AJP - Heart Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H2424-H2430, 2006. First published May 26, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00369.2006
0363-6135/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/5/H2424    most recent
00369.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hessel, M. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by van der Laarse, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hessel, M. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by van der Laarse, A.

Characterization of right ventricular function after monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension in the intact rat

Marleen H. M. Hessel, Paul Steendijk, Brigit den Adel, Cindy I. Schutte, and Arnoud van der Laarse

Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Submitted 7 April 2006 ; accepted in final form 22 May 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
We characterized hemodynamics and systolic and diastolic right ventricular (RV) function in relation to structural changes in the rat model of monocrotaline (MCT)-induced pulmonary hypertension. Rats were treated with MCT at 30 mg/kg body wt (MCT30, n = 15) and 80 mg/kg body wt (MCT80, n = 16) to induce compensated RV hypertrophy and RV failure, respectively. Saline-treated rats served as control (Cont, n = 13). After 4 wk, a pressure-conductance catheter was introduced into the RV to assess pressure-volume relations. Subsequently, rats were killed, hearts and lungs were rapidly dissected, and RV, left ventricle (LV), and interventricular septum (IVS) were weighed and analyzed histochemically. RV-to-(LV + IVS) weight ratio was 0.29 ± 0.05 in Cont, 0.35 ± 0.05 in MCT30, and 0.49 ± 0.10 in MCT80 (P < 0.001 vs. Cont and MCT30) rats, confirming MCT-induced RV hypertrophy. RV ejection fraction was 49 ± 6% in Cont, 40 ± 12% in MCT30 (P < 0.05 vs. Cont), and 26 ± 6% in MCT80 (P < 0.05 vs. Cont and MCT30) rats. In MCT30 rats, cardiac output was maintained, but RV volumes and filling pressures were significantly increased compared with Cont (all P < 0.05), indicating RV remodeling. In MCT80 rats, RV systolic pressure, volumes, and peak wall stress were further increased, and cardiac output was significantly decreased (all P < 0.05). However, RV end-systolic and end-diastolic stiffness were unchanged, consistent with the absence of interstitial fibrosis. MCT-induced pressure overload was associated with a dose-dependent development of RV hypertrophy. The most pronounced response to MCT was an overload-dependent increase of RV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, even under nonfailing conditions.

right ventricular hypertrophy; right ventricular failure; pressure-volume relations


MYOCARDIAL HYPERTROPHY is a compensatory mechanism whereby cardiac tissue adapts to increased workload. Depending on the degree or duration of increased workload, ventricular hypertrophy may progress from a compensatory state to impaired systolic or diastolic function and heart failure. This transition is characterized by alterations in extracellular matrix composition, energy metabolism, beta-adrenergic responsiveness, myofilament proteins, Ca2+ handling, signal transduction pathways, and gene expression profiles (6, 18, 19, 26, 32, 35, 37, 44, 49).

A model that is frequently used for study of functional, structural, and molecular changes associated with right ventricular (RV) compensated hypertrophy and RV failure is treatment of rats with monocrotaline (MCT), a pyrrolizidine alkaloid (12, 15, 29, 30). MCT selectively injures the vascular endothelium of the lung and induces pulmonary vasculitis (49). Muscularization and hypertrophy of media in pulmonary arteries lead to increased vascular resistance and increased pulmonary arterial pressure (8, 27, 28, 33, 43). MCT-induced pulmonary hypertension is associated with development of compensated RV hypertrophy, which progresses to failure within weeks, depending on the dose of MCT and the age of the animals (6, 13, 48). The functional consequences of MCT treatment have been studied in isolated papillary muscles and trabeculae (19, 20, 46), in the isolated working heart (48), and in vivo by echocardiography (3, 7, 16, 17).

Previous studies have shown selective induction of RV hypertrophy or RV failure after 4 wk of treatment with a low dose (30 mg/kg body wt) and a high dose (80 mg/kg body wt) of MCT, respectively (6). The purpose of this study was to accurately determine RV function in normal rats and rats treated with a low dose (30 mg/kg body wt) or a high dose (80 mg/kg body wt) of MCT in vivo with use of a combined pressure-conductance catheter. RV systolic and diastolic characteristics were quantified in the three groups of rats. The advantages of this technique are the rapid acquisition time of time-dependent pressure and volume data in the RV in vivo and the acquisition of pressure-volume loops during preload alterations to record RV end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure-volume relations (ESPVR and EDPVR) as load-independent measures of intrinsic ventricular function.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Animal Model

All animals were treated in accordance with the national guidelines and with permission of the Animal Experiments Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center. A total of 44 Wistar male rats (200–250 g body wt; Harlan, Zeist, The Netherlands) was randomly assigned to three groups. The animals received a single subcutaneous injection of MCT (Sigma, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) diluted in PBS in a low dose (MCT30, 30 mg/kg body wt, n = 15) or a high dose (MCT80, 80 mg/kg body wt, n = 16). Control (Cont) rats (n = 13) were injected with an equal volume of PBS. The animals were housed, five animals per cage, with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle and an unrestricted food supply. The rats were weighed three times a week. After 4 wk, RV function was assessed by pressure-conductance catheter, and the rats were killed.

Hemodynamic Measurements

Instrumentation. The rats were sedated by inhalation of a mixture of isoflurane (4%) and oxygen. Subsequently, general anesthesia was administered by injection of fentanyl-fluanisone-midazolam (0.25 ml/100 g body wt ip). The mixture consisted of two parts Hypnorm (0.315 mg/ml fentanyl + 10 mg/ml fluanisone; VitalPharma, Maarheeze, The Netherlands), one part Dormicum (5 mg/ml midazolam; Roche, Mijdrecht, The Netherlands), and one part saline. The animals were placed on a controlled warming pad to keep body temperature constant. A tracheotomy was performed, a 25-gauge cannula was inserted, and the animals were mechanically ventilated using a pressure-controlled respirator and a mixture of air and oxygen. The animals were placed under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss, Hamburg, Germany), and a midline cervical incision was made for cannulation of the left jugular vein for infusion of hypertonic saline (10%) to determine parallel conductance (2). A midsternal thoracotomy was performed, and a combined pressure-conductance catheter (model SPR-878, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) was introduced via the apex into the RV and positioned along the long axis of the RV. The catheter was connected to a Sigma signal processor (CD Leycom, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands), and RV pressures and volumes were recorded digitally. All data were acquired using Conduct-NT software (CD Leycom) at a sample rate of 2,000 Hz and analyzed off-line by custom-made software.

Calibration of the conductance catheter. The volume signal of the conductance catheter was calibrated for parallel conductance and slope factor ({alpha}). The parallel conductance volume was estimated by the hypertonic saline technique (2): a 20-µl bolus of hypertonic saline (10%) was injected via the cannula in the jugular vein, and parallel conductance was calculated as previously described (38, 50). {alpha} was determined by measurement of the aortic flow using an ultrasonic flow probe (Transonic Systems, Maastricht, The Netherlands) around the ascending aorta; {alpha} was calculated as the cardiac output (CO) determined by the uncalibrated conductance catheter divided by the CO determined by aortic flow measurement.

Hemodynamics. RV pressure and volume signals were recorded to quantify general hemodynamic conditions. Heart rate, stroke volume, CO, RV end-diastolic volume, RV end-systolic volume, RV ejection fraction, RV end-diastolic pressure, RV peak systolic pressure, and RV end-systolic pressure were determined from pressure-volume loops. Stroke work was obtained as the area of the pressure-volume loop, and the maximal rates of RV pressure upstroke and fall (dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin, respectively) were calculated. The relaxation time constant ({tau}) was assessed as the time constant of monoexponential decay of RV pressure during isovolumic relaxation (2, 23). Effective pulmonary arterial elastance, as a measure of RV afterload, was calculated as end-systolic pressure divided by stroke volume.

RV ESPVR and EDPVR. RV ESPVR and EDPVR were determined from pressure-volume loops recorded during transient occlusion of the inferior vena cava by external compression of the vessel. Slopes and intercepts of these relations are considered relatively load-independent parameters of intrinsic myocardial function (34, 39, 41, 45). The slopes, end-systolic and end-diastolic elastance (EES and EED, respectively), were determined by linear regression. The positions of the pressure-volume relations were quantified by calculation of the intercepts of the relations at an end-systolic pressure of 37 mmHg and an end-diastolic pressure of 5 mmHg. These pressure values were determined retrospectively as the mean end-systolic and end-diastolic pressures of all animals in the study.

RV end-systolic, end-diastolic, and peak wall stress. Time-varying RV wall stress [WS(t)] was calculated from RV cavity pressure and volume [P(t) and V(t), respectively] and RV wall volume (Vwall) according the following formula: WS(t) = P(t){1 + 3[V(t)/Vwall]} (1). RV wall volume was approximated as the sum of the RV free wall mass and 0.5 times the mass of the interventricular septum (IVS).

Tissue Preparation

After hemodynamic measurements, hearts and lungs were rapidly dissected and weighed. The RV, left ventricle (LV), and IVS were cut free, weighed, and fixed in 4% formalin for >24 h. Lung tissue was freeze-dried for 12 h and weighed again.

Histochemistry

Sirius red staining. After fixation, heart tissue was embedded in paraffin. RV blocks were embedded in the upright position to distinguish the endocardium, the midwall, and the epicardium of the RV free wall in cross sections. Tissue was cut into 4-µm-thick sections and deparaffinized in Ultraclear (Klinipath, Duiven, The Netherlands) for 5 min. The sections were rehydrated in decreasing graded alcohols (from 100% to 25%) and washed twice for 5 min each in distilled water and TBS (150 mM NaCl and 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 8.0).

For determination of the amount of interstitial, perivascular, and/or replacement fibrosis, RV sections were stained with sirius red (42) and photographed using a microscope (Nikon Eclipse, Nikon Europe, Badhoevedorp, The Netherlands) equipped with a x40 objective and a digital camera (model DXM1800, Nikon). Quantitative image analysis was performed with Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD).

The extent of fibrosis was quantified as the sirius red-stained percentage of the total area, measured per image. In each section, four images were acquired and analyzed to compensate for variations within a section. A total of 132 images of 33 animals (11 Cont, 12 MCT30, and 10 MCT80) were quantified.

RV thickness was measured in an overview image of Cont (n = 11), MCT30 (n = 12), and MCT80 (n = 10) sections at three levels to compensate for variations in wall thickness within a section. To derive absolute thickness (mm), measurements were corrected using a microscopic ruler (Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany). No correction was made for tissue shrinkage by the fixation procedure, inasmuch as this factor is equal in all samples.

Statistical Analysis

The effect of treatment (Cont, MCT30, or MCT80) was evaluated by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test. Correlations were determined using a parametric test (Pearson). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. SPSS11 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. Values are means ± SD.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Body, Lung, and Heart Weights

The time curves of body weights of the three experimental groups over a 4-wk period after MCT injection indicate a slightly reduced weight gain in MCT30 rats (Fig. 1). The MCT80 animals showed a more pronounced growth retardation, resulting in a significantly lower (P < 0.05) body weight after day 11, than Cont rats. The MCT80 animals started to lose weight at around day 25, which is a sign of heart failure comparable to cachexia in patients with chronic heart failure. In contrast to Cont and MCT30 animals, MCT80 rats showed an obvious lack of physical activity.


Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Time-dependent body weights of control (Cont, n = 13) rats and rats treated with monocrotaline (MCT) at 30 mg/kg body wt (MCT30, n = 15) or 80 mg/kg body wt (MCT80, n = 16). Values are means ± SD. Body weight differences between MCT80 and Cont rats were significantly different on day 11 and thereafter (P < 0.05).

 
Table 1 summarizes characteristics of the animals on the day they were killed. Body weight of MCT80 rats was significantly lower than that of Cont and MCT30 rats (P < 0.001 vs. Cont and MCT30). Wet and dry lung weights were significantly higher in MCT80 than in Cont and MCT30 rats, confirming the presence of an extensive proliferative pulmonary response in MCT80 rats. These increases were not related to pulmonary edema, because dry-to-wet weight ratios of lung tissue did not differ significantly between the groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. General and cardiac characteristics of Cont, MCT30, and MCT80 animals

 
RV weight of MCT80 animals was significantly higher than that of Cont and MCT30 rats, whereas LV and IVS weights were unaffected by MCT treatment. The degree of RV hypertrophy was determined as RV-to-(LV + IVS) weight ratio (Fig. 2). This hypertrophy parameter tended to increase (+21%) in MCT30 rats and was significantly higher in MCT80 rats (+69% compared with Cont and +40% compared with MCT30, both P < 0.001). Corresponding results were obtained for RV wall thickness (Table 1).


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Right ventricular (RV)-to-[left ventricular (LV) + interventricular septum (IVS)] weight ratio in Cont (n = 13), MCT30 (n = 15), and MCT80 (n = 16) animals on the day the animals were killed. *P < 0.001 vs. Cont. #P < 0.001 vs. MCT30.

 
RV Function

RV function was determined by recording pressure-volume loops. Results are summarized in Table 2. In MCT30 rats, RV peak pressure was significantly increased (+30%), whereas RV ejection fraction was significantly reduced (–18%), compared with Cont (both P < 0.05). CO and stroke volume were maintained, indicating a compensatory state at the expense of increased RV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and increased RV filling pressure (all P < 0.05 vs. Cont).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Cardiac and RV function of Cont, MCT30, and MCT80 animals

 
In MCT80 rats, RV peak pressure was further increased (+69%, P < 0.05 vs. Cont), consistent with the increased pulmonary arterial elastance, which was twice as high as that in Cont and MCT30 rats (both P < 0.01). RV ejection fraction decreased further (–47% compared with Cont and –35% compared with MCT30, both P < 0.05) and CO was significantly reduced by 31% compared with MCT30 rats (P < 0.05). RV dilatation was evident from progressive increases of RV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (roughly twice the corresponding values of Cont). {tau} was significantly increased in MCT80 rats compared with Cont and MCT30 rats, indicating prolonged early relaxation. RV peak wall stress of MCT80 rats was increased by 90% (P < 0.05) compared with Cont rats and by 29% compared with MCT30 rats.

Pressure-Volume Relations

Slopes of ESPVR and EDPVR, EES and EED, were not significantly different between Cont, MCT30, and MCT80 rats (Table 3). To correct for the influence of RV muscle mass, we also performed a univariate ANOVA with RV muscle mass as cofactor; the results did not show significant differences between groups for the normalized parameters. Both relations were shifted toward larger volumes in MCT30 rats and were even more pronounced in the MCT80 rats (Fig. 3). However, despite the clear trends, because of large within-group variability, only the shift in the EDPVR for the MCT80 group reached statistical significance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Pressure-volume indexes in Cont, MCT30, and MCT80 animals

 

Figure 3
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Typical examples of RV pressure-volume loops during vena cava occlusion and RV end-systolic pressure-volume relations (ESPVR) of Cont, MCT30, and MCT80 rats.

 
Myocardial Fibrosis

RV myocardial sections were stained with sirius red for assessment of interstitial, perivascular, and replacement fibrosis. Quantification of volume percentages showed no significant differences between groups (Fig. 4), indicating no interstitial or replacement fibrosis in MCT-treated rats. Similarly, perivascular fibrosis in MCT-treated rats did not differ from that in Cont rats (data not shown).


Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Quantification of interstitial fibrosis in sirius red-stained RV myocardial sections from Cont (n = 11), MCT30 (n = 12), and MCT80 (n = 10) rats. Values are means ± SD.

 
Relations Between RV Performance and Myocardial Characteristics

In studies on the cellular/molecular transition from compensated hypertrophy to failure using the MCT model, MCT is supposed to induce a dose-dependent increase in pulmonary vascular resistance with subsequent RV pressure overload and increased wall stress, leading to compensatory hypertrophy and, ultimately, RV dilatation and pump failure. However, this process has not been studied in the intact animal using detailed invasive hemodynamic measurements. Data reported in Tables 13 generally support these assumptions but also show substantial variability in the various parameters within groups. To provide a better insight into the underlying mechanisms, we investigated the relations between the various indexes of RV pressure overload, hypertrophy, wall stress, and RV function.

Figure 5A shows RV hypertrophy as a function of peak RV pressure. The significant overall correlation supports the concept of gradual pressure overload-induced RV hypertrophy. The functional consequences are reflected in Fig. 5B, which shows a gradual decrease in ejection fraction, with the lowest values in the MCT80 group, despite substantially higher hypertrophy in this group. The drop in ejection fraction is caused largely by increased end-diastolic volume, because stroke volume was reasonably maintained (Table 2). However, we did not find a significant correlation between RV end-diastolic volume and severity of hypertrophy. Finally, Fig. 5C shows that this progressive dilatation causes a gradual increase in wall stress, with the highest values in the MCT80 group, despite the compensatory increase in muscle mass, illustrating decompensation in these animals. The significant negative correlation within the MCT80 group indicates that the MCT80 animals showing the highest RV hypertrophy had the least wall stress. Therefore, it appears that at least part of the variability within the MCT80 group is caused by the ability to adequately increase RV weight, thereby opposing RV dilatation and limiting excessive RV wall stress.


Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Peak RV pressure (A), RV ejection fraction (B), and RV peak wall stress (C) as a function of RV hypertrophy [quantified as RV-to-(LV + IVS) weight ratio] for Cont, MCT30, and MCT80 animals. Linear correlations were tested for pooled data and within groups: only relations with significant correlations are shown.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was conducted to characterize changes in RV structure and function after MCT treatment in the intact rat model. Apart from RV hypertrophy, the primary response to MCT treatment was RV dilatation, i.e., increases of RV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes and, consequently, decreases of RV ejection fraction.

The dose-dependent RV hypertrophy strongly correlated with MCT-induced pressure overload, but, despite this increased muscle mass, RV wall stress gradually increased, ultimately leading to RV decompensation. Interestingly, RV EES and end-diastolic stiffness did not change significantly, even when we corrected for myocardial muscle mass, suggesting that intrinsic myocardial function was not importantly altered. The unchanged diastolic stiffness was consistent with the absence of changes in fibrosis and the fact that filling pressures remained relatively normal. However, ESPVR and EDPVR showed a tendency to be shifted toward larger volumes, suggesting myocyte slippage as a potential mechanism for dilatation. In addition, early active relaxation, as reflected by {tau}, was severely depressed in the MCT80 group, consistent with severe RV hypertrophy. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated reduced protein levels of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase in the RV of MCT-treated animals, which should result in a slower decline of intracellular Ca2+ concentration during relaxation and may partially explain the prolonged {tau} (19).

In studies in which a single dose of 40–60 mg MCT/kg body wt was administered, up to 50% of the animals progressed to RV failure after 4 wk, whereas the remaining animals developed stable compensatory RV hypertrophy without signs of heart failure (5, 16, 36, 47). The failing animals showed a significantly greater degree of RV hypertrophy, reflecting a higher pulmonary arterial pressure (16, 47). Recently, selective induction of compensated RV hypertrophy or RV failure after 4 wk was demonstrated by using a low dose (30 mg/kg body wt) or a high dose (80 mg/kg body wt) of MCT, respectively (6). In the present study, MCT30 rats developed a phenotype without clinical signs of cardiac failure, whereas MCT80 rats showed progressive body weight loss (cachexia), an increased respiratory rate, and a lack of physical activity starting at day 25. In this latter group, hemodynamic data could be obtained in only 9 of the 16 animals. The remaining seven animals died shortly before the measurements (n = 2), during induction of anesthesia (n = 2), or during instrumentation (n = 3), presumably due to very poor cardiac function. In the MCT30 group, no animals died before or during the hemodynamic studies, whereas one animal in the Cont group died during the instrumentation phase. Thus the hemodynamic data of the MCT80 group reported in our study probably reflect the animals with relatively preserved cardiac function, which may partly explain the substantial overlap of functional parameters between the groups.

To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate dose-dependent effects of MCT injection using invasive RV hemodynamics in the intact rat model. Previous studies in MCT-treated animals in vivo have used echocardiography and showed progressive development of pulmonary hypertension and RV hypertrophy consistent with our findings (3, 7, 16, 17), but no volumetric data have been reported. More detailed functional parameters were obtained by Werchan et al. (48) in the model of the isolated perfused heart with working RV: increased RV peak systolic pressures were found 3 wk after MCT injection (60 mg/kg body wt), but considerable variability was present. Consistent with our findings, the authors reported significantly increased RV systolic pressure only for animals with severe RV hypertrophy (>0.5), whereas +dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin were unchanged with mild hypertrophy and increased with severe hypertrophy. Similar to our study, diastolic RV pressure was not importantly altered.

In vitro studies with RV papillary muscles and trabeculae isolated from rats 3 and 4 wk after MCT treatment (40 mg/kg body wt) demonstrated a negative force-frequency relation and reduced maximum force compared with controls (20, 46).

Interestingly, our findings indicate substantial differences in RV function adaptation between the MCT model and the pulmonary artery banding (PAB) model, which is frequently used in RV pressure-overload research (4, 9, 14, 22, 23, 26, 31). Depending on the degree/severity of pulmonary artery stenosis, most PAB studies report an almost twofold increase in RV muscle mass, comparable to our findings, but despite the even higher RV systolic pressures in most PAB studies, generally no clear signs of cardiac failure and almost no RV dilatation have been reported (14, 22, 23, 26). A recent study in rats with instrumentation similar to that used in the present study showed that 6 wk of PAB resulted in an RV systolic pressure of ~60 mmHg and a twofold increase in RV mass, comparable to our study. However, the PAB rats had no signs of heart failure, unchanged systemic hemodynamics and RV volumes, and increased RV contractility (EES) (10). A comparison with the MCT-treated rats in our study suggests that effects of pressure overload and the mechanisms underlying contractility and RV dilatation are substantially different between the two models. These differences could be related to model-specific changes of the beta-adrenergic receptor system. Rats with MCT-induced RV hypertrophy showed a reduction in RV beta-adrenoceptor density due to a downregulation of the beta1-adrenoceptor and showed beta-adrenoceptor-G protein-adenylyl cyclase system desensitization (24, 25). This reduced beta-adrenoceptor responsiveness may explain why the hypertrophied RV cannot increase contractility, which is necessary to maintain cardiac function in MCT-induced pulmonary hypertension. In contrast, animals with pulmonary hypertension induced by PAB showed a two- to threefold increase of RV contractility in the absence of a changed beta-adrenoceptor system (10, 21).

We hypothesize that MCT-induced RV remodeling is caused by cardiomyocyte slippage due to diminished adhesion of cardiomyocytes to the extracellular matrix (11, 51). However, future studies are needed to investigate this hypothesis. An important issue for clinicians caring for patients with pulmonary hypertension is determination of the optimal timing for surgical or catheter-based interventions. Studies indicate that RV failure may develop in patients with pulmonary hypertensive heart diseases, even in the absence of impaired contractility (40). Although we did not perform a longitudinal study, our findings suggest that cardiac failure was preceded by gradual cardiac dilatation and increased wall stress, despite myocardial hypertrophy. The animals failed to adequately increase contractility and showed prolonged relaxation, ultimately leading to a decrease in CO. MCT-induced pulmonary hypertension is a useful animal model for study of the transition from compensatory RV hypertrophy to RV failure, which has important clinical relevance.

In conclusion, we have characterized the chronic effects of MCT injection on myocardial structure, RV function, and hemodynamics in the intact rat model. Our findings show a dose-dependent increase in RV systolic pressure, RV myocardial mass, and RV volumes. In high-dose MCT, this leads to significantly elevated wall stress, severely reduced ejection fraction, and decreased pump function. Future studies are required to investigate the molecular mechanisms.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by Netherlands Heart Foundation Grant 2001.B124.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: P. Steendijk, Dept. of Cardiology, C5-P, Leiden Univ. Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands (e-mail: p.steendijk{at}lumc.nl)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Arts T, Bovendeerd PH, Prinzen FW, and Reneman RS. Relation between left ventricular cavity pressure and volume and systolic fiber stress and strain in the wall. Biophys J 59: 93–102, 1991.[Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Baan J, van der Velde ET, de Bruin HG, Smeenk GJ, Koops J, van Dijk AD, Temmerman D, Senden J, and Buis B. Continuous measurement of left ventricular volume in animals and humans by conductance catheter. Circulation 70: 812–823, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Boissiere J, Gautier M, Machet MC, Hanton G, Bonnet P, and Eder V. Doppler tissue imaging in assessment of pulmonary hypertension-induced right ventricle dysfunction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2450–H2455, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Borenstein N, Jian Z, Fromont G, Bruneval P, Hekmati M, Behr L, Laborde F, Montarras D, and Le Bret E. Noncultured cell transplantation in an ovine model of right ventricular preparation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129: 1119–1127, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Brunner F, Wolkart G, and Haleen S. Defective intracellular calcium handling in monocrotaline-induced right ventricular hypertrophy: protective effect of long-term endothelin-A receptor blockade with 2-benzo[1,3]dioxol-5-yl-3-benzyl-4-(4-methoxy-phenyl-)-4-oxobut-2-enoate-sodium (PD 155080). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 300: 442–449, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Buermans HP, Redout EM, Schiel AE, Musters RJ, Zuidwijk M, Eijk PP, van Hardeveld C, Kasanmoentalib S, Visser FC, Ylstra B, and Simonides WS. Microarray analysis reveals pivotal divergent mRNA expression profiles early in the development of either compensated ventricular hypertrophy or heart failure. Physiol Genomics 21: 314–323, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Cottrill CM, Johnson GL, and Gillespie MN. Echocardiographic detection of pulmonary hypertension in anesthetized rats. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 60: 189–196, 1988.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Cowan KN, Heilbut A, Humpl T, Lam C, Ito S, and Rabinovitch M. Complete reversal of fatal pulmonary hypertension in rats by a serine elastase inhibitor. Nat Med 6: 698–702, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Faber MJ, Dalinghaus M, Lankhuizen IM, Bezstarosti K, Dekkers DH, Duncker DJ, Helbing WA, and Lamers JM. Proteomic changes in the pressure overloaded right ventricle after 6 weeks in young rats: correlations with the degree of hypertrophy. Proteomics 5: 2519–2530, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Faber MJ, Dalinghaus M, Lankhuizen IM, Steendijk P, Hop WC, Schoemaker RG, Duncker DJ, Lamers JM, and Helbing WA. Right and left ventricular function after chronic pulmonary artery banding in rats assessed with biventricular pressure-volume loops. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 291: H1580–H1586, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gerdes AM and Capasso JM. Structural remodeling and mechanical dysfunction of cardiac myocytes in heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol 27: 849–856, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Ghodsi F and Will JA. Changes in pulmonary structure and function induced by monocrotaline intoxication. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 240: H149–H155, 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hislop A and Reid L. Arterial changes in Crotalaria spectabilis-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats. Br J Exp Pathol 55: 153–163, 1974.[Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Hon JK, Steendijk P, Petrou M, Wong K, and Yacoub MH. Influence of clenbuterol treatment during six weeks of chronic right ventricular pressure overload as studied with pressure-volume analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122: 767–774, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ito KM, Sato M, Ushijima K, Nakai M, and Ito K. Alterations of endothelium and smooth muscle function in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertensive arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H1786–H1795, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Jones JE, Mendes L, Rudd MA, Russo G, Loscalzo J, and Zhang YY. Serial noninvasive assessment of progressive pulmonary hypertension in a rat model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283: H364–H371, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kato Y, Iwase M, Kanazawa H, Kawata N, Yoshimori Y, Hashimoto K, Yokoi T, Noda A, Takagi K, Koike Y, Nishizawa T, Nishimura M, and Yokota M. Progressive development of pulmonary hypertension leading to right ventricular hypertrophy assessed by echocardiography in rats. Exp Anim 52: 285–294, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Katz AM. Energetics and the failing heart. Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 26: 78–90, 1991.[Medline]
  19. Kogler H, Hartmann O, Leineweber K, Nguyen VP, Schott P, Brodde OE, and Hasenfuss G. Mechanical load-dependent regulation of gene expression in monocrotaline-induced right ventricular hypertrophy in the rat. Circ Res 93: 230–237, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Korstjens IJ, Rouws CH, van der Laarse WJ, Van der Zee L, and Stienen GJ. Myocardial force development and structural changes associated with monocrotaline-induced cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 23: 93–102, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Kuehne T, Yilmaz S, Steendijk P, Moore P, Groenink M, Saaed M, Weber O, Higgins CB, Ewert P, Fleck E, Nagel E, Schulze-Neick I, and Lange P. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of right ventricular pressure-volume loops: in vivo validation and clinical application in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 110: 2010–2016, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Leeuwenburgh BP, Helbing WA, Steendijk P, Schoof PH, and Baan J. Biventricular systolic function in young lambs subject to chronic systemic right ventricular pressure overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H2697–H2704, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Leeuwenburgh BP, Steendijk P, Helbing WA, and Baan J. Indexes of diastolic RV function: load dependence and changes after chronic RV pressure overload in lambs. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H1350–H1358, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Leineweber K, Brandt K, Wludyka B, Beilfuss A, Ponicke K, Heinroth-Hoffmann I, and Brodde OE. Ventricular hypertrophy plus neurohumoral activation is necessary to alter the cardiac beta-adrenoceptor system in experimental heart failure. Circ Res 91: 1056–1062, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Leineweber K, Seyfarth T, Abraham G, Gerbershagen HP, Heinroth-Hoffmann I, Ponicke K, and Brodde OE. Cardiac beta-adrenoceptor changes in monocrotaline-treated rats: differences between membrane preparations from whole ventricles and isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 41: 333–342, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  26. LekanneDeprez RH, van den Hoff MJ, de Boer PA, Ruijter PM, Maas AA, Chamuleau RA, Lamers WH, and Moorman AF. Changing patterns of gene expression in the pulmonary trunk-banded rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 30: 1877–1888, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  27. Mathew R, Gloster ES, Sundararajan T, Thompson CI, Zeballos GA, and Gewitz MH. Role of inhibition of nitric oxide production in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension. J Appl Physiol 82: 1493–1498, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Mitani Y, Maruyama K, and Sakurai M. Prolonged administration of L-arginine ameliorates chronic pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary vascular remodeling in rats. Circulation 96: 689–697, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Morita K, Ogawa Y, and Tobise K. Effect of endothelium of pulmonary artery vasoreactivity in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertensive rats. Jpn Circ J 60: 585–592, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Nakazawa H, Hori M, Ozaki H, and Karaki H. Mechanisms underlying the impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxation in the pulmonary artery of monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertensive rats. Br J Pharmacol 128: 1098–1104, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. Olivetti G, Ricci R, Lagrasta C, Maniga E, Sonnenblick EH, and Anversa P. Cellular basis of wall remodeling in long-term pressure overload-induced right ventricular hypertrophy in rats. Circ Res 63: 648–657, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ricchiuti V, Zhang J, and Apple FS. Cardiac troponin I and T alterations in hearts with severe left ventricular remodeling. Clin Chem 43: 990–995, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Rosenberg HC and Rabinovitch M. Endothelial injury and vascular reactivity in monocrotaline pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 255: H1484–H1491, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Sagawa K. The end-systolic pressure-volume relation of the ventricle: definition, modifications and clinical use. Circulation 63: 1223–1227, 1981.[Free Full Text]
  35. Schott P, Singer SS, Kogler H, Neddermeier D, Leineweber K, Brodde OE, Regitz-Zagrosek V, Schmidt B, Dihazi H, and Hasenfuss G. Pressure overload and neurohumoral activation differentially affect the myocardial proteome. Proteomics 5: 1372–1381, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  36. Seyfarth T, Gerbershagen HP, Giessler C, Leineweber K, Heinroth-Hoffmann I, Ponicke K, and Brodde OE. The cardiac beta-adrenoceptor-G protein(s)-adenylyl cyclase system in monocrotaline-treated rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol 32: 2315–2326, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  37. Spinale FG, Gunasinghe H, Sprunger PD, Baskin JM, and Bradham WC. Extracellular degradative pathways in myocardial remodeling and progression to heart failure. J Card Fail 8: S332–S338, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Steendijk P and Baan J. Comparison of intravenous and pulmonary artery injections of hypertonic saline for the assessment of conductance catheter parallel conductance. Cardiovasc Res 46: 82–89, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Steendijk P, Baan J Jr, van der Velde ET, and Baan J. Effects of critical coronary stenosis on global systolic left ventricular function quantified by pressure-volume relations during dobutamine stress in the canine heart. J Am Coll Cardiol 32: 816–826, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Stein PD, Sabbah HN, Anbe DT, and Marzilli M. Performance of the failing and nonfailing right ventricle of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Am J Cardiol 44: 1050–1055, 1979.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  41. Suga H, Sagawa K, and Shoukas AA. Load independence of the instantaneous pressure-volume ratio of the canine left ventricle and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ Res 32: 314–322, 1973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Sweat F, Puchtler H, and Rosenthal SI. Sirius red F3BA as a stain for connective tissue. Arch Pathol 78: 69–72, 1964.[Web of Science][Medline]
  43. Valdivia E, Lalich JJ, Hayashi Y, and Sonnad J. Alterations in pulmonary alveoli after a single injection of monocrotaline. Arch Pathol 84: 64–76, 1967.[Web of Science][Medline]
  44. Van der Laarse A. Hypothesis: troponin degradation is one of the factors responsible for deterioration of left ventricular function in heart failure. Cardiovasc Res 56: 8–14, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Van der Velde ET, Burkhoff D, Steendijk P, Karsdon J, Sagawa K, and Baan J. Nonlinearity and load sensitivity of end-systolic pressure-volume relation of canine left ventricle in vivo. Circulation 83: 315–327, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Versluis JP, Heslinga JW, Sipkema P, and Westerhof N. Contractile reserve but not tension is reduced in monocrotaline-induced right ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286: H979–H984, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Wassen FW, Schiel AE, Kuiper GG, Kaptein E, Bakker O, Visser TJ, and Simonides WS. Induction of thyroid hormone-degrading deiodinase in cardiac hypertrophy and failure. Endocrinology 143: 2812–2815, 2002.[Free Full Text]
  48. Werchan PM, Summer WR, Gerdes AM, and McDonough KH. Right ventricular performance after monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 256: H1328–H1336, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Wilson DW, Segall HJ, Pan LC, Lame MW, Estep JE, and Morin D. Mechanisms and pathology of monocrotaline pulmonary toxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol 22: 307–325, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]
  50. Yang B, Larson DF, Beischel J, Kelly R, Shi J, and Watson RR. Validation of conductance catheter system for quantification of murine pressure-volume loops. J Invest Surg 14: 341–355, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  51. Zimmerman SD, Criscione J, and Covell JW. Remodeling in myocardium adjacent to an infarction in the pig left ventricle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287: H2697–H2704, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Umar, Y. P. de Visser, P. Steendijk, C. I. Schutte, E. H. Laghmani, G. T. M. Wagenaar, W. H. Bax, E. Mantikou, D. A. Pijnappels, D. E. Atsma, et al.
Allogenic stem cell therapy improves right ventricular function by improving lung pathology in rats with pulmonary hypertension
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): H1606 - H1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
S. Gur, P. J. Kadowitz, S. Thammasitboon, J. A. Lasky, and W. J. G. Hellstrom
Characterization of Erectile Function in Monocrotaline-Treated Pulmonary Hypertensive Rats
J Androl, September 1, 2009; 30(5): 495 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Yamazato, A. J. Ferreira, K.-H. Hong, S. Sriramula, J. Francis, M. Yamazato, L. Yuan, C. N. Bradford, V. Shenoy, S. P. Oh, et al.
Prevention of Pulmonary Hypertension by Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Gene Transfer
Hypertension, August 1, 2009; 54(2): 365 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M.L. Handoko, F.S. de Man, C.M. Happe, I. Schalij, R.J.P. Musters, N. Westerhof, P.E. Postmus, W.J. Paulus, W.J. van der Laarse, and A. Vonk-Noordegraaf
Opposite Effects of Training in Rats With Stable and Progressive Pulmonary Hypertension
Circulation, July 7, 2009; 120(1): 42 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
P. Pokreisz, G. Marsboom, and S. Janssens
Pressure overload-induced right ventricular dysfunction and remodelling in experimental pulmonary hypertension: the right heart revisited
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_H): H75 - H84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. R. Lamberts, E. Caldenhoven, M. Lansink, G. Witte, R. J. Vaessen, J. A. St Cyr, and G. J. M. Stienen
Preservation of diastolic function in monocrotaline-induced right ventricular hypertrophy in rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1869 - H1876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/5/H2424    most recent
00369.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hessel, M. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by van der Laarse, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hessel, M. H. M.
Right arrow Articles by van der Laarse, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.