AJP - Heart Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292: H342-H347, 2007. First published September 1, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00306.2006
0363-6135/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/H342    most recent
00306.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elrod, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lefer, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elrod, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lefer, D. J.

Sildenafil-mediated acute cardioprotection is independent of the NO/cGMP pathway

John W. Elrod,1 James J. M. Greer,2 and David J. Lefer1

1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; and 2Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana

Submitted 24 March 2006 ; accepted in final form 27 August 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Sildenafil, a potent inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, has recently been investigated in animal models of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (MI/R) injury. Previous studies have suggested that the protective effects of sildenafil are mediated via activation of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthesis (eNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS). To further investigate the protective mechanism of sildenafil, we subjected wild-type, eNOS, and iNOS null animals to 30 min of myocardial ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion. Treatment with 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil 5 min before reperfusion significantly reduced myocardial infarct size in wild-type, eNOS null mice (eNOS–/–), and iNOS–/– animals. Additionally, the low dose utilized in this study did not alter myocardial cGMP. These results suggest that acute low-dose sildenafil-mediated cardioprotection is independent of eNOS, iNOS, and cGMP. In a second series of experiments, we investigated sildenafil in db/db diabetic mice subjected to MI/R. We found that sildenafil failed to protect diabetic mice against MI/R. However, NO· donor therapy was found to significantly protect against MI/R injury in both nondiabetic and diabetic mice, suggesting that protection could be conferred in diabetic mice and that the upstream modulator of soluble guanylyl cyclase, NO·, may mediate protection independent of cGMP signaling. The present study suggests that further research is needed to delineate the precise mechanisms by which sildenafil exerts cardioprotection.

cyclic guanosine monophosphate; nitric oxide; diabetes mellitus; phosphodiesterase type 5; myocardial infarction; endothelial nitric oxide; inducible nitric oxide; db/db mouse


SILDENAFIL WAS ORIGINALLY developed to treat angina pectoris and subsequently became the first Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for erectile dysfunction. Many recent studies (11, 15, 21, 27, 34) have again focused on the protective role of sildenafil in numerous cardiac pathologies. Sildenafil is a potent and selective inhibitor of cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5A (PDE-5). PDE-5 is responsible for the degradation of cGMP by hydrolysis to guanosine 5'-monophosphate (5'-GMP). Thereby, inhibition of PDE-5 by sildenafil preserves the cGMP pool and potentiates downstream signaling.

PDE-5 inhibition is currently a major focus of study in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (MI/R) injury. There have been several proposed mechanisms by which sildenafil may protect against MI/R injury. Most current research has focused on mechanisms of ischemic preconditioning (20, 21) and implicated endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase (eNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS) as prominent players in sildenafil-mediated protection. Sildenafil administered before ischemia has been found to reduce infarct size in an in vivo rabbit model (24). The same group (30) reported that sildenafil upregulated both eNOS and iNOS and that inhibition of iNOS completely abolished the protective effect of sildenafil. Additionally, in a study (9) of adult mouse cardiomyocytes, it was found that sildenafil protected against necrosis and apoptosis in an iNOS- and eNOS-dependent fashion.

Studies utilizing heart failure models have also cited NO synthases as central to the protective effects of sildenafil. Pretreatment with sildenafil attenuated apoptosis and left ventricle (LV) dysfunction in a model of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy (11). Protection was lost with administration of either N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a NOS inhibitor, or 5-hydroxydecanoate acid, a mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ (mitoKATP) channel channel blocker. In an isoproterenol-induced hypertrophy rat model, it was found that sildenafil reduced myocardial hypertrophy and necrosis. It was found that sildenafil increased cGMP levels and that protection was abrogated with the addition of the NOS inhibitor N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) (15).

These findings have been bolstered by reports (6) that sildenafil has no effect on erectile function in eNOS null (eNOS–/–) and eNOS/neuronal NOS–/– mice. In accordance, Takimoto et al. (33) found that PDE-5A inhibition had no effect on beta-stimulated contractility in eNOS–/– mice or mice pharmacologically treated with the NOS inhibitor L-NAME or the soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor ODQ.

