AJP - Heart Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H1731-H1737, 2006. First published May 12, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00336.2006
0363-6135/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/4/H1731    most recent
00336.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lankhaar, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Vonk-Noordegraaf, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lankhaar, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Vonk-Noordegraaf, A.

Quantification of right ventricular afterload in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension

Jan-Willem Lankhaar,1,2 Nico Westerhof,3 Theo J. C. Faes,1 Koen M. J. Marques,4 J. Tim Marcus,1 Piet E. Postmus,2 and Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf2

Departments of 1Physics and Medical Technology, 2Pulmonary Diseases, 3Physiology, and 4Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Submitted 30 March 2006 ; accepted in final form 8 May 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Right ventricular (RV) afterload is commonly defined as pulmonary vascular resistance, but this does not reflect the afterload to pulsatile flow. The purpose of this study was to quantify RV afterload more completely in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension (PH) using a three-element windkessel model. The model consists of peripheral resistance (R), pulmonary arterial compliance (C), and characteristic impedance (Z). Using pulmonary artery pressure from right-heart catheterization and pulmonary artery flow from MRI velocity quantification, we estimated the windkessel parameters in patients with chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH; n = 10) and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH; n = 9). Patients suspected of PH but in whom PH was not found served as controls (NONPH; n = 10). R and Z were significantly lower and C significantly higher in the NONPH group than in both the CTEPH and IPAH groups (P < 0.001). R and Z were significantly lower in the CTEPH group than in the IPAH group (P < 0.05). The parameters R and C of all patients obeyed the relationship C = 0.75/R (R2 = 0.77), equivalent to a similar RC time in all patients. Mean pulmonary artery pressure P and C fitted well to C = 69.7/P (i.e., similar pressure dependence in all patients). Our results show that differences in RV afterload among groups with different forms of PH can be quantified with a windkessel model. Furthermore, the data suggest that the RC time and the elastic properties of the large pulmonary arteries remain unchanged in PH.

pulmonary circulation; windkessel model; pulmonary blood flow; pulmonary artery pressure


PULMONARY HYPERTENSION (PH) can have a variety of causes (1), but all causes have an increased right ventricular (RV) afterload in common. Because this increased RV afterload may lead to hypertrophy, RV failure, and, ultimately, death, it is important to improve our understanding of the RV afterload. Most often, RV afterload is defined as pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Because PVR is the ratio of mean pressure and mean flow, it reflects the arterial load to a steady flow. In reality, however, blood flow is pulsatile. A complete description of RV afterload, therefore, should also include the load to pulsatile flow (38). A decreased arterial compliance, for example, may be of similar importance for RV afterload as an increased PVR (29).

Another determinant of RV afterload that is not reflected by PVR or by arterial compliance is the characteristic impedance of the proximal pulmonary artery (27, 42), which combines both blood inertia and vascular storage properties. The inertial properties play a role in acceleration and deceleration of the blood, and the storage properties arise from the elasticity of the vessel wall (27, 42). In the absence of wave reflection (i.e., if the pulmonary artery were infinitely long and waves would never reach the periphery), the input impedance of the pulmonary arterial system would equal the characteristic impedance (43). Characteristic impedance may be affected, particularly if the large vessels are involved, as is the case in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (5).

Differentiating the resistance, compliance, and characteristic impedance in RV afterload thus may provide important diagnostic and prognostic information. The three components can be derived directly from the input impedance spectrum but also by using a physiological model. A model that combines the three components is the three-element windkessel model (42), which is most often represented by an electrical circuit. It is attractive for clinical application because its parameters have a physiological meaning and the number of parameters is limited. The windkessel model has been applied successfully in the analysis of the systemic arterial tree (27), but we do not know studies in the pulmonary circulation, where the model has been used to quantify and differentiate the RV afterload in different forms of PH. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate whether three well-defined and clearly distinct patient groups could be discriminated using the three-element windkessel model and standard clinical measurement techniques.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Model and parameter estimation. The three-element windkessel model (Fig. 1) consists of (total) arterial compliance C, pulmonary artery characteristic impedance Z, and peripheral resistance R (42, 43). Resistance of the small arteries and arterioles dominates R, and C is the summation of the total compliance of the pulmonary conduit arteries. Z accounts for the local blood mass and compliance of the proximal pulmonary artery. A single resistor can represent this relation so that the sum of R and Z equals PVR. Note that in the model, R, C, and Z are independent of each other.


Figure 1
View larger version (3K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The 3-element windkessel model represented as an electrical circuit. R, peripheral resistance; C, pulmonary arterial compliance; Z, characteristic impedance.

 
Because of the popularity of the three-element windkessel model in different applications, a variety of methods can be found in the literature for estimation of its parameters from pressure and flow data obtained in the aorta or pulmonary artery (2, 9, 40, 42, 43). The energy balance method proposed by Cappello et al. (2) is based on conservation of mass and energy. With this method, expressions for R and Z are derived in terms of PVR, averaged squared pressure and flow, and mean power entering the vascular bed. After R and Z are derived, pressure and volume for the arterial compliance can be calculated, from which C can be estimated with linear regression. Thus implementation of the energy balance method of Cappello et al. is straightforward: initial values and iterations are not required for estimation of the parameters. Therefore, the energy balance method was used in this study. Venous pressure was assumed to be negligible so that pulmonary artery pressure represents the pressure gradient across the pulmonary vascular bed.

Because C estimated with a three-element windkessel model is known to overestimate compliance (37), compliance was also estimated using the pulse pressure method (39). Furthermore, compliance was estimated as the ratio of stroke volume divided by pulse pressure. The latter method has been shown recently to be a strong predictor of survival in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (24).

The product of R and C has the dimension of time. It is a time constant that characterizes the decay of pulmonary artery pressure in diastole (27). Because increased resistance leads to an increased pressure and increased pressure leads to decreased compliance, it is not clear a priori whether the RC time changes in PH. Therefore, RC time also was studied in the three patient groups.

Patients. Included in the study were patients without PH, with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), and with chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH). The latter patients had a history of pulmonary embolism and an abnormal pulmonary angiogram. Six of the CTEPH patients were considered inoperable. The decision on operability was made by a team of pulmonologists, radiologists, and a surgeon. A pulmonary angiogram that showed less obstruction in the central arteries than may be expected on the basis of the PVR was considered an important indication for small vessel disease.

It was assumed that the vasculopathy of IPAH involves distal resistive arteries (36), whereas the thrombi in CTEPH might also involve large pulmonary arteries (3, 5, 32). Thus both patient groups were likely to have a different RV afterload. Patients suspected of PH but in whom no elevated pulmonary artery pressure was measured served as controls (NONPH). Selection was based on clinically accepted standards (1). At the time of examination, patients had received neither treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension nor any other medication except acenocoumarol and diuretics. Patients with reversible PH were excluded. Reversibility was defined as a drop of at least 10 mmHg in pulmonary artery pressure to 40 mmHg or below after administration of 20 parts per million nitric oxide (NO) (1). In addition, PH due to lung or heart disease was excluded by further diagnostic workup (lung function test, high-resolution CT scan, and echocardiography) according to the guidelines (1). Clinical functional status of the study group was New York Heart Association class III or IV for both patient groups. The hemodynamic characteristics of both patients groups are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient characteristics and hemodynamic data

 
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Committee, and all patients gave informed consent.

Measurements. In the NONPH and IPAH patients, pressure was measured via the transfemoral approach with a 6-Fr fluid-filled, single-lumen, multipurpose catheter (Cordis, Miami Lakes, FL). In the CTEPH patients, pressure was measured during pulmonary angiography with a 6-Fr Grollman catheter (Cook, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The pressure signal and the ECG were digitally recorded at a sampling frequency of 250 Hz using a custom-made LabView application (National Instruments, Austin, TX). During catheterization, cardiac output was measured using Fick's method. The frequency response of the catheters used in the study was evaluated in vitro using a pressure-step apparatus (33), and the response was analyzed as described by Gardner (10).

In all patients, volumetric flow in the pulmonary artery was measured with MRI using phase-contrast velocity quantification within 7 days after right heart catheterization. It was assumed that despite the delay in the pressure and flow measurement, the patient was in the same hemodynamic steady state. On a 1.5-T scanner (Magnetom Sonata; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany), images of the main pulmonary artery cross section were acquired with velocity encoding perpendicular to the imaging plane. The slice location and orientation were determined as described previously (25). A two-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo pulse sequence was applied with an excitation angle of 15°, a TE of 4.8 ms, a TR of 11 ms, and a receiver bandwidth of 170 Hz per pixel. Velocity sensitivity was set to 150 cm/s, but, if appropriate, was adjusted to lower or higher values in individual cases. The velocity encoding was interleaved, resulting in a temporal resolution of 22 ms. The field of view was set to 260 x 320 mm, and the matrix size was set to 208 x 256. No k-space segmentation was applied, and acquisitions were not averaged. Acquisitions were prospectively triggered to the ECG, and during the acquisition the patients breathed freely. The ECG was recorded during the acquisition. In the image reconstruction, concomitant gradient terms were removed. Phase offset errors were removed using a time-varying variant of the method described by Lankhaar et al. (18).

