AJP - Heart Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H1529-H1535, 2006. First published April 28, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00107.2006
0363-6135/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/4/H1529    most recent
00107.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belluardo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Malatino, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belluardo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Malatino, L. S.

Lack of activation of molecular forms of the BNP system in human grade 1 hypertension and relationship to cardiac hypertrophy

Paola Belluardo,1 Alessandro Cataliotti,1,2 Lorena Bonaiuto,1 Eliana Giuffrè,1 Egle Maugeri,1 Paola Noto,1 Giovanna Orlando,1 Giuseppa Raspa,1 Brigida Piazza,1 Luciano Babuin,2 Horng H. Chen,2 Fernando L. Martin,2 Paul M. McKie,2 Denise M. Heublein,2 John C. Burnett, Jr.,2 and Lorenzo S. Malatino1

1Department of Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; and 2Cardiorenal Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Submitted 30 January 2006 ; accepted in final form 18 April 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
We evaluated relationships among two circulating molecular forms of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP32 and NT-proBNP), severity of hypertension (HTN), and cardiac hypertrophy in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe HTN. We prospectively studied 78 patients (43 males; mean age 51.4 ± 11 yr) with essential HTN and 28 age- and sex-matched controls. BNP32 and NT-proBNP were measured by radioimmunoassay. In grade 1 HTN, BNP32 was not elevated and NT-proBNP was reduced (P = 0.030) compared with controls. However, log-transformed values of BNP32 and NT-proBNP were both increased with severity of HTN from grade 1 to 3 (P <0.0001 and P = 0.003, respectively). By multivariate analysis, log BNP32 was independently predicted by age (beta = 0.210, P = 0.026) and HTN grade (beta = 0.274, P = 0.004), whereas log NT-proBNP was independently predicted by sex (beta = 0.235, P = 0.012) and HTN grade (beta = 0.218, P = 0.0023). Two forms of BNP were measured in normal subjects and patients with essential HTN. In grade 1 HTN, BNP32 was unchanged and NT-proBNP was significantly reduced compared with controls. As severity increased in humans with grade 1 to 3 HTN, both BNP32 and NT-proBNP levels were increased while not being affected by the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy. The lack of activation of BNP32 together with the reduction of NT-proBNP in grade 1 HTN may represent an impaired response of the BNP system in the early phase of HTN. The later activation of both forms of BNP may be a late compensatory effect, because it correlates with severity of HTN rather than cardiac hypertrophy/remodeling.

natriuretic peptide; brain natriuretic peptide; amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; left ventricular hypertrophy


BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE (BNP) is synthesized in cardiac myocytes as the precursor proBNP, a 108-amino acid peptide (4, 27, 33), and is converted to biologically active peptide BNP32 via a proteolytic cleavage by corin, a type II transmembrane cardiac serine protease (22, 38, 39). BNP is present in the circulation in two different forms, the biologically active BNP32 that elicits different beneficial cardiorenal and hormonal actions (1, 5, 8, 11, 25, 26, 40) and the amino-terminal portion of BNP (NT-proBNP) that consists of 76 amino acids.

In congestive heart failure (CHF) as well as in hypertension (HTN), ventricular cardiomyocytes are progressively recruited to synthesize BNP (24). Whereas initially a successful defensive endocrine response by the heart to preserve cardiorenal homeostasis might occur, a hyporesponsiveness to cardiac peptides, which might contribute in turn to the progression of hypertension, could follow later. Although BNP32 has emerged as an important diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of CHF (1, 12, 37), its levels are markedly variable in HTN. Therefore, its biological and prognostic significance in HTN remains to be elucidated. In addition, NT-proBNP has been proposed as an emerging biomarker of cardiovascular disease with prognostic potential in both HTN and CHF as well as in the general population, as recently shown by Costello-Boerrigter et al. (13) and others (21, 30, 31, 36).

Although several reports have demonstrated that plasma BNP is elevated in patients with HTN, especially in those with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), there is limited information available on the relationship between circulating molecular forms of BNP and the hypertensive phenotype. We hypothesized that early stages of HTN are characterized by a lack of compensatory activation of BNP system, which is partially reversed in more severe stages of HTN. The objective of the current study was to evaluate changes in circulating BNP32 and NT-proBNP in subjects with early stage HTN. Specifically, in human subjects with essential HTN, we evaluated the relationship among circulating BNP32 and NT-proBNP, cardiac remodeling assessed with echocardiography, blood pressure levels, and the severity of HTN.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Department of Medicine of Catania and the Cardiovascular Research Committee and Mayo Institutional Review Board. We prospectively recruited 78 HTN patients (43 males; mean age 51.4 ± 4 yr) and 28 age- and sex-matched controls. Each subject provided informed consent. Patients were classified as belonging to three grades of HTN targeted according to office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and in accordance with the 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines, grades 1 to 3 (19). Blood pressure was measured three times at 5-min intervals at an outpatient clinic, and a complete cardiovascular evaluation, including ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and echocardiogram, was performed the day of the study. Blood pressure levels, assessed by ABPM, were used for the multivariate analysis in HTN subjects only. Echocardiography was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography (32). Left ventricular mass (LVM) was calculated using the regression equation described by Devereux and Reichek (14) and indexed for body surface. Upper normal limits for LVM were considered 135 and 110 g/m2 for males and females, respectively. Cardiac remodeling was defined as concentric pattern if relative wall thickness (RWT) was >0.45 and as eccentric if RWT was ≤0.45. To limit the confounding effect on plasma BNP concentrations, patients with systolic (ejection fraction <50%) and/or diastolic (E < A) dysfunction or hepatic, metabolic, and renal diseases (serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl) were excluded. Blood samples were collected from an antecubital vein in the morning (8:00 to 9:00 AM) after patients had fasted overnight and rested supine for 30 min. Blood was placed in chilled EDTA (1 mg/ml) and aprotinin (500 U/ml) tubes. Blood was then centrifuged at 4°C, and plasma was frozen and stored at –80°C until assayed.

Radioimmunoassay. Biologically active BNP32 (Shionogi) and NT-proBNP (Roche) levels were measured at the Mayo Clinic Cardiorenal Research Laboratory (Rochester, MN) with commercially available radioimmunoassays carried out as previously described (2, 7, 9, 18). BNP32 level was determined using the Shionogi assay, which is highly specific for the mature 32-amino acid BNP peptide with recognition sites to both the 17-amino acid ring and the COOH terminus. In unpublished studies from our laboratory, we have determined that the Shionogi assay does not recognize NT-proBNP(1–76). No information exists regarding recognition of proBNP(1–108); however, we speculate that under normal physiological conditions, proBNP(1–108) does not circulate but rather is fully processed to NT-proBNP(1–76) and the mature BNP32. The Roche NT-proBNP(1–76) radioimmunoassay is highly specific for this linear processed form of BNP, which lacks any disulfide ring structure. Again, unpublished studies by our laboratory have determined that the Roche NT-proBNP assay does not detect BNP32. Furthermore, Roche's description of the assay states there is <0.001 cross-reaction with BNP32. No information has been published regarding its ability to detect proBNP(1–108), but we again speculate that proBNP(1–108) may not circulate under normal physiological conditions, and studies are required to determine whether this is the case in hypertension and especially heart failure with more advanced technologies. Thus these assays are highly specific for NT-proBNP(1–76) (Roche) and BNP32 (Shionogi).

Statistical analysis. Summary statistics are presented as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables, as means ± SD for the normal variables, and as median and first and third quartiles for the skewed variables. Categorical variables were compared by {chi}2-test and continuous variables by t-test or Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. ANOVA testing for linear trend among all study groups was performed using log-transformed values of BNP32 (log BNP32) and NT-proBNP (log NT-proBNP). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess which variables were independent predictors of log BNP32 and log NT-proBNP values. The variables for the multiple linear regression model were selected among the variables with P < 0.10 at univariate analysis and included age and sex. All tests were two-sided, and for all analyses P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed with SPSS 13.0 for Windows.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The clinical and biochemical characteristics of the patient population are shown in Table 1. According to blood pressure level, subjects were divided into three groups, from grade 1 to grade 3 HTN. There were no differences among groups in age, sex, and serum creatinine level. HTN drugs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, calcium channel blocker, beta-blocker, diuretic, blocker of angiotensin II receptor type IA, {alpha}1-receptor antagonist, {alpha}2-receptor partial agonist) used to treat patients increased from grade 1 to grade 3 of HTN from a minimum of one drug to a maximum of five drugs. The overall prevalence of LVH in our study was 35%, equally distributed in all three grades of HTN (Table 1). BNP32 concentration was slightly, but not significantly, higher in females [9.1 (4–32) pg/ml] than in males [8.3 (4–14) pg/ml] (P = 0.06). NT-proBNP was significantly higher in females [55.7 (31–122) pg/ml] than males [27.2 (14–58) pg/ml] (P = 0.001). Median values of BNP32 and NT-proBNP in controls and HTN subjects are summarized in Table 2. As shown in Fig. 1, A and B, log BNP32 and log NT-proBNP levels in grades 2 and 3 HTN were significantly higher than in grade 1 HTN. Importantly, although BNP32 was not different in subjects with grade 1 HTN compared with controls (P = 0.63), NT-proBNP was reduced in these subjects compared with controls (P = 0.03) (Fig. 2, A and B). In patients with HTN, BNP32 was not elevated in the subjects with LVH compared with those without LVH (Fig. 3A). In contrast, NT-proBNP was significantly higher in subjects with LVH compared with subjects without LVH (P = 0.02) (Fig. 3B).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical and biochemical characteristics

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Distribution of peptides between controls and hypertensive patients

 

Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mean log-transformed values of brain natriuretic peptide level (log BNP; A) and amino-terminal proBNP (log NT-proBNP; B) in controls and patients with grades 1 to 3 hypertension (HTN). Data are means ± SD. Significance is referred to test for trend.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. A: BNP32 level in subjects with grade 1 HTN [median 4 (Q1-Q2 4–11) pg/ml] and in controls [4.75 (4–10) pg/ml] (P = 0.63) by Mann-Whitney test. B: NT-proBNP level in subjects with grade 1 HTN [16.3 (9–54) pg/ml] and in controls [34.8 (25–48) pg/ml] (P = 0.03) by Mann-Whitney test. Error bars indicate the range of distribution, columns show the 25th (Q1) and 75th (Q2) percentiles, and the horizontal line within each column represents the median.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. A: BNP32 in subjects with HTN and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) [median 9 (Q1-Q2 4–18) pg/ml] and in subjects with HTN without LVH [13 (8–26) pg/ml] (P = 0.07 by Mann-Whitney test). B: NT-proBNP in subjects with HTN and LVH [66.2 (33–114) pg/ml] and in subjects with HTN without LVH [32.2 (12–83) pg/ml] (P = 0.02 by Mann-Whitney test). Error bars indicate the range of distribution, columns show the Q1 and Q2 percentiles, and the horizontal line within each column represents the median.

 
At univariate regression analysis, BNP32 and NT-proBNP were significantly related to each other and to other variables as shown in Table 3. In multivariate analysis, log BNP32 was independently predicted only by HTN grade (beta = 0.274, P = 0.004) and age (beta = 0.21, P = 0.026). Log NT-proBNP was independently predicted by sex (beta = 0.235, P = 0.012) and HTN grade (beta = 0.218, P = 0.023), with a trend for age (beta = 0.17, P = 0.07) (Table 4). Moreover, when we replaced HTN grade with blood pressure levels from 24-h ABPM in the multivariate model (only for subjects with HTN), log BNP32 was independently predicted only by age and sex, whereas log NT-proBNP was predicted by age, sex, and 24 h-SBP (Table 4). No relationship was observed between the two forms of BNP and cardiac remodeling (RWT > 0.45) or cardiac volumes in these patients. In a logistic regression analysis, an increase of 10 pg/ml in both BNP32 and NT-proBNP concentrations were associated with a significant increase in risk of HTN [odds ratio (OR) = 2.86, 95% confidence interval (CI 95%) = 1.09–7.52, P = 0.03; and OR = 1.17, CI 95% = 1.00–1.36, P = 0.04, respectively] (Table 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Bivariate (Pearson) correlation analysis

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Logistic regression analysis: odds ratio for hypertension outcome

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study shows for the first time that BNP32 and NT-proBNP levels are higher than control levels in HTN grades 2 and 3 but not in grade 1 and that this pattern is independent of LVH, cardiac remodeling, and cardiac volumes. On the whole, a positive relationship between the two molecular forms of BNP and blood pressure levels in patients with essential HTN has been observed in the present study. Therefore, two main findings should be emphasized. First, whereas BNP32 was unchanged in grade 1 HTN, NT-proBNP was significantly reduced; thus an impaired response of this cardioprotective system may occur in mild HTN. Second, the late activation of the BNP system was correlated to the levels of blood pressure more than to cardiac remodeling and hypertrophy. Indeed, reduced NT-proBNP together with a lack of activation of BNP32 in mild HTN, coupled with their late increase in moderate to severe stages, suggests that HTN is characterized by a derangement of the relationship between stimuli and release of this cardioprotective peptide in its early phase.

BNP is an endogenous peptide produced and is released from the heart under physiological and pathological conditions. Like atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) (7), BNP is highly increased in CHF, mainly because of left ventricular dysfunction. Indeed, in the last decade it has been well established that BNP is a biomarker of diagnostic and prognostic importance in CHF. Although BNP is involved in blood pressure regulation, clinical studies have provided conflicting results on its concentration in patients with essential HTN. Some reports indicate that patients with HTN have plasma natriuretic peptides levels higher than normal subjects (6), whereas others have demonstrated a different pattern (16, 34). Although elevated levels of both forms of BNP in HTN often have been attributed to the presence of LVH (17, 23, 35), no clear relationship between plasma BNP levels and blood pressure has been reported so far in patients with essential HTN.

In our study we simultaneously evaluated plasma BNP32 and NT-proBNP levels in an unselected cohort of patients with essential HTN and compared them with those of age- and sex-matched normal subjects to assess their association with HTN grade, cardiac remodeling, and LVH and cardiac volumes. Indeed, in grade 1 HTN, BNP32 concentration was not different from that of normal subjects, and a slight, yet significant, increase was observed in grades 2 and 3 HTN. We observed that both forms were higher than controls in grades 2 and 3 of HTN (Table 3), and the relationship between natriuretic peptides and HTN grades also was confirmed using multivariate analysis. Furthermore, in HTN subjects, NT-proBNP was independently predicted by 24-h SBP levels (Table 4). Moreover, the association between peptide concentrations and HTN was further strengthened by results of logistic regression, particularly for BNP32, with the HTN phenotype almost two times more frequent for any increase of 10 pg/ml BNP32. Of interest, the lack of activation or even a reduction of BNP (BNP32 and NT-proBNP) concentration in subjects with grade 1 HTN compared with controls might indicate the presence of an impaired response of this cardioprotective system in mild HTN. In addition, the relationship between both forms of BNP and blood pressure levels may be under a certain threshold for a stimulation of BNP system in grade 1 HTN. An alternative possible explanation of these findings may relate to a decrease in degradation by neutral endopeptidase, or clearance by the natriuretic peptide type C receptor (NPR-C) could attenuate the reduction in BNP32 concentration, whereas the decrease in NT-proBNP in grade 1 HTN may reflect a decrease in whole BNP secretion and/or production.

Importantly, our data show that the relationship between both BNP32 and NT-proBNP and HTN grades is independent of LVH. Ultimately, in subjects with HTN, no differences in plasma levels of BNP32 were observed between subjects with and without LVH, whereas NT-proBNP was elevated in the presence of LVH (Fig. 3, A and B). The lack of increase in concentrations of BNP32 in subjects with essential HTN and LVH compared with HTN subjects without LVH is certainly one of the most controversial finding of the current study. As to the relationship between natriuretic peptides and cardiac remodeling in patients with HTN, Nishikimi et al. (29) showed that plasma ANP and BNP levels increased with LVH and that plasma BNP levels were specifically higher in concentric cardiac hypertrophy compared with eccentric hypertrophy, despite comparable blood pressure and left ventricular mass values. Indeed, several other authors have hypothesized that the increased level of BNP in subjects with HTN is mainly due to LVH, and the lack of relationship at multivariate analysis between both forms of BNP and LVH and geometry in the current study is somehow surprising. One possible explanation of these findings may rely on the inclusion criteria adopted in our study. In fact, in our cohort, the grades of HTN were equally distributed and LVH had the same rather low prevalence (35%) in all three HTN grades. It is likely that in a cohort with a higher prevalence of severe HTN and LVH, the relationship between this cardiac hormone and cardiac hypertrophy/remodeling might become more evident. The present study therefore emphasizes that the relationship between BNP and cardiac remodeling/hypertrophy is rather weak when the prevalence of cardiac damage is low, therefore underscoring the weak utility of plasma BNP for LVH screening previously shown by others in a large survey (28). Moreover, considering that the presence of LVH was similar across the groups (Table 1), one could propose that chronic drug treatment in these groups was more effective for cardiac remodeling than it was for underlying vessel disease, thus contributing to the lack of relationship between BNP peptide levels and LVH. However, we do not have conclusive evidence that treatment of HTN could have affected underlying vessel disease more than cardiac remodeling.

Finally, to date, it is not yet clear whether BNP is circulating in a biologically active form and/or whether NT-proBNP possesses biological activities. However, it is common opinion that the physiological process that leads to the production of mature active BNP starts from the precursor proBNP(1–108) that is cleaved by the enzyme corin in two distinct fragments: BNP32, which contains the ring structure, and the linear 76-amino acid fragment NT-proBNP. Our group (20) previously reported the lack of mature BNP32 in some patients with overt heart failure, suggesting that an altered processing of proBNP(1–108) may occur in heart failure. However, it remains unclear whether altered processing occurs in hypertensive patients, as well, and, if it is so, at which stage of HTN it occurs. Furthermore, it is not yet known whether the altered processing of proBNP(1–108) occurs early in the natural history of the cardiovascular disease or if it is a late phenomenon. In this regard, it should be noted that Dries et al. (15) recently reported that the presence of corin gene allele defined by two missense mutations is associated with high blood pressure and HTN, making reasonable the hypothesis that an altered processing pathway also occurs in HTN. However, it is tempting to hypothesize that an initial insufficient production, processing, and/or release of BNP may take place in mild HTN and is followed by a later increase of BNP production (grades 2 and 3 HTN). If this hypothesis is proven to be true, subjects with mild HTN may be candidates for exogenous chronic administration of active forms of BNP. In this regard, our laboratory (10) recently reported a new technology that makes oral BNP administration feasible in animals.

There are limitations to these findings. First, this is an observational hypothesis generating study with a limited number of subjects enrolled that warrants further confirmation. Second, in this study we used common available radioimmunoassay methodology to determine concentration of BNP32 and NT-proBNP; although this technique may have a lower sensitivity and specificity compared with more advanced methodologies such as mass spectrometry, it is largely used and has high clinical relevance.

In conclusion, plasma levels of the two cardiac hormones BNP32 and NT-proBNP were for the first time measured concurrently in normal subjects and in patients with grades 1 to 3 essential HTN. Although both forms are not activated in mild HTN, with NT-proBNP levels even lower than in controls, their concentrations are increased in more advanced stages of HTN (grades 2 and 3), with no relationship to cardiac remodeling and/or hypertrophy. These findings could provide a better understanding of the biology of the BNP system in essential HTN.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
A. Cataliotti was the recipient of an Italian Society of Hypertension scholarship and American Heart Association Beginning Grant in Aid Award 0365411Z. This work was also supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL-36634 and P01-HL-76611.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Cataliotti, Cardiorenal Research Laboratory, 200 First St., SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (e-mail: cataliotti.alessandro{at}mayo.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Abraham WT, Lowes BD, Ferguson DA, Odom J, Kim JK, Robertson AD, Bristow MR, and Schrier RW. Systemic hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and renal effects of a steady-state infusion of human brain natriuretic peptide in patients with hemodynamically decompensated heart failure. J Card Fail 4: 37–44, 1998.[Medline]
  2. Ala-Kopsala M, Magga J, Peuhkurinen K, Leipala J, Ruskoaho H, Leppaluoto J, and Vuolteenaho O. Molecular heterogeneity has a major impact on the measurement of circulating N-terminal fragments of A- and B-type natriuretic peptides. Clin Chem 50: 1576–1588, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Berkowitz R. B-type natriuretic peptide and the diagnosis of acute heart failure. Rev Cardiovasc Med 5, Suppl 4: S3–S16, 2004.
  4. Bloch KD, Scott JA, Zisfen JB, Fallon JT; Margolies MN, Seidman CE, Matsueda GR, Homcy CJ, Graham RM, and Seidman JC. Biosynthesis and secretion of proatrial natriuretic factor by cultured rat cardiocytes. Science 230: 1168–1171, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Brunner-La Rocca HP, Kaye DM, Woods RL, Hastings J, and Esler MD. Effects of intravenous brain natriuretic peptide on regional sympathetic activity in patients with healthy control subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 37: 1221–1227, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Buckley MG, Markandau ND, Miller MA, Sagnella GA, and MacGregor GA. Plasma concentration and comparison of brain and atrial natriuretic peptide in normal subjects and in patients with essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 7: 245–250, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Burnett JC Jr, Hu DC, and Heser D. Atrial natriuretic peptide elevation in congestive heart failure in man. Science 231: 1145–1146, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cataliotti A, Boerringter G, Costello-Boerringter LC, Schirgher JA, Tsuruda T, Heublein DM, Chen HH, Malatino LS, and Burnett JC Jr. Brain natriuretic peptide enhances renal actions of furosemide and suppresses furosemide induced aldosterone activation in experimental heart failure. Circulation 109: 1680–1685, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Cataliotti A, Malatino LS, Jougasaki M, Zoccali C, Castellino P, Giacone P, Bellanuova I, Tripepi R, Seminara G, Parlongo S, Stancanelli B, Bonanno G, Fatuzzo P, Rapisarda F, Belluardo P, Signorelli SS, Heublein DM, Lainchbury JC, Leskinen HK, Bailey KR, Redfield MM, and Burnett JC Jr. Circulating natriuretic peptide concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease: role of brain natriuretic peptide as a biomarker for ventricular remodeling. Mayo Clin Proc 76: 1111–1119, 2001.[Abstract]
  10. Cataliotti A, Schirger JA, Martin FL, Chen HH, McKie PM, Boerrigter G, Costello-Boerrigter LC, Harty G, Heublein DM, Sandberg SM, James KD, Miller MA, Malkar NB, Polowy K, and Burnett JC Jr. Oral human brain natriuretic peptide activates cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate and decreases mean arterial pressure. Circulation 112: 836–840, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Clemens LE, Almirez RG, Baudouin KA, Mischak RP, Grossbard EB, and Protter AA. Pharmacokinetics and biological actions of brain natriuretic peptide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 287: 67–71, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Chen HH and Burnett JC Jr. The natriuretic peptides in heart failure: diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 111: 406–416, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Costello-Boerrigter LC, Boerrigter G, Redfield MM, Rodeheffer RJ, Urban LH, Mahoney DW, Jacobsen SJ, Heublein DM, and Burnett JC Jr. Amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and B-type natriuretic peptide in the general community. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 345–353, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Devereux RB and Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Circulation 55: 613–618, 1977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Dries DL, Victor RG, Rame JE, Cooper RS, Zhu X, Leonard D, Ho SI, Wu Q, Post W, and Drazner MH. Corin gene minor allele defined by 2 missense mutations is common in blacks and associated with high blood pressure and hypertension. Circulation 112: 2403–2410, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Flickinger AL, Burnett JC Jr, and Turner ST. Atrial natriuretic peptide and blood pressure in a population-based sample. Mayo Clin Proc 70: 932–938, 1995.[Abstract]
  17. Freitag MH, Larson MG, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Wang TJ, Leip EP, Wilson PWF, and Vasan RS. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels and blood pressure tracking in the Framingham heart study. Hypertension 41: 978–983, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Grantham JA, Borgeson DD, and Burnett JC Jr. BNP: pathophysiological and potential therapeutic roles in acute congestive heart failure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 272: R1077–R1083, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 21: 1011–1053, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  20. Hawkridge AM, Heublein DM, Bergen HR, Cataliotti A, Burnett JC Jr, and Muddiman DC. Quantitative mass spectral evidence for the absence of circulating C-terminal brain (B-type) natriuretic peptide (BNP32) in severe human heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 17442–17447, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hildebrandt P, Boesen M, Olsen M, Wachtell K, and Groenning B. N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in arterial hypertension—a marker for left ventricular dimensions and prognosis. Eur J Heart Fail 6: 313–317, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Hooper JD, Scarman AL, Clarke BE, Normyle JF, and Antalis TM. Localization of the mosaic transmembrane serine protease corin to heart myocytes. Eur J Biochem 267: 6931–6937, 2000.[Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Kohno M, Horio T, Yokokawa K, Murakawa K, Yasunari K, Akioka K, Tahara A, Toda I, Takeuchi K, Kurihara N, and Takeda T. Brain natriuretic peptide as a cardiac hormone in essential hypertension. Am J Med 92: 29–34, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  24. Luchner A, Stevens TL, Borgeson DD, Redfield MM, Wei CM, Porter JC, and Burnett JC Jr. Differential atrial, and ventricular expression of myocardial BNP during evolution of heart failure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 274: H1684–H1689, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Marcus LS, Hart D, Packer M, Yushak M, Medina N, Danziger RS, Heitjan DF, and Katz SD. Hemodynamic and renal excretory effects of human brain natriuretic peptide infusion in patients with con congestive heart failure. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised crossover trial. Circulation 94: 3184–3189, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Michaels AD, Klein A, Madden JA, and Chatterjee K. Effects of intravenous nesiritide on human coronary vasomotor regulation and myocardial oxygen uptake. Circulation 107: 2697–2701, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Minamino N, Kangawa K, and Matsuo H. Isolation and identification of a higher molecular weight brain natriuretic peptide in porcine cardiac atrium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 157: 402–409, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  28. Nakamura M, Tanaka F, Yonezawa S, Satou K, Nagano M, and Hiramori K. The limited value of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide for screening for left ventricular hypertrophy among hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 16: 1025–1029, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Nishikimi T, Yoshihara F, Morimoto A, Ishikawa K, Ishimitsu T, Saito Y, Kangawa K, Matsu H, Omae T, and Matsuoka H. Relationship between left ventricular geometry and natriuretic peptide levels in essential hypertension. Hypertension 28: 22–30, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Pedersen F, Raymond I, Kistorp C, Sandgaard N, Jacobsen P, and Hildebrandt P. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in arterial hypertension: a valuable prognostic marker of cardiovascular events. J Card Fail 11, Suppl: S70–S75, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Rivera Otero JM, Talens-Visconti R, Salvador A, Bertomeu V, Miro V, Jordan A, Sogorb F, Cortes R, Paya R, Diago JL, and Grau G; Grupo de Disfuncion VI, Comunidad Valenciana. Ventricular hypertrophy increases NT-proBNP in subjects with and without hypertension. Int J Cardiol 96: 265–271, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Shan DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, and Weyman A. Recommendation regarding quantitation in M-Mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 58: 1072–1083, 1978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Suzuki E, Hirata Y, Kohmoto O, Sugimoto T, Hayakawa H, Matsuoka H, Suigomoto T, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Minamino N, and Matsuo H. Cellular mechanism for synthesis and secretion of atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide in cultured rat atrial cells. Circ Res 71: 1039–1048, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Talartschik J, Eisenhauer T, Schrader J, Schoel G, Buhr-Schinner H, and Scheler F. Low atrial natriuretic peptide plasma concentrations in 100 patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 3: 45–47, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Takeda T and Kohno M. Brain natriuretic peptide in hypertension. Hypertens Res 18: 259–266, 1995.[Medline]
  36. Talwar S, Siebenhofer A, Williams B, and Ng LL. Influence of hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction on plasma N terminal proBNP. Heart 83: 278–282, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Yamamoto K, Burnett JC Jr, Jougasaki M, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, Saito Y, Nakao K, and Redfield MM. Superiority of brain natriuretic peptide as a hormonal marker of ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction and ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertension 28: 988–994, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Yan W, Sheng N, Seto M, Morser J, and Wu QQ. Corin, a mosaic transmembrane serine protease encoded by a novel cDNA from human heart. J Biol Chem 274: 14926–14935, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Yan W, Wu F, Morser J, and Wu Q. Corin, a transmembrane cardiac serine protease, acts as a pro-atrial natriuretic peptide-converting enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 8525–8529, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Zellner C, Protter AA, Ko E, Pothireddy MP, De Marco T, Hutchinson SJ, Chou TM, Chatterjee K, and Sudhier K. Coronary vasodilator effects of BNP: mechanism of action in coronary conductance and resistance arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H1049–H1057, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Cataliotti, H. H. Chen, J. A. Schirger, F. L. Martin, G. Boerrigter, L. C. Costello-Boerrigter, K. D. James, K. Polowy, M. A. Miller, N. B. Malkar, et al.
Chronic Actions of a Novel Oral B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Conjugate in Normal Dogs and Acute Actions in Angiotensin II-Mediated Hypertension
Circulation, October 21, 2008; 118(17): 1729 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. M. Heublein, B. K. Huntley, G. Boerrigter, A. Cataliotti, S. M. Sandberg, M. M. Redfield, and J. C. Burnett Jr
Immunoreactivity and Guanosine 3',5'-Cyclic Monophosphate Activating Actions of Various Molecular Forms of Human B-Type Natriuretic Peptide
Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 1114 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/4/H1529    most recent
00107.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belluardo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Malatino, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belluardo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Malatino, L. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.