Given the multitude of studies suggesting that protection by sildenafil is eNOS and iNOS dependent, the first aim of the current investigation was to test this hypothesis utilizing eNOS and iNOS null mice in an in vivo model of MI/R. Additionally, all of the studies to date have utilized healthy animals with no preexisting risk factors for cardiovascular disease. We therefore chose to investigate sildenafil in a more clinically relevant model utilizing the db/db diabetic mouse.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals and Reagents

Sildenafil citrate [1-({3-[6,7-dihydro-1-methyl-7-oxo-3-propyl-1H-pyrazolo(4,3-d)pyrimidin-5-yl]-4-ethoxyphenyl}sulfonyl)-4 methyl piperazine citrate], a selective inhibitor of cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) was administered at doses ranging from 0.03 to 0.25 mg/kg via injection into the LV lumen 5 min before reperfusion dissolved in normal saline.

Dipropylenetriamine (DPTA) NONOate (DPTA/NO), a NO donor, was purchased from Alexis Biochemicals (San Diego, CA) and administered (100 µg/kg) via injection into the LV lumen 5 min before reperfusion dissolved in normal saline.

Animals

Diabetic mice. Our studies focused on the db/db diabetic mouse as an animal model of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Male B6.Cg-m+/+Leprdb/J (C57BL6/J background) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories and maintained on a normal rodent chow diet. Male mice were used at 8–10 wk of age.

iNOS knockout mice. These mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories and maintained on a normal rodent chow diet. Male mice on a C57BL6/J background were used at 8–10 wk of age.

eNOS knockout mice. These mice were originally donated by Dr. P. Huang (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) and generated in our breeding colony at Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Bronx, NY) on a C57BL6/J background. Male eNOS–/– mice were utilized at 8–10 wk of age. All experimental procedures were approved/reviewed by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee.

MI/R Protocol

Surgical procedures used in the MI/R protocol (Fig. 1) were similar to methods previously described (17, 18). Briefly, mice were weighed and fully anesthetized via intraperitoneal injections of pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg) and ketamine (60 mg/kg). Mice were then orally intubated and connected to a Harvard Apparatus Rodent Ventilator (model 835). Oxygen (100%) was supplied, and body temperature was monitored using a rectal probe thermometer and controlled with an infrared heat lamp. A median sternotomy was performed, and the left coronary artery (LCA) was visualized and ligated proximally using a 7-0 silk suture mounted on a BV-1 tapered needle. A piece of PE-10 tubing was placed between the LCA and the 7-0 silk suture to minimize coronary injury induced by occlusion and facilitate reperfusion. The LCA was completely occluded for 30 min, and reperfusion was initiated by removal of the 7-0 suture. Following reperfusion, the chest wound was reapproximated, and mice were extubated and allowed to recover with supplemental oxygen until mobile. All mice received butorphanol tartrate (0.2 mg/kg im) to minimize pain.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion (MI/R) protocol. Mice were anesthetized and intubated. Temperature was stabilized at 37°C. The left coronary artery (LCA) was then ligated to induce 30 min of ischemia. At 5 min before reperfusion, mice were treated with either sildenafil or vehicle. Following 24 h of reperfusion, the LCA was religated, and Evans blue was injected via a carotid catheter to delineate the area at risk. The heart was then removed and cross-sectioned, and viable myocardium was stained with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) for infarct size determination.

 
Myocardial Infarct Size Determination

After 24 h of reperfusion, the mice were anesthetized as described previously, intubated, and connected to a rodent ventilator. A catheter (PE-10 tubing) was placed in the common carotid artery to allow for Evans blue dye injection. A median sternotomy was performed, and the LCA was religated in the same location as before. Evans blue dye (1 ml of a 3% solution) was injected into the carotid artery catheter into the heart to delineate the ischemic zone from the nonischemic zone. The heart was rapidly excised and cross-sectioned into 1-mm-thick sections, which were then incubated in 1.0% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride for 5 min at 37°C to demarcate the viable and nonviable myocardium within the risk zone. Each of the five 1-mm-thick myocardial slices was weighed, and the areas of infarction, risk, and nonischemic LV were assessed by a blinded observer using computer-assisted planimetry (NIH Image 1.57). All of the procedures for area at risk (AAR) and infarct size determination have been previously described (17, 18).

Plasma Sildenafil Concentration

HPLC analysis of plasma samples was carried out by SFBC Analytical Laboratories (North Wales, PA).

Myocardial cGMP Analysis

Animals injected with 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil or the vehicle normal saline into the LV lumen were euthanized 30 min after injection, and hearts were removed. The LV was dissected and immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Snap-frozen samples were analyzed by Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI) EIA testing service for cGMP (7).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed where appropriate by Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, or two-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey and Bonferroni analysis using JMP IN statistical software (SAS Institute). Data are reported as means ± SE. P values <0.05 were considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Dose Response of PDE-5 Inhibition in MI/R

To determine the lowest efficacious dose of sildenafil and minimize both nonspecific and hemodynamic effects, a dose-response study was performed (Fig. 2). Sildenafil or vehicle (normal saline) was injected into the LV 5 min before reperfusion at incremental doses ranging from 0.03 to 0.25 mg/kg. Mice receiving vehicle injection displayed a 48.1 ± 3.3% infarct per area at risk (Inf/AAR) following 30 min of ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion. Inf/AAR was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced to 29.7 ± 4.8% in mice receiving 0.25 mg/kg sildenafil vs. vehicle. In mice receiving 0.125 mg/kg sildenafil, Inf/AAR was not reduced (35.3 ± 4.2%). Mice receiving either 0.06 mg/kg or 0.03 mg/kg sildenafil both displayed a very significant reduction in Inf/AAR compared with vehicle (26.3 ± 3.1% and 23.5 ± 3.2%; P < 0 .001). The percent AAR per LV (AAR/LV) was similar among all study groups, indicating similar severities of myocardial ischemia.


Figure 2
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Sildenafil dose-response study. Mice were treated 5 min before reperfusion with either sildenafil (0.03–0.25 mg/kg) or vehicle (normal saline) and assessed for infarct per area at risk (Inf/AAR) and infarct per left ventricle (Inf/LV; data not shown). A sildenafil dose of 0.03 and 0.06 mg/kg yielded the most significant protection compared with vehicle-treated mice. The AAR per LV (AAR/LV) was similar among all groups. Numbers inside circles are number of animals per group. NS = not significant; *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle; ***P < 0.001 vs. vehicle.

 
PDE-5 Inhibition Reduces MI/R Injury in Wild-Type Mice

Wild-type mice receiving 0.06 mg/kg of sildenafil citrate displayed a very significant (P < 0.001) reduction in percent Inf/AAR vs. vehicle (49.5 ± 2.6% vs. 26.3 ± 3.1%; Fig. 3). Likewise, infarct per LV (Inf/LV) was also reduced (30.6 ± 1.9% vs. 15.0 ± 1.9%; P < 0.001 vs. vehicle). There was no significant difference in AAR/LV between groups.


Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Sildenafil reduces MI/R injury in wild-type animals. Mice subjected to 30 min of ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion were injected intraventricularly 5 min before reperfusion with 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil. Sildenafil reduced Inf/AAR by 47% compared with vehicle. Inf/LV was also significantly reduced. Numbers inside circles are number of animals per group. ***P < 0.001 vs. vehicle.

 
The Protective Mechanism of Sildenafil is Independent of eNOS

eNOS–/– mice were subjected to 30 min of myocardial ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion (Fig. 4A). Mice received either 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil or vehicle 5 min before reperfusion. Sildenafil reduced Inf/AAR in eNOS–/– mice by 69.2% (59.1 ± 4.3% vs. 18.2 ± 6.3%; P < 0.001). Inf/LV was also reduced (from 36.5 ± 3.7% to 12.7 ± 3.8%; P < 0.01). AAR/LV was similar for both groups.


Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Sildenafil-mediated cardioprotection is endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase (eNOS)- and inducible NOS (iNOS) independent. eNOS null mice (eNOS–/–) and iNOS null mice (iNOS–/–) were injected with 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil 5 min before reperfusion. Sildenafil yielded significant protection in eNOS–/– (A) and iNOS–/– (B) animals. Numbers inside circles are number of animals per group. *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle; **P < 0.01 vs. vehicle; ***P < 0.001 vs. vehicle.

