and atrioventricular valves to fix the shape. The sock electrode locations were then recorded with a three-dimensional (3D) digitizer. From the tagged images, midwall circumferential strain was calculated throughout the cardiac cycle (20).

Unipolar voltage readings from each electrode were averaged over ~20 heartbeats. Depolarization time tdep,epi was determined as the steepest downstroke of the electrode voltage reading. Depolarization time was related to the timing of the pacing trigger. Electrode locations in digitizer coordinates were transformed to scanner coordinates with a rigid-body rotation and translation.

Simulations

In the following paragraphs we give a short summary of the most important characteristics of the model of LV electromechanics, which have been reported previously (13, 15).

Geometry. The unloaded state was defined by zero transmural pressure. The LV wall was represented by a thick-walled, truncated prolate ellipsoid with a realistic myofiber orientation (Fig. 1A).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Overview of the model (13). A: myofiber orientation in the left ventricle (LV), plotted on epicardium, endocardium, and partly through midwall. B: depolarization times (ms) for right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing. Time step between isochrones is 10 ms. The pacing sites in the experiment and RVA simulation were similar (15). Maximum depolarization time was 116 ms, located at the base of the LV free wall. C: stress of passive material parallel (solid line) and perpendicular (dashed line) to the myofiber for biaxial stretching. D: active myofiber stress as a function of time for isometric twitches at sarcomere lengths of 1.6, 1.9, and 2.2 µm. E: relation between sarcomere shortening velocity and myofiber force (F), normalized to maximum force (F0).

 
Electrical activation. Depolarization times tdep (Fig. 1B) were determined previously (13, 15) by solving the eikonal-diffusion equation (9). The eikonal-diffusion equation is derived from the bidomain model (12) and solves for electrical activation times only. Prescribed wave velocity was higher parallel (0.75 m/s) than perpendicular (0.3 m/s) to the myofiber. Just as in the experiment, depolarization time was related to the timing of the pacing trigger (at 0 ms).

Hemodynamics. LV mitral inflow was simulated by increase of pressure in the nonactivated LV from 0 to 1 kPa. The LV was then activated by the pacing stimulus. LV pressure in the isovolumic contraction and relaxation phases was estimated such that LV cavity volume remained constant. The ejection phase started when LV cavity pressure exceeded aortic pressure, being set at 10 kPa. During ejection, LV cavity pressure was determined from the interaction of the LV with an aortic input impedance (40). Reversal of aortic flow ended the ejection phase.

Wall mechanics. Wall mechanics were determined by solving the equations of force equilibrium. Passive myocardial material was considered anisotropic and nonlinearly elastic (Fig. 1C). Active stress development in the myofibers depended on time, sarcomere length, and sarcomere shortening velocity (Fig. 1, D and E) and was initiated at the timing of depolarization.

Numerical implementation. The eikonal-diffusion equation was solved by using a Galerkin finite-element method with eight-noded hexahedral elements with trilinear interpolation of the field of depolarization times. The LV wall was subdivided into 44,064 elements, resulting in 46,987 degrees of freedom and a spatial resolution of ~1.4 mm.

The equations related to mechanics were solved by using a Galerkin finite-element method with 27-noded hexahedral elements with triquadratic interpolation of the displacement field. The LV wall was subdivided into 108 elements, with 3,213 degrees of freedom. All equations were solved on a 64-bit Origin 200 computer (SGI, Mountain View, CA), using a single processor at 225 MHz. The finite-element calculations were performed with the FORTRAN77 compiler-based package SEPRAN (SEPRA, Leidschendam, The Netherlands) on a UNIX platform. Calculation time for simulation of a complete cardiac cycle was ~5 h.

Simulations and Data Analysis

Two separate simulations were performed. In the first simulation, normal sinus rhythm (SR) was simulated as in Ref. 13. Briefly, depolarization was started in three regions at the LV subendocardium below the equator and at one region at the septum at the RV side. At the subendocardium, prescribed wave velocity was six times higher than in the rest of the heart to account for a fully activated Purkinje system. Contraction was initiated with a heterogeneously distributed electromechanical delay such that mechanical activation was synchronous (13). Next, electromechanics after pacing at the RVA was simulated as in Ref. 15. Depolarization was started at the RVA. At the subendocardium, wave velocity was 1.7 times higher than in the rest of the heart. Contraction was initiated 0 ms after depolarization (Fig. 1B). The only difference in input for simulating mechanics on SR and RVA stimulations was the sequence of mechanical activation, while all other parameters were kept equal (geometry, passive and active material properties, preload, aortic impedance). For all simulations, global hemodynamics were computed as a function of time. In both experiment and simulation, circumferential natural strain {varepsilon}cc in the midwall was defined as:

(1)
with lmc the actual length of a line element, oriented in the circumferential direction in the reference state, with a reference length lmc0. The reference state, just as in the experiment, was set at the beginning of ejection.

Circumferential strain during ejection {varepsilon}cc,ej was defined as the strain {varepsilon}cc,eej at the end of ejection minus the strain {varepsilon}cc,bej at the beginning of ejection:

(2)

Algorithm to find beginning and end of ejection. To find the beginning of ejection in the experiment, we assumed that ventricular volume is closely related to mean of midwall circumferential strain, averaged over all regions of the LV wall, from which mean circumferential strain rate was computed (Fig. 2). From the largest shortening velocity (point A in Fig. 2), timing of 50% of the largest shortening velocity (point B) was determined. At this moment, the tangent line of shortening velocity (thin oblique line in Fig. 2) was computed. The intersection of the tangent line with zero shortening velocity yielded the beginning of ejection (point C). All midwall circumferential strains were set to 0 at the beginning of ejection, defining the reference state. The timing of minimum mean strain was chosen as the end of ejection (point D).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Calculation of beginning (reference state) and end of ejection in model and experiment. Mean midwall circumferential strain rate (s–1; dashed line) was calculated from mean midwall circumferential strain (solid line) for each experiment separately. Point A, time of largest shortening velocity; point B, time of 50% of largest shortening velocity; point C, beginning of ejection; point D: end of ejection defined by minimum mean strain. The beginning and end of ejection are denoted by dotted vertical lines.

 
Although the beginning and end of ejection were known exactly for the RVA simulation, we applied the same algorithm for detecting these timings to the simulation and used these results in further processing of the simulation data. With the algorithm, the beginning and end of ejection in the RVA simulation were detected 13 and 18 ms before the real events, respectively.

Early, middle, and late depolarized regions. We compared strain courses in more detail in early, middle, and late depolarized regions in the simulation and experiment for dog 3. Early, middle, and late depolarization were defined as 22–28%, 55–59%, and 94–100% of latest depolarization, respectively.

Relating ejection strain to depolarization time. It has been shown that local timing of depolarization determines myofiber strain during ejection (6), i.e., the local contribution to the ejected blood volume. We investigated this relation by computing the slope from a linear regression analysis (plus a 95% confidence interval) of the relation between epicardial depolarization time and midwall circumferential ejection strain in both experiment and simulation. The regression analysis was performed with the Analysis Toolpak in Microsoft Excel 2002. The three slopes from the experiment were averaged, yielding the mean ± SD slope. Thus midwall circumferential strain was assumed to closely match midwall myofiber strain, because myofibers are oriented within 20° from the circumferential direction (10). Also, epicardial depolarization time tdep,epi closest to the sites of calculated midwall circumferential strain was used to reproduce the methods in the experiment as closely as possible.

Stroke work density. In the experiment, circumferential strain was calculated from the midwall and depolarization at the epicardium. In the simulation, local depolarization times tdep (see Fig. 1B) and myofiber strain were calculated throughout the whole LV wall. Therefore, more information (and in addition stress and stroke work density) can be retrieved from the simulation than from the experiment performed.

Stroke work density Wf (J/m) was computed, using

(3)
where {sigma}f and {varepsilon}f represent total Cauchy myofiber stress and myofiber strain, respectively.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Latest depolarization time (an indication of QRS width) in the SR and RVA simulation occurred at 43 and 116 ms, respectively. In the three dogs, latest depolarization occurred at 131, 118, and 125 ms, respectively. A more elaborate comparison with experiments on electrophysiology for the SR and RVA simulations can be found in Refs. 13 and 15, respectively.

As shown in Fig. 3, maximum pressure and ejection fraction in the RVA pacing simulation (16.5 kPa and 48%, respectively) were lower than in the SR simulation (17.7 kPa and 55%, respectively). In the RVA simulation, ejection started later and peak aortic flow was lower than in the SR simulation.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Global hemodynamics for the RVA (solid lines) and sinus rhythm (SR; dashed lines) simulations. Left: from top to bottom, LV pressure plv (kPa) and cavity volume Vlv (ml) and aortic flow qao (l/s) as a function of time (ms). Dots indicate times of opening and closure of the valves. Arrows indicate the reference state. Right: pressure-volume loops. Note the decreased systolic pressure and ejection fraction for the pacing simulation, compared with the simulated normal heartbeat.

 
Strain Patterns

In the SR simulation (Fig. 4, left), circumferential strain during ejection {varepsilon}cc,ej was similar for all regions (–0.10 to –0.14). Both in the RVA simulation and measurements, strain patterns depended on epicardial depolarization time, as shown in Fig. 4, for early, middle, and late depolarized regions.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Circumferential strain as a function of time in SR simulation (left), RVA pacing simulation (middle), and experiment (right, dog 3). Strains in early (solid lines), middle (dashed lines), and late (dotted lines) depolarized regions in the RVA simulation and experiment are shown as well as mean circumferential strain (thick gray line). The strains shown for the SR simulation are from the same regions as for the RVA simulation. For both simulations, strains during isovolumic contraction, ejection, and isovolumic relaxation are depicted. Solid vertical lines mark the beginning and end of ejection.

 
Early depolarized regions. In the RVA pacing simulation circumferential strain {varepsilon}cc decreased during early isovolumic contraction. During ejection, {varepsilon}cc increased initially. Thereafter, strain courses diverged such that total strain during ejection, {varepsilon}cc,ej, ranged from slightly negative to positive (–0.02 to +0.05). Stretching continued in the isovolumic relaxation phase.

In the experiment the strain also decreased during early isovolumic contraction, reaching a minimum of about –0.05 ~30 ms before beginning of ejection. During the ejection phase, {varepsilon}cc became positive up to 0.08 before midejection. Next, strain decreased slowly. Over the complete ejection phase, {varepsilon}cc,ej was positive (0.00–0.06).

Middle depolarized regions. In the RVA pacing simulation {varepsilon}cc decreased by ~0.08 in the isovolumic contraction phase. The decrease continued during ejection. Over the complete ejection phase, {varepsilon}cc,ej was negative (–0.02 to –0.12).

In the experiment {varepsilon}cc also changed by about –0.09 just before ejection. At end of ejection strain was negative (0 to –0.05).

Late depolarized regions. In the RVA pacing simulation {varepsilon}cc increased by ~0.08 during the isovolumic contraction phase. Maximum {varepsilon}cc occurred early in the ejection phase. Thereafter, strain decreased to values of –0.25 to –0.28 at end of ejection. Shortening continued in the beginning of isovolumic relaxation.

In the experiment {varepsilon}cc increased by 0.10–0.12 during early isovolumic contraction, reaching a maximum of ~0.03 ~30 ms before beginning of ejection. During ejection, {varepsilon}cc,ej decreased to –0.12 to –0.27 at end of ejection. In the beginning of isovolumic relaxation, strain decrease continued.

Stress-Sarcomere Length Relation

Figure 5 shows myofiber stress as a function of sarcomere length (SL) in the RVA simulation in early, middle, and late depolarized regions. For the SR simulation myofiber stress and SL were taken from the same regions as in the RVA simulation. In the SR simulation the stress-SL loops progressed in a normal counterclockwise direction and were also similar in shape. Myofibers were stretched during filling (point A in Fig. 5). During isovolumic contraction (point B) some shortening was seen while stress was generated significantly. Stress reached a peak during ejection (point C), and myofibers shortened further until the isovolumic relaxation phase was reached (point D). During this last phase SL change was small and stress decreased until about zero at the end of the cycle.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Myofiber stress as a function of sarcomere length in the midwall for an early (left), a middle (middle), and a late (right) depolarized region in the LV. Plots were obtained for normal SR (SR simulation, dashed lines) and for pacing at the RVA (RVA simulation, solid lines). The plots represent stress-sarcomere length loops from the same region in the wall for both the SR and RVA simulations. A complete cardiac cycle is shown, including filling (point A), isovolumic contraction (point B), ejection (point C), and isovolumic relaxation (point D). {triangleup} and {circ}, Opening and closing of valves for the SR and RVA simulations, respectively. Arrows indicate direction of the loop progression through time. Note that in the early depolarized region the loop for the RVA simulation progresses in a clockwise direction, whereas all other loops progress in a counterclockwise direction.

 
For the RVA simulation, the following was observed.

Early depolarized region. The stress-SL loop progressed in a clockwise direction. After filling (point A) myofibers shortened by ~20% during isovolumic contraction (point B), while stress remained low, on the order of 1 kPa, in the first part of isovolumic contraction. In the second part of the isovolumic contraction phase, stress started to increase while the myofibers were stretched. Stretching continued during ejection (point C) and stress increased for the largest part of the ejection phase. During the first part of isovolumic relaxation (point D), SL still increased, until it decreased in the last part of this phase. Stress decreased throughout the whole isovolumic relaxation phase.

Middle depolarized region. The stress-SL loop progressed in a counterclockwise direction, as in the SR simulation. However, right after filling, myofibers were stretched first before they started to shorten while stress increased during isovolumic contraction. Both shortening during ejection and peak stress were smaller.

Late depolarized region. Also in this region, the stress-SL loop progressed in a counterclockwise direction, but here both SL and stress increased throughout the isovolumic contraction phase. Shortening during ejection and peak stress were both larger than in the SR simulation. Shortening also continued during the first part of isovolumic relaxation.

The area of myofiber stress-strain (replacing sarcomere length with strain in Fig. 5) loops represents stroke work density Wf (kJ/m), as computed from Eq. 3. Figure 6 shows a 3D representation of the LV wall, in which stroke work density for both simulations is presented in color code. Comparison with Fig. 1B shows that stroke work density was dependent on depolarization time as well. In the RVA simulation, it gradually increased from negative values (less than –3.0 kJ/m3) in early depolarized to supranormal values in late depolarized regions (>10 kJ/m3). Mean ± SD work in the RVA and SR simulation was 3.74 ± 4.0 and 4.90 ± 0.8 kJ/m3, respectively.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Stroke work density for SR (left) and RVA pacing (right) simulations. Note the relative homogeneous and inhomogeneous distributions of work in the SR and RVA simulations, respectively.

 
The close relation between depolarization sequence and regional systolic behavior is also clear from the relation between depolarization time and midwall circumferential strain during ejection (Fig. 7). Here circumferential strain during ejection {varepsilon}cc,ej is plotted as a function of epicardial depolarization time tdep,epi for the RVA simulation and the three dogs.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Midwall circumferential strain during ejection as a function of epicardial depolarization time tdep,epi (ms) for the simulation ({circ}) during RVA pacing and for the 3 dogs (x). Solid lines represent the linear fit for the RVA simulation, for which the slope is –3.80 ± 0.28 s–1 and R2 = 0.87. Dashed lines represent linear fits for the experiments. Dog 1: slope = –2.62 ± 0.43 s–1; R2 = 0.59. Dog 2: slope = –2.97 ± 0.38 s–1; R2 = 0.69. Dog 3: slope = –4.44 ± 0.51 s–1; R2 = 0.76. The mean slope for the 3 dogs is –3.34 s–1 (SD 0.97).

 
The slope, which relates midwall circumferential strain during ejection {varepsilon}cc,ej and epicardial depolarization time tdep,epi for the RVA pacing simulation (–3.80 ± 0.28 s–1), was similar to the mean slope for the experiments [–3.34 s–1 (SD 0.97); n = 3].


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
With a mathematical model, electromechanics in the LV for pacing at the RVA was simulated realistically by using the same electromechanical properties as for a normal heart. For comparison, data from the simulation were treated similar to data from the experiments (reference state, beginning and end of ejection, midwall circumferential strains, epicardial depolarization times). We showed that we can reproduce the main features of the experimental results with a model that may appear complex but is based on relatively simple assumptions. The ellipsoidal geometry is simple compared with the real geometry. Modeling of electrical conduction with the eikonal-diffusion equation is straightforward compared with the bidomain model (12), without any need for a cellular model describing many ionic currents (25). Excitation-contraction coupling is straightforward compared with the model of Rice et al. (25), consisting of 36 differential equations, which includes an ionic cellular model and a myofilament activation model. Thus the present study indicates that the apparently complex electrical activation sequence and contraction patterns during ventricular pacing can be simulated with relatively simple mathematical models. This also suggests that the complicated events observed during ventricular pacing are based on fairly straightforward physiological processes, like cell-to-cell conduction and force-length relations of myofibers. Both insights are likely to be helpful for designing better pacing therapies. After showing the similarity between model and experiment we present local stress-SL relations in the paced heart.

Model

In the model geometry has been simplified. The real cardiac geometry with a LV and a RV is more complex than the truncated ellipsoid we used in the simulations. The load the RV exerts on the LV wall through RV pressure and the force transmission in the LV-RV attachment were neglected. During RVA pacing, RV pressure rises earlier than LV pressure, as observed in patients with left bundle branch block (11). The effect of these geometric simplifications might be investigated in a future study.

The inotropic states in the SR and RVA simulations were identical. Because this may vary from animal to animal, the effects of inotropy also might be investigated in more detail in a future study.

Choice of Reference State

To compare strains in simulation and experiments, an identical reference state must be chosen. Our choice was determined by considerations with respect to the experiment. Often, timing of the beginning or end of the ejection phase is determined by an aortic flow probe, but this approach is very difficult in the MRI scanner setup used. Alternatively, the LV pressure signal might be used. We considered this not very appropriate, because determining end diastole or beginning of ejection from LV pressure signals may be subject to larger error due to the gradual onset of LV pressure rise (end diastole) and the absence of a clear transition (beginning of ejection). We have also attempted to use the timing of stimulus as a reference state. However, in the heart there is a delay from excitation to contraction, so that time of electrical stimulation precedes true end diastole by a few tens of milliseconds. Therefore, we assumed that ventricular volume is closely related to the mean value of circumferential strain in the entire LV midwall and derived the moment of beginning ejection from the mean strain rate signal.

Measurements of Depolarization

Depolarization was measured at the epicardium. Previously performed studies have mapped endocardial depolarization (7, 34, 36). However, epicardial maps show a wider range of depolarization times than endocardial maps, which makes the calculation of the slope of the linear fit between myofiber ejection strain and depolarization time less prone to error. Ideally, one should measure depolarization and strain at the same location, but this is not feasible because of the limited accuracy of strain measurement at endocardium and epicardium and the requirement of invasive techniques to measure electrical activation at multiple sites in the midmyocardium.

Results from Simulations and Experiment

In the SR simulation, epicardial breakthrough occurred near the apex. After breakthrough, epicardial depolarization spread smoothly from apex to base, contrary to the finding of Arisi et al. (3). In the latter study, many epicardial breakthrough regions were measured in a mosaiclike pattern. This group addressed the occurrence of many breakthrough regions to bulges of excitation wave fronts that emerge from the trabecular endocardial surface and to discontinuous junctions between the Purkinje system and myocardium. In our model, the endocardium was smooth and we assumed a continuous layer of fast propagation at the endocardium. However, most characteristics (early activated regions, direction of propagation, timing) of the simulated normal propagating wave are physiological, as we discussed previously (13).

Time courses of circumferential strain {varepsilon}cc are similar in the experiment and the RVA simulation (Fig. 4). The findings from the experiment were also similar to previously published experimental studies (4, 38, 41).

The main difference is related to timing, despite an identical procedure to determine the moment of beginning ejection in model and experiment. In early depolarized regions, minimum strain is reached earlier in the experiment (20 ms before beginning of ejection) than in the model (at beginning of ejection). Similarly, in late depolarized regions, maximum strain is reached earlier in the experiment (20 ms before beginning of ejection) than in the model (10 ms after beginning of ejection). To investigate the influence of the definition of beginning of ejection on the slope of the linear fit between myofiber ejection strain and depolarization time, we shifted the beginning of ejection in the simulation. Shifting the beginning of ejection such that timing of minimum strain in the early depolarized region in the simulation is equal to the timing in the experiment results in a slope of –3.19 ± 0.22 s–1. Shifting such that timing of maximum strain in the late depolarized region in the simulation is equal to the timing in the experiment results in a slope of –2.78 ± 0.18 s–1. These slopes are still in the range of the experiment.

Experimentally it has been made plausible that the relation between activation time and systolic shortening reflects the enhancement of late systolic contraction by early systolic stretch. The fact that the model was able to estimate the slope of this relation quite accurately indicates that the complex myocardial strain patterns occurring during ventricular pacing can be regarded as being based on differences in early and late depolarized regions. From the RVA simulation it was observed that in early depolarized regions myofibers shorten almost unloaded (Fig. 5). That is, cavity pressure is still low and the rest of the ventricular wall is not activated yet. Because all valves are closed, myofibers in the rest of the wall are stretched when early depolarized myofibers contract. When more myofibers become depolarized, stress in the wall increases and cavity pressure starts to rise. Early depolarized myofibers also become more loaded and start to generate stress.

Myofibers in late depolarized regions are stretched up to 10% and hence generate more stress than early depolarized myofibers because of the SL-active stress relation (Fig. 1D), the basis for the Frank-Starling mechanism. Therefore, during ejection, these late depolarized myofibers are able to shorten by >25% while stretching the early depolarized myofibers. Latter myofibers are stretched because of their lower stress, because their strain is low and they have reached the end of their twitch (they were activated ~100 ms before myofibers in late depolarized regions). Hence, late depolarized myofibers contribute more to the ejection of blood than the rest of the heart (and also more than myofibers in a normal heart, as seen from the SR simulation), whereas the early depolarized ones even counteract that by being stretched.

The pattern of stroke work density Wf in the RVA simulation is similar to that reported earlier in the literature (23), with negative work in early depolarized regions and large positive work in late depolarized regions. Also, stroke work density is closely related to regional myocardial blood flow. Lindner et al. (17) showed that in patients with left bundle branch block myocardial blood flow is increased in late depolarized regions. The increase of Wf with depolarization time is explained by the fact that in early depolarized regions myofibers shorten in the isovolumic phase and are stretched during ejection and isovolumic relaxation. In late depolarized regions, SL at beginning of ejection is high, which enables large shortening and stress during ejection (and hence in need of more oxygen and blood flow). Overall, mean Wf is lower during ventricular pacing, compared with a normal heartbeat, which is also reflected in a smaller pressure-volume loop (Fig. 3).

In the present simulation of mechanics for normal SR a fixed, albeit regionally different, electromechanical delay was assumed, which fits with the data from the experiments in nonfailing dog hearts. It is being questioned whether electromechanical coupling in normal and failing hearts is the same. Leclercq et al. (16) found that in dyssynchronous failing hearts LV pacing improved mechanical synchrony and function without reducing electrical dyssynchrony. It is not clear from their data whether this result is due to altered local electromechanical delay or other factors like diastolic ventricular coupling (5). To simulate the experiment of Leclercq et al., it therefore seems necessary to use a biventricular model (14, 30), to account for ventricular interaction. Also, incorporation of the many changes at the cellular, tissue, and organ levels that are known to occur in failing hearts (29) will be required.

Usyk and McCulloch (32) concluded that the regional sequence of onset of myofiber shortening is an unreliable surrogate for regional depolarization. In our study, however, the goal was not to find a reliable surrogate for regional depolarization. We have focused on myofiber strain over the ejection phase in relation to depolarization and its agreement with experiments.

The resulting asynchrony of myofiber contraction during ventricular pacing affects pump function (21). In the long term, myocardial tissue structure changes (33) and may even contribute to the development of heart failure (2). Therefore, investigators are searching for better sites of pacing for optimal pump function. Positioning of the pacing electrode by trial and error is cumbersome. In assessing various pacing sites for minimal mechanical asynchrony, our mathematical model of cardiac electromechanics in the ventricle is likely to be a useful tool.

In conclusion, applying known principles of propagation of depolarization, time-dependent contraction of myofibers, and equilibria of forces, a finite-element model of LV electromechanics was developed. With this model we could realistically simulate mechanics in a ventricle that is paced at the RVA by only changing the sequence of depolarization, showing that the apparently complex events observed during pacing are caused by well-known basic physiological processes.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The study has been financially supported by Medtronic Bakken Research Center Maastricht.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. H. M. Bovendeerd, Eindhoven Univ. of Technology, PO Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven (e-mail: p.h.m.bovendeerd{at}tue.nl)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2003 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2002.
  2. Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PEB, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, and Pedersen AK. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 350: 1210–1216, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Arisi G, Macchi E, Baruffi S, Spaggiari S, and Taccardi B. Potential fields on the ventricular surface of the exposed dog heart during normal excitation. Circ Res 52: 706–715, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Badke FR, Boinay P, and Covell JW. Effects of ventricular pacing on regional left ventricular performance in the dog. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 238: H858–H867, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bleasdale RA, Turner MS, Mumford CE, Steendijk P, Paul V, Tyberg JV, Morris-Thurgood JA, and Frenneaux MP. Left ventricular pacing minimizes diastolic ventricular interaction, allowing improved preload-dependent systolic performance. Circulation 110: 2395–2400, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Delhaas T, Arts T, Prinzen FW, and Reneman RS. Relation between regional electrical activation time and subepicardial fiber strain in the canine left ventricle. Pflügers Arch 423: 78–87, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Faris OP, Evans FJ, Dick AJ, Raman VK, Ennis DB, Kass DA, and McVeigh ER. Endocardial versus epicardial electrical synchrony during LV free-wall pacing. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285: H1864–H1870, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Faris OP, Evans FJ, Ennis DB, Helm PA, Taylor JL, Chesnick AS, Guttman MA, Ozturk C, and McVeigh ER. Novel technique for cardiac electromechanical mapping with magnetic resonance imaging tagging and an epicardial electrode sock. Ann Biomed Eng 31: 430–440, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Franzone PC, Guerri L, and Tentoni S. Mathematical modeling of the excitation process in myocardial tissue: influence of fiber rotation on wavefront propagation and potential field. Math Biosci 101: 155–235, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Geerts L, Bovendeerd P, Nicolay K, and Arts T. Characterization of the normal cardiac myofiber field in goat measured with MR-diffusion tensor imaging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283: H139–H145, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Grines CL, Bashore TM, Boudoulas H, Olson S, Shafer P, and Wooley CF. Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony. Circulation 79: 845–853, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Henriquez CS. Simulating the electrical behavior of cardiac tissue using the bidomain model. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 21: 1–77, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Kerckhoffs RCP, Bovendeerd PHM, Kotte JCS, Prinzen FW, Smits K, and Arts T. Homogeneity of cardiac contraction despite physiological asynchrony of depolarization: a model study. Ann Biomed Eng 31: 536–547, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Kerckhoffs RCP, Bovendeerd PHM, Prinzen FW, Smits K, and Arts T. Intra- and interventricular asynchrony of electromechanics in the ventricularly paced heart. J Eng Math 47: 201–216, 2003.[CrossRef]
  15. Kerckhoffs RCP, Faris OP, Bovendeerd PHM, Prinzen FW, Smits K, McVeigh ER, and Arts T. Timing of depolarization and contraction in the paced canine left ventricle: model and experiment. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 14: S188–S195, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  16. Leclercq C, Faris O, Tunin R, Johnson J, Kato R, Evans F, Spinelli J, Halperin H, McVeigh E, and Kass DA. Systolic improvement and mechanical resynchronization does not require electrical synchrony in the dilated failing heart with left bundle-branch block. Circulation 106: 1760–1763, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lindner O, Vogt J, Baller D, Kammeier A, Wielepp P, Holzinger J, Lamp B, Horstkotte D, and Burchert W. Global and regional myocardial oxygen consumption and blood flow in severe cardiomyopathy with left bundle branch block. Eur J Heart Fail 7: 225–230, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Liu F, Xia L, and Zhang X. Analysis of the influence of the electrical asynchrony on regional mechanics of the infarcted left ventricle using electromechanical heart models. JSME Int J A Solid Mech Mat Eng 46: 1–9, 2003.
  19. McVeigh ER, Prinzen FW, Wyman BT, Tsitlik JE, Halperin HR, and Hunter WC. Imaging asynchronous mechanical activation of the paced heart with tagged MRI. Magn Reson Med 39: 507–513, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Ozturk C and McVeigh ER. Four-dimensional B-spline based motion analysis of tagged MR images: introduction and in vivo validation. Phys Med Biol 45: 1683–1702, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Prinzen FW, Augustijn CH, Allessie MA, Arts T, Delhaas T, and Reneman RS. The time sequence of electrical and mechanical activation during spontaneous beating and ectopic stimulation. Eur Heart J 13: 535–543, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Prinzen FW, Augustijn CH, Arts T, Allessie MA, and Renehan RS. Redistribution of myocardial fiber strain and blood flow by asynchronous activation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 259: H300–H308, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Prinzen FW, Hunter WC, Wyman BT, and McVeigh ER. Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J Am Coll Cardiol 33: 1735–1742, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Prinzen RW and Peschar M. Relation between the pacing induced sequence of activation and left ventricular pump function in animals. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25: 484–498, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Rice JJ, Jafri MS, and Winslow RL. Modeling short-term interval-force relations in cardiac muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278: H913–H931, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Rice JJ, Winslow RL, and Hunter WC. Comparison of putative cooperative mechanisms in cardiac muscle: length dependence and dynamic responses. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H1734–H1754, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sachse FB, Seemann G, Chaisaowong K, and Weiss D. Quantitative reconstruction of cardiac electromechanics in human myocardium: assembly of electrophysiologic and tension generation models. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 14: S210–S218, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Suga H, Goto Y, Yaku H, Futaki S, Ohgoshi Y, and Kawaguchi O. Simulation of mechanoenergetics of asynchronously contracting ventricle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 259: R1075–R1082, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Tomaselli GF and Zipes DP. What causes sudden death in heart failure? Circ Res 95: 754–763, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Usyk TP, LeGrice IJ, and McCulloch AD. Computational model of three dimensional cardiac electromechanics. Comput Vis Sci 4: 249–257, 2002.[CrossRef]
  31. Usyk TP and McCulloch AD. Electromechanical model of cardiac resynchronization in the dilated failing heart with left bundle branch block. J Electrocardiol 36: 57–61, 2003.
  32. Usyk TP and McCulloch AD. Relationship between regional shortening and asynchronous electrical activation in a three-dimensional model of ventricular electromechanics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 14: S196–S202, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Van Oosterhout MFM, Prinzen FW, Arts T, Schreuder JJ, Vanagt WYR, Cleutjens JPM, and Reneman RS. Asynchronous electrical activation induces asymmetrical hypertrophy of the left ventricular wall. Circulation 98: 588–595, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Vassallo JA, Cassidy DM, Marchlinski FE, Miller JM, Buxton AE, and Josephson ME. Abnormalities of endocardial activation pattern in patients with previous healed myocardial infarction and ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 58: 479–484, 1986.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Vassallo JA, Cassidy DM, Miller JM, Buxton AE, Marchlinski FE, and Josephson ME. Left ventricular endocardial activation during right ventricular pacing—effect of underlying heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 7: 1228–1233, 1986.[Abstract]
  36. Verbeek X, Vernooy K, Peschar M, Cornelussen RNM, and Prinzen FW. Intra-ventricular resynchronization for optimal left ventricular function during pacing in experimental left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol 42: 558–567, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Vetter FJ and McCulloch AD. Mechanoelectric feedback in a model of the passively inflated left ventricle. Ann Biomed Eng 29: 414–426, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Waldman LK and Covell JW. Effects of ventricular pacing on finite deformation in canine left ventricles. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 252: H1023–H1030, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Weirich WL, Paneth M, Gott VL, and Lillehei CW. Control of complete heart block by use of an artificial pacemaker and a myocardial electrode. Circ Res 6: 410–415, 1958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Westerhof N, Elzinga G and van den Bos G. Influence of central and peripheral changes on hydraulic input impedance of systemic arterial tree. Med Biol Eng 11: 710–723, 1973.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Wyman BT, Hunter WC, Prinzen FW, and McVeigh E. Mapping propagation of mechanical activation in the paced heart with MRI tagging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H881–H891, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
S. G. Campbell, E. Howard, J. Aguado-Sierra, B. A. Coppola, J. H. Omens, L. J. Mulligan, A. D. McCulloch, and R. C. P. Kerckhoffs
Effect of transmurally heterogeneous myocyte excitation-contraction coupling on canine left ventricular electromechanics
Exp Physiol, May 1, 2009; 94(5): 541 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Parsai, B. Bijnens, G. R. Sutherland, A. Baltabaeva, P. Claus, M. Marciniak, V. Paul, M. Scheffer, E. Donal, G. Derumeaux, et al.
Toward understanding response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: left ventricular dyssynchrony is only one of multiple mechanisms
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2009; 30(8): 940 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Parsai, A. Baltabaeva, L. Anderson, M. Chaparro, B. Bijnens, and G. R. Sutherland
Low-dose dobutamine stress echo to quantify the degree of remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2009; 30(8): 950 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
B. A. Coppola, J. W. Covell, A. D. McCulloch, and J. H. Omens
Asynchrony of ventricular activation affects magnitude and timing of fiber stretch in late-activated regions of the canine heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H754 - H761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
N. H. L. Kuijpers, H. M. M. ten Eikelder, P. H. M. Bovendeerd, S. Verheule, T. Arts, and P. A. J. Hilbers
Mechanoelectric feedback leads to conduction slowing and block in acutely dilated atria: a modeling study of cardiac electromechanics
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2832 - H2853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/5/H1889    most recent
00340.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerckhoffs, R. C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Arts, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kerckhoffs, R. C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Arts, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.