AJP - Heart AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H600-H611, 2006. First published April 14, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01305.2005
0363-6135/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/2/H600    most recent
01305.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azakie, A.
Right arrow Articles by He, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Azakie, A.
Right arrow Articles by He, Y.

Sp3 inhibits Sp1-mediated activation of the cardiac troponin T promoter and is downregulated during pathological cardiac hypertrophy in vivo

Anthony Azakie,1,2 Jeffrey R. Fineman,2 and Youping He1

Departments of 1Surgery and 2Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Submitted 12 December 2005 ; accepted in final form 7 March 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Combinatorial interactions between cis elements and trans-acting factors are required for regulation of cardiac gene expression during normal cardiac development and pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Sp factors bind GC boxes and are implicated in recruitment and assembly of the basal transcriptional complex. In this study, we show that the cardiac troponin T (cTnT) promoter contains a GC box that is necessary for basal and cAMP-mediated activity of cTnT promoter constructs transfected in embryonic cardiomyocytes. Cardiac nuclear proteins bind the cTnT GC box in a sequence-specific fashion and consist of Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3 protein factors. By chromatin immunoprecipitation, Sp1 binds the cTnT promoter "in vivo." Cotransfected Sp1 trans-activates the cTnT promoter in cardiomyocytes in culture. Sp3 represses Sp1-mediated transcriptional activation of the cTnT gene in embryonic cardiomyocytes. Sp3 repression of Sp1-mediated cTnT promoter activation is dose dependent, inferring a mechanism of competitive binding/inhibition. To evaluate the role of Sp factors in cardiac gene expression in vivo, we have established a clinically relevant animal model of pathological cardiac hypertrophy where the fetal cardiac program is activated. In this animal model, cardiac hypertrophy results from increased left-right shunting, volume loading of the left ventricle, and pressure loading of the right ventricle. Sp1 expression is increased in all four hypertrophied cardiac chambers, whereas Sp3 expression is diminished. This observation is consistent with the in vitro activating function of Sp1 and inhibitory effects of Sp3 on activity of cTnT promoter constructs. Sp factor levels are modulated during the hypertrophic cardiac program in vivo.

promoter function; transcription factors; cardiac differentiation; cell specification; cardiac muscle hypertrophy


THE SP FAMILY OF TRANSCRIPTION factors is characterized by a series of three zinc fingers at the carboxy-terminal end of the protein that are preceded by glutamine- and serine-threonine-rich domains (8, 28). Sp proteins bind GC boxes and the related GT/CACC-box motifs and are implicated in the recruitment and assembly of the basal transcriptional complex. GC boxes have been implicated in the regulation of cardiac promoters, but the direct effects of Sp family members on cardiac promoter activity have not been defined.

We use the cardiac troponin T (cTnT) gene promoter as a model of cardiac-specific gene expression during myocardial differentiation (3, 5, 22, 27, 29). The cTnT promoter is developmentally regulated by numerous promoter motifs and trans-acting factors, including MCAT or transcription enhancer factor-1 (TEF-1) binding sites, AT-rich/monocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF-2) binding sites, GATA motifs, and Nkx2.5. The significance of the GC box for cTnT promoter function and the role of the Sp family of transcription factors in the regulation of cTnT promoter activity are not known. In this study, we use transient cotransfections of Sp expression constructs with cTnT promoter constructs in embryonic cardiomyocytes to define the trans-activating functions of Sp1 and Sp3. We show that Sp1 activates, whereas Sp3 represses, transiently transfected cTnT promoter constructs in cardiomyocyte cultures. Although the presence of cis elements in the regulation of promoter function has been well established in the avian embryonic cardiomyocyte system, we found it necessary to determine in vivo correlates between Sp1/Sp3 and sarcomeric protein expression. To determine the in vivo relevance of Sp factors to myocardial gene expression, we report their chromatin binding and the changing expression patterns of sarcomeric proteins and Sp factors in a clinically relevant and novel model of pathological cardiac hypertrophy.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Reagents

Oligonucleotides were purchased from Operon Technologies (Alameda, CA) or Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Media, serum, enzymes, reagents, and materials for tissue culture were purchased from the Cell Culture Facility at the University of California, San Francisco.

Plasmids and Constructs

The promoter/reporter constructs consist of 268 nucleotides of the chicken cTnT promoter upstream of the transcription initiation site (4). These promoter constructs were originally generated by nested deletions of the chicken cTnT gene in Bluescript KS+ linked to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene (pBS.CAT) containing +38 nucleotides of exon 1. Luciferase reporter constructs were created by digestion of the above-mentioned promoter inserts with XhoI, which is located in the polylinker, and NaeI, which cuts at nucleotide +15 of exon 1, and subcloned into the plasmid pGL2 (Promega, Madison, WI). Mutant cTnT promoter constructs were made using the Quick-Change site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) with each of the following forward primers and their antisense oligonucleotides as reverse primers: wild-type GC box primer (5'-GCTGCTCTGCCCGCCCCGGGGTGGGC-3') and mutant GC box primer (5'-GCTGCTCTGCAGATCTCGGGGTGGGC-3').

Briefly, 25 ng of double-strand DNA template (–268cTnTpGL2) and 125 ng of each respective oligonucleotide were used in the PCR according to the manufacturer's instructions. After temperature cycling (model PTC-200, MJ-Research, Boston, MA), parental DNA was cleaved by treatment with DpnI to improve the efficiency of mutant plasmid screening. The reaction mixture was transferred into one-shot competent cells (Invitrogen) on LB ampicillin plates.

Sp1 (pEVR2), Sp2 (pcCMV SPORT6), and Sp3 (pRC/CMV) expression constructs for cardiomyocyte cultures were kind gifts from Dr. Guntram Suske (Institut fur Molekular Biologie und Tumorforschung, Philipps-Universitaet Marburg). All constructs were confirmed by standard sequencing methods.

Nuclear Extracts

All tissues (cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle, fibroblasts, lung, liver, kidney, brain, and gizzard) were harvested from embryonic day 12 chicks at 4°C. Nuclear extracts were prepared using standard methods (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA).

Protein Expression/Drosophila Schneider Cell Culture

Schneider cells were cultured according to previously reported techniques (28) and the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen). Sp1 (pPAC) and Sp3 (pPACUbx) constructs for expression in Drosophila SL2 cells were kind gifts from Dr. Guntram Suske. Schneider cell nuclear protein was prepared using the nuclear extract kit according to the manufacturer's protocols (Active Motif).

Mobility Shift, Competition, and Supershift Assays

Gel shift probes and competitors were made from 26-mer oligonucleotide fragments of wild-type cTnT-GC-box oligonucleotide (5'-GCTGCTCTGCCCGCCCCGGGGTGGGC-3') and mutant GC-box oligonucleotide (5'-GCTGCTCTGCAGATCTCGGGGTGGGC-3'). Probe labeling, DNA-protein binding reactions, and gel shifts were performed as previously described (14). Supershift assays were performed using rabbit anti-Sp1, -Sp2, -Sp3, and -Sp4 antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).

Western Analysis

Total protein concentration in the samples was quantitated using the DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). An equal amount of protein was loaded in each lane for Western blots: nuclear proteins (10 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE on a 10% gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in 130 mM NaCl and 25 mM Tris (pH 7.5) for 1 h at room temperature. After they were washed in Tris-buffered saline and 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST), the membranes were incubated in antibody (0.5–2.0 µg IgG/ml). The immunoblot was incubated at 4°C overnight and then washed in TBST. Goat anti-rabbit IgG peroxidase in TBST-2% goat serum was added to the incubation for 1 h at 4°C, and the immunoblot was washed in TBST. Chemiluminescence was used for visualization of bands. Parallel SDS gels and immunoblots of beta-actin and GAPDH controls were carried out to verify sample integrity and quantity.

To identify proteins in gel shift complexes (14), the mobility shift reactions were scaled up fivefold in a final volume of 20 µl. After electrophoresis, the gels were soaked in 2% SDS, 62.5 mM Tris, and 25 mM dithiothreitol and then dried. The DNA-protein complexes were identified by autoradiography, and the band of interest was excised and loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The immunoblot was then carried out as described above.

Coimmunoprecipitation

The immune complexes were prepared using the Seize classic (A) immunoprecipitation kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). Nuclear extracts or whole cell lysates were incubated with 5 µl of anti-Sp1 or -Sp3 antibody, control IgG or preimmune serum, or no antibody/antiserum in binding buffer overnight at 4°C (4). Membranes were probed separately with TEF-1 antibody (BD Transduction Laboratories), anti-divergent TEF-1 (DTEF-1) antiserum (Anaspec, San Jose, CA), poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) antibody, GATA antibody, MEF-2 antibody, Nkx2.5 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and preimmune antiserum (AnaSpec).

Tissue Culture, Cell Transfection, and Reporter Gene Assay

Hearts were harvested from embryonic day 6–12 chicks, and cardiomyocyte cultures were established using standard techniques (5, 1315, 1822, 26). The differentiation state of cardiomyocytes was determined by light microscopy, presence of beating cardiomyocytes, immunohistochemistry for anti-sarcomeric myosin antibody MF-20, and Western blotting for myosins, cTnT, GATA-4, MEF-2, and Nkx2.5. Plasmid constructs were transfected according to the manufacturer's protocol (Effectene transfection kit, Qiagen) with minor modifications. Briefly, cultured cells were washed and resuspended in serum-free medium. –268cTnTpGL2 promoter constructs (300 ng) with wild-type and mutated GC box were transfected. Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3 expression constructs (see above) were cotransfected at concentrations of 2–2,000 ng in a total volume of 200 µl. cAMP-mediated activation of –268cTnT promoter constructs was determined by addition of 20 µM forskolin for 60 min to cardiomyocytes in culture. Reporter gene activity was determined using the luciferase reporter assay (Promega). Firefly light intensity was read on a luminometer (model TD-20/20, DLR Ready, Turner Designs Instrument, Sunnyvale, CA). Cotransfection with TK reporter was used to standardize for transfection variability. Cotransfection efficiency of Sp expression constructs was verified using pSV-beta-Gal (Promega) and/or pAAV-GFP staining. Reporter gene activity data are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical comparisons were performed using paired t-tests, with level of significance set at 0.01.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

All chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays were performed according to the protocols of the ChIP assay kit (Upstate, Lake Placid NY) (4). Five micrograms of primary antibody against Sp1, DTEF-1, GATA-4, and PARP were added to a 500-µl chromatin sample for the immunoprecipitation reaction. ChIP dilution buffer and preimmune rabbit serum were used as controls for nonspecific interactions and DNA contamination. Anti-beta-actin and anti-cTnT antibodies were used as negative controls.

PCR

After DNA purification, samples were subjected to PCR with primers designed for the chick heart cTnT promoter (cTnT-268) as follows: 5'GCTGGCTGGCTTGTGTCA-3' (upper primer) and 5'-CTTGGGGGGCAGAGGCTTT-3' (lower primer). The primers used for PCR were designed by primer analysis software (Oligo 6.8, Molecular Biology Insights, Cascade, CO). The amplified PCR product is 265 bp.

Immunohistochemistry

Embryonic chick cardiomyocytes were prepared as described elsewhere (15). For immunofluorescent staining, the cells were plated in rat-tail collagen-coated (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN; 50 mg/ml in 0.2% acetic acid) two-well chamber slides (4.2 cm2/well, Nalgene Nunc, Naperville, IL) at a seeding density of 0.1 x 106 cells and then cultured in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C for 72–96 h. After fixation in 0.2% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, the cells were washed in PBS and then blocked in goat serum (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame CA) for 20 min at 37°C. The cells were incubated in primary antibody for 60 min in PBS with 1.5% normal blocking serum at 4°C overnight, washed, and then incubated with secondary antibody [goat anti-rabbit green fluorescent protein (Alexa Fluor 488), goat anti-mouse red fluorescent protein (Alexa Fluor 555), or rabbit anti-goat red fluorescent protein (Alexa Fluor 555) IgG antibodies, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR], diluted in PBS with 1.5–3% normal blocking serum at 37°C for 1 h. The coverslip was mounted with aqueous mounting medium or 90% glycerol in PBS. Primary antibodies were as follows: rabbit anti-rat Sp1 (catalog no. sc-59), anti-human Sp2 (catalog no. sc-643), and anti-human Sp3 (catalog no. sc-644) polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); mouse anti-chicken MF-20 antibody (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa); rabbit anti-chick DTEF polyclonal antibody (AnaSpec); and goat anti-human cytokeratin (epithelial/preproepicardial cells) polyclonal antibody, goat anti-human caldesmon (smooth muscle) polyclonal antibody, and goat anti-human vimentin (fibroblasts and mesenchyme) polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Surgical Preparation and Care

Ewes. Five pregnant, mixed-breed Western ewes (135–140 days gestation, full term = 145 days) were operated on under sterile conditions. Through a left lateral fetal thoracotomy, an 8.0-mm Gore-Tex vascular graft (2 mm long; W. L. Gore, Milpitas, CA) was sewn between the ascending aorta and the main pulmonary artery (53). After surgery, the ewes were returned to their cages and allowed free access to food and water. The ewes were treated with 1 g of cefazolin and 100 mg of gentamicin sulfate intraoperatively and daily thereafter until 2 days after spontaneous delivery of the lambs.

