|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Department of Dermatology
Rikshospitalet University Hospital
N-0027 Oslo, Norway
Ullevaal University Hospital
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
University of Oslo
Kirkeveien 166
N-0407 Oslo, Norway
Ullevaal University Hospital
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
University of Oslo
Kirkeveien 166
N-0407 Oslo, Norway
To the Editor: We thank Dr. Immink and colleagues (2) for discussion of our study. Their question as to whether this shows preservation of cerebral autoregulation during normal pregnancy uses their own definition of cerebral autoregulation as "the tendency of cerebral blood flow to remain constant over a range of systemic blood pressures." Our study (1) shows that the cerebral blood velocities were unchanged during significant increase in systemic blood pressure in gestational weeks 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 and 3 mo after birth. We do agree that the mechanisms responsible for this control are complex. However, our findings do suggest that cerebral autoregulation is preserved during pregnancy. Furthermore, as Immink and colleagues state, our study also shows that the cerebral CO2 reactivity is preserved during healthy pregnancy because a vasoconstriction was always seen during significant lowering of the end-tidal CO2.
REFERENCES
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |