AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2657-H2664, 2005. First published July 22, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00297.2005
0363-6135/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/6/H2657    most recent
00297.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pries, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Secomb, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pries, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Secomb, T. W.

Microvascular blood viscosity in vivo and the endothelial surface layer

A. R. Pries1,2 and T. W. Secomb3

1Department of Physiology, Charité Berlin; and 2Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and 3Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Submitted 25 March 2005 ; accepted in final form 18 July 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The apparent viscosity of blood in glass tubes declines with decreasing diameter (Fåhraeus-Lindqvist effect) and exhibits a distinctive minimum at 6–7 µm. However, flow resistance in vivo in small vessels is substantially higher than predicted by in vitro viscosity data. The presence of a thick endothelial surface layer (ESL) has been proposed as the primary cause for this discrepancy. Here, a physical model is proposed for microvascular flow resistance as a function of vessel diameter and hematocrit in vivo; it combines in vitro blood viscosity with effects of a diameter-dependent ESL. The model was developed on the basis of flow distributions observed in three microvascular networks in the rat mesentery with 392, 546, and 383 vessel segments, for which vessel diameters, network architecture, flow velocity, and hematocrit were determined by intravital microscopy. A previously described hemodynamic simulation was used to predict the distributions of flow and hematocrit from the assumed model for effective blood viscosity. The dependence of ESL thickness on vessel diameter was estimated by minimizing deviations of predicted values for velocities, flow directions, and hematocrits from measured data. Optimal results were obtained with a layer thickness of ~0.8–1 µm for 10- to 40-µm-diameter vessels and declined strongly for smaller diameters, with an additional hematocrit-dependent impact on flow resistance exhibiting a maximum for ~10-µm-diameter vessels. These results show that flow resistance in vivo can be explained by in vitro blood viscosity and the presence of an ESL and indicate the rheologically effective thickness of the ESL in microvessels.

flow resistance; hemodynamics; hematocrit; glycocalyx; microcirculation; red blood cell


AFTER ABOUT 75 years, the investigation of blood rheology in glass tubes of small luminal diameters, triggered by the initial reports of Martini et al. (19) and Fåhraeus and Lindqvist (8), has resulted in a relatively consistent set of experimental data (1, 8, 12, 19, 20, 27, 36, 46; Barbee JH and Cokelet GR, personal communication). These data have been used to derive a parametric empirical description of the dependence of apparent blood viscosity on tube diameter and hematocrit (27). The most impressive property of this relation is the reduction of viscosity for red blood cell suspensions (e.g., with a flow fraction of red blood cells or discharge hematocrit of 40%) relative to the viscosity of the suspending medium alone from ~3.2 in tubes with diameters above ~1 mm to only ~1.25 in tubes with diameters of 6–7 µm, the so-called Fåhraeus-Lindqvist effect.

However, there are also indications that the direct extrapolation of such data to the situation in living microvessels in vivo may not be adequate. Among those concerns were the effects of irregular vessel diameters (28, 38), the effects of vascular bifurcations and relatively short vascular segments, and the presence of leukocytes (9, 47). In classical experiments using a double-micropipette technique, Lipowsky et al. (16, 17) showed that the apparent blood viscosity is much higher in relatively straight, unbranched microvessels than in glass tubes with corresponding inner diameters. A study based on the analysis of overall pressure drop in microvascular networks (32) suggested that only about one-third of the observed pressure drop could be explained on the basis of blood viscosity as measured in vitro. On the basis of the comparison of the measured flow distribution with predictions of a mathematical flow simulation, the authors derived a viscosity relation that exhibited a substantially attenuated Fåhraeus-Lindqvist effect and much higher effective viscosities in smaller vessels. However, this relation was not based on a physical model for the causes of the increased effective viscosity.

In the last decade, the experimental evidence for the presence of a comparatively thick layer on the endothelial surface [endothelial surface layer (ESL)] has expanded substantially (30). In addition to indirect evidence from measurements of hematocrit (6, 15) and flow resistance (32, 33), the layer and its modification by physiological and pathophysiological stimuli have been visualized (49, 50). A number of theoretical approaches have been proposed to analyze the mechanical properties of the ESL and its impact on blood rheology and exchange between the blood and the tissue (4, 3942, 45, 52).

The aim of the present study was to investigate 1) whether the distribution of flow resistance in microvessels in vivo can be explained by a simple physical model combining the well-established in vitro viscosity relation with the assumption of an ESL and 2) what effective thickness the layer would then exhibit in vessels of different sizes.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental data. The animal preparation, the intravital microscopic setup, the scanning procedures, and the methods for optical determination of hematocrit and flow velocity have been described in detail elsewhere (23, 31). After approval from the university and state authorities for animal welfare, male Wistar rats were prepared for intravital microscopy. Catheters were inserted into the jugular vein and carotid artery to allow the control of anesthetic level and fluid balance by continuous intravenous infusion of physiological saline (24 ml·kg–1·h–1) containing pentobarbital sodium (0.3 mg/ml) and by monitoring of heart rate and arterial pressure. The small bowel was exteriorized, and fat-free portions of the mesentery were selected for investigation. Papaverine (10–4 M) was continuously applied to suppress active vessel tone.

The area of tissue supplied by a selected microvascular network was scanned with an immersion objective (model 25 x 0.6 NA SW, Leitz) and recorded on videotape using monochromatic illumination (448-nm wavelength) for offline densitometric measurement of hematocrit [flow fraction of red blood cells: discharge hematocrit (HD)] (25). A second scan was performed using asynchronous strobe illumination (model 11360-1, Chadwick-Helmuth, El Monte, CA) to allow measurement of flow velocity. The scanning procedures lasted ~30 min. A digital image analysis system was used to measure hematocrits and flow velocities offline from the video recordings (23). Spatial correlation analysis of recordings obtained with asynchronous illumination allowed measurement of velocities along the centerline of a microvessel up to ~40 mm/s (24). Values were averaged over ~4 s to obtain mean velocity data independent of pulsatile fluctuations. From repeated measurements of flow velocity and hematocrit in 190 segments in one of the networks, conservative estimates of relative root mean square velocity error of 0.25 and absolute root mean square hematocrit error of 0.11 were obtained (32). These errors represent the precision, but not the accuracy, of the methods used. Although it is very difficult to assess the accuracy of the in vivo measurements, estimates based on mass balance considerations have been published elsewhere (3).

During the scanning procedure, photographs were taken from which we assembled a photo montage of the network, which was used to measure the length of all segments. In the mesenteric preparations, all vessels were located in one plane, so it was not necessary to apply correction for viewing angles. Anatomic vessel segment diameters were determined from the photo negatives. Three networks with 392, 546, and 383 vessel segments supplying ~30- to 50-mm2 areas with overall blood flow rates of 750, 402, and 224 nl/min, respectively, were recorded and analyzed.

Simulation of network hemodynamics. The mathematical simulation used to estimate the distribution of blood flow with the microvascular networks has been described in detail elsewhere (32). A system of linear equations obtained by imposing conservation of flow at each node (segment junction) in the network was used to assess the pressures at each node given the hematocrit (according to phase separation), the effective viscosity (according to the Fåhraeus-Lindqvist effect), and the effective diameter for each segment (linear analysis, inner loop). The nodal pressures were then used to update the volume flow rate, hematocrit, and viscosity in each segment (rheological analysis, outer loop), and the procedure was repeated. The respective loops were iterated until a satisfactory degree of convergence was achieved. Inputs for the model calculation are the experimentally recorded network structure (segment connection matrix, segment length, and diameter) and network boundary conditions. The boundary conditions comprise the volume flow rate, the hematocrit in the feeding segments of the network, and volume flow rates in all draining segments. In addition to the network data, the model calculations are based on parametric descriptions of rheological phenomena as follows.

Phase separation effect. The distribution of red blood cells and plasma at microvascular bifurcations was represented according to the approach described earlier (31) with modifications to render predictions more robust for extreme combinations of input hematocrit and vessel diameter. The fractional flow of erythrocytes into one daughter branch (FE) is calculated from the respective fractional blood flow FB as follows

(1)
where logit x = ln[x/(1 – x)] and the parameters A, B, and X0 defining the phase separation characteristics of the bifurcation were obtained from linear fits to experimental data obtained in the rat mesentery (26)

(2)

(3)

(4)
where D{alpha}, D{beta}, and DF are the diameters of the daughter branches and the mother vessel and HD is the discharge hematocrit in the mother vessel (i.e., the flow fraction of red blood cells in the blood passing through the vessel). In these relations and throughout, all diameters are given in micrometers.

Effective blood viscosity (Fåhraeus-Lindqvist effect). The viscosity estimation in the model simulation was based on the results of a meta-analysis of experimental data from numerous in vitro studies of red cell suspensions perfused through ~1-mm- down to 3.3-µm-diameter glass tubes (27). These data were used to derive a parametric description of relative apparent viscosity for suspensions of human erythrocytes as a function of tube diameter and hematocrit ("in vitro viscosity law") according to the following equation

(5)
The relative apparent blood viscosity for a fixed HD of 0.45 (or 45%), {eta}0.45, is given by

(6)
where D is the lumen diameter of the tube.

The shape of the viscosity dependence on hematocrit is governed by the factor C, according to

(7)
which represents a sharp transition from a linear to a convex dependence of viscosity on hematocrit between 7 and 9 µm, respectively. Consistent with the experimental data, these equations describe a substantial decline of apparent viscosity with decreasing diameter <1 mm. In the diameter range 5–7 µm, a minimum of the relative apparent viscosity is obtained, and the presence of suspended red blood cells only slightly increases flow resistance in glass tubes.