Lambs. At 2 wk after spontaneous delivery, weight, respiratory rate, and heart rate were monitored daily. At 2 wk of life, 10 lambs (5 shunted and 5 age-matched controls) were sedated, induced [ketamine hydrochloride (0.3 mg·kg–1·min–1), diazepam (0.002 mg·kg–1·min–1), and fentanyl citrate (1.0 µg·kg–1·h–1)], intubated, and mechanically ventilated. The lambs were instrumented for measurement of cardiopulmonary dynamics as previously described (53).

All protocols and procedures were approved by the Committee on Animal Research of the University of California, San Francisco. All animals were euthanized using appropriate methods as described in the National Institutes of Health’s Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Heart Tissue Preparation

Whole heart and chamber-specific weights were measured in all shunted and control specimens. Samples of right atrium, right ventricle, left atrium, left ventricle, and ventricular septum were excised, weighed, and used to make fresh nuclear preparations. Whole tissue and excess nuclear preparations were snap frozen in liquid N2. Samples were stored at –70°C.

Determination of DNA Content

DNA content was determined using standard methods (53). Values were normalized to gram of cardiac muscle.

Statistical Analysis

Comparisons between shunt and age-matched controls were made by an unpaired t-test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Proximal GC box Is Required for cTnT Promoter Activity in Cultured Embryonic Chick Cardiomyocytes

Maximal expression of reporter gene driven by cTnT promoter constructs in vitro requires cis-elements within the 268-nt region upstream of the transcription initiation site (Fig. 1A). Within the –268cTnT promoter, tandem MCAT sites and an AT-rich/MEF-2 binding site have been shown to be essential for promoter activity. We sought to determine the contribution of the proximal GC box (nt –49 to –57), a putative Sp binding site, to promoter activity. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to generate promoter constructs with a mutated GC box. Transient transfections of embryonic cardiomyocyte cultures with mutated promoter constructs resulted in an 11-fold reduction in promoter activity relative to wild-type constructs that was statistically significant: 100% for –268cTnT and 9% for –268cTnT GC-box mutation (n = 12, P < 0.0001). Forskolin has a unique ability to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity and increase intracellular cAMP, thus activating cAMP-dependent protein kinase and other cAMP receptor proteins. Addition of forskolin results in a four- to fivefold increase in reporter gene activity. cAMP-mediated activation of the cTnT promoter requires an intact GC box, because addition of forskolin to GC-box-mutated promoters did not increase promoter activity (Fig. 1B).


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A: schematic diagram of chick cardiac troponin T (cTnT) gene promoter. Promoter contains upstream monocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF-2) and GATA sites, which are required for optimal activity in cardiomyocytes. Tandem MCAT sites within the proximal region of the promoter are essential for promoter function. GC box proximal to the MCAT sites is a putative binding site for Sp factors. –129cTnT promoter is sufficient for full activity in skeletal myocytes but only 10–20% activity in cardiocytes. TEF-1, transcription enhancer factor-1; PARP-1, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. B: –268cTnT promoter has relatively full activity in cardiocytes and is superactivated by forskolin (F)-mediated cAMP activation of the cTnT promoter. Mutation (mt) of the GC box reduces reporter gene activity >10-fold and significantly impairs the ability of forskolin/cAMP to activate the promoter.

 
cTnT GC Box Binds Sequence-Specific Cardiac Nuclear Activities, Including Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3

Gel retardation and supershift assays were performed using embryonic chick cardiac nuclear extracts, GC-box DNA probes (26-mer), and antibodies specific to Sp1, Sp2, Sp3, and Sp4. The cTnT GC box binds cardiac nuclear protein activities, generating two mobility shift complexes: C1 and C2 (Fig. 2, lane 2). Addition of 50- to 100-fold excess of wild-type unlabeled DNA results in competition of the radiolabeled complexes (Fig. 2, lanes 3 and 4). There is no competition when excess mutant DNA competitor is added to the DNA-protein binding reaction (Fig. 2, lanes 5 and 6), suggesting that GC-box activities bind the cTnT promoter motif in a sequence-specific fashion. Addition of Sp1, Sp2, or Sp3 antibody (Fig. 2, lanes 7–9) results in supershifting of complexes, whereas addition of Sp4 antibody to the binding reaction does not (Fig. 2, lane 10).


Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Mobility shift assays using GC-box probes labeled with 32P and embryonic chick heart nuclear extracts. Two complexes, C1 and C2 (arrows), which bind cTnT GC-box DNA in a sequence-specific fashion (lane 2), are formed. A 50- to 100-fold excess wild-type (wt) unlabeled oligonucleotide results in competition of complexes (lanes 3 and 4), but 50- to 100-fold excess unlabeled mutant oligonucleotide does not (lanes 5 and 6). Addition of anti-Sp1, -Sp2, and -Sp3 antibody produces a supershift (lanes 7–9), whereas anti-Sp4 antibody does not (lane 10).

 
The in vitro binding of the cTnT GC box was further evaluated using Sp1 and Sp3 polypeptides expressed in eukaryotic cells. Schneider cells were transfected with Sp1 and Sp3 expression constructs and cultured, and nuclear protein was extracted and used for mobility shift assays. Figure 3 shows that expressed Sp1 (lane 4) and Sp3 (lane 9) form mobility shift complexes with radiolabeled cTnT GC-box DNA. The gel shift has intermediate mobility relative to complexes C1 and C2 with cardiac nuclear extract (Fig. 3, lane 2). Addition of excess unlabeled GC-box DNA results in competition of the complex formed by cardiac nuclear extract (Fig. 3, lane 2), expressed Sp1 (Fig. 3, lanes 5 and 6), and expressed Sp3 (Fig. 3, lane 10), whereas excess addition of mutant competitor does not [expressed Sp1 (Fig. 3, lanes 7 and 8) and expressed Sp3 (Fig. 3, lane 11)].


Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Mobility shift assays using Sp1 or Sp3 polypeptide expressed in SL-2 cells and radiolabeled cTNT GC-box DNA. Lane 1, free probe. Lane 2, mobility shift complexes C1 and C2 formed by GC-box DNA probe and cardiac nuclear extract. Lane 3, addition of excess, unlabeled GC-box DNA competes radiolabeled complexes C1 and C2. Lanes 4 and 9, expressed Sp1 and Sp3, respectively, form mobility shift complexes with radiolabeled cTnT GC-box DNA. Gel shift has intermediate mobility relative to complexes C1 and C2 with cardiac nuclear extract (lane 2). Addition of excess unlabeled GC-box DNA results in competition of the complex formed by Sp1 (lanes 5 and 6) and Sp3 (lane 10), whereas excess addition of mutant (mut) competitor does not [Sp1 (lanes 7 and 8) and Sp3 (lane 11)].

 
To further analyze the Sp family members in cardiac tissue, mobility shift complexes C1 and C2 were excised, and proteins were eluted and probed in Western blots using antibodies specific for Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3 (Fig. 4). The mobility shift complexes generated from cTnT GC-box DNA binding to cardiac nuclear extract, C1 and C2, consist of Sp family members. The faster mobility shift complex C1 contains Sp1, but not Sp2 or Sp3, proteins (Fig. 4, A–C, lane 1). The slower mobility shift complex C2 contains all three family members, Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3 (Fig. 4, A–C, lane 2).


Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Western blots of proteins eluted from gel-shift complexes C1 and C2 using antibodies to Sp1 (A), Sp2 (B), Sp3 (C), DTEF-1 (D), PARP (E), Nkx2.5 (F), and GATA-4 (G). Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3, DTEF, Nkx2.5, and PARP contribute to GC-box-nuclear protein complexes; GATA-4 does not. Lane 1, proteins eluted from C1; lane 2, proteins eluted from C2; lane 3, cardiac nuclear extract; lane 4, control protein; lane M, molecular weight (MW) marker.

 
The GC box within the avian cTnT promoter has neighboring TEF-1, Nkx2.5, and PARP-1 binding sites. Western analysis of proteins eluted from complexes C1 and C2 showed that DTEF-1 and PARP were present, forming part of the mobility shift complex, suggesting an in vitro protein-protein interaction that included Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3 (Fig. 4, D and E, lanes 1 and 2). Nkx2.5 was detected within complex C2 (Fig. 4F, lane 2). GATA-4 was not detected in either complex (Fig. 4, F and G, lanes 1 and 2), nor was MEF-2 (not shown). Coimmunoprecipitation experiments using anti-Sp1 antibody and cardiac nuclear extracts confirmed interactions between Sp1 and DTEF-1, PARP-1, and Nkx2.5 (data not shown) but not MEF-2 or GATA-4. We conclude that Sp family members bound to GC-box DNA interact with trans-acting factors that bind neighboring cis elements, but not factors (GATA-4) that bind distal elements (GATA), within the cTnT promoter.

Expression Patterns of Sp Factors in Embryonic Chick Nuclear Extracts

The protein expression profiles of Sp family members in avian embryonic tissues were determined using antibodies specific for Sp1, Sp2, Sp3, and Sp4 (Fig. 5). Sp1 is expressed as a 95- or 106-kDa isoprotein, and each is widely distributed in various embryonic tissues, including heart, skeletal muscle, skin, lung, liver, gizzard, kidney, and brain. In heart and skeletal muscle, the 95-kDa isoform is expressed at higher levels than the 106-kDa protein. In gizzard, the 106-kDa isoform is highly expressed and the 95-kDa isoform is not detected. Expression of Sp2 is tissue restricted. Sp2 is expressed as an 80-kDa protein in heart, fibroblasts, and gizzard but is not detected in other avian embryonic nuclear extracts.


Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Western analysis of embryonic chick tissues/organs immunoblotted with anti-Sp1, -Sp2, -Sp3, and -Sp4 antibody. Lane 1, molecular weight marker; lane 2, positive control; lane 3, heart (H); lane 4, skeletal muscle (Sk); lane 5, fibroblasts (skin, F); lane 6, lung (Lg); lane 7, liver (Lv); lane 8, gizzard (Gz); lane 9, kidney (K); lane 10, brain (B). Sp1 is expressed as 95- and/or 106-kDa protein in most embryonic chick tissues. Sp2 is expressed in heart and fibroblasts and at low levels in gizzard. Sp3 is expressed in most tissues in the 60-kDa isoform and at very low levels in gizzard. Sp4 is restricted to brain.

 
Similar to Sp1, Sp3 expression is more widely distributed. Two isoforms are detected. A 60-kDa protein is expressed at higher levels than the 100-kDa isoform. Similar to Sp1, Sp3 expression is lower in gizzard. The 100-kDa isoform is undetectable in gizzard, whereas trace levels of the 60-kDa protein are seen in that tissue. In heart, both isoforms are expressed. The expression of Sp4 is restricted to brain tissue, where a single 120-kDa protein is detected.

Sp1 Binds the cTnT Promoter "In Vivo" Within the Context of Chromatin

Having shown that Sp1 is present in cardiac nuclear extracts and contributes to GC-box binding activities, we sought to determine whether Sp1 binds the endogenous or chromosomal cTnT promoter in vivo within the context of chromatin (Fig. 6). After it was subjected to cross-linking and shearing, chromatin from embryonic chick heart was immunoprecipitated with Sp antibody and DTEF, GATA, and PARP antibodies (positive controls), as well as troponin and beta-actin antibody and preimmune serum (negative controls). The immunoprecipitated complexes were eluted, and protein DNA cross-links were reversed. DNA from the immunoprecipitated sample was then purified and subjected to PCR using primers specific to the cTnT promoter (265 bp). Antibody to Sp1, DTEF-1, PARP, and GATA factors immunoprecipitates chromatin from cardiac nuclear extracts, which produces a PCR fragment spanning the 265-bp region upstream of the transcription initiation site, implying that these factors bind the cTnT promoter in vivo.


