AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290: H1004-H1010, 2006. First published October 7, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00886.2005
0363-6135/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/3/H1004    most recent
00886.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voros, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Voros, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, C. M.

Interaction between AT1 and AT2 receptors during postinfarction left ventricular remodeling

Szilard Voros,1 Zequan Yang,3 Christina M. Bove,1 Wesley D. Gilson,3 Frederick H. Epstein,2,3 Brent A. French,2,3 Stuart S. Berr,2,3 Sanford P. Bishop,5 Mark R. Conaway,4 Hiroaki Matsubara,6 Robert M. Carey,1 and Christopher M. Kramer1,2

1Departments of Medicine, 2Radiology, 3Biomedical Engineering, and 4Health Evaluation Sciences, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; 5Department of Pathology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama; and 6Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Submitted 18 August 2005 ; accepted in final form 5 October 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The relative contribution of the angiotensin II type 1 and 2 receptors (AT1-R and AT2-R) in postmyocardial infarction (MI) remodeling remains incompletely understood. We studied five groups of C57Bl/6 mice after 1 h of left anterior descending artery occlusion-reperfusion: 1) wild type, untreated (n = 12); 2) wild type, treated with the AT1-R blocker losartan (10–20 mg·kg–1·day–1 in drinking water) from day 1 to day 28 post-MI (n = 10); 3) cardiac overexpression of the AT2-R [AT2-transgenic (TG); n = 14]; 4) AT2-TG treated with losartan (n = 13); and 5) AT2-TG and null for the AT1a-R [AT2-TG/AT1 knockout (KO); n = 10]. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) measured ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume (EDVI and ESVI) and mass indexed to weight on days 0, 1, 7, and 28 post-MI. Infarct size was measured on day 1 by late gadolinium-enhanced CMR. Regional myocyte hypertrophy and collagen content were measured on day 28 post-MI. Infarct size was similar among groups. Systolic blood pressure was lowest in AT2-TG/AT1KO. By day 28 post-MI, when corrected for baseline differences, EDVI and ESVI were higher and ejection fraction was lower in wild type than other groups. Ejection fraction was highest and EDVI and mass index were lowest in AT2-TG/AT1KO at day 28. The AT2-TG/AT1KO demonstrated less fibrosis in adjacent regions. Regional myocyte hypertrophy was similar in all groups. The AT1-R and AT2-R are intricately intertwined in post-MI remodeling. Pharmacological blockade of AT1-R is equivalent to AT2-R overexpression in attenuating post-MI remodeling. Genetic knockout of the AT1a-R is additive to AT2-R overexpression, due, at least in part, to blood pressure lowering.

magnetic resonance imaging; angiotensin; myocardial infarction; receptors


THE ANGIOTENSIN II (ANG II) type 1 receptor (AT1-R) has multiple effects, both cardiac and systemic, after myocardial infarction (MI), including mediating vasoconstriction, cellular hypertrophy, and catecholamine release (17). The ANG II type 2 receptor (AT2-R) has opposing actions in general, favoring vasodilation and inhibiting cellular hypertrophy and catecholamine release (8, 25). Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system by both angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is protective after MI, although through different mechanisms (19, 20). ACE inhibitors block the renin-angiotensin system by decreasing the levels of circulating ANG II, which leads to decreased stimulation of both the AT1-R and the AT2-R, as well as by inhibiting bradykinin breakdown. In contrast, ARBs selectively block the AT1-R, which could mean that much of the beneficial effects of AT1-R blockade may be mediated by unopposed ANG II on the AT2-R.

The latter notion is supported by two major lines of investigation. First, it has been shown in animal models that the lack of AT2-R worsens outcomes after experimental MI (1, 5, 18). In mice that were not able to mount a profibrotic and hypertrophic response, cardiac rupture was significantly increased post-MI (1, 5). Second, it has been shown that the protective effect of AT1-R blockade by ARBs is attenuated in the presence of AT2-R inhibition (7, 13, 27). Data suggest that the AT2-R has a minimal role in blood pressure lowering in the setting of AT1-R blockade, but it is thought to reduce fibrosis and myocyte hypertrophy after MI (27). Our group has demonstrated that AT2-R overexpression is associated with improved baseline LV function and attenuates post-MI remodeling and that nitric oxide is part of the downstream signaling pathway (2, 30)

We hypothesized that the AT2-R mediates much of the benefit of AT1-R blockade in the myocardium, and therefore we studied the AT1-R/AT2-R interplay by pharmacological and genetic inhibition of the AT1-R in AT2-R cardiac transgenic (TG) mice compared with appropriate controls. We hypothesized that if AT2-R plays a major role in both left ventricular (LV) remodeling and modulating the benefits of AT1-R blockade, then losartan (Los) therapy and knocking out the AT1-R may not be additive to AT2-R overexpression.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animal Model

Animal protocols were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, Revised 1996) and were approved by the University of Virginia Animal Care and Use Committee. All five arms of the present study were performed in mice of C57Bl/6 background; in three arms with cardiac overexpression of the AT2-R, as described previously (2, 30). This strain was originally created by Dr. H. Matsubara (Kyoto Prefectural University School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan) (16).

For one arm of the study, AT2-R TG mice and mice with systemic knockout (KO) of the AT1a-R were cross-bred. Heterozygote AT1a-R deficient mice, originally derived from a line previously described (6) and backcrossed more than five generations into the C57Bl/6 strain were bred in the laboratory of Dr. Amy Mangrum to generate wild-type (WT; +/+), heterozygous (+/–), and homozygous null (–/–) littermates. After the AT2-R TG mice were cross-bred with homozygous AT1a-R null mice, subsequent generations yielded mice with both cardiac overexpression of the AT2-R and systemic knockout of the AT1a-R. Transgene expression and knockout were confirmed by Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from mouse tails.

Study Design

This study consisted of five arms with a total of 59 mice: 1) WT, untreated (n = 12); 2) WT, treated with the AT1-R blocker losartan (10–20 mg·kg–1·day–1 in drinking water) from day 1 to day 28 post-MI (WT-Los; n = 10); 3) cardiac overexpression of the AT2-R (AT2-TG; n = 14); 4) cardiac overexpression of the AT2-R, treated with losartan (AT2-TG+Los; n = 13); and 5) cardiac overexpression of the AT2-R and null for the AT1a-R (AT2-TG/AT1KO; n = 10). All mice were 8–14 wk of age at the start of the study period. We measured daily water intake in all losartan-treated animals to assure that mice were receiving the prescribed doses of losartan. MI was created on day 0. Noninvasive measurements of heart rate and systolic blood pressure were performed weekly postinfarction with the use of a Visitec-2000 tail-cuff apparatus. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was performed at baseline and on days 1, 7, and 28 post-MI. Invasive hemodynamic measurements were performed before mice were euthanized and cardiac tissue was sampled for histological analysis.

Infarct Surgery

Myocardial infarction was created as described previously (30). Briefly, after mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium at a dose of 80–100 mg/kg ip, the chest was opened and the left anterior descending artery was ligated with a 7-0 silk suture for 60 min over a short PE-50 tube; this was followed by reperfusion. Occlusion was verified by visual confirmation of color changes in the ischemic regions of the LV and by widened QRS complex on ECG.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Murine CMR was performed as previously described (30). Briefly, a 4.7-T MRI system (Varian 200/400, Inova) with Magnex gradients (80 G/cm maximum strength) was used with a custom-built Litz radiofrequency coil (Doty Scientific, Columbia, SC). Anesthesia was induced with 3% isoflurane and was maintained with a 1% isoflurane-oxygen mixture throughout the study. Core body temperature was maintained at 37.0 ± 0.1°C by using an external water bath. ECG triggering was achieved with a gating/monitoring system (SA Instruments, Stony Brook, NY). After localizer images, contiguous short-axis bright blood cine images of the LV were obtained with a 2D-FLASH gradient echo sequence (Fig. 1). Cine-imaging parameters were as follows: repetition time, 8–10 ms; time to echo, 3.1–3.9 ms; flip angle, 20°; field of view, 2.56 cm; matrix, 128 x 128; slice thickness, 1 mm; voxel size, 100 x 100 x 1,000 µm3; and number of excitations, three. We obtained 12–14 phases for each of the six to eight contiguous short-axis slices. Infarct imaging was done by using the same sequence on day 1 post-MI, after the intraperitoneal injection of 0.3 mM/kg Gd-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid, by using a flip angle of 60° to increase postcontrast T1 weighting. This technique has been carefully validated against pathological measures of infarct size by our group (29).


Figure 1
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. End-systolic midventricular short-axis cine images at day 28 postmyocardial infarction (MI) in wild-type (WT), WT+losartan (Los), ANG II type 2 (AT2)-transgenic (TG), AT2-TG+Los, and AT2-TG/AT1 knockout (KO) mice. Note area of wall thinning in WT mice and increased end-systolic cavity areas relative to other groups. This is a relatively basal slice in each mouse, adjacent to the more transmural apical infarct.

 
Image Analysis

Short-axis cine images were analyzed by using ARGUS image analysis software (Siemens Medical Solutions, Princeton, NJ). Epi- and endocardial borders were planimetered to determine end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), LV mass (LVM), and ejection fraction (EF). Volumes and mass were indexed to body weight (EDVI, ESVI, and LVMI). Infarct size was measured on day 1 postcontrast cine images by planimetry of the area of late gadolinium enhancement with signal intensity >2 SD above the signal intensity of remote myocardium (29).

Hemodynamic Measurements

Invasive hemodynamic measurements were performed after the day 28 CMR examination. Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (50 µg/g body wt), enhanced by local subcutaneous injection of 0.5% bupivicaine (100 µl). Peripheral arterial pressure was measured by cannulating the right common carotid artery with PE-10 tubing, and LV pressure was measured after direct puncturing of the LV with a 27-gauge needle in the fifth intercostal space, connected to PE-50 tubing. Blood pressure, LV pressure, heart rate, and developed pressure (dP/dt) were recorded with a MacLab recording system.

Collagen Analysis

We performed collagen analysis as previously described (2). Briefly, hearts were removed after mice were euthanized, fixed in formaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin. Six-micrometer slices were prepared and stained with picric acid Sirius red. Morphometric analysis was done in the infarct border zone (adjacent) and in remote regions with the use of an Olympus microscope with a green 540-nm filter, interfaced with a CCD72 videocamera. Analysis was done with a Universal Imaging Image 1/AT morphometry system (West Chester, PA). Volume percent collagen was determined by measuring three to four sections from each region by calculating the mean from all fields in each region in each animal.

Myocyte Analysis

Three to five tissue samples from each heart were sectioned at 5-µm thickness, stained with picric acid Sirius red, and examined with an Olympus AH2 research microscope by using rhodamine epifluorescence. With the use of a x40 objective (x660 on monitor), the cross-sectional area was determined on a minimum of 60 myocytes from each animal in adjacent and remote noninfarcted regions, selected from areas judged to be within 20° of true cross section, by using a Universal Imaging AT1 image analysis system. The mean area was calculated for each animal.

Statistical Methods

Infarct sizes between groups and noninvasive and invasive hemodynamic parameters were compared by one-way ANOVA with Tukey subtesting. Regional percent collagen and regional myocyte size between groups were compared by two-way ANOVA with Tukey subtesting. Volumetric parameters were compared between all five groups by using F tests in repeated-measures models by using day 0 data as a covariate. Analyses were carried out by using PROC MIXED in SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All values are presented as means ± SE; P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Infarct Size

Infarct size, expressed as percent LVM on day 1 post-MI, was similar among groups (42 ± 2% for WT, 39 ± 3% for WT+Los, 41 ± 3% for AT2-TG, 41 ± 2% for AT2-TG+Los, and 39 ± 2% for AT2-TG/AT1KO; P = not significant).

Noninvasive Blood Pressure

When noninvasive systolic blood pressures were averaged over the 4-wk post-MI time course, the AT2-TG/AT1KO group demonstrated lower systolic blood pressures than the other groups (111 ± 3 for WT, 106 ± 2 for WT+Los, 109 ± 3 for AT2-TG, 111 ± 3 for AT2-TG+Los, and 98 ± 3 mmHg for AT2-TG/AT1KO; P < 0.001).

LV Volumetric Parameters

A complete description of parameters is given in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Global volumetric parameters by CMR

 
Baseline. At baseline, LV ESVI was smaller in the AT2-R TG animals compared with WT, but this difference was abolished by the additional AT1a-R knockout (Table 1). LV EF was greater than WT at baseline in all three AT2-R TG groups. LVMI was similar among all groups at baseline.

Day 1. Acute LV dilatation and dysfunction on day 1 post-MI was characterized by an increase in ESVI and a fall in EF in all groups. EDVI was smaller in all three AT2-R TG groups than WT at this time point.

Day 7. LV dilatation continued through this time point, although ESVI and EF were best preserved in the AT2-TG/AT1KO and WT+Los groups (Table 1 and Figs. 2 and 3). EDVI was lower in all groups compared with WT.


Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Changes in end-systolic volume index (ESVI) over time. Data are shown as means ± SE. *P < 0.05 vs. WT; {dagger}P < 0.05 vs. WT-Los; {ddagger}P < 0.05 vs. AT2-TG.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Changes in ejection fraction over time. Data are shown as means ± SE. *P < 0.05 vs. WT; {dagger}P < 0.05 vs. WT-Los; {ddagger}P < 0.05 vs. AT2-TG; #P < 0.05 vs. AT2-TG+Los.

 
Day 28. Other than in WT animals, little to no further increase in ESVI was noted in the other groups. (Figs. 1 and 2) LV EF was greater in all four groups compared with WT and was best preserved in the AT2-TG/AT1KO group. (Fig. 3) Similarly, EDVI was less in all four other groups than WT and was lowest in the AT2-TG/AT1KO group. LVMI was lowest in the WT+Los, AT2-TG+Los, and AT2-TG/AT1KO groups.

Day 28 Hemodynamics

On invasive hemodynamic measurements performed after completion of day 28 post-MI imaging, heart rate was similar in the five groups (Table 2). Invasive systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were lowest in the WT+Los and AT2-TG/AT1KO groups. (Table 2) LV end-diastolic and end-systolic pressures were also significantly lower in the WT+Los and AT2-TG/AT1KO groups. Positive dP/dt was similar in the five groups (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Invasive hemodynamic parameters on day 28 post-MI

 
Myocardial Fibrosis

The fibrosis identified in noninfarcted regions was interstitial fibrosis. Collagen content on day 28 post-MI was not different among the five groups in remote regions, but in adjacent regions it was significantly lower in AT2-TG/AT1KO compared with all other groups (Table 3). For purposes of comparison, collagen content in noninfarcted WT mice is 1.2 ± 0.4%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Collagen content on day 28 post-MI

 
Myocyte Hypertrophy

Myocyte hypertrophy occurred in all groups on day 28 post-MI and was greater in adjacent noninfarcted regions than in remote regions (Table 4). For comparison purposes, myocyte size in noninfarcted C57Bl/6 WT controls is 164 ± 31 µm2. However, regional myocyte hypertrophy in both regions was similar among groups (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Myocyte size on day 28 post-MI

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Modulation of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, ARBs and aldosterone antagonists remains an important therapeutic tool in clinical practice. Further understanding of the interplay between the AT1-R and AT2-R systems might lead to the development of newer strategies to interfere with this system to further attenuate post-MI LV remodeling. The present study examined this interaction by using CMR to follow post-MI remodeling in five groups of mice: two WT control groups, one of which was treated with losartan and three groups with cardiac AT2-R overexpression; one untreated; one treated with losartan; and one that was also AT1a-R null.

Infarct size was similar among groups as measured on day 1 post-MI. Systolic blood pressure was lower in AT2-TG/AT1KO than in other groups from postinfarction through late in the post-MI course. By day 28 post-MI, when corrected for baseline differences, EDVI and ESVI were higher and EF was lower in WT than in all other groups. EF was highest and EDV and mass indexes were lowest in the AT2-TG/AT1KO group at day 28. The AT2-TG/AT1KO demonstrated less fibrosis in adjacent noninfarcted regions. Regional myocyte hypertrophy was similar in all groups.

Throughout the study, LV size and function were similar among the AT2-TG and AT2-TG+Los groups, suggesting that pharmacological inhibition of the AT1-R pathway provides no additional attenuation of post-MI LV remodeling in the setting of cardiac AT2-R overexpression. We chose a dose of losartan that has been shown to attenuate LV remodeling in the setting of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in mice, without lowering systolic blood pressure (12). Indeed, LV remodeling was significantly attenuated in the WT mice treated with losartan alone when compared with untreated WT, equivalent to the group with cardiac overexpression of AT2-R.

Systolic blood pressure was, on average, 12–14 mmHg lower in AT2-TG/AT1KO compared with both AT2-TG and AT2-TG+Los throughout the study, consistent with previously reported data (21). This blood pressure lowering may have contributed to the additional benefit of AT1a-R knockout over and above AT2-R overexpression noted in the present study. In addition, AT2-TG/AT1KO showed additional effects on limiting fibrosis in adjacent noninfarcted regions, consistent with prior studies with a AT1a-R knockout model (4). A primary benefit of inhibiting the AT1-R may be due to this effect on collagen in noninfarcted regions. However, collagen levels before MI were not measured in AT2-TG/AT1KO mice and may be different at baseline, although baseline interstitial collagen in WT mice is quite low. These adjacent noninfarcted regions play a crucial role in the remodeling process (11) due to local increases in wall stress, a major stimulus to ANG II release (22). Cellular hypertrophy was similar among groups, but the power of the study to demonstrate differences in myocyte size was limited.

A recent study (10) in a canine model demonstrated that one of the effects of AT1-R blockade is to upregulate the AT2-R. This may explain why WT+Los findings were very similar to those of the AT2-TG group in the present study. The role of the AT2-R post-MI has been previously investigated in knockout models. In mice that were not able to mount a profibrotic and hypertrophic response, cardiac rupture was significantly increased post-MI (1, 5), suggesting a protective effect post-MI to maintain myocardial scar formation. However, the AT2-R null mouse may not be an ideal model of disease states because the AT2-R is expressed at very low levels in normal animals and is only upregulated in disease states. Therefore, some have suggested that models overexpressing the AT2-R may be more appropriate for study (23). For that reason, we have chosen to study AT2-R overexpression. Our previous studies (30) have demonstrated the protective effects of AT2-R overexpression in the post-MI setting. Pharmacological approaches to increase levels of the AT2-R post-MI may indeed be a reasonable goal based on these studies.

A similar interrelationship between the AT1-R and AT2-R has been shown post-MI with pharmacological inhibition of the AT2-R. With the use of a pharmacological AT2-R antagonist, one group demonstrated that the infarct size-reducing effect of AT1-R antagonism was dependent on the AT2-R (7). The beneficial effects of AT1-R blockade in rats with post-MI heart failure, including attenuation of interstitial fibrosis, hypertrophy, and LV volumes, were shown to be antagonized by pharmacological blockade of the AT2-R (14). This is additional evidence that much of the benefit of AT1-R blockade may be mediated by the AT2-R. In this study, treatment was started 2 mo after myocardial infarction, thus representing a more chronic heart failure state rather than an acute post-MI condition. These effects were reduced by bradykinin receptor blockade and eliminated in rats with impaired kininogen transport mechanisms, supporting the hypothesis that kinins, at least in part, mediate the benefits of the AT2-R. Furthermore, the benefits of valsartan postinfarction on LV EF, cardiac output, myocyte size, and fibrosis were significantly reduced in AT2-R knockout mice (27). These data lend further credence to the notion that the AT2-R mediates some of the benefit of AT1-R blockade and support our findings of equivalence of pharmacological blockade of AT1-R and AT2-R overexpression.

The interplay between the AT1-R and AT2-R has been studied in models other than post-MI remodeling. The AT1-R blocker valsartan inhibited both coronary arterial thickening and perivascular fibrosis in aortic-banded mice, but it was more potent in WT mice than in AT2-R null mice, suggesting that the AT2-R is necessary for the benefits of AT1-R blockade to be realized (26). In spontaneously hypertensive rats, AT1-R antagonism reduced blood pressure and myocardial fibrosis, which was in turn partially prevented by AT2-R antagonism (24). In aged rats, AT2-R antagonism reversed the reduction in myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis afforded by AT1-R blockade with candesartan.(9) Thus data in models of infarction, hypertrophy, and aging show that the AT2-R is essential to mediate the effect of AT1-R blockade.

The downstream signaling pathways responsible for the benefits of AT2-R overexpression remain only partially elucidated. Nitric oxide has been shown to be an important mediator (2). Bradykinin may well be an important intermediate signaling molecule between the AT2-R and nitric oxide as it is in the kidney (3). Bradykinin itself has little direct effect on post-MI LV remodeling as demonstrated by lack of effect with bradykinin B2 receptor knockouts (28). However, the absence of the B2 receptor limited the benefits of ACE inhibitors and AT1-R blockade (28). Further work is necessary to clarify these issues.

Limitations

ANG II levels were not directly measured, and therefore the level of pharmacological inhibition of the AT1-R by losartan was not assessed directly. However, water consumption by the mice was carefully measured to ensure that they received the prescribed doses of losartan. In addition, WT mice treated with the same dose of losartan demonstrated significant attenuation of LV remodeling. Higher, supratherapeutic doses of losartan that significantly lower blood pressure may have had an effect similar to that of AT2-TG/AT1KO. However, the effects of ARBs in postinfarct remodeling have been shown to be independent of blood pressure lowering in animal models (14, 15). Blood pressure lowering was insignificant in clinical trials of ACE inhibition or ARBs post-MI and is unlikely to be the primary mode of benefit (19, 20).

The AT1-R knockout model was specific to the AT1a-R, thereby leaving the AT1b-R intact. However, the predominant effect of angiotensin on the AT1-R is thought to be mediated through the AT1a-R. The study was underpowered to examine some of the secondary end points such as myocyte size, but the most important clinical effect that impacts mortality in a given animal is that on LV size and function post-MI.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Grant RO1 HL-52980 (to C. M. Kramer), American Heart Association Mid-Atlantic Affiliate Grant-in-Aid 0256343U (to C. M. Kramer), and NHLBI Grant T32 HL-07355 (to S. Voros and C. M. Bove).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Amy Mangrum for the kind donation of AT1a-R knockout mice for the present studies. We thank Joseph M. DiMaria for expert technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. M. Kramer, Dept. of Radiology and Medicine, Univ. of Virginia Health System, Lee St., Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (e-mail: ckramer{at}virginia.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Adachi Y, Saito Y, Kishimoto I, Harada M, Kuwahara K, Takahashi N, Kawakami R, Nakanishi M, Nakagawa Y, Tanimoto K, Saitoh Y, Yasuno S, Usami S, Iwai M, Horiuchi M, and Nakao K. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor deficiency exacerbates heart failure and reduces survival after acute myocardial infarction in mice. Circulation 107: 2406–2408, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bove CM, Yang Z, Gilson WD, Epstein FH, French B, Berr SS, Bishop SP, Matsubara H, Carey RM, and Kramer CM. Nitric oxide mediates benefits of angiotensin II type 2 receptor in post-infarct remodeling. Hypertension 43: 680–685, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Carey RM, Jin X, Wang Z, and Siragy HM. Nitric oxide: a physiological mediator of the type 2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor. Acta Physiol Scand 168: 65–71, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Harada K, Sugaya T, Murakami K, Yazaki Y, and Komuro I. Angiotensin II type 1A receptor knockout mice display less left ventricular remodeling and improved survival after myocardial infarction. Circulation 100: 2093–2099, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ichihara S, Senbonmatsu T, Price E Jr, Ichicki T, Gaffney A, and Inagami T. Targeted deletion of angiotensin type 2 receptor caused cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 106: 2244–2249, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ito M, Oliverio MI, Mannon PJ, Best CF, Maeda N, Smithies O, and Coffman TM. Regulation of blood pressure by the type 1A angiotensin II receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 3521–3525, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Jalowy A, Schulz R, Dorge H, Behrends M, and Heusch G. Infarct size reduction by AT1-receptor blockade through a signal cascade of AT2-receptor activation, bradykinin and prostaglandins in pigs. J Am Coll Cardiol 32: 1787–1796, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Johren O, Dendorfer A, and Dominiak P. Cardiovascular and renal function of angiotensin II type-2 receptors. Cardiovasc Res 62: 460–467, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Jones ES, Black MJ, and Widdop RE. Angiotensin AT2 receptor contributes to cardiovascular remodelling of aged rats during chronic AT1 receptor blockade. J Mol Cell Cardiol 37: 1023–1030, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Jugdutt BI and Menon V. AT1 receptor blockade limits myocardial injury and upregulates AT2 receptors during reperfused myocardial infarction. Mol Cell Biochem 260: 111–118, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Kramer CM, Lima JAC, Reichek N, Ferrari VA, Palmon LC, Yeh IT, Tallant B, and Axel L. Regional function within noninfarcted myocardium during left ventricular remodeling. Circulation 88: 1279–1288, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lim DS, Lutucuta S, Bachireddy P, Youker K, Evans A, Entman M, Roberts R, and Marian AJ. Angiotensin II blockade reverses myocardial fibrosis in a transgenic mouse model of human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 103: 789–791, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Liu YH, Yang XP, Sharov VG, Nass O, Shabbah HN, Peterson E, and Carretero OA. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure. J Clin Invest 99: 1926–1935, 1997.[ISI][Medline]
  14. Liu YH, Yang XP, Shesely E, Sankey SS, and Carretero OA. Role of angiotensin II type 2 receptors and kinins in the cardioprotective effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 1473–1480, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Mankad S, d'Amato T, Reichek N, McGregor W, Lin J, Singh D, Rogers WJ, and Kramer CM. Combining angiotensin II receptor antagonism and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition further attenuates post-infarction left ventricular remodeling. Circulation 103: 2845–2850, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Masaki H, Kurihara T, Yamaki A, Inomata N, Nozawa Y, Mori Y, Murasawa S, Kizima K, Maruyama K, Horiuchi M, Dzau VJ, Takahashi H, Iwasaka T, Inada M, and Matsubara H. Cardiac-specific overexpression of angiotensin II AT2 receptor causes attenuated response to AT1 receptor-mediated pressor and chronotropic effects. J Clin Invest 101: 527–535, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Matsubara H. Renin-angiotensin system in human failing hearts: message from nonmyocyte cells to myocytes. Circ Res 88: 861–863, 2001.[Free Full Text]
  18. Oishi Y, Ozono R, Yano Y, Teranishi Y, Akishita M, Horiuchi M, Oshima T, and Matsubara H. Cardioprotective role of AT2 receptor in postinfarction left ventricular remodeling. Hypertension 41: 814–818, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Pfeffer MA, Lamas GA, and Vaughan DE. Effect of captopril on progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 319: 80–86, 1988.[Abstract]
  20. Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Rouleau J, Kober L, Maggioni AP, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Van de Werf F, White H, Leimberger JD, Henis M, Edwards S, Zelenkofske S, Sellers MA, Califf RM, and the Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial Investigators. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 349: 1893–1906, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ruan X, Oliviero MI, Coffman TM, and Arendshorst WJ. Renal vascular reactivity in mice: ANG II-induced vasoconstriction in AT1A receptor null mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 2620–2630, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sadoshima J, Xu Y, Slayter HS, and Izumo S. Autocrine release of angiotensin II mediates stretch-induced hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes in vitro. Cell 75: 977–984, 1993.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  23. Schneider MD and Lorell BH. AT2 judgment day: which angiotensin receptor is the culprit in cardiac hypertrophy? Circulation 104: 247–248, 2001.[Free Full Text]
  24. Varagic J, Susic D, and Frohlich ED. Coronary hemodynamic and ventricular responses to angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibition in SHR: interaction with angiotensin type 2 receptors. Hypertension 37: 1399–1403, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Widdop RE, Jones ES, Hannan RE, and Gaspari TA. Angiotensin AT2 receptors: cardiovascular hope or hype? Br J Pharmacol 140: 809–824, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  26. Wu L, Iwai M, Nakagami H, Chen R, Suzuki J, Akishita M, de Gasparo M, and Horiuchi M. Effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade on cardiac remodeling in angiotensin II type 2 receptor null mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22: 49–54, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Xu J, Carretero OA, Liu YH, Shesely E, Yang F, Kapke A, and Xang XP. Role of AT2 receptors in the cardioprotective effect of AT1 antagonists in mice. Hypertension 40: 244–250, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Yang XP, Liu YH, Mehta D, Cavasin MA, Shesely E, Xu J, Liu F, and Carretero OA. Diminished cardioprotective response to inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme and angiotensin II type 1 receptor in B2 kinin receptor gene knockout mice. Circ Res 88: 1072–1079, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yang Z, Berr SS, Gilson WD, Toufektsian MC, and French BA. Simultaneous evaluation of infarct size and cardiac function in intact mice by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals contractile dysfunction in non-infarcted regions early after myocardial infarction. Circulation 109: 1161–1167, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yang Z, Bove CM, French BA, Epstein FH, Berr SS, Dimaria JM, Gibson J, Carey RM, and Kramer CM. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor overexpression preserves left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Circulation 106: 106–111, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. C. Isbell, S. Voros, Z. Yang, J. M. DiMaria, S. S. Berr, B. A. French, F. H. Epstein, S. P. Bishop, H. Wang, R. J. Roy, et al.
Interaction between bradykinin subtype 2 and angiotensin II type 2 receptors during post-MI left ventricular remodeling
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3372 - H3378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/3/H1004    most recent
00886.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voros, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Voros, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kramer, C. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.