ESL thickness and effective viscosity. Data on the thickness of the ESL and its dependence on vessel diameter are sparse (18, 30, 35, 44, 48, 50). Therefore, a number of possible functions were tested for the dependence of layer thickness on D, the apparent anatomic vessel diameter as measured by intravital microscopy. The data set used in the present study contains few >40-µm-diameter vessels. An ESL thickness of 2.6 µm in 150-µm rat mesenteric small arteries was reported by van Haaren et al. (48). The layer thickness functions were therefore chosen to asymptote to a maximal thickness (Wmax) of 2.6 µm at large vessel diameters. The alternative functions were evaluated on the basis of the deviations of measured flow velocities, flow directions, and hematocrits from the respective values predicted by the hemodynamic model simulation.

Of the functional forms considered for layer thickness as a function of diameter, the best results were obtained by considering a family of functions consisting of a sum of two components: 1) a monotonically increasing function (Was) with a hyperbolic asymptote to the maximal thickness (Wmax) at large diameters and 2) and a biphasic function (Wpeak) growing linearly to a peak at a critical diameter (Dcrit) and then decaying exponentially to zero at large diameters

(8)

(9)
Both functions approach zero at a lower threshold diameter (Doff), below which the layer thickness is zero. A sharp corner in the variation of layer thickness with diameter as predicted by Eq. 9 is likely not present in nature. However, when a term was added that allowed smoothing of the corner to a variable degree, the best results in the optimization procedure (see below) were obtained with the parameter controlling the degree of smoothing set to zero. The assumed physical thickness of the layer (Wph) was calculated by adding the asymptotic component and the peak component multiplied by a variable parameter (Epeak)

(10)
During the optimization process, a better fit to observed network flow behavior was obtained if the peak component of the thickness function was assumed to have an additional hematocrit-dependent effect on flow resistance. This was implemented by calculating the effective thickness of the layer (Weff) according to

(11)
where EHD gives its sensitivity to HD.

In the simulations, the effective viscosity in each segment of the network is given by {eta}vivo = {eta}vitro·(D/Deff)4, where Deff is the effective diameter, which takes into account the influence of the ESL (with the assumption of no or very little flow through the ESL); i.e., Deff = D – 2Weff. The corresponding in vitro viscosity ({eta}vitro) is calculated using the relations defined by Eqs. 57, but with the measured anatomic diameter D replaced by Dph = D – 2Wph, which defines the part of the vessel cross section that is available for free flow. The flow resistance in each segment is then computed using Poiseuille's law, based on {eta}vivo and D.

Optimization procedure. The free parameters of Eqs. 811, Doff, Dcrit, D50, Eamp, Ewidth, Epeak, and EHD, were estimated by minimizing the mean square deviation between measured flow velocities and flow velocities obtained from the model simulation (VERR). For the calculation of VERR, values of red blood cell velocity (Vc) were used. In the presence of an ESL, the relation between mean blood velocity (Vb, calculated for the anatomic vessel diameter) and Vc varies strongly with the assumed thickness of the layer. However, the experimental measurements of flow velocity (32) are based on the movement of red blood cells and, after correction for the spatial averaging effect (22), correspond to Vc. Thus this value allows a comparison of measured and predicted velocities that is independent of assumptions on effective layer thickness.

Predicted values of Vc were derived from the calculated volume flow rate () in each vessel. A previously published parametric description of the Fåhraeus effect for blood flow in vitro (31) was used

(12)
where HT is tube hematocrit. The corresponding in vivo Fåhraeus effect in the presence of the ESL was calculated by replacing D with Dph in Eq. 12 and multiplying by a factor to reflect the difference between the anatomic diameter and the diameter available for flow

(13)
Cell velocity was then calculated as follows

(14)
The parameter optimization by minimizing VERR was performed using the multidimensional downhill simplex approach (21), in which the parameter values are successively adjusted in multiple model runs. In addition to VERR, the mean square deviation of discharge hematocrits (HERR) and the number of segments in which the measured and predicted flow directions did not coincide (NINV) were determined to assess the quality of the obtained results.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Figure 1 shows the overall deviations of hemodynamic parameters obtained from the flow simulation from the corresponding values measured during intravital microscopy of mesenteric microvascular networks for several different assumptions with respect to the dependence of apparent viscosity on diameter and hematocrit. Switching from the in vitro viscosity law to a previously published in vivo viscosity relation (32) led to a significant reduction in the velocity and hematocrit deviations (VERR and HERR) as well as the number of segments in which the predicted flow direction did not coincide with the measured flow direction (NINV).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mean square deviation of measured flow velocities (VERR), number of segments with inverted flow directions (NINV), and mean square deviation of hematocrits (HERR) based on comparisons of model simulation results with observed values. Averages with standard errors are given for 3 microvascular networks in the mesentery. In vitro 92, simulations using viscosity relation based on data obtained in glass tubes (27); in vivo 94, simulations using relation derived previously for microvascular networks (32); in vivo ESL, simulations using relations obtained in the present study based on the assumption of an endothelial surface layer (ESL) with a diameter-dependent thickness. For the latter, 2 alternatives, with (HD dependence: yes) and without (HD dependence: no) a hematocrit-dependent effect of the ESL, are shown.

 
Further reductions in VERR and NINV were obtained if the present ESL-based in vivo viscosity relation described in Eqs. 811 was used. The optimized parameter values for a retardation of flow due to the layer that is independent of hematocrit [EHD = 0] were Doff = 2.4 µm, Dcrit = 10.5 µm, D50 = 100 µm, Eamp = 1.23, Ewidth = 0.03, and Epeak = 0.6. However, HERR values were not reduced relative to the in vitro or the previously published in vivo relations when a hematocrit-independent effect of the ESL was assumed. The lowest values in all three deviation parameters, including HERR, were obtained with the ESL-based viscosity relation, including a hematocrit-dependent impact of the layer on flow resistance [EHD > 0] and the optimized parameter values Doff = 2.4 µm, Dcrit = 10.5 µm, D50 = 100 µm, Eamp = 1.1, Ewidth = 0.03, Epeak = 0.6, and EHD = 1.18. The deviation levels obtained are in the range of the theoretical minimum that would be expected on the basis of known experimental measurement errors in the determination of vessel diameters and flow velocities (32). The mean absolute deviation between measured velocities and the results of the flow simulation was 0.54 ± 0.79 (SD) mm/s and showed no dependence on vessel diameter.

The dependence of ESL thickness on diameter as predicted by the optimized parameter values listed above is shown in Fig. 2. For any vessel that allows passage of red blood cells, it can be assumed that a maximal layer thickness corresponds to the vessel diameter reduced by the minimal diameter of a maximally elongated red blood cell (~2.8 µm) divided by 2. The range of values that do not comply with this condition is shown in Fig. 2 (dark shaded area). The assumptions on effective layer thickness that resulted in the best match between experimental data and predictions of the hemodynamic model are given for different levels of HD. They exhibit a marked peak at a vessel diameter just above 10 µm (10.5 µm), the height of which increases with increasing HD.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effective thickness of the ESL obtained by minimizing differences between observed and predicted flow velocities, flow directions, and hematocrits in microvascular networks of the rat mesentery. Values are expressed as a function of anatomic vessel diameter as measured during intravital microscopy. Distribution of vessel diameters is indicated by the box plot above the graph, which indicates 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles. Minimum and maximum diameters were 3.3 and 83 µm, respectively. Dark-shaded area, region excluded by the constraint that red blood cells must be able to pass through the vessel when deformed to a minimal diameter of 2.8 µm as prescribed by their surface-to-volume ratio; vertically hatched area, estimated physical thickness of the layer (Wph, Eq. 10), as might be visualized by appropriate staining procedures in intravital microscopy. On the basis of results of the optimization, the layer exerts a hematocrit-dependent increase in viscosity with a peak close to vessel diameters of ~10 µm. This viscosity increase is equivalent to an increase in layer thickness (Weff, Eq. 11), as shown for different levels of discharge hematocrit (HD).

 
In interpreting this result, it must be acknowledged that the values in Fig. 2 may not directly represent the morphological thickness of the ESL. In contrast, they correspond to the reduction in effective vessel diameter that is necessary to explain the observed flow resistance in microvessels of a given apparent vessel diameter at a given HD. Thus, for a given morphological thickness of the layer, its impact on flow resistance may grow with an increase in red blood cell interaction with the layer. Such an increased interaction is enforced in vessels with diameters above the range where red blood cells can only travel one after the other (single-file flow), i.e., above ~6 µm. At low hematocrits, red blood cells can travel in such vessels without interfering with the vessel wall or the ESL (Fig. 3). With increasing hematocrit, the probability increases that more than one red blood cell is found in a given cross section through the vessel. This leads to cell-to-cell interactions, which effectively displace cells in a radial direction toward the wall, where they may experience retardation because of the presence of the ESL. This effect seems to be strongest in the range where two or three cells interact with each other on one cross section of the vessel, i.e., for diameters ~10 µm.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Micrographs of red blood cells flowing through small-bore glass tubes (top 4 micrographs) and mesenteric microvessels (bottom 2 micrographs). In the intermediate range of vessel diameters from ~6–13 µm, cells may flow in single file at low hematocrits. With increasing hematocrit, more cells are present in a vessel cross section, leading to a transition to multifile flow and increased interaction of cells with the wall.

 
The diameter- and hematocrit-dependent increase of effective layer thickness shown in Fig. 2 may thus represent an increased hemodynamically relevant interaction of red blood cells with the layer. It is therefore likely that the morphological layer thickness corresponds to the boundary of the vertically hatched area (corresponding to Wph) in Fig. 2. This indicates a more-or-less constant layer thickness down to ~10 µm. The sharp decrease below this level results from the resistance of red blood cells to deformation, diminishing layer thickness with reduction of the vessel diameter to maintain the part of the vessel diameter available for red blood cells.