Figure 6
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Sp1 binds the cTnT promoter by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Primers specific for cTnT promoter were used for PCR on DNA purified after chromatin immunoprecipitation. Embryonic chick heart nuclear preparations were cross-linked and sonicated, and chromatin complexes were purified. After the preparation was heated at 65°C, input chromatin was incubated with antibodies to DTEF-1, GATA-4, beta-actin, cTnT, preimmune serum, PARP, poly(ADP ribose) (PAR), and Sp1. Separation of immune complexes by and elution from protein A/G-agarose beads was followed by reversal of protein-DNA cross-links and DNA purification. Lane 1, chromatin input DNA + antibody. Lanes 1–5 include ChIP "output" DNA for PCR. Immunoprecipitation (IP) of chromatin preparations was performed using antibodies listed at left. Lane 6 contains ChIP buffer as the "DNA source." Lane 7 contains the control, "input DNA" to verify quality of nuclear preparations. a, Output DNA; b, input DNA; c, PCR buffer and primers.

 
Sp3 Represses Sp1-Mediated Transcriptional Activation of the cTnT Gene in Embryonic Cardiomyocytes

To determine the transcriptional effects of Sp factors on cTnT promoter activity, Sp expression constructs and cTnT promoter constructs were subjected to cotransfections in embryonic chick cardiomyocytes (Fig. 7). Cotransfection of Sp1 (5 ng, n = 22) resulted in a moderate, statistically significant superactivation of promoter activity above baseline: 100% for 268 cTnT and 171% for 268 cTnT + Sp1 (n = 22, P ≤ 0.0001). Sp3, however, had an inhibitory effect on promoter activity, whereas Sp2 also produced a moderate increase in promoter activity: 100% for 268cTnT and 32% for 268cTnT + Sp3 (n = 10, P < 0.001) and 149% for 268cTnT + Sp2 (n = 18, P = 0.01). The activating effect of Sp1 was inhibited by cotransfection with Sp3 (Fig. 7A): 171% for –268cTnT + Sp1 (n = 22) and 89% for –268cTnT + Sp1 + Sp3 (n = 12). Increasing doses of Sp3 expression construct resulted in greater degrees of inhibition (Fig. 7B).


Figure 7
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. A: reporter gene activity driven by cTnT promoter constructs that are transiently transfected in primary cultures of embryonic chick cardiomyocytes. –268cTnT relative activity of 100% is reduced >10-fold when the GC-box is mutated. Cotransfection of pEVR2-Sp1 (5 ng) expression constructs results in a moderate, but statistically significant, increase in reporter gene expression. Cotransfection of Sp1 does not increase promoter activity if the GC-box is mutated. Cotransfection of Sp2 (5 ng) results in a mild increase in reporter gene activity. Cotransfection of Sp3 (2 ng) results in repression of baseline cTnT promoter activity. Sp3 inhibits Sp1-mediated gene activation. B: increasing doses of pRC/CMV-Sp3 expression construct result in progressive inhibition of Sp1-mediated reporter gene activation of –268cTnT promoter driving a luciferase reporter gene (n = 8).

 
Immunocytochemistry

Western blot and electrophoretic mobility shift analyses demonstrate that Sp3 is expressed in whole embryonic chick hearts. Paradoxically, expressed Sp3 inhibits reporter gene expression driven by cTnT promoter constructs that are transiently cotransfected in embryonic chick cardiomyocytes. Numerous cell types, including myocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, epicardial-epithelial cells, and smooth muscle cells, populate the heart. To determine the cell-specific expression of Sp3, embryonic cardiomyocytes in cell culture were stained for immunocytochemistry using various cell-specific antibodies, including MF-20, vimentin, cytokeratin, caldesmon, and PCAM, and the results correlated with cellular colocalization of Sp1/Sp3 immunostaining (Fig. 8).


Figure 8
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Immunocytochemical staining of cultured embryonic cardiomyocytes with MF-20 and Sp1 antibody. A: MF-20 immunostaining (red immunofluorescence) demonstrates myocyte population in culture. B: cells in A show positive immunolabeling with anti-Sp1 antibody (green immunofluorescence). C: double staining with MF-20 and Sp-1 antibody shows colocalization, inferring that Sp1 is present in myocytes of the heart.

 
Sp1 immunostaining showed colocalization within MF-20-positive cells, suggesting that Sp1 is expressed in cardiomyocytes (Fig. 8). Sp1 also colocalized in cells that stained positively for vimentin, caldesmon, and cytokeratin, implicating Sp1 expression in fibroblasts, smooth muscle, and epithelial cells of the heart, respectively (data not shown). Sp3 immunostaining, however, did not colocalize with MF-20-positive cells, suggesting that Sp3 is present at undetectable levels or is not specifically expressed in the cardiomyocyte population within the avian embryonic heart on embryonic days 6–12 (Fig. 9). Embryonic chick cardiac cultures immunolabeled with Sp3 showed colocalization with anti-vimentin, anti-caldesmon, and anti-cytokeratin antibody labels, suggesting that Sp3 expression in the heart occurs within fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, and epicardial-epithelial cells, respectively (data not shown).


Figure 9
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Immunocytochemical staining of cultured embryonic cardiomyocytes with MF-20 (red immunofluorescence) and Sp3 antibody (green immunofluorescence). A: MF-20-positive cells (yellow arrow) identify myocyte population in culture. B: Sp3-positive immunolabeling (white arrow) identifies cells distinct from myocytes in culture. C: MF-20 and Sp3 antibody do not colocalize on double staining, suggesting that Sp3 is not expressed or is not detectable in embryonic chick cardiomyocytes.

 
Having shown that Sp1 activates, whereas Sp3 represses, cTnT promoter constructs in cardiac cell culture and that Sp1 binds the cTnT promoter in vivo, we sought to determine the in vivo relevance of Sp1/Sp3 regulation of cardiac gene expression. Rather than using aortic constriction/coarctation models of hypertrophy in rodents, we have established a large animal model of pathological myocardial hypertrophy by surgically creating aortopulmonary shunts in fetal and neonatal lambs. The model has the advantage of being precise and reproducible, it allows for direct and accurate hemodynamic measurements, and it is easily amenable to evaluation of cardiac function by standard echocardiography. Concomitant with the biochemical and physiological description of hypertrophy in 2-wk-old shunted lambs, the expression patterns and levels of Sp family members were determined using this model.

In Vivo Model of Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy: Hemodynamics

Hemodynamic parameters for control and shunted lambs at 2 wk of postnatal life are summarized in Table 1. In 2-wk-old lambs with large left-to-right shunts, pulmonary artery, right atrial, and left atrial pressures were significantly elevated. The overall cardiac output in shunted animals was also significantly increased. Mean blood pressure was comparable in both groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. General hemodynamics

 
Left-to-Right Shunting Produces Biventricular Hypertrophy and Increased Sarcomeric Protein Expression

Hearts were significantly larger in shunted animals than in nonshunted controls (Fig. 10). The right atrium (P = 0.003), left atrium (P = 0.001), right ventricle (P = 0.004), and left ventricle (P = 0.02) were significantly larger in shunted than in control animals. Hearts of shunted animals weighed nearly twice as much as those of controls. Septal weight and size did not significantly differ between groups. Western blot analysis of chamber-specific tissue was performed for shunted (n = 5) and control hearts (n = 5), and band density was scanned to assess relative protein levels of myosins, cTnT, and Sp factors. In a Western blot of sarcomeric and Sp protein levels in atria and ventricles, no significant difference in GAPDH or beta-actin expression levels was shown between control and shunted animals (Fig. 11). Myosin expression was significantly increased in shunted hearts within atria and ventricles. cTnT protein levels were also significantly increased in atria and ventricles. In addition to increased cTnT protein levels, the embryonic/fetal high-molecular-weight isoform was upregulated in the shunted hypertrophied hearts.


Figure 10
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Hypertrophy of neonatal sheep heart after 2 wk of significant left-to-right shunting. Right atrium (RA), right ventricle (RV), left atrium (LA), and left ventricle (LV) are significantly enlarged and hypertrophied in shunted animals compared with controls. *P < 0.05. There is a trend (P = 0.053) to septal enlargement and hypertrophy in shunted animals.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Characteristic Western blot analysis of sarcomeric and Sp protein levels in 2-wk-old control and shunted lambs. Increase in MF-20 and cTnT levels in shunted animals is consistent with hypertrophy and increased mass seen on gross pathological examination. Fetal/embryonic isoforms of cTnT are expressed in hypertrophied, shunted hearts, specifically in RV, LV, and LA. There is an associated increase in Sp1 levels (a cTnT promoter trans-activator) and a concomitant decrease in Sp3 levels (a repressor of cTnT promoter activity) within the cardiac chambers. beta-Actin and GAPDH control proteins are comparable in shunted and control specimens. Septum, interventricular septal muscle.

 
Sp1 and Sp3 Levels Are Modulated During Ventricular Hypertrophy in Shunted Lambs

Densitometric analysis of Sp1 protein levels were significantly increased in all chambers (except the septum) after shunting, volume loading of the heart, and development of pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Concomitant with an increase in Sp1 protein levels, Sp3 expression levels decreased in all four cardiac chambers.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The cTnT promoter contains a GC box that is necessary for basal and cAMP-mediated activity of cTnT promoter constructs transfected in avian embryonic cardiomyocytes. The GC box is bound by Sp factors in vitro as well as in vivo within the context of chromatin derived from embryonic cardiac tissue. Sp1 activates, whereas Sp3 inhibits, promoter activity, and although both proteins are expressed in avian embryonic cardiac tissue, Sp3 expression is predominant in the nonmyocyte cell populations of the normal, developing chick heart. Sp3 repression of Sp1-mediated cTnT promoter activity is "dose dependent," inferring a mechanism that involves competitive binding/inhibition. In a clinically relevant ovine model in which cardiac hypertrophy results from increased left-to-right shunting, volume loading of the left ventricle, and pressure loading of the right ventricle, Sp1 expression was increased, whereas Sp3 expression was diminished, in all four cardiac chambers. The observation is consistent with the in vitro effects of Sp1 and/or Sp3 on activity of cTnT promoter constructs.

Sp1 Activates the –268cTnT Promoter

The necessity of the GC box for cTnT promoter activity is consistent with other reports in the literature which suggest that cardiac promoters require Sp1 binding elements for activity. The human and murine cardiac troponin I promoters require their respective GC elements for promoter activity (9, 12). Mutation of murine GC/GA elements within the cardiac troponin I promoter produces a four- to fivefold reduction of promoter activity comparable to that seen for the avian cTnT promoter. Putative Sp1 promoter elements have also been shown to be required for optimal activity of cardiac and skeletal {alpha}-actin, sarco(endo)plasmic Ca2+-ATPase, and Na+-K+-ATPase beta1-subunit genes in cultured cells (6, 16, 24, 31, 33). These studies do not show direct trans-activation of promoter constructs cotransfected with expressed Sp factors. In the present study, we show that the GC box within the cTnT promoter is necessary for basal and cAMP-mediated promoter activity and bound by Sp factors within the context of chromatin in vivo. The cAMP responsiveness of cTnT promoter constructs is abolished by mutation of the Sp1 binding site, similar to that seen for the CYP11A gene (1). We extend the evidence supporting a role for Sp1 in cardiac muscle gene activation by demonstrating that Sp1 directly activates cTnT promoter constructs when cotransfected in primary cardiomyocyte cultures. Control of tissue-specific activation of the cardiac genes probably requires combinatorial cis-acting elements and their respective trans-acting factors. Gel shift and coimmunoprecipitation experiments suggest protein interactions between Sp and other cardiac transcription factors. Elution of proteins from mobility shift complexes formed by the binding reaction between cardiac nuclei and GC-box DNA elements shows that TEF-1, PARP, and Nkx2.5 contribute to GC-box binding activities, probably through their interaction with Sp1. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments confirmed interactions between Sp1 and DTEF-1, PARP, and Nkx2.5 (data not shown) but not MEF-2 or GATA-4. The protein interactions are predictable on the basis of the proximity of the respective cis elements within the promoter to each other. The cis elements for TEF-1, Nkx2.5, PARP, and Sp1 are close to each other, supporting any potential protein-protein interactions. The binding sites for MEF-2 and GATA factors are more distant (~200 bp away) within the promoter.

Sp3 Represses –268cTnT Promoter Activity

Reports on the transcriptional functions of Sp3 have shown that Sp3 can act as an activator or a repressor. Whether Sp3 functions as an activator or inhibitor of gene expression depends partly on posttranslational modifications of the protein (2), the number of GC-box binding sites (8, 28) within a particular promoter, and the cell type within which Sp3 is expressed (25). It has been reported that promoters containing a single binding site are activated, whereas promoters containing multiple binding sites often are not activated or respond weakly to Sp3 (7, 10, 11). This model is in contradistinction to cTnT promoter responsiveness to the Sp family of factors, because the cTnT promoter contains a single GC-box element and is inhibited by Sp3 coexpression. The inhibitory effect was dose dependent. Higher concentrations of Sp3 resulted in greater degrees of inhibition of Sp1-mediated promoter activation, presumably by competing for Sp1 binding sites (17). The cell-specific expression of Sp3 within the heart is consistent with its transcriptional effects on –268cTnT promoter constructs. Endogenous Sp3 was not detected in embryonic cardiomyocytes by immunocytochemical staining, but endogenous Sp3 expression was detected in the fibroblast, smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, and epicardial-epithelial cells of the avian embryonic heart.

GC-box DNA elements and Sp transcription factors have also been implicated in the hypertrophic response in cardiomyocytes stimulated by {alpha}1-adrenergic agonists (24). Fetal sarcomeric and fetal metabolic gene programs are activated by {alpha}-agonists and seem to require Sp elements combined with increased binding of their respective factors Sp1 and Sp3. Sp factors have also been implicated in skeletal muscle hypertrophy and inactivity (30). In adult skeletal muscle, beta-myosin heavy chain (beta-MHC) gene expression is primarily restricted to slow-twitch type I fibers; however, its expression is downregulated in response to muscle inactivity. Tsika et al. (30) showed that, under non-weight-bearing conditions, downregulation of beta-MHC gene expression is associated with increased binding of Sp3 to GC-rich elements. Conversely, binding of Sp3 to these elements decreased, whereas Sp1 binding increased, with nuclear extracts from plantaris muscle exposed to mechanical overload, a stimulus that increases beta-MHC gene expression. Sp3 proteins acted as competitive inhibitors of Sp1-mediated beta-MHC reporter gene trans-activation in Drosophila SL-2 and mouse C2C12 myotubes. Our cell culture studies indicate that Sp3 acts as a repressor of cardiac promoters. Because 1) Sp3 downregulation is associated with mechanical overload in skeletal muscle, 2) Sp3 represses cardiac promoter function in cultured cells, and 3) Sp elements are implicated in the cardiac hypertrophic program, we postulated that Sp factors have a role in myocardial hypertrophy in vivo.

Placement of a large aortopulmonary shunt in lambs produces significant left-to-right shunting, increases in pulmonary blood flow, volume loading of the left ventricle, pulmonary hypertension, and pressure loading of the right ventricle. The model used in this study is clinically relevant. Volume loading of the left ventricle is common with valvular heart disease, such as aortic and mitral insufficiency. Right ventricular pressure overload is also commonly seen clinically, as in pulmonary hypertension, tetralogy of Fallot, and pulmonary stenosis. Patent ductus arteriosus, large ventricular septal defects, atrial septal defects, and aortopulmonary windows produce significant left-to-right shunts and pathophysiology similar to that in the shunted lamb model. The right and left ventricles undergo concentric and eccentric hypertrophy, respectively. Both chambers are enlarged and thickened (right more than left). Surgically created aortopulmonary shunts are also common for the management of single ventricle anomalies with inadequate pulmonary blood flow. The resultant pathophysiology includes volume loading of the ventricle.

Sp3 Is Expressed in Ovine Cardiomyocytes and Is Downregulated During Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy

In the lamb model of aortopulmonary shunt, the heart is enlarged and hypertrophied after 2 wk of left-to-right shunting, with volume loading of the left ventricle and pressure loading of the right ventricle. Western blotting shows increased myosin and troponin T expression in both ventricles, concomitant with significant chamber enlargement and wall thickening. The hypertrophic response, in vivo, in a clinically relevant model of ventricular hypertrophy includes an increase in Sp1 expression and a simultaneous decrease in Sp3 expression. This is consistent with the findings that Sp3 inhibits, whereas Sp1 activates, the cTnT promoter; however, these data do not provide direct evidence that Sp1 upregulation and Sp3 downregulation, in vivo, are mechanistically responsible, in part, for the changes in sarcomeric protein expression during pathological cardiac hypertrophy in the ovine model. In sheep, Sp3 localizes to the myocyte population of the heart under normal and shunted conditions (data not shown). The mechanism by which biomechanical forces produce differential expression and/or activity of Sp factors remains to be elucidated. Numerous kinases are implicated in the transduction of a variety of hypertrophic stimuli, ultimately leading to the hypertrophic phenotype and implicating common transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. In the hypertrophied ventricle of a shunted lamb, increased levels of TEF-1, Nkx2.5, and GATA factors were found, implicating combinatorial interactions to produce the hypertrophic response (data not shown). Histone and transcription factor acetylation is also implicated in regulating gene expression during myocardial hypertrophy and may play a role in modulating activities of Sp factors (23, 32).


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
A. Azakie is supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint Program Grant 1K08HL-72774-01 and the Thoracic Surgery Foundation for Research and Education. This work was supported, in part, by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Prof. Charles Ordahl and Dr. Harold Bernstein for critical review of the manuscript and Leonard Moon for assistance with the figures.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Azakie, 513 Parnassus Ave., Box 0117, Rm. S-549, Univ. of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 (e-mail: azakiet{at}surgery.ucsf.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Ahlgren R, Suske G, Waterman MR, and Lund J. Role of Sp1 in cAMP-dependent transcriptional regulation of the bovine CYP11A gene. J Biol Chem 274: 19422–19428, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ammanamanchi S, Freeman JW, and Brattain MG. Acetylated Sp3 is a transcriptional activator. J Biol Chem 278: 35775–35780, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Azakie A, Lamont L, Fineman JR, and He Y. Divergent transcriptional enhancer factor-1 regulates the cardiac troponin T promoter. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289: C1522–C1534, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Azakie A, Lamont L, Fineman JR, and He Y. Divergent transcriptional enhancer factor 1 (DTEF-1) regulates the cardiac troponin T promoter. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289: C1522–C1534, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Azakie A, Larkin SB, Farrance IK, Grenningloh G, and Ordahl CP. DTEF-1, a novel member of the transcription enhancer factor-1 (TEF-1) multigene family. J Biol Chem 271: 8260–8265, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Baker DL, Dave V, Reed T, and Periasamy M. Multiple Sp1 binding sites in the cardiac/slow-twitch muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase gene promoter are required for expression in Sol8 muscle cells. J Biol Chem 271: 5921–5928, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Birnbaum MJ, van Wijnen AJ, Odgren PR, Last TJ, Suske G, Stein GS, and Stein JL. Sp1 trans-activation of cell cycle regulated promoters is selectively repressed by Sp3. Biochemistry 34: 16503–16508, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Bouwman P and Philipsen S. Regulation of the activity of Sp1-related transcription factors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 195: 27–38, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Dellow KA, Bhavsar PK, Brand NJ, and Barton PJ. Identification of novel, cardiac-restricted transcription factors binding to a CACC-box within the human cardiac troponin I promoter. Cardiovasc Res 50: 24–33, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dennig J, Beato M, and Suske G. An inhibitor domain in Sp3 regulates its glutamine-rich activation domains. EMBO J 15: 5659–5667, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
  11. Dennig J, Hagen G, Beato M, and Suske G. Members of the Sp transcription factor family control transcription from the uteroglobin promoter. J Biol Chem 270: 12737–12744, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Di Lisi R, Millino C, Calabria E, Altruda F, Schiaffino S, and Ausoni S. Combinatorial cis-acting elements control tissue-specific activation of the cardiac troponin I gene in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem 273: 25371–25380, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Farrance IK, Mar JH, and Ordahl CP. M-CAT binding factor is related to the SV40 enhancer binding factor, TEF-1. J Biol Chem 267: 17234–17240, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Farrance IK and Ordahl CP. The role of transcription enhancer factor-1 (TEF-1)-related proteins in the formation of M-CAT binding complexes in muscle and non-muscle tissues. J Biol Chem 271: 8266–8274, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Iannello RC, Mar JH, and Ordahl CP. Characterization of a promoter element required for transcription in myocardial cells. J Biol Chem 266: 3309–3316, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Karns LR, Kariya K, and Simpson PC. M-CAT, CArG, and Sp1 elements are required for {alpha}1-adrenergic induction of the skeletal {alpha}-actin promoter during cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. Transcriptional enhancer factor-1 and protein kinase C as conserved transducers of the fetal program in cardiac growth. J Biol Chem 270: 410–417, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kwon HS, Kim MS, Edenberg HJ, and Hur MW. Sp3 and Sp4 can repress transcription by competing with Sp1 for the core cis-elements on the human ADH5/FDH minimal promoter. J Biol Chem 274: 20–28, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Larkin SB, Farrance IK, and Ordahl CP. Flanking sequences modulate the cell specificity of M-CAT elements. Mol Cell Biol 16: 3742–3755, 1996.[Abstract]
  19. Mar JH, Antin PB, Cooper TA, and Ordahl CP. Analysis of the upstream regions governing expression of the chicken cardiac troponin T gene in embryonic cardiac and skeletal muscle cells. J Cell Biol 107: 573–585, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Mar JH, Iannello RC, and Ordahl CP. Cardiac troponin T gene expression in muscle. Symp Soc Exp Biol 46: 237–249, 1992.[Medline]
  21. Mar JH and Ordahl CP. A conserved CATTCCT motif is required for skeletal muscle-specific activity of the cardiac troponin T gene promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 6404–6408, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Mar JH and Ordahl CP. M-CAT binding factor, a novel trans-acting factor governing muscle-specific transcription. Mol Cell Biol 10: 4271–4283, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. McKinsey TA and Olson EN. Toward transcriptional therapies for the failing heart: chemical screens to modulate genes. J Clin Invest 115: 538–546, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Sartorelli V, Hong NA, Bishopric NH, and Kedes L. Myocardial activation of the human cardiac {alpha}-actin promoter by helix-loop-helix proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 4047–4051, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sjottem E, Anderssen S, and Johansen T. The promoter activity of long terminal repeats of the HERV-H family of human retrovirus-like elements is critically dependent on Sp1 family proteins interacting with a GC/GT box located immediately 3' to the TATA box. J Virol 70: 188–198, 1996.[Abstract]
  26. Stewart AF, Larkin SB, Farrance IK, Mar JH, Hall DE, and Ordahl CP. Muscle-enriched TEF-1 isoforms bind M-CAT elements from muscle-specific promoters and differentially activate transcription. J Biol Chem 269: 3147–3150, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Stewart AF, Richard CW III, Suzow J, Stephan D, Weremowicz S, Morton CC, and Adra CN. Cloning of human RTEF-1, a transcriptional enhancer factor-1-related gene preferentially expressed in skeletal muscle: evidence for an ancient multigene family. Genomics 37: 68–76, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  28. Suske G. The Sp-family of transcription factors. Gene 238: 291–300, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  29. Tidyman WE, Sehnert AJ, Huq A, Agard J, Deegan F, Stainier DY, and Ordahl CP. In vivo regulation of the chicken cardiac troponin T gene promoter in zebrafish embryos. Dev Dyn 227: 484–496, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  30. Tsika G, Ji J, and Tsika R. Sp3 proteins negatively regulate beta-myosin heavy chain gene expression during skeletal muscle inactivity. Mol Cell Biol 24: 10777–10791, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wendt CH, Gick G, Sharma R, Zhuang Y, Deng W, and Ingbar DH. Up-regulation of Na,K-ATPase beta1 transcription by hyperoxia is mediated by SP1/SP3 binding. J Biol Chem 275: 41396–41404, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Zhang CL, McKinsey TA, Chang S, Antos CL, Hill JA, and Olson EN. Class II histone deacetylases act as signal-responsive repressors of cardiac hypertrophy. Cell 110: 479–488, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  33. Zhuang Y, Wendt C, and Gick G. Regulation of Na,K-ATPase beta1 subunit gene transcription by low external potassium in cardiac myocytes. Role of Sp1 and Sp3. J Biol Chem 275: 24173–24184, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Hucl, J. R. Brody, E. Gallmeier, C. A. Iacobuzio-Donahue, I. K. Farrance, and S. E. Kern
High Cancer-Specific Expression of Mesothelin (MSLN) Is Attributable to an Upstream Enhancer Containing a Transcription Enhancer Factor Dependent MCAT Motif
Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 9055 - 9065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
W. K. Steagall, J.-P. Lin, and J. Moss
The C/A(-18) polymorphism in the surfactant protein B gene influences transcription and protein levels of surfactant protein B
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): L448 - L453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Azakie, J. R. Fineman, and Y. He
Myocardial transcription factors are modulated during pathologic cardiac hypertrophy in vivo
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2006; 132(6): 1262 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/2/H600    most recent
01305.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azakie, A.
Right arrow Articles by He, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation