AJP - Heart AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H283-H295, 2006. First published February 17, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01347.2005
0363-6135/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/1/H283    most recent
01347.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sankaranarayanan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kassab, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sankaranarayanan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kassab, G. S.

Analysis of blood flow in an out-of-plane CABG model

Meena Sankaranarayanan,1 Dhanjoo N. Ghista,2 Chua Leok Poh,1 Tan Yong Seng,3 and Ghassan S. Kassab4

1School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and 2Bioengineering Division, Nanyang Technological University; 3Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart Centre, Singapore; and 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California

Submitted 20 December 2005 ; accepted in final form 14 February 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is a routine surgical treatment for ischemic and infarcted myocardium. A large number of CABG fail postoperatively because of intimal hyperplasia within months or years. The cause of this failure is thought to be partly related to the flow patterns and shear stresses acting on the endothelial cells. An accurate representation of the flow field and associated wall shear stress (WSS) requires a detailed three-dimensional (3D) model of the CABG. The purpose of this study is to present a detailed analysis of blood flow in a 3D aorto/left CABG, bypassing the occluded left anterior descending coronary (LAD) artery. The analysis takes into account the influence of the out-of-plane geometry of the graft. The finite volume technique was employed to model the 3D blood flow pattern to determine the velocity and WSS distributions. This study presents the flow field distributions of the velocity and WSS at four instances of the cardiac cycle, two in systole and two in diastole. Our results reveal that the CABG geometry has a significant effect on the velocity distribution. The axial velocity profiles at different instances of the cardiac cycle exhibit strong skewing; significant secondary flow and vortex structures are seen in the in-plane velocity patterns. The maximum WSS on the bed of the occluded LAD artery opposite to the graft junction is 14 Pa in middiastole, whereas there is a significantly lower and more uniform distribution of WSS on the bed of the anastomosis. The present results indicate that nonplanarity of the blood vessel along with the inflow conditions has a substantial effect on the fluid mechanics of CABG that contribute to the patency of graft.

coronary artery bypass graft; three-dimensional flow; computational fluid dynamics; wall shear stress; graft patency


ATHEROSCLEROSIS is a major disease of arterial blood vessels. The epicardial coronary arteries are very susceptible to atherosclerosis and plaque formation. The inflammatory disease process causes blockage of blood flow to the heart muscle and is a major cause of mortality and morbidity today. The coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is a common surgical procedure that reroutes blood flow around a blocked artery through a conduit. According to the American Heart Association, the number of CABG procedures in the United States was more than 600,000 (1.2 million worldwide) in the year 2000, which is twice that of 1986.

Despite CABG being an effective surgical procedure, it has been reported that >50% of the grafts fail because of restenosis caused by arterial disease (6, 25). Although the mechanism of this disease is unclear, there are several possible reasons, including compliance mismatch between the graft and the artery (1, 9, 31), local hemodynamic effects of disturbed flow patterns, magnitude and direction of wall shear stress (WSS) (4), and graft incompatibility (21). Because the prone disease sites are near bends and junctions of graft with the host vessel (14), it is likely that hemodynamic factors such as WSS magnitude and direction play a vital role in atherogenesis.

An accurate assessment of WSS requires a faithful simulation of the velocity field. Numerous studies have determined the flow streamlines in patient-specific models of CABG (11, 15, 24). Despite the insight gained from these studies, an integrative model that takes into account all three elements does not exist: 1) the complete bypass flow domain, 2) measured physiological inlet flow conditions, and 3) nonplanarity of the bypass graft vessel. The objective of the present study is to present such an integrated model.

The present study addresses and ameliorates that the three-dimensional (3D) out-of-plane CABG geometry is an important determinant of the flow velocity and hence WSS. Our results support the view that the nonplanarity of the graft vessel is an important determinant of the average level of WSS and its variability on the bed of the stenosed left anterior descending (LAD) artery. Hence, a properly contoured (out-of-plane) graft may contribute to improved graft patency.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
Geometrical Model

The model simulation of the flow field of the anastomosis in aorto/left CABG is illustrated in Fig. 1A. The ascending aorta (AB) is considered to have a length of 80 mm with a diameter of 25 mm. The right coronary artery (RCA) (C, depicted in Fig. 1A) has a circular cross section with a 3.2-mm diameter, and the left main coronary artery (LCA; D, appearing diametrically opposite to the RCA) has a circular cross section with a 4-mm diameter. The LAD is assumed to be a straight cylindrical tube with diameter and length of 3.2 and 45 mm, respectively. The proximal portion of the LAD (FG) is assumed to be fully occluded.


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A: schematic of out-of-plane aorto/left coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) model that includes 1) ascending aorta AB; 2) right coronary artery (RCA) inlet C; 3) left coronary artery (LCA) inlet D; 4) nonplanar bypass graft vessel EF; and 5) 100% proximally occluded left anterior descending (LAD) artery GH. B: CABG model illustrates different cross sections of 1) aorta, namely, A (Ai, i = 1, 4) and B; 2) graft, namely, Gi i = 1, 6; and 3) LAD artery, namely, Ci, i = 1, 4.

 
The venous graft is simulated as a nonplanar vessel of circular cross section with diameter of 4 mm. It originates from the aorta at E and anastomosis with the LAD at F (Fig. 1A). The intersection between the graft and the LAD artery has an elliptical shape that is caused by the deformation of the larger-diameter graft because of its sutured attachment to the smaller LAD vessel. The overall dimensions of the total aorto/left CABG model are based on surgical observations. Specifically, the mean diameter, length, and angle of several clinical cases (patients who had undergone LAD bypass using sapheneous vein) were obtained with the use of a 16-slice computerized tomography coronary angiogram. Figure 1B illustrates the different cross sections of 1) the aorta [A, Ai (i = 1, 4) and B] with A corresponding to the aortic inlet and B to that of the ascending aorta exit; 2) CABG (Gi, i = 1, 6), with G1 corresponding to the first section close to the proximal anastomotic junction and G6 close to the distal anastomotic junction; and 3) the LAD artery (Ci, i = 1, 4) with C1 just after the distal anastomotic junction and C4 closest to the exit of the LAD. The flow characteristics that include the axial velocity profiles/in-plane velocity vectors (depicting the secondary flow patterns) are displayed on the above mentioned sections of the CABG model.