A number of alternative versions for Eqs. 9 and 10, which predict different diameter dependence of the effective layer, were tested. Among these were a sigmoidal increase of layer thickness with diameter with and without an overshoot in a given diameter range and modifications of the present equations allowing for a smooth, rounded transition between the two slopes. However, these alternatives consistently resulted in higher levels for the deviation parameters VERR, HERR, and NINV.

Figure 4 shows values for effective blood viscosity relative to plasma viscosity. By multiplying by plasma viscosity (~1.05 cP for rat blood at 37°C), relative blood viscosity can be converted to absolute viscosity and used to estimate volume flow for a given pressure drop and vessel diameter as measured by light microscopy (without visualization of the ESL). For comparison, in vitro viscosities are also shown. The difference between the corresponding values, especially in the ~10-µm-diameter range, is assumed in the present approach to be solely due to the hemodynamic effect of the ESL. The curves show a substantial attenuation of the Fåhraeus-Lindqvist effect and a shift of the minimal effective viscosity to ~30–50 µm.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Dependence of effective relative blood viscosity (top) and ratio of volume concentration of red blood cells in microvessels (tube hematocrit, HT) to their concentration in blood discharged from vessels (HD, bottom) on measured anatomic vessel diameter. Thick black lines, present results for different HD values representing in vivo situation; thin gray lines, previous results for flow of red cell suspensions in glass tubes of equivalent diameters (27).

 
The corollary of the present approach for the dynamic reduction of the volume fraction of red blood cells (HT) during passage through microvessels relative to their flow fraction (HD), i.e., the Fåhraeus effect, is shown in Fig. 4, bottom. Estimates for HT/HD exhibit a deeper minimum in ~10-µm-diameter vessels in vivo than in vitro because of the ESL. The Fåhraeus effect results from the difference in flow velocity between red blood cells and plasma. It may be challenged whether the region within the ESL should be included in the intravascular volume when HT is computed, as done here. However, in most intravital investigations, it is not possible to distinguish between the ESL and the free-flowing plasma. The anatomic vessel diameter is therefore used to calculate HT (6, 15). Also, the components of the ESL are in dynamic exchange with the free-flowing plasma, and there is some hydraulic flow through the layer (4, 34, 40, 41), rendering the distinction between plasma and ESL material dependent on the time scale that is applied.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present study shows that the estimated variation of flow resistance in microvessels in vivo with anatomic diameter and with hematocrit may be explained by the viscosity relations as determined in vitro if the presence of an ESL is taken into account. To account for this variation, we assumed that the effective thickness of the layer varies with vessel diameter and, less importantly, with hematocrit. The approach used to obtain these results is based on the comparison of flow and hematocrit distributions in microvascular networks with predictions of a mathematical flow simulation using the established in vitro viscosity relations and several assumptions on effective layer thickness. This approach circumvents the experimental problems of direct viscosity measurements in single microvessels in vivo (16, 17) by analyzing distributions in a large number of vessels within a network. This approach, however, also suffers from measurement errors during the experimental determination of vessel diameters and lengths as well as flow velocities (3, 32). Also, 90% of the vessels included in the analysis exhibit diameters between ~5 and 40 µm. Thus data presented for larger microvessels reflect the extrapolation to data for small arteries by van Haaren et al. (48).

The dependence of effective viscosity on diameter shown in Fig. 4 may appear surprising, with effective viscosity decreasing as diameter decreases below ~10 µm. However, it should be remembered that flow resistance is proportional to effective viscosity divided by the fourth power of diameter. Flow resistance continues to increase with decreasing diameter in this range. According to the present results, the rate of increase would, however, be reduced because of the progressive thinning of the ESL for <10-µm-diameter vessels.

A limitation of approaches in which the effective thickness of the ESL is inferred from an observed increase in flow resistance is the inability to distinguish between variations of the structural thickness of the layer and the interactions that flowing red blood cells may have with the layer. Such a differentiation requires the use of direct visualization, as shown, for example, by Vink and Duling (50, 51). On the basis of the available information, it is not likely that the structural layer thickness shows a distinctive peak at ~10 µm. Furthermore, there are no conceivable physical explanations for an increase in ESL thickness with increasing hematocrit. Thus it appears likely that the structural thickness of the wall layer exhibits the simpler dependence on diameter shown by the vertically hatched area in Fig. 2. According to this assumption, the diameter- and hematocrit-dependent increase in the hemodynamic effect of the layer corresponds to specific flow patterns in the relevant diameter range of vessels.

A major characteristic of blood rheology (2, 11, 29) is the particulate nature of the red blood cells. This imposes a specific length scale in the micrometer range on rheological phenomena as related to vessel diameters. Up to ~6 µm, the vessel cross section can accommodate only one red blood cell, and single-file flow conditions prevail, at least for hematocrit below ~60%. Under these conditions, red blood cells deform and exhibit shapes that allow them to travel in the more central flow regions (10, 37, 43), limiting their interaction with the vessel wall or the ESL. An increase in hematocrit leads to the alignment of more cells along a given length of the vessel, but not to a substantial widening of the red blood cell column. For example, two cases illustrated in Fig. 3 (HD 15, D 7 µm and HD 30) correspond to a linear increase in viscosity with increasing hematocrit, as reported for small tubes in experimental studies (27).

Starting at very high hematocrit levels in 6-µm tubes or lower levels in somewhat larger tubes, more than one cell must be squeezed into a given vascular cross section, resulting in multifile flow. For the 7-µm tube in Fig. 3, the transition to multifile flow conditions begins at a hematocrit of ~45%. For a >9-µm-diameter tube, this process starts at low hematocrits, and the relation between viscosity and hematocrit is consistently nonlinear (27). In the in vitro viscosity relation, this is reflected by the variation of the shape factor C, which according to Eq. 7 generates a transition from a linear to a convex relation between viscosity and hematocrit for tube diameters increasing from 7 to 9 µm. If the ESL thickness of ~0.5–0.7 µm is considered, this transition would be seen in vivo in a range of anatomic vessel diameters of 8–10.4 µm. This corresponds closely to the peak in the effective layer thickness (Fig. 2). The transition to multifile flow generates more cell-to-cell interactions, which are accentuated by the fact that cells travel on different streamlines and, thus, may exhibit different average velocities (13, 14). Cell-to-cell interactions and collisions lead to a radial displacement of cells toward the wall, bringing them into close contact with the ESL. This diameter- and hematocrit-dependent mechanism is thought to be the cause of the observed increase in effective layer thickness centered at ~10 µm.

In previous studies (31), several potential mechanisms were proposed for the discrepancy between experimental estimates of apparent viscosity in microvessels in vitro and in vivo. In the present work, we have shown that the discrepancy can be fully accounted for by the effects of an ESL with diameter-dependent thickness, which exerts additional hematocrit-dependent restriction on flow for ~10-µm diameters, coupled with a relation between apparent viscosity, diameter, and hematocrit established on the basis of in vitro observations.

The range of ESL thickness inferred by this approach is in general agreement with values estimated by other techniques. On the basis of direct micropipette measurements, Lipowsky and co-workers (16) reported mean blood viscosity levels of 4.2 cP in microvessels with mean diameters of ~30 µm. The discrepancy between their values and in vitro values (~1.5 cP) can be accounted for by assuming a wall layer thickness of ~3.4 µm. To reconcile the hematocrit measurements by Duling and Desjardins (7) and Klitzman and Duling (15) in capillaries with the law of mass conservation, a layer on the order of 1–1.2 µm would be required. From a meta-analysis of hemodilution studies, Pries et al. (34) inferred a layer thickness of ~1.5 µm. Using a double-indicator-dilution technique, Rehm et al. (35) estimated the total ESL volume in patients to be ~720 ml. With the assumption of an endothelial surface of ~350 m2 (30), the corresponding average ESL thickness would be 2 µm. Vink and co-workers developed the dye-exclusion technique to visualize the ESL thickness directly and reported values of ~0.4–0.5 µm in capillaries (50) and up to 2.6 µm in small arteries (48). Using microparticle image velocimetry, Long et al. (18) and Smith et al. (44) estimated values of ~0.5 µm for ~25- and 45-µm-diameter venules.

One possible cause of the apparent discrepancy between the lower values reported from dye exclusion and microparticle image velocimetry approaches in true microvessels and the higher values from studies focusing on flow resistance may be related to the difference between the effective physical thickness of the layer and its effect on red blood cell flow. Although the data of van Haaren et al. (48) indicate an increase of ESL thickness toward larger microvessels, experimental support for the decline of the ESL thickness below ~10 µm is not available.

The present results do not rule out the possibility that other effects, such as flow disturbances due to irregularity of vascular lumens, bifurcations, and leukocytes, contribute to increased resistance in vivo but are consistent with the hypothesis that the ESL is the main cause of the discrepancy. Independent of the underlying physical mechanisms, these results provide an improved representation of the hemodynamics of microvascular networks that can be used in simulations of microvascular flow.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. R. Pries, Charité Berlin, Dept. of Physiology, Arnimallee 22, D-14195 Berlin, Germany (e-mail: axel.pries{at}charite.de)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Braasch D and Jenett W. Erythrozytenflexibilität, Hämokonzentration und Reibungswiderstand in Glaskapillaren mit Durchmessern zwischen 6 bis 50 µm. Pflügers Arch 302: 245–254, 1968.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  2. Cokelet GR. Rheology and hemodynamics. Annu Rev Physiol 42: 311–324, 1980.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Cokelet GR, Pries AR, and Kiani MF. Observations on the accuracy of photometric techniques used to measure some in vivo microvascular blood flow parameters. Microcirculation 5: 61–70, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Damiano ER. The effect of the endothelial-cell glycocalyx on the motion of red blood cells through capillaries. Microvasc Res 55: 77–91, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  5. Desjardins C and Duling BR. Microvessel hematocrit: measurement and implications for capillary oxygen transport. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 252: H494–H503, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Duling BR and Desjardins C. Capillary hematocrit—what does it mean? News Physiol Sci 2: 66–69, 1987.
  7. Fahraeus R and Lindqvist T. The viscosity of the blood in narrow capillary tubes. Am J Physiol 96: 562–568, 1931.[Free Full Text]
  8. Fenton BM, Wilson DW, and Cokelet GR. Analysis of the effects of measured white blood cell entrance times on hemodynamics in a computer model of a microvascular bed. Pflügers Arch 403: 396–401, 1985.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Gaehtgens P, Dührssen C, and Albrecht KH. Motion, deformation, and interaction of blood cells and plasma during flow through narrow capillary tubes. Blood Cells 6: 799–812, 1980.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Gaehtgens P, Pries AR, and Ley K. Structural, hemodynamic, and rheological characteristics of blood flow in the circulation. In: Clinical Hemorheology, edited by Chien S, Dormandy J, Ernst E, and Matrai A. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987, p. 97–124.
  11. Gerbstädt H, Vogtmann C, Rüth P, and Schöntube E. Die Scheinviskosität von Blut in Glaskapillaren kleinster Durchmesser. Naturwissenschaften 53: 526, 1966.[Medline]
  12. Goldsmith HL. Red cell motions and wall interactions in tube flow. Fed Proc 30: 1578–1588, 1971.[ISI][Medline]
  13. Goldsmith HL. The microrheology of red blood cell suspensions. Nature 190: 5S–28S, 1961.
  14. Klitzman B and Duling BR. Microvascular hematocrit and red cell flow in resting and contracting striated muscle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 237: H481–H490, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lipowsky HH, Usami S, and Chien S. In vivo measurements of "apparent viscosity" and microvessel hematocrit in the mesentery of the cat. Microvasc Res 19: 297–319, 1980.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  16. Lipowsky HH and Zweifach BW. Methods for the simultaneous measurement of pressure differentials and flow in single unbranched vessels of the microcirculation for rheological studies. Microvasc Res 14: 345–361, 1977.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  17. Long DS, Smith ML, Pries AR, Ley K, and Damiano ER. Microviscometry reveals reduced blood viscosity and altered shear rate and shear stress profiles in microvessels after hemodilution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 10060–10065, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Martini P, Pierach A, and Schreyer E. Die Strömung des Blutes in engen Gefä{beta}en. Eine Abweichung vom Poiseuille'schen. Gesetz Dt Arch Klin Med 169: 212–222, 1930.
  19. McKay CB and Meiselman HJ. Osmolality-mediated Fahraeus and Fahraeus-Lindqvist effects for human RBC suspensions. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 254: H238–H249, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Nelder JA and Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7: 308–313, 1965.
  21. Pittman RN and Ellsworth ML. Estimation of red cell flow in microvessels: consequences of the Baker-Wayland spatial averaging model. Microvasc Res 32: 371–388, 1986.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  22. Pries AR. A versatile video image analysis system for microcirculatory research. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 7: 327–345, 1988.[ISI][Medline]
  23. Pries AR, Eriksson SE, and Jepsen H. Real-time oriented image analysis in microcirculatory research. SPIE 1357: 257–263, 1990.[CrossRef]
  24. Pries AR, Kanzow G, and Gaehtgens P. Microphotometric determination of hematocrit in small vessels. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 245: H167–H177, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Pries AR, Ley K, Claassen M, and Gaehtgens P. Red cell distribution at microvascular bifurcations. Microvasc Res 38: 81–101, 1989.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Pries AR, Neuhaus D, and Gaehtgens P. Blood viscosity in tube flow: dependence on diameter and hematocrit. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 263: H1770–H1778, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Pries AR, Schönfeld D, Gaehtgens P, Kiani MF, and Cokelet GR. Diameter variability and microvascular flow resistance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H2716–H2725, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Pries AR and Secomb TW. Rheology of the microcirculation. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 29: 143–148, 2003.[ISI][Medline]
  29. Pries AR, Secomb TW, and Gaehtgens P. The endothelial surface layer. Pflügers Arch 440: 653–666, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  30. Pries AR, Secomb TW, Gaehtgens P, and Gross JF. Blood flow in microvascular networks—experiments and simulation. Circ Res 67: 826–834, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Pries AR, Secomb TW, Gessner T, Sperandio MB, Gross JF, and Gaehtgens P. Resistance to blood flow in microvessels in vivo. Circ Res 75: 904–915, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Pries AR, Secomb TW, Jacobs H, Sperandio M, Osterloh K, and Gaehtgens P. Microvascular blood flow resistance: role of endothelial surface layer. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 273: H2272–H2279, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Pries AR, Secomb TW, Sperandio M, and Gaehtgens P. Blood flow resistance during hemodilution: effect of plasma composition. Cardiovasc Res 37: 225–235, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Rehm M, Haller M, Orth V, Kreimeier U, Jacob M, Dressel H, Mayer S, Brechtelsbauer H, and Finsterer U. Changes in blood volume and hematocrit during acute preoperative volume loading with 5% albumin or 6% hetastarch solutions in patients before radical hysterectomy. Anesthesiology 95: 849–856, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  35. Reinke W, Johnson PC, and Gaehtgens P. Effect of shear rate variation on apparent viscosity of human blood in tubes of 29 to 94 µm diameter. Circ Res 59: 124–132, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Secomb TW. Red blood cell mechanics and capillary blood rheology. Cell Biophys 18: 231–251, 1991.[ISI][Medline]
  37. Secomb TW and Hsu R. Resistance to blood flow in nonuniform capillaries. Microcirculation 4: 421–427, 1997.[ISI][Medline]
  38. Secomb TW, Hsu R, and Pries AR. Blood flow and red blood cell deformation in nonuniform capillaries: effects of the endothelial surface layer. Microcirculation 9: 189–196, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  39. Secomb TW, Hsu R, and Pries AR. Effect of the endothelial surface layer on transmission of fluid shear stress to endothelial cells. Biorheology 38: 143–150, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
  40. Secomb TW, Hsu R, and Pries AR. Effect of endothelial glycocalyx on oxygen transport from capillaries to tissue: a theoretical model (Abstract). FASEB J 13: A25, 1999.
  41. Secomb TW, Hsu R, and Pries AR. A model for red blood cell motion in glycocalyx-lined capillaries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 274: H1016–H1022, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Secomb TW, Skalak R, Özkaya N, and Gross JF. Flow of axisymmetric red blood cells in narrow capillaries. J Fluid Mech 163: 405–423, 1986.[CrossRef]
  43. Smith ML, Long DS, Damiano ER, and Ley K. Near-wall micro-PIV reveals a hydrodynamically relevant endothelial surface layer in venules in vivo. Biophys J 85: 637–645, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Stace TM and Damiano ER. An electrochemical model of the transport of charged molecules through the capillary glycocalyx. Biophys J 80: 1670–1690, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Stadler AA, Zilow EP, and Linderkamp O. Blood viscosity and optimal hematocrit in narrow tubes. Biorheology 27: 779–788, 1990.[ISI][Medline]
  46. Sutton DW and Schmid-Schönbein GW. Elevation of organ resistance due to leukocyte perfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 262: H1646–H1650, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Van Haaren PM, VanBavel E, Vink H, and Spaan JA. Localization of the permeability barrier to solutes in isolated arteries by confocal microscopy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285: H2848–H2856, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Vink H, Constantinescu AA, and Spaan JA. Oxidized lipoproteins degrade the endothelial surface layer: implications for platelet-endothelial cell adhesion. Circulation 101: 1500–1502, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Vink H and Duling BR. Identification of distinct luminal domains for macromolecules, erythrocytes, and leukocytes within mammalian capillaries. Circ Res 79: 581–589, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Vink H and Duling BR. Capillary endothelial surface layer selectively reduces plasma solute distribution volume. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278: H285–H289, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Weinbaum S, Zhang X, Han Y, Vink H, and Cowin SC. Mechanotransduction and flow across the endothelial glycocalyx. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7988–7995, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. W. G. E. VanTeeffelen, A. A. Constantinescu, J. Brands, J. A. E. Spaan, and H. Vink
Bradykinin- and sodium nitroprusside-induced increases in capillary tube haematocrit in mouse cremaster muscle are associated with impaired glycocalyx barrier properties
J. Physiol., July 1, 2008; 586(13): 3207 - 3218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
N. Kleinstreuer, T. David, M. J. Plank, and Z. Endre
Dynamic myogenic autoregulation in the rat kidney: a whole-organ model
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): F1453 - F1464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Nieuwdorp, M. C. Meuwese, H. L. Mooij, C. Ince, L. N. Broekhuizen, J. J. P. Kastelein, E. S. G. Stroes, and H. Vink
Measuring endothelial glycocalyx dimensions in humans: a potential novel tool to monitor vascular vulnerability
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2008; 104(3): 845 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. W. Ji, F. Mac Gabhann, and A. S. Popel
Skeletal muscle VEGF gradients in peripheral arterial disease: simulations of rest and exercise
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3740 - H3749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Kim, R. L. Kong, A. S. Popel, M. Intaglietta, and P. C. Johnson
Temporal and spatial variations of cell-free layer width in arterioles
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1526 - H1535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Jacob, D. Bruegger, M. Rehm, M. Stoeckelhuber, U. Welsch, P. Conzen, and B. F. Becker
The endothelial glycocalyx affords compatibility of Starling's principle and high cardiac interstitial albumin levels
Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2007; 73(3): 575 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/6/H2657    most recent
00297.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pries, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Secomb, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pries, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Secomb, T. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.