Volumetric flow as a function of time was obtained from the MRI phase images after analysis with Medis Flow (Medis, Leiden, The Netherlands). Contours were drawn semiautomatically around the pulmonary artery cross section in the MRI magnitude images. The average velocity within the contour of each image was multiplied with its area. Analysis of a complete cine resulted in a volumetric flow curve with a sampling period of 22 ms. The flow curve is an average of ~200 heartbeats.

Data preprocessing. Pressure resulted from a continuous recording, whereas flow was an average of many cardiac cycles. The sampling frequency of the pressure signal was higher (250 Hz) than that of the flow signal (45 Hz). Furthermore, differences in heart rate were found in both signals because measurements were not conducted simultaneously. Therefore, pressure and flow had to be preprocessed before analysis.

From the pressure signal, an interval of ~20 s during which the pressure is stationary (no large variations in systolic, diastolic, and mean pressure) was selected. Underdamping artifacts were removed by zero-phase filtering (25a) with a fifth-order Butterworth filter (cutoff frequency 10 Hz). The cycles in the selection were ensemble averaged. The influence of beat-to-beat variations due to breathing was reduced by setting the average of each individual cardiac cycle to the overall average of the selected interval.

The flow curve was resampled to the sampling frequency of the pressure curve by using zero padding in the frequency domain (25a). Subsequently, the start of diastole was identified (first zero crossing after its minimum). Because valvular leakage could be excluded in all patients, it was assumed that diastolic flow equals zero. Therefore, all diastolic samples were set equal to zero, and the period length of the resulting flow curve was adjusted to match the period length of the ensemble-averaged pressure by adding or deleting zero samples in diastole. Finally, to ensure a periodic flow, the last five samples (after interpolation) of flow were linearly interpolated to the first sample of flow.

Preprocessing thus yielded an average pressure and an average flow wave of the same length, sampled at the same frequency. Although t = 0 of both signals coincided with the R wave of the ECG, synchronization was still necessary. With the windkessel model, this was done as follows. Flow was used to predict pressure with the windkessel model. Flow was then shifted in time (i.e., samples at the end of the cardiac cycle were cyclically rotated to the beginning of the cycle), and the windkessel parameters were estimated again from pressure and the shifted flow. With the use of these new parameters, the pressure was predicted and compared with the measured pressure. Shifting of flow was repeated until the difference between predicted and measured pressure (i.e., the sum of squared residuals) was minimal. Data processing, simulation, and parameter estimation were conducted using MATLAB (version 7.0.0.19920 [EC] , R14; The MathWorks, Natick, MA).

Accuracy of the energy balance method and pressure measurement. A simulation model was used to assess the accuracy of the energy balance method in the presence of distortions due to the transfer characteristics of a fluid-filled catheter. Both a pressure and a flow wave were simulated with the ventricle-vascular bed model described by Stergiopulos et al. (41). In this model, the vascular bed is modeled as a three-element windkessel model and the ventricle as a time-varying elastance. Three sets of model parameters were chosen such that the pressure and flow waves generated by the model were representative of the three patient groups used in this study. The simulated pressure wave was used as input to a second-order differential equation model of the fluid-filled catheter (10, 14). Depending on the damping and natural frequency chosen for this model, an under- or overdamped catheter could be simulated. Subsequently, the distorted pressure wave resulting from this catheter model was filtered with the Butterworth filter as described above. Both the filtered and unfiltered distorted pressure wave and the simulated flow wave were used to estimate the windkessel parameters using the energy balance method. The estimated parameters were compared with the true parameters (as initially set in the simulation). This procedure was repeated for different combinations of natural frequencies and damping coefficients.

Statistical methods. The group averages of the basic hemodynamic data and the estimated windkessel parameters of the patients were compared using one-way analysis of variance with a least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test that compares all pairs of patient groups. Differences with P < 0.05 were regarded as significant. Values are presented as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS 12.0.1 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Basic hemodynamic characteristics of patient groups. The characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. Note that although the pulmonary artery pressure seems to be lower in the CTEPH group than in the IPAH group, the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.083). Also, there is no difference in PVR (calculated from mean pressure and Fick's cardiac output, P > 0.5), right atrium pressure (P = 0.39), and mixed venous saturation (P > 0.5). Thus severity of the PH is comparable in both groups.

Model parameters of patient groups. An example of a preprocessed pressure-flow pair from each patient group is shown in Fig. 2. The estimated windkessel model parameters of the three patient groups are shown in Fig. 3. The NONPH group differed significantly from the CTEPH and IPAH groups in terms of R, C (estimated with the energy balance method), and Z (P < 0.01 vs. CTEPH, P < 0.001 vs. IPAH). As to the difference between the two groups with PH, there was a significant difference in terms of Z and R (P < 0.05) but not in terms of C (Fig. 3). Thus RV afterload in terms of peripheral resistance and characteristic impedance is different in CTEPH from the RV afterload in IPAH but not in terms of pulmonary arterial compliance. All three compliance estimation methods resulted in the same significance levels for the differences in compliance among the patient groups (Fig. 3, middle).


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Example of a preprocessed and synchronized pressure-flow pair for each patient group. Note that diastolic flow is set equal to zero. NONPH, no pulmonary hypertension (control); CTEPH, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; IPAH, idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Estimated windkessel parameters R, C, and Z in the 3 patient groups. For compliance C, results of the 3 estimation methods used are shown. EBM, energy balance method; PPM, pulse pressure method; SVPP, ratio of stroke volume over pulse pressure. Values are means ± SE; values for R and Z are in mmHg·s·ml–1, and values for C are in ml/mmHg.

 
Comparison of compliance estimation methods. Compliance estimated with the pulse pressure method (CPPM) and with the ratio stroke volume over pulse pressure (CSVPP) correlated well with the compliance estimated with the energy balance method (CEBM) (overall correlations: {rho} = 0.83, P < 0.0001, CEBM vs. CPPM, and {rho} = 0.85, P < 0.0001, CEBM vs. CSVPP). Also, CPPM and CSVPP correlated well overall ({rho} = 0.99, P < 0.0001). Analyzed for each patient group separately, all three methods showed good correlations ({rho} > 0.82, P < 0.01), except for the NONPH group. In the latter group, CEBM correlated weakly with CPPM ({rho} = 0.50, P = 0.14) and with CSVPP ({rho} = 0.58, P = 0.08). CEBM and CSVPP showed no bias with respect to each other, whereas they were consistently greater than CPPM.

Accuracy of pressure measurement and energy balance method. The damping {zeta} and natural frequency fn of the used catheters as determined using the pressure-step apparatus (33) were {zeta} = 0.37 ± 0.10 and fn = 15.2 ± 4.0 Hz for the multipurpose catheter, {zeta} = 0.41 ± 0.10 and fn = 14.3 ± 0.4 Hz for the Swan-Ganz catheter, and {zeta} = 0.43 ± 0.10 and fn = 19.6 ± 0.7 Hz for the Grollman catheter. In all tests, the frequency response was adequate, as defined by Gardner (10). For the simulation model, the accuracy of the energy balance method was tested using ({zeta}, fn) combinations in the ranges {zeta} = 0.25–0.55 and fn = 13–21 Hz. These ranges included all frequency responses found in the in vitro test of the catheters. A cutoff frequency of 10 Hz for the Butterworth filter was used. From the simulations it followed that without filtering, the maximum error in Z and C was <12% in all cases. Filtering reduced the error in the estimated parameters to ≤9%, except for C in the simulated NONPH case (error 3% before and 12% after filtering).

Relationship between R and C. The parameters R and C (CEBM) of all patients showed a strong inverse relationship, independent of the patient group to which they belonged (Fig. 4). Fitting C = {tau}/R to the data resulted in {tau} = 0.75 s (R2 = 0.77). This relationship implies that the product RC equals 0.75 s in all patients. Indeed, the average product of R and C was not significantly different among the three groups (0.79 ± 0.31 in NONPH, 0.74 ± 0.37 in CTEPH, and 0.69 ± 0.22 s in IPAH). The same holds for the RC times as determined from CPPM and CSVPP, although the former resulted in a smaller RC time (overall average 0.48 ± 0.17 s). Thus, on average, the RC time is not altered in PH.


Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between R and C (estimated using the energy balance method) in the 3 patient groups. Solid line shows the best-fitting inverse relation.

 
Relationship between P and C. The mean pulmonary artery pressure P and C (CEBM) of all patients also showed a relationship (Fig. 5). Fitting an exponential model (19, 43) to the data,

Formula 1((1))
resulted in a = 6.5 ml/mmHg and b = 0.037 mmHg–1 (R2 = –0.62, absolute sum of squares = 72.5), whereas fitting an inverse model,

Formula 2((2))
resulted in beta = 69.7 ml (R2 = –0.16, absolute sum of squares = 69.3). Comparison of both models with Akaike's information criterion (21) showed that despite its better fit, the exponential model (higher R2) is less likely than the inverse model (evidence ratio 6.82, corresponding to a 13% chance that the exponential model is most likely compared with an 87% chance that the inverse model is most likely). Similar results were found for P vs. CPPM and CSVPP (both with a 96% chance that the inverse model is most likely).


Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Nonlinear regression of C (estimated using the energy balance method) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (P). Both the best-fitting inverse model (solid line) and exponential model (dashed line) are shown.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, a hemodynamic model of the pulmonary vascular bed was used to quantify RV afterload in three distinct patient groups. By combining standard clinical measurements of the pulmonary artery pressure and flow wave in individual patients, a difference was shown in peripheral resistance R and characteristic impedance Z of the CTEPH and the IPAH group. Furthermore, it was shown that the parameters R, total pulmonary arterial compliance C, and Z of the CTEPH and the IPAH groups were different from those of the NONPH group. Finally, it was shown that R and C of all patients obeyed the same inverse relation (i.e., RC of all patients is equal) and that the relation between mean pulmonary artery pressure and C can be described by an inverse relationship.

The three-element windkessel model was used as a model of the pulmonary vascular bed. Although alternative models have been proposed for the pulmonary circulation (8, 11, 23), the windkessel model has several advantages. It is a general, widely accepted model (33) that can be applied to many vascular beds including the pulmonary vascular bed as a load on the heart (11, 42). Furthermore, many methods have been published for the estimation of its parameters. Finally, because its parameters have physiological meaning, its interpretation is straightforward, which makes it attractive for clinical application.

Model parameters of patient groups. As may be expected, R was higher in the CTEPH and IPAH patients than in the NONPH patients. This must be attributed to vasoconstriction, inward vascular wall remodeling, rarefaction, thrombosis, or a combination of these processes (36). In IPAH, the disease is mainly located in the peripheral arteries and arterioles, whereas in CTEPH, the larger vessels also are involved (5). This agrees with a higher R in IPAH than in CTEPH, but this also may be because of the (nonsignificantly) higher PVR that was found in IPAH. An overlap between both groups, on the other hand, agrees with the fact that in one-half of the CTEPH patients, small vessel disease was believed to be present.

We found that Z was higher in the IPAH group than in the CTEPH group. Therefore, it may be concluded that the lumen reduction of the main pulmonary artery in CTEPH, due to the very proximal pseudo-intimal thickening (5), does not affect characteristic impedance and that the higher pressure in IPAH than in CTEPH, on the other hand, leads to a decrease in proximal pulmonary artery compliance, which is a main determinant of characteristic impedance (27).

Because the windkessel model is known to overestimate compliance (37), compliance was also estimated using the pulse pressure method. Despite the differences found between both methods, the pulse pressure method showed the same trends as the differences between the patient groups. Consequently, the significance levels of the differences between the groups were not altered. The same holds for the compliance as estimated by the ratio of stroke volume and pulse pressure. Thus, for comparison of the RV afterload in groups of patients, the compliance estimation method appears not to be of great importance.

Constant RC time. The RC time characterizes the exponential decay of pulmonary artery pressure during diastole (27, 35), although R and C also are important determinants of RV afterload during systole. In the past, it has been shown that there is an inverse relation between pulmonary arterial compliance and vascular resistance under normal and a wide variety of experimental conditions in both humans and dogs (27, 35). An inverse relation corresponds with a constant RC time. In our study, an inverse relationship was indeed found, but there was a difference between the value of 0.75 s that we found and the average of 0.33 s reported by Reuben (35). The difference may be attributed to the difference in estimation methods: Reuben used the exponential decay of the pulmonary artery pressure wave in diastole from which left atrial pressure was subtracted and used PVR (=R + Z), whereas we used the energy balance method (2) and used R instead of PVR.

Pressure-dependent compliance. Pressure dependence of vascular compliance agrees with earlier findings on the pulmonary artery (7, 16) and the aorta (17, 19, 22). Several models to describe the relationship between pressure and compliance have been proposed in the literature (16, 17, 19, 22), most of them being exponential. When fitted to the data, the model of Fung (43) showed that the term in the denominator is negligible, and thus the inverse model presented above suffices. Neglecting the term has the advantage that the following equation holds:

Formula 3((3))
where F is the cardiac output. If the mean cardiac output F = 5.3 l/min = 88.9 ml/s and beta = 62.6 ml are substituted, an RC time of 0.70 s results. This agrees very well with the RC time of 0.75 s we found.

The remarkable consistency and similarity in all patients, whether with or without PH, in both RC time and pressure-dependent compliance suggests that there are little or no structural changes in the elastic properties of the pulmonary artery in PH. The pulmonary circulation seems to keep RC time constant by the mechanism that was suggested by Sniderman et al. (38): an increased resistance R leads to an increased pressure (Ohm's law), which in turn leads to a decrease in compliance C by a shift in position on the pressure-volume relationship of the large pulmonary artery.

Clinical value of model. It has been shown that PVR is a poor predictor of prognosis in PH (38). This may be explained in part by the fact that PVR does not reflect the entire RV afterload. In the pulmonary circulation, the pulsatile components of pressure and flow constitute as much as one-third to one-half of the total hydraulic power that is transferred from the RV to the pulmonary vascular bed (28). As a consequence, pulsatility plays a more important role in the pulmonary than in the systemic circulation. Piene and Sund (34) showed that the RV and its load are matched (i.e., pump efficiency is maximal) by the characteristic impedance of the pulmonary vascular bed, and they even suggested that pulsatility is transferred throughout the whole pulmonary vascular bed to assist the left atrium. Pulsatility and mismatching of the RV to its afterload may therefore better explain signs of clinical worsening than quantities related to steady flow only, such as PVR and mean pulmonary artery pressure (38). Thus identifying the different components that constitute RV afterload is a prerequisite for understanding the mechanisms that lead to RV failure. Optimal insight in RV afterload would be obtained by an input impedance spectrum (26), but because input impedance spectra are difficult to interpret, a simpler model is preferable for clinical practice. It has been shown that the input impedance of the pulmonary circulation can be represented by the three-element windkessel model (11, 42). This model has the advantage that it is easy to interpret and that it is, as our findings show, sensitive enough to characterize differences in physical properties of the pulmonary vascular bed in different patient groups.

At first sight, a windkessel model may not seem to be a good representation of the pulmonary circulation. Being a lumped model, it does not contain spatial information and therefore cannot describe wave reflection phenomena, which play an important role in the pulmonary circulation. However, in this study we were interested in the arterial load on the heart and not in aspects of wave traveling and reflection. To this end, a windkessel model is adequate (42).

Clinical implications. The similar RC time in all patients may explain why changes in PVR often do not reflect clinical changes in PH patients. If it is assumed that the RC time remains constant under all circumstances, an equal decrease in PVR (e.g., due to therapy) will have a much larger impact on the compliance in patients with a low PVR than in patients with a high PVR. Thus patients with a low PVR will improve in both steady and pulsatile RV afterload, whereas patients with a high PVR only improve in steady afterload. This is illustrated in Fig. 6. Both patients have an equal improvement in PVR, but the resulting improvement in compliance of patient A is much larger than that of patient B. Changes in compliance, on the other hand, may better reflect clinical changes in PH patients, because this has recently been shown to be a strong and independent predictor of survival in IPAH (24). It still remains to be studied whether changes in compliance also better reflect clinical changes and whether the RC time remains the same during treatment. If so, the RC time may be used to retrospectively estimate compliance from resistance.


Figure 6
View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Comparison of the consequence of a decrease of 0.3 mmHg·s·ml–1 in R for a patient with a low baseline R (patient A) and a patient with a high baseline R (patient B). Although the decrease in R is equal in both patients, patient A will have a corresponding increase of 60% in C, whereas patient B will have an increase of only 16%.

 
Limitations. The NONPH group consisted of patients with unexplained complaints that led to the suspicion of PH. Therefore, they may not be completely normal. The NONPH group has a mean pulmonary artery pressure of 18 mmHg, which is slightly elevated compared with the normal value of 12 mmHg given in literature (12, 23). However, because a catheterization is required, it has been acceptable practice to use such a control group (30). Furthermore, all patients were screened extensively before inclusion in the study according to the clinical guidelines for the management of PH (1). IPAH patients reactive to NO were excluded. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn on compliance changes in response to NO or on reactive IPAH.

The measurements of pressure and flow were not conducted simultaneously but were treated as if they had been. Simultaneous measurement of pressure and flow in the human pulmonary artery is difficult due to the anatomic position of the artery. Several methods have been used in the past (15, 28, 30, 31), but most of them cannot be applied routinely in the clinic because they require either high operator skills (with observer variability as a consequence) or expensive devices. The feasibility study of Muthurangu et al. (31) bears most resemblance with the current study. Their setup with MR-guided catheterization would be preferable, but in most clinics (as in ours) it is not available. Although nonsimultaneity may lead to errors in the parameter estimations due to variations in the state of the patient, we assume that it will not affect accuracy to a great extent. Because parameters are estimated from averaged signals, short-term variations will average out. The remaining signals reflect the long-term state of the pulmonary vascular bed. For stable patients, it may be safely assumed that this will not change within a week.

Pulmonary artery pressure was measured using fluid-filled catheters. As pointed out by numerous authors (4, 13, 20, 27), pressure waves measured with a fluid-filled catheter have to be interpreted cautiously, because the pressure waveform may be distorted by the dynamic response of the catheter. By taking care of a properly flushed catheter system, we optimized the catheter response. Remaining underdamping artifacts were filtered out. Furthermore, we concluded from a sensitivity test on the parameter estimation method that the energy balance method was robust in the presence of distortions.

In conclusion, this study has shown that is possible to detect differences in RV afterload in distinct patient groups by using a three-element windkessel model. The windkessel parameters were shown to be different in patients with NONPH, CTEPH, and IPAH. Furthermore, it was shown that a strong relationship exists between resistance and compliance and between pressure and compliance, which indicates that the elastic properties of the large pulmonary arteries remain unaltered in PH.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by a grant (NHS2003B274) from the Netherlands Heart Foundation, The Hague, The Netherlands.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. W. Lankhaar, Dept. of Pulmonary Diseases, VU Univ. Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: jw.lankhaar{at}vumc.nl)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Barst RJ, McGoon M, Torbicki A, Sitbon O, Krowka MJ, Olschewski H, and Gaine S. Diagnosis and differential assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: S40–S47, 2004.[CrossRef]
  2. Cappello A, Gnudi G, and Lamberti C. Identification of the three-element windkessel model incorporating a pressure-dependent compliance. Ann Biomed Eng 23: 164–177, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Castelain V, Herve P, Lecarpentier Y, Duroux P, Simonneau G, and Chemla D. Pulmonary artery pulse pressure and wave reflection in chronic pulmonary thromboembolism and primary pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 37: 1085–1092, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chemla D, Castelain V, Simonneau G, Lecarpentier Y, and Herve P. Pulse wave reflection in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 39: 743–744, 2002.[Free Full Text]
  5. Dartevelle P, Fadel E, Mussot S, Chapelier A, Herve P, de Perrot M, Cerrina J, Ladurie FL, Lehouerou D, Humbert M, Sitbon O, and Simonneau G. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 23: 637–648, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Dobrin PB. Mechanical properties of arteries. Physiol Rev 58: 397–460, 1978.[Free Full Text]
  7. Engelberg J and DuBois AB. Mechanics of pulmonary circulation in isolated rabbit lungs. Am J Physiol 196: 401–414, 1959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fogliardi R, Di Donfrancesco M, and Burattini R. Comparison of linear and nonlinear formulations of the three-element windkessel model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 271: H2661–H2668, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Gardner RM. Direct blood pressure measurement—dynamic response requirements. Anesthesiology 54: 227–236, 1981.[ISI][Medline]
  10. Grant BJ and Paradowski LJ. Characterization of pulmonary arterial input impedance with lumped parameter models. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 252: H585–H593, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Guyton AC. Textbook of Medical Physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1986.
  12. Hansen AT. Pressure measurement in the human organism. Acta Physiol Scand 19, Suppl 68: 1–227, 1949.
  13. Hansen AT and Warburg E. The theory for elastic liquid-containing membrane manometers: general part. Acta Physiol Scand 19: 306–332, 1950.[Medline]
  14. Kitabatake A, Inoue M, Asao M, Masuyama T, Tanouchi J, Morita T, Mishima M, Uematsu M, Shimazu T, Hori M, and Abe H. Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary hypertension by a pulsed Doppler technique. Circulation 68: 302–309, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kornet L, Jansen JR, Nijenhuis FC, Langewouters GJ, and Versprille A. The compliance of the porcine pulmonary artery depends on pressure and heart rate. J Physiol 512: 917–926, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, and Goedhard WJ. The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. J Biomech 17: 425–435, 1984.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  17. Lankhaar JW, Hofman MB, Marcus JT, Zwanenburg JJ, Faes TJ, and Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Correction of phase offset errors in main pulmonary artery flow quantification. J Magn Reson Imaging 22: 73–79, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Li JK, Cui T, and Drzewiecki GM. A nonlinear model of the arterial system incorporating a pressure-dependent compliance. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37: 673–678, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  19. Li JK, van Brummelen AG, and Noordergraaf A. Fluid-filled blood pressure measurement systems. J Appl Physiol 40: 839–843, 1976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Lindsey JK and Jones B. Choosing among generalized linear models applied to medical data. Stat Med 17: 59–68, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  21. Liu Z, Brin KP, and Yin FC. Estimation of total arterial compliance: an improved method and evaluation of current methods. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 251: H588–H600, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lucas CL. Fluid mechanics of the pulmonary circulation. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 10: 317–393, 1984.[Medline]
  23. Mahapatra S, Nishimura RA, Sorajja P, Cha S, and McGoon MD. Relationship of pulmonary arterial capacitance and mortality in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 799–803, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Marcus JT, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, De Vries PM, Van Rossum AC, Roseboom B, Heethaar RM, and Postmus PE. MRI evaluation of right ventricular pressure overload in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 8: 999–1005, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  25. The Mathworks. MATLAB Mathematics. Natick, MA: The MathWorks, 2004.
  26. Milnor WR. Arterial impedance as ventricular afterload. Circ Res 36: 565–570, 1975.[Free Full Text]
  27. Milnor WR. Hemodynamics. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1989.
  28. Milnor WR, Bergel DH, and Bargainer JD. Hydraulic power associated with pulmonary blood flow and its relation to heart rate. Circ Res 19: 467–480, 1966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Milnor WR, Conti CR, Lewis KB, and O'Rourke MF. Pulmonary arterial pulse wave velocity and impedance in man. Circ Res 25: 637–649, 1969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Murgo JP and Westerhof N. Input impedance of the pulmonary arterial system in normal man. Effects of respiration and comparison to systemic impedance. Circ Res 54: 666–673, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Muthurangu V, Atkinson D, Sermesant M, Miquel ME, Hegde S, Johnson R, Andriantsimiavona R, Taylor AM, Baker E, Tulloh R, Hill D, and Razavi RS. Measurement of total pulmonary arterial compliance using invasive pressure monitoring and MR flow quantification during MR-guided cardiac catheterization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H1301–H1306, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Nakayama Y, Nakanishi N, Hayashi T, Nagaya N, Sakamaki F, Satoh N, Ohya H, and Kyotani S. Pulmonary artery reflection for differentially diagnosing primary pulmonary hypertension and chronic pulmonary thromboembolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 38: 214–218, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF, and McDonald R. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries. London: Hodder Arnold, 2005.
  34. Piene H and Sund T. Does normal pulmonary impedance constitute the optimum load for the right ventricle? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 242: H154–H160, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Reuben SR. Compliance of the human pulmonary arterial system in disease. Circ Res 29: 40–50, 1971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Rubin LJ. Primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl J Med 336: 111–117, 1997.[Free Full Text]
  37. Segers P, Brimioulle S, Stergiopulos N, Westerhof N, Naeije R, Maggiorini M, and Verdonck P. Pulmonary arterial compliance in dogs and pigs: the three-element windkessel model revisited. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 277: H725–H731, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sniderman AD and Fitchett DH. Vasodilators and pulmonary arterial hypertension: the paradox of therapeutic success and clinical failure. Int J Cardiol 20: 173–181, 1988.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  39. Stergiopulos N, Meister JJ, and Westerhof N. Simple and accurate way for estimating total and segmental arterial compliance: the pulse pressure method. Ann Biomed Eng 22: 392–397, 1994.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  40. Stergiopulos N, Meister JJ, and Westerhof N. Evaluation of methods for estimation of total arterial compliance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 268: H1540–H1548, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Stergiopulos N, Meister JJ, and Westerhof N. Determinants of stroke volume and systolic and diastolic aortic pressure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 270: H2050–H2059, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Westerhof N, Elzinga G, and Sipkema P. An artificial arterial system for pumping hearts. J Appl Physiol 31: 776–781, 1971.[Free Full Text]
  43. Westerhof N, Stergiopulos N, and Noble M. Snapshots of Hemodynamics. New York: Springer, 2005.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J.-W. Lankhaar, N. Westerhof, T. J.C. Faes, C. Tji-Joong Gan, K. M. Marques, A. Boonstra, F. G. van den Berg, P. E. Postmus, and A. Vonk-Noordegraaf
Pulmonary vascular resistance and compliance stay inversely related during treatment of pulmonary hypertension
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2008; 29(13): 1688 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Souza
Assessment of compliance in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2008; 29(13): 1603 - 1604.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. Morimont, B. Lambermont, A. Ghuysen, P. Gerard, P. Kolh, P. Lancellotti, V. Tchana-Sato, T. Desaive, and V. D'Orio
Effective arterial elastance as an index of pulmonary vascular load
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): H2736 - H2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. T.-J. Gan, J.-W. Lankhaar, N. Westerhof, J. T. Marcus, A. Becker, J. W. R. Twisk, A. Boonstra, P. E. Postmus, and A. Vonk-Noordegraaf
Noninvasively Assessed Pulmonary Artery Stiffness Predicts Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Chest, December 1, 2007; 132(6): 1906 - 1912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
A. Vonk-Noordegraaf, J.-W. Lankhaar, M. J.W. Gotte, J. T. Marcus, P. E. Postmus, and N. Westerhof
Magnetic resonance and nuclear imaging of the right ventricle in pulmonary arterial hypertension
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_H): H29 - H34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/4/H1731    most recent
00336.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lankhaar, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Vonk-Noordegraaf, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lankhaar, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Vonk-Noordegraaf, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.