Model Assumptions, Data Input, and Boundary Conditions

The blood is assumed to be an incompressible, Newtonian fluid with a dynamic viscosity (µ) of 0.00408 Pa·s and a density ({rho}) of 1,050 kg/m3. The blood vessel walls are assumed to be rigid and impermeable. For a 3D flow, the conservation of mass and linear momentum are expressed by the equations of continuity and Navier-Stokes, respectively, as

Formula 1(1)

Formula 2(2)
where p denotes pressure and Formula 2 denotes velocity vector in three dimensions. The velocity distributions are obtained as a solution to the governing equations for the appropriate boundary conditions defined below. The flow field is automatically updated during each time interval by adopting measured time-varying input data of the aorta (Fig. 2A), the ascending aorta (Fig. 2B), the LAD artery (Fig. 2C), the left circumflex artery (LCX; Fig. 2D), and the RCA (Fig. 2E). In this study, we have assumed that the total flow in the LCA is the sum of flows in the LAD and LCX (Fig. 2F). Because the LAD has been bypassed, the flow entering the LCX must be equal to the flow in LCA. Hence, in this study, the measured LCX flow waveform (Fig. 2D) has been imposed at the LCA entrance. Once the velocity field is computed, the WSS is computed as the product of viscosity and the radial gradient of the velocity.


Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. A: flow-rate waveform at inlet A of aorta (obtained from Ref. 13), where t is measured from start of ejection phase. B: calculated flow-rate waveform at ascending aorta B. C: flow-rate waveform at distal end of LAD artery H, derived from velocity measurements performed by using phase contrast MRI scanning (30). D: flow-rate waveform at left circumflex (LCX) artery derived from velocity measurements performed by using phase contrast MRI scanning (30). E: flow-rate waveform at entrance C of RCA, measured by using a Doppler flowmeter catheter (22). F: flow-rate waveform at LCA D, obtained as a sum of flow-rate waveforms of LAD and LCX arteries.

 
Boundary Conditions

Systolic phase. The systolic flow is obtained by prescribing a blunt velocity profile (along the cross section) at the inlet to the aorta, from the left ventricle (LV). The velocity magnitude is computed from the physiologically measured stroke volume over the ejection period based on the flow wave form (13) as shown in Fig. 2A. During this period, the extravascular myocardial compression of the coronary circulation reduces the blood flow through the coronary arteries significantly.

During systole, the inputs to the model consist of 1) a blunt velocity derived from the time-varying flow-rate waveform (QA) at the inlet A (shown in Fig. 1A) of the aorta (depicted in Fig. 2A) as adopted from Ref. 13; 2) the calculated time-varying flow-rate waveform (QB) at the exit B from the ascending aorta (Fig. 2B); 3) the time-varying flow-rate waveform (QH) at the distal end H (shown in Fig. 1A) of the LAD artery (Fig. 2C), as derived from the mean velocity waveform obtained from phase contrast MRI scanning (30); 4) the time-varying flow-rate waveform (QD) (Fig. 2D) at the LCA entrance D (shown in Fig. 1A) is equal to the flow rate in LCX (Fig. 2D), obtained by phase contrast MRI scan (30); and 5) the time-varying flow-rate waveform (QC) imposed at the entrance C (shown in Fig. 1A) of the RCA (Fig. 2E), as obtained by means of a Doppler flowmeter catheter (22).

Diastolic phase. At the start of diastole, there exists a small amount of back flow into the LV through the aortic inlet as depicted in Fig. 2A. During the diastolic phase, the aortic valve remains closed, and it is the back flow from the ascending aorta (Fig. 2B) that perfuses the coronary arteries. Figure 2, CF, reveals that the majority of the flow enters the LCA, which is in agreement with earlier works (23, 32). It can be noted that the perfusion to the coronary arteries is much greater during diastolic phase as compared with the systolic phase as shown in Fig. 2, A–F. This implies that the coronary vascular resistance in the left coronary circulation is significantly lower than that of the right.

In summary, the data input to the model consists of 1) the calculated blunt velocity profile at the ascending aorta (Fig. 2B) and 2) the flow conditions at the LAD exit and LCA and RCA entrances obtained from time-varying input flow-rate waveforms (Fig. 2, CE).

Fluid Dynamics Simulation

The fluid dynamics simulations are performed by using a control volume-based computational technique, implemented in the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code Fluent (Fluent User’s Guide, Fluent, Lebanon, NH). The computation procedure of the commercial code consists of several steps: 1) construction of the geometry with the use of a preprocessor, Gambit (Gambit User’s Guide, Fluent); 2) meshing the computational domain; 3) assigning boundary conditions (at A, B, C, D, and H) in terms of velocities and flow-rate weightings, i.e., flow rate normalized with respect to the entrance flow rate; 4) assigning fluid properties (viscosity and density); and 5) prescribing the solution algorithm.

The geometry of the aorto/left CABG model was constructed in Gambit by using the mean dimensions obtained from clinical cases. The elements employed to mesh the computational domain consist primarily of regular structured hexahedral elements as well as wedge elements wherever necessary (such as at proximal and distal junctions of the graft).

To carry out the mesh sensitivity analysis, numerical simulations were carried out by varying the number of grid cells in the computational domain. In the computational domain, the mesh sensitivity on the flow variables (velocity and WSS) was tested by varying the number of grid cells (namely, 65,390; 92,330; 213,324; 388,900; and 509,350). The velocity profile results obtained from different grid cells are displayed along the vertical center line of the graft section (G5) and the LAD artery section (C1) in Fig. 3, A and B. It was found that the computational domain of 388,900 cells was sufficient.


Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. A: velocity profiles obtained from different grid cells along vertical center line in graft section (G5), B: velocity profiles obtained from different grid cells along vertical center line in section of LAD artery (C1).

 
In the solution algorithm used by Fluent, the governing equations (conservation of mass and linear momentum) were solved sequentially. Because the governing equations are nonlinear (and coupled), several iterations of the solution loop were needed before a convergent solution was obtained. With the use of this approach, the resultant algebraic equations for the dependent variables (namely the velocities) in each control volume were solved sequentially by a point implicit (Gauss Seidel) linear equation solver in conjunction with an algebraic multigrid method. The governing equations were solved iteratively until convergence of all flow variables was achieved. The solutions for all the flow variables were deemed to converge once their residuals were below the set convergence criterion of 10–5. There were no differences in the simulation results when the convergence criterion was set at 10–6.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
Simulations were carried out at various time instants of the cardiac cycle. Herein we depict the simulation results at 1) start of ejection (t = 0.0 s), 2) midejection (t = 0.15 s), 3) early diastole (t = 0.32 s), and 4) middiastole (t = 0.57 s). At these time instants, the flow velocity, secondary flow motion, and WSS distributions were determined.

The axial velocity profiles in the vessels (aorta, graft, and LAD artery) were computed along the vertical and horizontal center lines at all cross sections depicted in Fig. 1B. The in-plane velocity vectors were computed at specific sections of 1) the aorta, at A1 and A3 (as shown in Fig. 1B) located at distances of 10 and 40 mm from the aortic inlet, respectively; 2) the graft, at G1 (close to the proximal anastomosis junction) and G5 (close to the distal anastomosis junction); and 3) the LAD artery, at C1 and C4 located at 20 and 40 mm from the proximal end of the artery GH, respectively.

Systole Phase

During systole, blood flows in the forward direction from the LV into the ascending aorta and into the coronary arteries. This is termed as forward flow.

Start of ejection (t = 0.0 s). To capture the flow features, the computed axial velocity profiles (in the aorta, graft, and LAD artery) along both the horizontal and vertical center lines (at all cross sections of the flow domain) are illustrated in Fig. 4, AF. In Fig. 4, A and B, it can be seen that the blunt velocity profile assigned at the aortic inlet slowly changes to a parabolic profile as blood flows downstream in the ascending aorta. In the aorta, the axial velocity distribution along the horizontal center line results in an M-shaped profile because of the influence of the flow entering the RCA. This double-peaked velocity profile gradually changes to a somewhat parabolic profile with increasing distance from the aortic entrance (section A).


Figure 4
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Axial velocity at start of ejection (t = 0.0 s). A: axial velocity profiles (m/s) extracted along horizontal center line of all cross sections of aorta. Blunt velocity profile changes to a parabolic profile with increasing distance from aortic inlet. M-shaped velocity profiles seen in A1 and A3 are due to effects of two junctions, namely, RCA and proximal anastomotic junction, respectively. B: axial velocity profiles computed along vertical center line of aorta sections exhibit a slight skewing toward top wall of aorta as a result of junction effects. C: axial velocity profiles in graft sections are parabolic with slight variations seen in velocity magnitude along different sections. D: vertical center line axial velocity profiles in the graft exhibit slight skewing due to effect of curvature of graft vessel. E: axial velocity profiles in different LAD sections are parabolic. F: vertical center line axial velocity plot indicates that blood flows in LAD vessel with a constant velocity except with a slight difference seen on C1 due to effect of distal anastomotic junction. G: in-plane velocity vector components (m/s) in A1 exhibit symmetric vortices close to top wall. H: similar behavior in the in-plane velocity vector pattern is observed in A3. I: vector components are all directed toward inner (I) vessel wall of graft section G1. J: in-plane velocity vector components shift from inner to outer (O) wall as seen in G5 due to curvature effects of graft. K: small recirculation region observed in center of C1 of LAD vessel. L: bicellular patterns of negligible velocity magnitude observed in section C4 reflecting symmetric nature of flow.

 
It can be noted that as the flow progresses further downstream in the aorta, the effect of the proximal anastomotic junction does not significantly affect the velocity profile because there is only a very small amount of flow entering the graft (Fig. 4A). In Fig. 4B, the computed axial velocity profiles along the vertical line exhibit a slight skewing toward the top wall of the aorta, which is due to the junction effects. In the graft, it is noted (Fig. 4, C and D) that as blood flow progresses from the proximal junction of the graft to the distal end, the axial velocity exhibits a parabolic profile with slight skewing. Figure 4, E and F, depicts the velocity profiles at different sections in the LAD artery.

Figure 4, GL, depicts the in-plane flow field in terms of the in-plane velocity vectors at specific sections of the vessels mentioned in Geometrical Model. Figure 4, G and H, shows the computed secondary-flow vector fields in the cross-sectional plane of the aorta at A1 and A3. In Fig. 4G, symmetric vortices are observed close to the top wall, whereas the rest of the core flow is directed upward; this may be due to some flow entering into the RCA junction. On section A3 (after the proximal anastomotic junction), a similar pattern is observed in Fig. 4H with a slightly decreased peak velocity magnitude. In the graft section G1, the in-plane velocity vectors (depicted in Fig. 4I) are all directed toward the inner wall. As flow progresses downstream, the flow direction at section G5 (as depicted in Fig. 4J) changes from the inner to the outer wall of the graft because of the curvature of the vessel. The flow distribution at section C1 of the LAD artery immediately after the distal anstomotic junction, in Fig. 4K, depicts a small recirculation region at the center of the cross section; herein, the flow is skewed toward the bed of the artery. On reaching the distal end of the LAD artery (section C4), the secondary flow weakens and the flow is purely in the axial direction, as seen in Fig. 4L.

The flow velocity distributions result in WSS distributions depicted in Figs. 5, A and B. The flow disturbances due to the junction effects result in steep velocity gradients around the RCA entrance C and the proximal anastomotic junction E. Hence, the maximum WSS (~0.58 Pa) occurs at the proximal anastomotic junction, as depicted in Fig. 5A. Large spatial variation in WSS is also seen in the body of the graft (close to the region where the curvature of graft changes), which may be attributed to the skewing of flow as a result of the curvature effect. The magnitude of WSS around the distal anastomotic junction ranges from 0.30 to 0.41 Pa, whereas the toe experiences a WSS of magnitude 0.27 Pa. As the proximal portion (FG) of the LAD vessel is completely occluded, the flow is stagnant, with negligible WSS. When compared with the distal junction, the floor of the artery is subjected to a low (and uniformly distributed) WSS of magnitude 0.24 Pa (Fig. 5B).


Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. A: wall shear stress (WSS) distribution (in Pa) at start of ejection (t = 0.0 s). Peak magnitude of WSS (0.58 Pa) is present at proximal anastomotic junction. Through the aortic domain, WSS is negligible with an exception around the RCA entrance, where WSS is ~0.35 Pa due to flow disturbance. B: toe region experiences an appreciable WSS of magnitude 0.27 Pa compared with heel, where it is nearly zero due to stagnation of flow. WSS is uniformly distributed along bed of LAD with magnitude of 0.24 Pa.

 
Midejection (t = 0.15 s). During midacceleration, the blood enters the aorta with a very high velocity magnitude of ~0.85 m/s (compared to 0.04 m/s at the start of ejection). This instant corresponds to the maximum flow in the ascending aorta during the cardiac cycle. In Fig. 6, A and B, the computed axial velocity profiles at different sections of the aorta exhibit a blunt profile, with a slight variation in the magnitude of peak velocity. As expected, the magnitude of the peak velocity increases as the flow proceeds toward the ascending aorta. The flow in the core region has a blunt profile throughout the flow domain (Fig. 6, A and B), similar to an inviscid flow. In the graft,significant skewing of the axial velocity profiles is seen at the different sections of the graft (Fig. 6, C and D). The curvature of the graft vessel results in skewing of the flow toward the outer wall. In Fig. 6C, it is seen that as blood flows toward the distal anastomotic junction, the peak velocity gets skewed toward the inner graft wall. The distal junction effects along with the nonplanarity of the graft are reflected in the axial velocity profiles. In the LAD artery, it is observed (Fig. 6, E and F) that, initially, the velocity profile is skewed toward the bed of the artery and becomes more uniform downstream.


Figure 6
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Axial velocity at midejection (t = 0.15 s). A: axial velocity profiles at different sections of the aorta are all similar in shape to blunt velocity profile assigned at aortic inlet A. Blood from LV ejects with a high velocity (0.83 m/s). B: vertical center line plots exhibit a similar profile except with a slight variation in velocity magnitude. Most of flow goes into ascending aorta with a small amount entering RCA, LCA, and graft. C: horizontal center line axial velocity profiles in graft sections exhibit skewing initially toward outer graft wall, whereas downstream, flow gets skewed toward inner graft wall because of the presence of curvature. D: similar pattern is observed in vertical center line profiles except with a change in magnitude of axial velocity in different vessel sections. E: axial velocity plots along horizontal center line of LAD sections depict a parabolic profile. Presence of distal anastomotic junction causes a shift in peak velocity in axial velocity profile in C1. F: axial velocity profiles extracted along vertical center line of LAD sections. G: in-plane velocity vectors on A1 are directed toward top wall. H: magnitude of in-plane velocity vectors on A3 are similar to that seen on A1. I: in-plane velocity vector components in G1 are directed toward inner graft wall. J: there is a change in flow direction on reaching G5. Although amount of flow entering graft is less during systole, curvature effects contribute to this swirling of blood. K: LAD artery section C1 exhibits a bicellular flow pattern with one vortex of negligible strength as compared with the other reflecting skewing of velocity profiles. L: bicellular pattern changes to a unicellular pattern as we move from C1 to C4.

 
Figure 6, G and H, depicts that the in-plane velocity vector components in the sections of the aorta are all directed toward the top wall (caused by the flow diversion into the RCA and the graft). The in-plane velocity vector components in the graft sections G1 and G5 are depicted in Fig. 6, IJ. Figure 6K reveals counterrotating vortices in the LAD artery section C1, with the peak velocity being on the floor of the artery. On reaching the LAD exit, the bicellular secondary flow pattern gradually changes to a single vortex pattern (as seen in section C4) of negligible magnitude as depicted in Fig. 6L; i.e., it tends toward developed flow.

The corresponding WSS distributions at the proximal and distal junctions of the graft are shown in Fig. 7, A and B. The blunt axial velocity profiles result in a uniform WSS magnitude of ~2.16 Pa in the aorta. Sites of peak WSS (6.185 Pa) are at the RCA and graft junctions (Fig. 7A) due to high velocity gradients at these sites. At the distal anastomotic region, the WSS at the toe is ~0.62 Pa. The WSS along the bed of the LAD artery is almost uniformly distributed (at 0.45 Pa), as seen in Fig. 7B.


Figure 7
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. A: WSS distribution (in Pa) at midejection (t = 0.15 s). Steep velocity gradients observed near RCA entrance and proximal anastomotic junction result in maximum WSS (6.18 Pa). At all other regions in aortic domain where blood behaves like an inviscid flow, WSS is almost uniform, with a magnitude of ~2.16 Pa. B: WSS magnitude in the bed of LAD vessel is ~0.43 Pa, which is smaller than in toe region (0.62 Pa). Nonplanarity of graft vessel results in a uniform WSS distribution along the bed of LAD artery.

 
Diastole Phase

During diastole, the back flow enters the ascending aorta at B (Fig. 1B) because of the elastic recoil of the aortic wall. The flow profiles are hence depicted with a negative sign to indicate the reverse in the flow direction.

Start of diastole (t = 0.32 s). At this point, there is only a small amount of back flow from the ascending aorta into the LV (through the aortic valve). Thereafter, the reverse pressure gradient on the aortic valve leaflets (protruding into the coronary sinus) makes the valve close quickly and allows only a small amount of blood flow back into the LV. A blunt velocity profile is prescribed at the ascending aorta exit B. As the flow progresses from B (shown in Fig. 1B) into the ascending aorta, the axial velocity profile gradually increases in magnitude, as depicted in Fig. 8, A and B.


Figure 8
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Axial velocity at start of diastole (t = 0.32 s). A: blood flows from ascending aorta into coronary arteries and because aortic valve is not fully closed, there is a small amount entering LV. Flow profiles are depicted with a negative sign to indicate change in flow direction. Blunt profile gradually begins to develop as flow progresses toward aortic inlet. B: different sections of the aorta exhibit a similar trend in axial velocity profile when extracted along horizontal center line. Most of flow enters coronaries, especially LAD artery (through graft). C: blood enters graft with a high flow rate. This along with nonplanarity of graft vessel results in considerable skewing. D: pronounced movement of blood from outer vessel to inner graft vessel is observed. E: presence of M-shaped profiles in LAD artery sections in C1 and C2 are due to high flow coming out of distal anastomotic junction. F: predominant skewing of the axial velocity profiles is observed along the bed of LAD artery seen in C1 and C2. As flow progresses downstream toward LAD artery exit, maximum velocity shifts and flow pattern exhibits symmetry. G: in-plane velocity components in A3 are directed toward top wall as a result of suction effect caused by proximal anastomotic junction. H: presence of RCA and LCA results in the in-plane velocity vector components skewed to either side. More blood goes into LCA than RCA, thus showing peak velocity directed toward bottom wall. I: high flow rate in graft along with curvature of vessel wall causes skewing of the in-plane velocity vector components in G1. J: movement of flow from top to bottom is observed reflecting the presence of second bend in graft vessel. Skewing of the in-plane velocities toward bottom portion of outer wall results in a small region of recirculation near top wall. K: C1 exhibits counterrotating vortices of comparable magnitude reflecting M-shaped profile of axial velocity. L: a small region of recirculation is seen in section C4. This indicates that flow is almost parabolic in nature as observed in axial velocity plot.

 
The velocity profiles in the graft (Fig. 8, C and D) exhibit considerable skewing. The double curvature of the graft vessel results in change in the skewness of the velocity profile from the outer to inner wall as shown in Fig. 8, C and D. Figure 8E shows that the M-shaped velocity profiles at sections C1 and C2 changes to quasi-parabolic profiles at downstream sections C3 and C4. Prominent skewing of the axial velocity profiles toward the floor of the artery is observed along the vertical center line in Fig. 8F.

Because the flow advances in the ascending aorta from B toward the aortic inlet, the in-plane velocity vector components are first displayed at section A3, followed by A1 (between the RCA and the proximal anastomotic junction) in Fig. 8, G and H. On approaching the proximal anastomotic graft junction E, the suction effect is felt on the in-plane velocity vector components, thereby pulling the velocity vectors toward the top wall as seen in Fig. 8G. It is evident from Fig. 8H that the amount of flow entering the LCA is relatively higher than the flow entering the RCA, thereby directing more flow toward the bottom wall. The significant skewing of the axial velocity profiles (Fig. 8, C and D) is reflected in the in-plane velocity vectors shown in Fig. 8, I and J. In the graft, the velocity vectors (Fig. 8I) are directed toward the inner wall and the top portion of the graft vessel. Figure 8J depicts a small region of recirculation in the graft section G5. In the LAD artery sections (C1 and C4), the secondary flow patterns (Fig. 8, K and L) are qualitatively similar to those observed at the earlier time instant (t = 0.15 s).

The corresponding WSS distributions are shown in Fig. 9, A and B. Negligible WSS is seen in the aortic domain, with the aorta-graft junction depicting a high WSS of ~5.0 Pa (Fig. 9A.) The WSS at the bed of the artery opposite to the distal junction (in Fig. 9B) is relatively high (6.0 Pa) as compared with that at the toe region (~1.5 Pa). This is expected due to the impingement of blood on the floor of the artery.


Figure 9
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. A: WSS distribution (in Pa) at early diastole (t = 0.32 s). During diastole, most of flow enters the coronaries, especially the LCA. WSS is negligible in the aortic domain. Blood entering the nonplanar graft vessel with a high flow rate experiences steep velocity gradients that result in high WSS (5.5 Pa). B: bed of artery just opposite to distal anastomotic junction experiences a higher WSS of ~6.0 Pa compared with that at toe (~1.5 Pa).

 
Middiastole (t = 0.57 s). At this instant, the aortic valve remains closed and the majority of the back flow comes into the ascending aorta and enters into the graft vessel, with the remainder perfusing the LCA and RCA. Figure 10, A and B, shows the axial velocity distributions at different cross sections of the aorta along the horizontal and vertical center lines, respectively. With increasing distance from B, it is noted that the blunt profile (Fig. 10A) becomes parabolic. It is interesting to observe (Fig. 10B) that at section A2 (50 mm from B), the axial velocity distribution exhibits a "bidirectional behavior." This bidirectional behavior may be due to the strong suction of the branching flow into the graft.


Figure 10
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Axial velocity at middiastole (t = 0.57 s). A: axial velocity profiles extracted along horizontal center line of different sections of aorta changes from blunt profile to an almost parabolic profile. B: junction effects are strongly reflected in axial velocity profiles extracted along vertical line of different sections of aorta. Profile in A2 exhibit a bidirectional behavior, indicating that majority of flow enters graft during middiastole. C: pronounced movement of fluid from outer wall toward inner wall is seen due to pressure gradient caused by curvature of graft vessel. D: predominant skewing of velocity profile is observed with pronounced movement from outer to inner graft vessel caused by curvature of graft vessel. E: continuing effect of high flow rate from graft results in double-peaked and asymmetric velocity profiles. F: with increasing distance along LAD vessel, skewed velocity profile seen in C1 and C2 gradually shifts to center line of host vessel. G: similar trend as seen during early diastole is observed in the in-plane velocities in A3. H: suction effect due to presence of LCA and RCA junctions is seen in A1 of the in-plane velocity plot. I: a C-shaped profile is seen in G1 of graft vessel. High flow in graft results in an increase in magnitude of the in-plane velocities as compared with early ejection. J: pattern of in-plane velocities is qualitatively similar to that seen at t = 0.32 s, except with an increase in magnitude. K: bicellular in-plane velocity vector pattern in C1, with one vortex of higher strength (seen close to O) revealing effect of distal anastomotic junction. L: unicellular vortex pattern in C4 reflects asymmetric distribution in axial velocity profile.

 
The nonplanarity of the graft vessel breaks the flow symmetry, resulting in pronounced movement of the fluid from the outer wall toward the inner wall (depicted in Fig. 10, C and D) caused by the pressure gradient induced by the curvature of the graft vessel. The flow (in the LAD artery exiting from the graft at high speed) results in pronounced skewing of the axial velocity profiles toward the bed of LAD artery (Fig. 10, E and F). The in-plane velocity components in Fig. 10, GL, illustrate that the flow features are found to be qualitatively similar to those observed at the earlier diastolic times, except with an increase in the velocity magnitude. This high velocity magnitude in turn results in high WSS distributions at the proximal and distal anastomotic junctions, depicted in Fig. 11, A and B. The WSS in the aorta is uniform and low (~1.0 Pa), except at the proximal anastomotic junction, exhibiting a WSS of magnitude ~17 Pa (Fig. 11A). The WSS at the toe (~3.0 Pa) is much lower as compared with that observed on the floor of the artery (14.0 Pa) opposite to the distal anastomotic junction (Fig. 11B).


Figure 11
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. A: WSS distribution (in Pa) at middiastole (t = 0.57 s). Distribution of WSS is qualitatively similar to that observed during early diastole. WSS in aorta is only ~1.0 Pa. High velocity gradients are responsible for high WSS at proximal anastomotic junction (~17.0 Pa). B: bed of artery just opposite to distal anastomotic junction experiences a high WSS of ~14.0 Pa due to strong impingement of blood on floor of artery (just opposite to distal anastomotic junction), whereas WSS at toe is ~3.0 Pa.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
Despite the significance impact of the previous studies on the understanding of CABG hemodynamics, the previous models have only focused on only some aspects of the problem. For example, much of the modeling work in graft flow is limited to only a part of the total bypass conduit geometry, namely, the anastomosis site. A fully integrated model that accounts for all the relevant factors such as realistic geometry, inlet flow conditions, and anastomosis angle is not available. Some models have focused on more realistic inlet flow conditions, others on the 3D geometry, while yet others on a local domain of the CABG anastomosis. The major objective of the present study was to integrate all these aspects to provide a novel, 3D nonplanar graft geometry with physiologically measured inlet flow conditions over the entire domain of the CABG. Quasi-steady flow simulations were carried out by using CFD. The present analysis focused on the blood flow pattern and WSS because they are intimately related to the development of arterial diseases and hence the patency or failure of bypass graft. The results indicate that a properly contoured (out-of-plane) graft may contribute to improved patency.

Effect of Geometry on Flow Simulation

Because of the difficulties in retrieving patient-specific geometry, researchers have considered idealized geometries (the diameters of the host and the graft vessels being assumed equal) to predict the flow field and WSS in bypass grafts. Most of the CFD studies of the end-to-side anastomosis are based on geometries of two cylindrical conduits of equal diameter intersecting at angles ranging between 30° and 45°. Bertolotti and Deplano (5) adopted a nonstenotic proximal vessel model having a flow rate of one-eighth the flow rate in the proximal artery. With regard to the anastomosis geometry, Song et al. (29) developed a Y-figure anastomotic model for proximal arterial stenosis (at angles ranging from 10° to 30°) to analyze the 3D simulation of CABG. In their end-to-side anastomosis model, all the vessels were simulated to have the same diameter. They found that the WSS was lowest (contributes to intimal hyperplasia) at the heel position in 10° anastomosis and highest in 30° anastomosis. Hence, they concluded that a more acute anastomosis angle may lead to better graft patency.

In contrast to previous studies that have only considered the distal anastomotic junction (with all vessels of equal dimensions), the present study takes into account the complete 3D CABG model, which includes the aorta, the RCA and LCA entrances, the proximal and distal anastomotic junctions, and the occluded LAD artery. Furthermore, we have used realistic graft artery dimensions as provided by our surgeon coauthor (T. Y. Seng). Because geometry plays a significant role in flow simulation, this study simulates patient-specific dimensions. As a result, the intersection of the nonplanar graft with the host artery (LAD) is considered such that the anastomotic junction results in a 3D elliptical curve that closely simulates the patient vessel after suturing. Collectively, this description may result in a more realistic CFD model.

Effect of Inlet Flow Conditions

The input flow conditions play an important role in determining the flow rates and flow patterns in the graft as well as the WSS distribution. When Kute and Vorp (19) conducted CFD studies on the end-to-side anastomosis model for different proximal artery flow conditions (e.g., prograde, zero flow, and retrograde), it was seen that the local flow patterns and hence the spatial distribution of WSS and its gradient are dependent on the inlet flow conditions. Ethier et al. (10) studied the role of inlet flow on the WSS distribution in an end-to-side anastomosis geometry, consisting of two cylindrical conduits of equal diameter intersecting at 45°. With a study of the effect of different flow waveforms (LAD artery waveform, a femoral waveform, and an iliac waveform) on the anastomotic WSS patterns, it was seen that temporal and spatial gradients of WSS on the host artery bed were larger for the femoral waveform than the coronary artery waveforms. This was due to the LAD artery waveform exhibiting a less intense deceleration phase and a weaker retrograde flow.

In the present time-varying flow input waveform, it is implicit that the coronaries are more perfused during diastole as compared with systole. Hence, our computed flow patterns in the graft reflect this more realistic inlet condition. Correspondingly, the computed WSS can be deemed to be more representative of the in vivo condition.

Effect of Anastomotic Angle at Anastomosis

For two different geometrical end-to-side coronary bypass models, steady-state simulations for different flow conditions were studied for anastomotic angles of 45° and 60° by Inzoli et al. (15). To mimic the surgical geometry, the intersection between the graft and the coronary vessel was made elliptical based on dimensions of the saphenous vein and the LAD artery (3, 16). The results show that the WSS along the bottom wall of the artery is higher for a larger graft anastomosis angle. These results agree in principle with the numerical simulations of Fei et al. (11), who also analyzed the effect of angle and steady flow rate in distal vascular graft anastomosis. In the present simulation, the anastomotic angle is smaller and conforms better to the surgically sutured geometry. Hence, the predicted flow patterns and WSS close to the anastomotic junctions may be more representative of the in vivo condition.

Effect of Nonplanarity of Graft

Recently, Sankaranarayanan et al. (27) introduced the first CFD model that includes the total bypass conduit in a planar geometry; i.e., the center lines of all the three vessels (aorta, bypass graft, and host vessel) lie in the same plane. Although the dimensions of the planar CABG geometry were somewhat different from those used in the present study, it was observed that the WSS was much higher in the planar geometry, particularly, at the toe and the bed of the distal anastomosis. Furthermore, the out-of-plane geometry breaks the symmetry of the flow and results in more uniform WSS on the bed of the distal anastomosis region as compared with that of the planar CABG model.

The in-plane bypass graft model is unattainable because of the geometry of the coronary system. Realistically, a bypass graft from the aorta to an occluded coronary vessel has an out-of-plane geometry. The present model indicates that the nonplanar graft vessel geometry results in low WSS at the toe and the bed of the LAD artery opposite to the distal anastomotic junction. Our results on WSS distribution are in agreement with Sherwin et al. (28), who carried out flow studies within a distal end-to-side anastomosis model (that was fully occluded proximal to the anastomotic junction) taking into account the nonplanarity of the bypass vessel. Their results showed that nonplanarity resulted in a 10% reduction in the peak WSS magnitude on the bed of the anastomosis. It was noted that the WSS is uniformly distributed along the bed of the artery, resulting in small spatial WSS gradients. This may be again due to the nonplanarity of the vessel geometry as seen in Caro et al. (8). They reconstructed the geometry of the aorta at sites of curvature and bends using casts and employed MRI techniques to measure the flow patterns in the arteries. Their findings revealed that nonplanarity enhanced flow mixing and resulted in a more uniform WSS distribution.

These observations underscore the role of 3D graft geometry on the hemodynamics. The value of WSS in the toe region observed in this study is close to the physiological range of WSS (1–2 Pa), with an exception at middiastole, where the toe experiences a higher WSS of about ~3.0 Pa. Hence, it may be that the in vivo nonplanar graft geometry enhances graft patency.

Critique of Model

Despite the sophistication of the present analysis, a number of limitations exist in the model. For example, we have reported only four time points in the cardiac cycle (two during systole and two during diastole), whereas information on the temporal gradients of WSS and oscillatory shear index (OSI) requires additional time points. The extension of the model to additional time points for the determination of temporal gradients of WSS and OSI will be a natural extension of the present model. Furthermore, the elasticity of the vessel wall and the non-Newtonian fluid property of blood must be considered in future studies.

Clinical implications of study. The role of WSS in arterial disease has been the subject of debate for over three decades. Fry (12) reported that if the endothelial cells are exposed to a WSS magnitude of over 37 N/m2, the endothelial surface would be subject to denudation. Caro et al. (7), on the other hand, reported that early atherosclerotic lesions are present in low WSS areas because of shear-dependent mass transport for atherogenesis. Furthermore, regions of low WSS and flow recirculation have been shown to correlate with locations of atheroma in coronary arteries (2). In summary, the hemodynamic culprits for intimal hyperplasis and atherogenesis are disturbances to streamlined flow, including WSS magnitude (too low or too high relative to a homeostatic value) and direction (forward vs. reverse flow), WSS gradients (temporal and spatial), high OSI, flow separation and secondary flow, and long particle residence time (17). The present paradigm is that these hemodynamic features influence endothelial cell response by inducing platelet activation, cell migration and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, release of mitogenic factors and proteinases (see review in Ref. 17).

In the present study, we determined the WSS distribution from the velocity profiles based on realistic out-of-plane 3D geometry of CABG. Our results show that the WSS is uniformly distributed on the bed of the anastomosis (opposite to the distal anastomotic junction) and the magnitude of WSS at the toe region is close to the physiological range. The section of the host artery close to the heel is continually exposed to low WSS because of the proximity of relatively stagnant fluid in this vessel segment. Our nonplanar WSS model results are consistent with those obtained by Sherwin et al. (28) for a distal end-to-side anastomosis junction. The nonplanar graft vessel geometry has resulted in swirling of blood between the outer and inner walls of the graft. This may be deemed advantageous because it might wash out the deposits of the arteries that cause arterial disease (18).

It is well known that fluid shear stresses have a definite bearing on endothelial cell shape and function. It has been shown that, in lesion-prone regions, the endothelial cells are polygon shaped, whereas in nonatherosclerotic regions they are elongated and aligned in the flow direction (26, 33). Lei et al. (20) have shown that, in disturbed flow regions, the elongation and alignment of endothelial cells are difficult to achieve because of high WSS gradients. The realistic out-of-plane graft geometry leads to smaller WSS and WSS gradients that cause the endothelial cells to be more elongated and aligned in the flow direction. Along these lines, it may be best to provide more laxity at the ends of the anastomosis to enhance the out-of-plane geometry. This recommendation is now being adopted by our surgeon coauthor (T. Y. Seng).

In conclusion, the nonplanar geometry of the present aorto/left CABG is seen to reduce the spatial variation of WSS distribution in the distal anastomotic region. This geometry also reduces the overall level of WSS variation along the bed of the anastomosis, thereby reducing damage to the endothelium which may improve graft patency.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
The financial support of Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (project no. 0221010023) is gratefully acknowledged. This research was also supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant 2-R01-HL-055554–06.


