AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290: H1454-H1459, 2006. First published November 11, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00902.2005
0363-6135/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/4/H1454    most recent
00902.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, Z. B.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, Z. B.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. D.

Relationship among diastolic intraventricular pressure gradients, relaxation, and preload: impact of age and fitness

Zoran B. Popovic,1 Anand Prasad,2 Mario J. Garcia,1 Armin Arbab-Zadeh,2 Allen Borowski,1 Erika Dijk,2 Neil L. Greenberg,1 Benjamin D. Levine,2 and James D. Thomas1

1Cardiovascular Imaging Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and 2Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas

Submitted 23 August 2005 ; accepted in final form 8 November 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Diastolic intraventricular pressure gradients (IVPGs) are a measure of the ability of the ventricle to facilitate its filling using diastolic suction. We assessed 15 healthy young but sedentary subjects, aged <50 yr (young subjects; age, 35 ± 9 yr); 13 healthy but sedentary seniors, aged >65 yr with known reductions in ventricular compliance (elderly sedentary subjects; age, 70 ± 4 yr); and 12 master athletes, aged >65 yr, previously shown to have preserved ventricular compliance (elderly fit subjects; age, 68 ± 3 yr). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and echocardiography measurements were performed at baseline, during load manipulation by lower body negative pressure at –15 and –30 mmHg, and after saline infusion of 10 and 20 ml/kg (elderly) or 15 and 30 ml/kg (young). IVPGs were obtained from color M-mode Doppler echocardiograms. Baseline IVPGs were lower (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 2.4 ± 0.7 mmHg, P < 0.0001), and the time constant of pressure decay ({tau}0) was longer (60 ± 10 vs. 46 ± 6 ms, P < 0.0001) in elderly sedentary than in young subjects, with no difference in PCWP. Although PCWP changes during load manipulations were similar (P = 0.70), IVPG changes were less prominent in elderly sedentary than in young subjects (P = 0.02). Changes in stroke volume and IVPGs during loading manipulations correlated (r = 0.96, P = 0.0002). PCWP and {tau}0 were strong multivariate correlates of IVPGs (P < 0.001, for both). IVPG response to loading interventions in elderly sedentary and elderly fit subjects was similar (P = 0.33), despite known large differences in ventricular compliance. The ability to regulate IVPGs during changes in preload is impaired with aging. Preserving ventricular compliance during aging by lifelong exercise training does not prevent this impairment.

aging; diastolic function; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; isovolumic relaxation


THE PRESENCE OF EARLY DIASTOLIC intraventricular pressure gradients (IVPGs), defined as a discrete (positive) pressure difference between the base and apex of the heart, has been previously demonstrated in the normal left ventricle (LV) (18). IVPGs are directly related to LV relaxation parameters, such as the time constant of isovolumic relaxation ({tau}) and peak negative derivative of LV pressure (13). Studies have shown that IVPGs significantly decrease in ischemic heart disease (7, 18) and increase in response to catecholamine stimulation (13). We have recently validated a method to estimate IVPGs noninvasively, based on quantitative analysis of the spatiotemporal distribution of color M-mode Doppler velocities (8, 13, 21). Using this method, we have demonstrated that IVPGs increase during exercise and that their increase is related to maximum oxygen consumption both in normal subjects and patients with heart failure (20). Moreover, in that study (21), we found a strong inverse relationship between the increase in IVPGs and the increase in estimated left atrial (LA) pressure during exercise, suggesting that IVPGs may represent active LV suction. However, the response of IVPGs to preload-induced changes of cardiac function (i.e., Frank-Starling mechanism) with respect to ventricular compliance (9), which is a fundamental property of cardiovascular system regulation, is unknown.

Accordingly, the aims of this study were to determine 1) whether IVPGs vary in response to changes in preload; 2) whether load-induced changes in IVPGs are related to changes in stroke volume (SV); 3) whether the ability to increase IVPGs in response to preload is reduced in healthy elderly subjects with age-related changes in relaxation; and 4) whether lifelong exercise training, previously shown to preserve ventricular compliance (8), favorably impacts diastolic suction.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Study Subjects

To assess the effects of normal aging, we compared a group of 15 young, sedentary healthy volunteers <50 yr (young subjects; age, 35 ± 9 years; 12 men) with a group of 13 sedentary healthy seniors >65 yr (elderly sedentary subjects; age, 70 ± 4 yr; 7 men). The study of the characteristics of subjects has already been described in detail (1). None of the subjects were involved in an exercise-training program, and their estimated average weekly activity was <90 min of endurance exercise.

To discern whether the effects of aging on relaxation are dependent on underlying changes in ventricular compliance, we compared our elderly sedentary subjects with 12 highly trained master athletes in whom ventricular compliance has been demonstrated previously to be normal and similar to young control subjects (elderly fit; age, 68 ± 3 yr; 6 men) (1). We have already published data on the compliance of our groups on elderly fit and elderly sedentary subjects, using a three-parameter monoexponential equation that fits pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) to corresponding LV end-diastolic volume data (1). We have shown that elderly fit subjects have a LV stiffness index of 0.013 ± 0.020, which was significantly lower than 0.029 ± 0.026 detected in elderly sedentary subjects. Because stiffness is the inverse of compliance, it follows that elderly fit subjects as a group have a higher compliance than elderly sedentary subjects.

All subjects were rigorously screened for the presence of arterial hypertension, obstructive coronary artery disease, or structural heart disease, using 24-h blood pressure recordings and baseline and exercise ECGs and echocardiograms. Subjects were excluded if any of the following were present: mean daytime blood pressure >140/90 mmHg, ECG changes suggestive of ischemic heart disease, left bundle branch block, atrial flutter/fibrillation, atrioventricular block greater than first degree, baseline or exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities, valvular heart disease other than mild valvular insufficiency, right ventricular or LV hypertrophy, untreated thyroid disorders, chronic lung disease, regular cigarette smoking within the previous 10 yr, body mass index of ≥30, or use of any cardiovascular medications (e.g., beta-blockers, etc.). All subjects signed an informed consent approved by the institutional review boards of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas.

Loading Maneuvers and Hemodynamic Assessment

A 6-Fr balloon-tipped fluid-filled catheter was placed under fluoroscopic guidance through an antecubital vein into the pulmonary artery. The catheter was connected to a pressure transducer with the zero reference point set at 5 cm below the sternal angle. The wedge position of the catheter was confirmed by both fluoroscopy and the presence of typical waveforms. Mean PCWP and right atrial pressures were determined visually at the end of expiration.

Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) was applied to decrease PCWP as previously reported (16). Briefly, the subject was placed in a Plexiglas box sealed at the level of the iliac crest. The suction was provided with the use of a vacuum pump with a variable autotransformer. Measurements of PCWP, thermodilution SV, cardiac output, heart rate, and blood pressure were made after 5 min of LBNP at –15 and –30 mmHg. The negative pressure was then released. After repeated baseline measurements to confirm a return to hemodynamic steady state, cardiac filling was increased by rapid infusion (100 ml/min) of warm (37°C) isotonic saline. Measurements were repeated, after 10 and 20 ml/kg (elderly) or 15 and 30 ml/kg (young) had been infused, to attain similar increases in PCWP in both groups.

Graded Low-Level Exercise Testing

Nine (of 12) of elderly fit and 11 (of 13) of elderly sedentary subjects underwent graded low-level upright bicycle stress testing at rest and during the 5-min stages of 30 and 60 W. At each stage, we collected color M-mode data. In 10 (of 11) elderly sedentary and 7 (of 9) elderly fit subjects, the data were of satisfactory quality both at rest and at least one stage of exercise.

Echocardiographic Studies

Data acquisition. Complete two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler echocardiographic studies were performed at baseline to exclude any structural heart disease (HDI 5000, ATL, Bothel, WA). Subsequently, apical two- and four-chamber views, pulsed-wave Doppler interrogation of inflow and outflow LV tracts, and color M-mode of the LV inflow tract were performed at each stage of load protocols. Care was taken to avoid foreshortening of image views and to record images with optimal endocardial definition. All images were stored digitally for off-line analysis by a blinded, experienced observer.

Data analysis. Noninvasive measurement of IVPGs has been previously described (13). Briefly, we simplified three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible fluid flow by assuming that the viscous term is very small and can be neglected and that the gravitational force is balanced by hydrostatic buoyancy. If we consider flow along a streamline only, this results in the Euler equation (Eq. 1), in which the vector notation has been dropped because the focus has shifted to the velocity in one direction.

Formula 1(1)
where p, s, t, and v are pressure, distance, time, and velocity, respectively.

Integrating the Euler equation from the LV base to apex yields an estimate of the IVPGs (Eq. 2).

Formula 2(2)
where {Delta}PIV represents IVPG.

We applied this equation to color M-mode data, because they closely approximate the spatiotemporal velocity distribution, v(s,t), along an inflow streamline from the LV base to apex. To obtain spatiotemporal velocity distribution, digital images of the color M-mode data were calibrated by custom software developed in the LabView environment (National Instruments, Houston, TX), and the resulting 2-D matrix was used to calculate time-varying intraventricular pressure drop over a fixed 4-cm distance. The peak pressure drop during early diastole was defined as IVPG. This method was validated extensively both in animal studies and in clinical population (8, 13, 21).

The time constant of isovolumic pressure decay with a zero asymptote assumption ({tau}0) was estimated by using the following equation (26):

Formula 3(3)
where P is systolic blood pressure and IVRT is isovolumic relaxation time by echocardiography (22). To further validate this equation, we analyzed LV, LA, and aortic pressure tracings obtained by a micromanometer-tipped catheter (Millar, Houston, TX) from 1,327 individual beats recorded in seven mongrel dogs under a variety of hemodynamic conditions. We compared {tau}0 calculated from the IVRT (calculated as a time interval between LV minimum pressure derivative and mitral valve opening), peak aortic pressure, and mean LA pressure with a gold-standard time constant of isovolumic pressure decay calculated by a shifting asymptote method. Although {tau}0, as described (22), underestimates true time constant, there was a very strong correlation between the two parameters (r = 0.90, P < 0.0001; see Fig. 1), indicating that changes in {tau}0 adequately reflect changes in ventricular relaxation over a wide range of values.


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Time constant of isovolumic pressure decay ({tau}0), calculated from isovolumic relaxation time [calculated as time interval between left ventricular (LV) minimum pressure derivative and mitral valve opening]. Peak aortic and mean left atrial pressures is compared with a gold-standard time constant of isovolumic pressure decay, calculated by a shifting asymptote method ({tau}, shifting asymptote). Data were obtained by analyzing 1,327 individual beats recorded in 7 mongrel dogs under a variety of hemodynamic conditions (i.e., baseline, right ventricular pacing, LV pacing, dobutamine infusion, and esmolol infusion). Although {tau}0 underestimates a true time constant, there was a strong correlation between the two parameters (r = 0.90, P < 0.0001), indicating that changes in {tau}0 adequately reflect changes in ventricular relaxation over a wide range of values.

 
All IVPGs and pulsed-wave Doppler measurements were averaged over six consecutive beats.

Intra- and Interobserver Variability of IVPG Measurements

To assess intra- and interobserver variability of IVPG measurements, six data sets of individuals were measured twice, after a time interval of >1 mo, by the same observer and, at that time, also by a second observer blinded to the measurements of the first observer. Inter- and intraobserver variability was then quantitated as absolute and relative difference between the two measurements. Absolute intraobserver variability of measurements obtained by integrating reconstructed pulsed-wave Doppler tissue-imaging signal was 0.1 ± 0.1 mmHg (4.4 ± 3.7% for relative value). The absolute interobserver variability of measurements was 0.4 ± 0.7 mmHg (15.2 ± 21.7% for relative value).

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means ± SD, except in figures where means ± SE were used. A comparison of baseline hemodynamic parameters (e.g., R-R interval, PCWP, IVPG, and {tau}0) between young, elderly sedentary, and elderly fit subjects was performed by unpaired t-test. A comparison of change in hemodynamic parameters (calculated by summing the absolute values of the maximum change occurring during LBNP and during volume loading) between the same groups was also performed by unpaired test. The significance of a change of IVPG, R-R interval, and PCWP values during two loading interventions within studied groups was assessed by a paired t-test. Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was applied if appropriate.

To compare the impact of PCWP on IVPGs in patient groups, as well as to describe the relation between changes in IVPGs and changes in SV, we performed repeated-measures linear regression, assuming different slopes and intercepts in two subject groups (young and elderly sedentary, or elderly sedentary and elderly fit; SPSS 10.00, SPSS, Chicago, IL) (12). To assess the predictive value of PCWP and {tau}0 on IVPGs, a standard multiple stepwise linear regression was used.

Finally, for bicycle exercise testing data, within-group changes were evaluated by Wilcoxon paired test, whereas between-group differences were evaluated by Mann-Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Baseline IVPGs were 50% lower in both elderly sedentary and elderly fit subjects compared with young subjects (1.2 ± 0.4 and 1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 2.4 ± 0.7 mmHg; P < 0.002 vs. young, for both). Similarly, the time constant of pressure decay ({tau}0) was longer in both elderly sedentary and elderly fit subjects compared with young subjects (60 ± 10 and 60 ± 6 vs. 46 ± 6 ms; P < 0.0001 vs. young, for both). Baseline PCWP was similar in elderly sedentary, elderly fit, and young subjects (11 ± 2 and 10 ± 1 vs. 11 ± 2 mmHg; P > 0.05, for all comparisons). R-R interval duration was expectedly shorter in elderly sedentary and young subjects compared with elderly fit subjects (999 ± 193 ms and 987 ± 151 ms vs. 1,082 ± 156 ms; P < 0.01 vs. elderly fit, for both).

Effects of Aging and Preload on IVPG

Preload manipulations led to comparable changes of PCWP in elderly sedentary and young groups (P = 0.7). In addition, although RR interval decreased during both LBNP (by 150 ms, P < 0.001) and saline infusion (by 119 ms, P < 0.001), R-R changes in both groups were similar (P = 0.26).

IVPGs decreased with LNBP and increased with saline infusion (Fig. 2). The change of IVPG values recorded during loading interventions was twice as large in young ({Delta}IVPGs = 1.6 ± 0.3 mmHg) than in elderly sedentary ({Delta}IVPGs = 0.8 ± 0.2 mmHg, P = 0.02) subjects. Figure 2 illustrates the relation between IVPGs and PCWP in elderly sedentary versus young subjects. The IVPGs were strongly influenced by PCWP (P < 0.0001) in young but less in elderly sedentary subjects, as demonstrated by the difference in slope (P = 0.0006) and intercept (P = 0.0002) of these correlations: IVPGs = (0.069 – 0.031·Yi)·PCWP + 1.18 – 0.42·Yi, where Yi equals –1 for young subjects and 1 for elderly sedentary subjects.


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Impact of load manipulations on intraventricular pressure gradients (IVPGs) in elderly sedentary vs. young subjects. Note large difference (P < 0.0001) in slopes of IVPGs vs. pulmonary capillary wedge relationship (PCWP) in young vs. elderly subjects. Error bars represent means ± SE.

 
We found a significant correlation between changes in SV and in IVPGs (P = 0.0002) (Fig. 3) but with no effect of age on either the slope or the intercept of this relationship. The r value for linear regression of average data was 0.96, whereas the linear regression equation was {Delta}SV (in ml) = 49·{Delta}IVPGs – 6.


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relation between stroke volume (SV) change and IVPG change during preload manipulations. The r value for linear regression of average data was 0.96. Both elderly and young data group fell along same regression line. Error bars represent means ± SE.

 
A multiple linear regression showed that both PCWP (P < 0.0001) and {tau}0 (P < 0.0001) are independent predictors of IVPGs, with the multiple regression correlation coefficient r = 0.58 (P < 0.0001)(Fig. 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Three-dimensional scatterplot that shows correlation between time constant of ventricular relaxation ({tau}0, x-axis), PCWP (y-axis), and IVPG (z-axis). Data are from both elderly (solid circles) and young (open circles) subjects around the regression plane. A highly significant, moderately strong correlation was observed. Note that separation of young and elderly subjects according to their IVPG values disappears when both {tau}0 and PCWP are taken into account.

 
Diastolic Ventricular Compliance and IVPG in Aging LV.

Figure 5 illustrates the relation between IVPGs and PCWP in elderly sedentary versus elderly fit subjects. Overall, the IVPGs were strongly influenced by PCWP (P = 0.001). However, no difference between groups in either slopes (P = 0.33) or parameter intercepts (P = 0.94) could be demonstrated, indicating that an IVPG decrease with aging occurs even when passive diastolic properties remain preserved.


Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Impact of load manipulations on IVPG in elderly sedentary vs. elderly fit subjects. There was no difference in slopes of IVPGs vs. PCWP relationship between 2 groups of subjects. Error bars represent means ± SE.

 
Upright Bicycle Stresss Echocardiography.

Figure 6 displays rest and exercise testing data in elderly sedentary and elderly fit groups, along with the number of subjects at each stage. As can be seen, only three elderly sedentary subjects exercised at the stage of 60 W. The heart rates at rest, 30 W, and 60 W were 67 ± 8, 96 ± 14, and 104 ± 18 beats/min for the elderly sedentary group and 56 ± 5, 84 ± 10, and 100 ± 13 beats/min for the elderly fit group (P = 0.01 and 0.03 for the difference between groups at rest and at 30 W, respectively). IVPG increased in both groups at 30 W (P < 0.02, for both), with the increase equivalent in both groups (P = not significant); however, at 60 W, it showed a tendency to decrease in the elderly sedentary group and increase in the elderly fit group (P = 0.17).


Figure 6
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. IVPGs during exercise in 2 elderly subject groups. In both groups, IVPG significantly increased at 30 W, without significant difference between them. Although at 60 W, IVPGs remained the same in elderly fit group, IVPGs tended to decrease in elderly sedentary group.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The results of this study demonstrate that IVPGs vary directly and predictably in response to alterations in preload. Normal aging dramatically impairs this relationship, probably through age-dependent decline in relaxation, and is independent of changes in ventricular compliance. It should be emphasized that impaired sensitivity of IVPGs to preload in the sedentary elderly occurs in parallel with the already reduced ability to augment SV via the Starling mechanism. A coupling of these two phenomena may become important during exercise as when heart rate increases the ability to fill depends on the establishment of IVPGs and diastolic suction, particularly in the elderly who have reduced ventricular compliance.

Impact of Loading on Relaxation

It is well known that an increase of afterload during contraction inhibits the relaxation process (19), which may influence the basoapical pressure gradient by increasing the pressure in the regions close to the incoming fluid front. Interestingly, despite numerous studies, controversy still exist about the impact of preload on the subsequent isovolumic LV relaxation (4). Starling et al. (24) have shown that relaxation is unaffected by modest alterations in preload or afterload. Eichhorn et al. (6) built on these findings, showing that although this is valid if contractility is normal, relaxation decreases with increasing preload in the presence of heart failure. This load dependency in the presence of heart failure, however, was recently questioned (23). It has also been proposed that load-relaxation relations may be U-shaped (11).

Impact of Aging on Diastolic Function

A multitude of studies (2, 15) have described profound effects that aging exerts on LV filling patterns. Because impaired LV relaxation may bring about similar changes (27, 28), it was usually inferred that aging impairs LV relaxation. Surprisingly, the only study that directly assessed the impact of aging on invasively estimated {tau} (calculated by standard nonlinear fit methods) has not found any association between these two phenomena, although few subjects over the age of 65 were included in this study, and none were asymptomatic (30). In contrast, our current data clearly show that normal and vigorously healthy aging influences {tau}0. This indicates that aging itself invariably deteriorates calcium reuptake, as seen by slowing of relaxation (29), which in turn profoundly affects IVPG.

Aging also profoundly affects passive diastolic properties (1). It induces concentric remodeling (10), increases chamber stiffness constant, and decreases equilibrium volume (a volume at which diastolic pressure equals 0 mmHg). For the study of IVPG, equilibrium volume decrease is especially important because ventricular suction, of which IVPG is a major manifestation, depends on the ability to contract below the equilibrium volume in systole to engage passive restorative forces during relaxation. Thus aging is associated with two processes that may lead to IVPG decrease.

Impact of Loading on IVPG Development in Aging vs. Normal Human LV

Hoit et al. (14) have shown that increase of LA pressure (preload) increases peak lengthening rate while decreasing time from minimum of the change of pressure over time (dP/dtmin) to peak lengthening. Furthermore, they (14) have shown that this process is more evident in the apex of the LV. LeWinter et al. (17) have demonstrated that preload augmentation increases the difference between standard end-diastolic pressure and the pressure of the fully relaxed but nonfilling LV. Although the authors did not assess IVPGs, their data support the hypothesis that preload should directly and positively relate to IVPGs. In this study, we have shown decisively that IVPGs indeed increase with volume loading and that this phenomenon is blunted in elderly subjects with impaired relaxation. We (13), as well as others (25), have previously shown that the IVPG changes in response to alterations in inotropy and lusitropy are more significant than those related solely to an increase in preload. Interestingly, increased contractility and relaxation are associated with increased equilibrium volume. Thus increased contractility may increase restoring forces even without decreasing end-systolic volume (17), which is consistent with our data. It should be pointed out that, despite larger number of subjects, limitations of clinical research prohibit a rigorous comparison between these experimental studies and our data. The results of our study suggest that 1) IVPGs are influenced by preload, 2) LV relaxation modulates the IVPG response to preload in the normal LV, and 3) impaired relaxation with aging overrides the beneficial effect of preserved passive ventricular properties sustained by lifelong exercise training. Thus IVPGs are both influenced by LA pressure as a driving force and likely are related to changes in calcium reuptake during relaxation.

IVPGs During Exercise

We have recently shown that in heart failure IVPG increase during exercise predicts subject's aerobic capacity (20). Similarly, our current data also show that to support ventricular filling during exercise, IVPGs must increase. Although this increase was equivalent at low levels of exercise in two elderly groups, our data suggest that, to sustain higher exercise levels that elderly fit subjects are capable of sustaining, IVPGs must continue to augment. It should be pointed out that the seeming equivalence of IVPGs at low levels of exercise in the two elderly groups should be taken cautiously, because the same absolute work rate of 30 W translates into a much greater relative work rate (expressed as a percentage of peak oxygen consumption) for the sedentary subjects (1). This is further strengthened by the higher heart rate increase during exercise in elderly sedentary subjects, indicating a more potent mobilization of cardiac (catecholamine) reserve in this group.

Although we cannot separate out the cause from the effect in this study, it is certainly clear that to fill the heart fast at high filling volumes (and therefore high SVs), such as those seen in fit individuals, the large IVPGs are necessary. This is another example as to how systolic function critically interacts with diastolic function by increasing restorative forces in hearts with relatively large equilibrium volumes under high catecholamine support.

Study Limitations

We estimated preload by measuring pulmonary capillary pressure, which we use as an estimate of LA and LV end-diastolic pressure. Although end-diastolic volume represents a gold standard for measuring within-subject changes of preload, the presence of large between-group differences in resting end-diastolic volume precluded its use for group comparison (1). PCWP was equivalent among all subject groups and closely tracked the carefully quantified and induced changes in central blood volume, justifying its use as an estimate of preload in these in vivo experiments.

The differences between groups may be influenced by the differences of sympathetic activation in elderly versus young individuals (15). However, although we documented R-R interval decreases mediated by Bainbridge (during volume loading) and baroreflex (during LBNP), there was no difference in response between the two groups, and plasma norepinephrine levels were not different (1), suggesting that differences in the observed changes were not due to different activation patterns of the autonomic nervous system. Also, some differences may have been mediated by LV remodeling that occurs with aging (10). Finally, not all sedentary subjects could complete the higher work rate, producing an incomplete assessment of the importance of IVPGs in elderly subjects during exercise.

Clinical Implications

An increase of IVPGs in the setting of a preload challenge may be viewed as a physiologically important phenomenon that would imply that the LV appropriately modulates its function to increase output in response to increased venous return while limiting the increase in LA pressure. It is known that the incidence of diastolic dysfunction increases with aging (3). Furthermore, it is known that filling pressures during exercise increase more in elderly individuals (5). Thus it is possible that the IVPG decrease that occurs with aging may be a contributing mechanism to these phenomena.

In conclusion, we have shown that IVPGs are modulated by central blood volume and preload and that this preload modulation is attenuated in elderly individuals with documented abnormalities in relaxation independent of the preservation of ventricular compliance that occurs with lifelong endurance training. This may be a contributing physiological mechanism to an inordinate diastolic pressure rise under a preload challenge in elderly individuals.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by National Institute on Aging Grant AG-17479-02.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. D. Thomas, Dept. of Cardiology, Desk F-15, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, Ohio 44195 (e-mail: thomasj{at}ccf.org)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Arbab-Zadeh A, Dijk E, Prasad A, Fu Q, Torres P, Zhang R, Thomas JD, Palmer D, and Levine BD. Effect of aging and physical activity on left ventricular compliance. Circulation 110: 1799–1805, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Anderson KM, Wolf PA, Plehn JF, Evans JC, Comai K, Fuller DL, and Sutton MS. Determinants of Doppler indexes of left ventricular diastolic function in normal subjects (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 70: 508–515, 1992.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Braunwald E. Shattuck lecture–cardiovascular medicine at the turn of the millennium: triumphs, concerns, and opportunities. N Engl J Med 337: 1360–1369, 1997.[Free Full Text]
  4. Cheng CP, Freeman GL, Santamore WP, Constantinescu MS, and Little WC. Effect of loading conditions, contractile state, and heart rate on early diastolic left ventricular filling in conscious dogs. Circ Res 66: 814–823, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ehrsam RE, Perruchoud A, Oberholzer M, Burkart F, and Herzog H. Influence of age on pulmonary haemodynamics at rest and during supine exercise. Clin Sci (Lond) 65: 653–660, 1983.[Medline]
  6. Eichhorn EJ, Willard JE, Alvarez L, Kim AS, Glamann DB, Risser RC, and Grayburn PA. Are contraction and relaxation coupled in patients with and without congestive heart failure? Circulation 85: 2132–2139, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Falsetti HL, Verani MS, Chen CJ, and Cramer JA. Regional pressure differences in the left ventricle. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 6: 123–134, 1980.[ISI][Medline]
  8. Firstenberg MS, Smedira NG, Greenberg NL, Prior DL, McCarthy PM, Garcia MJ, and Thomas JD. Relationship between early diastolic intraventricular pressure gradients, an index of elastic recoil, and improvements in systolic and diastolic function. Circulation 104: I330–I335, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Fuchs F and Smith SH. Calcium, cross-bridges, and the Frank-Starling relationship. News Physiol Sci 16: 5–10, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ganau A, Saba PS, Roman MJ, de Simone G, Realdi G, and Devereux RB. Ageing induces left ventricular concentric remodelling in normotensive subjects. J Hypertens 13: 1818–1822, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
  11. Gillebert TC, Leite-Moreira AF, and De Hert SG. Relaxation-systolic pressure relation. A load-independent assessment of left ventricular contractility. Circulation 95: 745–752, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Glantz SA and Slinker BK. Analysis of Variance and Multiple Regression. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990, p. 491–493.
  13. Greenberg NL, Vandervoort PM, Firstenberg MS, Garcia MJ, and Thomas JD. Estimation of diastolic intraventricular pressure gradients by Doppler M-mode echocardiography. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H2507–H2515, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hoit BD, LeWinter M, and Lew WY. Independent influence of left atrial pressure on regional peak lengthening rates. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 259: H480–H487, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lakatta EG and Levy D. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: part II: the aging heart in health: links to heart disease. Circulation 107: 346–354, 2003.[Free Full Text]
  16. Levine BD, Lane LD, Buckey JC, Friedman DB, and Blomqvist CG. Left ventricular pressure-volume and Frank-Starling relations in endurance athletes. Implications for orthostatic tolerance and exercise performance. Circulation 84: 1016–1023, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. LeWinter MM, Fabian J, and Bell SP. Left ventricular restoring forces: modulation by heart rate and contractility. Basic Res Cardiol 93, Suppl 1: 143–147, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Ling D, Rankin JS, Edwards CH II, McHale PA, and Anderson RW. Regional diastolic mechanics of the left ventricle in the conscious dog. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 236: H323–H330, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Nikolic S, Yellin EL, Tamura K, Vetter H, Tamura T, Meisner JS, and Frater RW. Passive properties of canine left ventricle: diastolic stiffness and restoring forces. Circ Res 62: 1210–1222, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rovner A, Greenberg NL, Thomas JD, and Garcia MJ. Relationship of diastolic intraventricular pressure gradients and aerobic capacity in patients with heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2081–H2088, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Rovner A, Smith R, Greenberg NL, Tuzcu EM, Smedira N, Lever HM, Thomas JD, and Garcia MJ. Improvement in diastolic intraventricular pressure gradients in patients with HOCM after ethanol septal reduction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285: H2492–H2499, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Scalia GM, Greenberg NL, McCarthy PM, Thomas JD, and Vandervoort PM. Noninvasive assessment of the ventricular relaxation time constant (tau) in humans by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 95: 151–155, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Senzaki H, Fetics B, Chen CH, and Kass DA. Comparison of ventricular pressure relaxation assessments in human heart failure: quantitative influence on load and drug sensitivity analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 34: 1529–1536, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Starling MR, Montgomery DG, Mancini GB, and Walsh RA. Load independence of the rate of isovolumic relaxation in man. Circulation 76: 1274–1281, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Steine K, Stugaard M, and Smiseth O. Mechanisms of diastolic intraventricular regional pressure differences and flow in the inflow and outflow tracts. J Am Coll Cardiol 40: 983, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Thomas JD, Flachskampf FA, Chen C, Guererro JL, Picard MH, Levine RA, and Weyman AE. Isovolumic relaxation time varies predictably with its time constant and aortic and left atrial pressures: implications for the noninvasive evaluation of ventricular relaxation. Am Heart J 124: 1305–1313, 1992.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Thomas JD, Newell JB, Choong CY, and Weyman AE. Physical and physiological determinants of transmitral velocity: numerical analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 260: H1718–H1731, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Thomas JD and Weyman AE. Numerical modeling of ventricular filling. Ann Biomed Eng 20: 19–39, 1992.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Varma N, Morgan JP, and Apstein CS. Mechanisms underlying ischemic diastolic dysfunction: relation between rigor, calcium homeostasis, and relaxation rate. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284: H758–H771, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yamakado T, Takagi E, Okubo S, Imanaka-Yoshida K, Tarumi T, Nakamura M, and Nakano T. Effects of aging on left ventricular relaxation in humans. Analysis of left ventricular isovolumic pressure decay. Circulation 95: 917–923, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. M. Riordan and S. J. Kovacs
Absence of diastolic mitral annular oscillations is a marker for relaxation-related diastolic dysfunction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2952 - H2958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z. B. Popovic, K. E. Richards, N. L. Greenberg, A. Rovner, J. Drinko, Y. Cheng, M. S. Penn, K. Fukamachi, N. Mal, B. D. Levine, et al.
Scaling of diastolic intraventricular pressure gradients is related to filling time duration
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H762 - H769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figure
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/4/H1454    most recent
00902.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, Z. B.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, Z. B.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.