    DISCLOSURE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 
Current address for M. Sankaranarayanan: Institute for Infocomm Research, Singapore.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. S. Kassab, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, 204 Rockwell Engineering Center, Irvine, CA 92697-2715 (e-mail: gkassab{at}uci.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 DISCLOSURE
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Abbott WM, Megerman J, Hasson JE, L’Italien G, Warnock DF. Effect of compliance mismatch on vascular graft patency. J Vasc Surg 5: 376–382, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Asakura T and Karino T. Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ Res 66: 1045–1066, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bach RG, Kern MJ, Donohue TJ, Aguirre FV, and Caracciolo EA. Comparison of phasic blood flow velocity characteristics of arterial and venous coronary artery bypass conduits. Circulation 88: 133–140, 1993.
  4. Bassiouny HS, White S, Glasgov S, Choi E, Giddens DP, and Zarins CK. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia: mechanical injury or flow induced? J Vasc Surg 15: 708–717, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Bertolotti C and Deplano V. Three-dimensional numerical simulations of flow through a stenosed coronary bypass. J Biomech 33: 1011–1022, 2000.[Medline]
  6. Bryan AJ and Angelini GD. The biology of saphenous vein graft occlusion: etiology and strategies for prevention. Curr Opin Cardiol 9: 641–649, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Caro CG, Fitzgerald JM, and Schroter RC. Atheroma and arterial wall shear stress. Observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 177: 109–159, 1971.[Medline]
  8. Caro CG, Doorly DJ, Tarnawski M, Scott KT, Long Q, and Dumoulin CL. Non-planar curvature and branching of arteries and non-planar-type flow. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 452: 185–197, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Clark RE, Apostolou S, and Kardos JL. Mismatch of mechanical properties as a cause of arterial prosthesis thrombosis. Surg Forum 27: 208–210, 1976.[Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Ethier CR, Prakash S, Steinman DA, Leask RL, Couch GG, and Ojha M. Steady flow separation patterns in a 45° junction. J Fluid Mech 411: 1–38, 2000.[CrossRef]
  11. Fei DY, Thomas JD, and Rittgers SE. The effect of angle and flow rate upon hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses: a numerical model study. J Biomech Eng 116: 331–336, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Fry DL. Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circ Res 22: 165–197, 1968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ganong WF.Review of Medical Physiology. Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange, 1999.
  14. Giddens DP, Zarins CK, and Glagov S. The role of fluid mechanics in localization and detection of atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng 115: 588–594, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
  15. Inzoli F, Migliavacca F, and Pennati G. Numerical analysis of steady flow in aorto-coronary bypass 3-D model. J Biomech Eng 118: 172–179, 1996.[Medline]
  16. Kajiya F, Tsujioka K, Ogasawara Y, Wada Y, Matsuoka S, Kananzawa S, Hiramatsu O, Tadaoka S, Goto M, and Fujiwara T. Analysis of flow characteristics in poststenotic regions of the human coronary artery during bypass graft surgery. Circulation 76: 1092–1100, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kassab GS and Navia JA. Biomechanical considerations in the design of CABG: the mechanical homeostasis hypothesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, in press.
  18. Knight J. Cunning plumbing. New Sci 2172: 32–37, 1999.
  19. Kute SM and Vorp DA. The effect of proximal artery flow on the hemodynamics at the distal anastomosis of a vascular bypass graft: Computational study. J Biomech Eng 123: 277–283, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Lei M, Kleinstreuer C, and Truskey G. Numerical investigation and prediction of atherogenic sites in branching arteries. J Biomech Eng 117: 350–357, 1995.[Medline]
  21. LoGerfo FW, Quist WC, Nowak MD, Crawshaw HM, and Haudenschild CC. Downstream anastomotic hyperplasia: a mechanism for failure in Dacron arterial grafts. Ann Surg 197: 479–483, 1998.
  22. Matsuo S, Tsuruta M, Hayano M, Imamura Y, Eguchi Y, Tokushima T, and Tsuji S. Phasic coronary artery flow velocity determined by Doppler flowmeter catheter in aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 62: 917–922, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Mc Alpine WA.Heart and Coronary Arteries. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975.
  24. Moore JA, Steinmann DA, Prakash S, Johnson KW, and Ethier CR. A numerical study of blood flow patterns in anatomically realistic and simplified end-to-side anastomoses. J Biomech Eng 121: 265–272, 1999.[Medline]
  25. Nikkari ST and Clowes AW. Restenosis after vascular reconstruction. Ann Med 26: 95–100, 1994.[Medline]
  26. Nerem RM. Vascular fluid mechanics and the arterial wall, and atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng 114: 274–282, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Sankaranarayanan M, Chua LP, Ghista DN, and Tan YS. Computational model of blood flow in the aorto-coronary bypass graft (Abstract). Biomed Eng Online 4: 14, 2005.[Medline]
  28. Sherwin SJ, Shah O, Doorly DJ, Peiro J, Pappaharilaou Watkins N, Caro CG, and Dumoulin CL. The influence of out-of-plane geometry on the flow within a distal end-to-side anastomosis. J Biomech Eng 122: 86–95, 2000.[Medline]
  29. Song MH, Masaru S, and Yuichi U. Three-dimensional simulation of coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of computational fluid dynamics. Surg Today 30: 993–998, 2000.[Medline]
  30. Suo J, Yang Y, Oshinski J, Tannenbaum A, Gruden J, and Giddens D. Flow patterns and wall shear stress distributions at atherosclerotic-prone sites in a human left coronary artery-an exploration using combined methods of CT and computational fluid dynamics. Proc 26th Annual Int Conf IEEE EMBS San Francisco, 2004, p. 3789–3791.
  31. Trube W, Schima H, Moritz A, Raderer F, Windisch A, and Ullrich R. Compliance mismatch and formation of distal anastomotic intimal hyperplasia in externally stiffened and lumen-adapted venous grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 10: 415–423, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Zamir M and Silver MD. Morpho-functional anatomy of the human coronary arteries with reference to myocardial ischemia. Can J Cardiol 1: 363–372, 1985.[Medline]
  33. Zand T, Majno G, Nunnari JJ, Hoffman AH, Savilonis BJ, Mac Williams B, and Joris I. Lipid deposition and intimal stress and strain–A study in rats with aortic stenosis. Am J Pathol 139: 101–113, 1991.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y. Huo, T. Wischgoll, and G. S. Kassab
Flow patterns in three-dimensional porcine epicardial coronary arterial tree
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2959 - H2970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/1/H283    most recent
01347.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sankaranarayanan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kassab, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sankaranarayanan, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kassab, G. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.