 
Sildenafil Protects Against MI/R Injury in an iNOS-Independent Fashion

iNOS–/– mice were subjected to 30 min of myocardial ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion (Fig. 4B). Mice received either 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil (n = 9) or vehicle (n = 7) 5 min before reperfusion. Sildenafil reduced Inf/AAR in iNOS–/– mice by 50.0% (50.6 ± 7.0% vs. 25.3 ± 5.4%; P < 0.05). Inf/LV was also reduced (from 28.4 ± 4.4% to 14.8 ± 3.1%; P < 0.05). AAR/LV was similar for both groups.

Sildenafil Does Not Protect Diabetic Mice From MI/R Injury

In a subsequent study of MI/R injury, diabetic (db/db) mice were given either vehicle (n = 8) or 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil (n = 12) 5 min before reperfusion (Fig. 5). Sildenafil did not significantly reduce Inf/AAR in db/db mice [64.4 ± 3.5% vs. 57.4 ± 3.8; P = not significant (NS)] or Inf/LV (41.3 ± 3.9% vs. 31.5 ± 3.0%; P = NS).


Figure 5
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Sildenafil does not protect the diabetic myocardium against I/R injury. Diabetic (db/db) mice were injected with either vehicle or 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil 5 min before reperfusion. Sildenafil treatment failed to protect the db/db diabetic mouse compared with vehicle. Numbers inside circles are number of animals per group.

 
Sildenafil Did Not Alter Myocardial cGMP Levels in Nondiabetic or Diabetic Mice

Mice were injected with 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil or normal saline into the LV cavity, and plasma and heart samples were collected 30 min later. Intravascular injection of 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil resulted in a plasma concentration of 1.614 ± 0.376 ng/ml (P < 0.001 vs. vehicle; Fig. 6A). This low dose, although efficacious, did not significantly alter myocardial cGMP levels in wild-type or diabetic mice (n = 4, Fig. 6B). Nondiabetic mice receiving vehicle displayed cGMP levels of 60.19 ± 3.99 pmol/mg protein compared with 57.52 ± 3.76 pmol/mg in mice receiving sildenafil (P = NS). Likewise, db/db diabetic mice receiving vehicle exhibited cGMP levels of 60.00 ± 4.66 pmol/mg, and sildenafil-treated db/db mice exhibited cGMP levels of 67.08 ± 2.29 pmol/mg of protein (P = NS).


Figure 6
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Low-dose sildenafil does not alter myocardial cGMP levels. Intraventricular injection of 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil resulted in a mean plasma concentration of 1.6 ng/ml or 2.4 nM (A). This low dose did not significantly alter myocardial cGMP levels in nondiabetic or diabetic mice (B). Numbers inside circles are number of animals per group. **P < 0.01 vs. vehicle.

 
The NO Donor DPTA/NO Protects Against MI/R in Nondiabetic and Diabetic Mice

The well-characterized upstream modulator of cGMP, NO, was evaluated in both nondiabetic and diabetic mice to investigate whether direct NO· therapy could be cardioprotective. DPTA/NO (100 µg/kg) was injected into the LV 5 min before myocardial reperfusion in nondiabetic and diabetic mice. Nondiabetic mice (Fig. 7A) displayed a 45.4% reduction in Inf/AAR (44.7 ± 3.0% vs. 24.4 ± 2.7%). In correlation, Inf/LV was also significantly reduced (P < 0.01). Diabetic (db/db) mice receiving DPTA/NO (Fig. 7B) before reperfusion showed a significant decrease in Inf/AAR from 62.5 ± 2.0% to 41.4 ± 3.8% (P < 0.001, vs. vehicle). Inf/LV was also significantly reduced by 38.1% in animals receiving DPTA/NO before reperfusion.


Figure 7
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Direct NO therapy protects nondiabetic and diabetic mice. Mice subjected to 30 min of ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion were injected intraventricularly 5 min before reperfusion with 100 µg/kg of the NO donor dipropylenetriamine (DPTA) NONOate (DPTA/NO). DPTA/NO significantly reduced Inf/AAR in nondiabetic mice compared with vehicle (A). Inf/LV was also significantly reduced. Diabetic mice receiving DPTA/NO displayed a significant reduction in Inf/AAR and Inf/LV (B). Numbers inside circles are number of animals per group. ***P < 0.001 vs. vehicle; **P < 0.01 vs. vehicle.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Recent studies have reported the protective effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition in various models of cardiac pathology. Suggested mechanisms responsible for the protective action of sildenafil remain to be fully elucidated. In the present study, we sought to examine some of the proposed cardioprotective mechanisms in an in vivo model of MI/R injury. In addition, we hypothesized that sildenafil may augment cGMP signaling and mediate cardioprotection in a more rigorous and clinically relevant model of MI/R injury (i.e., diabetes mellitus).

Initially, a dose-response study was performed to evaluate the most efficacious dose of sildenafil. Importantly, in all of our studies, sildenafil was injected intravascularly only 5 min before reperfusion, thereby avoiding any preconditioning effect. We found that low dose (0.06–0.03 mg/kg) sildenafil was most effective, reducing infarct by ~50% compared with vehicle-treated animals. Similar doses have been shown to have no effect on hemodynamics (8) or regional myocardial blood flow (26), allowing for the investigation of protection independent of alterations in myocardial oxygen demand. In agreement, we found in a subset of animals that 0.06 mg/kg had no effect on systemic blood pressure or heart rate (data not shown).

To test whether mechanism of action of sildenafil is NOS dependent, we next subjected eNOS and iNOS null animals to MI/R. Interestingly, 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil significantly protected both eNOS–/– and iNOS–/– animals. In eNOS–/– animals, which we have previously reported (32) display exacerbated injury and increased infarct compared with wild-type animals, sildenafil injected just before reperfusion lowered Inf/AAR to levels just as low as in wild-type mice. This finding clearly demonstrates that protective action of sildenafil is not mediated via eNOS. This discovery, although contradictory to other studies, is not surprising. First, other studies (9, 11, 15, 30) examining the role of eNOS and iNOS have utilized pharmacological inhibition. These drugs (i.e., L-NAME or L-NNA) have been reported (22) to have many other nonspecific effects in addition to inhibiting NOS. In contrast to the present study, previous studies (8, 15, 24, 30) investigated sildenafil treatment before cardiac insult. Also, these studies investigated delayed preconditioning, which may have allowed for iNOS and/or eNOS to be upregulated and lead to cardioprotection. In the present study, we focused on the acute cardioprotective effect with delivery just before reperfusion in an in vivo model.

We also examined modulation by sildenafil of myocardial cGMP levels yielding unexpected results. In the present study, a single dose of 0.06 mg/kg sildenafil resulted in a mean circulating plasma level, 30 min following injection, of only 1.6 ng/ml. In human subjects, a single oral dose of 100 mg translates into a peak plasma concentration of ~440 ng/ml (Pfizer), 275 times higher than levels achieved in this study. Furthermore, 1.6 ng/ml correlates to a concentration of ~2.4 nM, slightly lower than sildenafil's IC50 of 3.9 nM. This low, yet effective, dose did not, however, significantly alter myocardial cGMP levels in either nondiabetic or diabetic mice. This suggests that the protective effect of sildenafil at this low dose may be independent of increasing myocardial cGMP levels. In corroboration of these findings, a recent study (34) reported that chronic sildenafil delivery resulting in plasma concentrations ~10 nM reversed cardiac hypertrophy in a murine, transaortic constriction model yet did not alter cGMP levels. Whereas the absolute level of cGMP was not altered by sildenafil, recent reports (3, 5) suggest that the subcellular localization of various cGMP pools (i.e., soluble vs. particulate) may play a prominent role in signal transduction. This leaves open the possibility that sildenafil may modulate the compartmentalization and localization of cGMP within the cardiomyocyte.

To test whether sildenafil would protect animals with preexisting cardiovascular disease, we utilized the db/db diabetic mouse. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in diabetes. According to the American Heart Association, people with diabetes mellitus are more likely to develop cardiovascular disease due to multiple risk factors (2, 4). These heightened diabetic risk factors include insulin resistance, obesity, physical inactivity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Postmortem studies of diabetic hearts have independently concluded that coronary heart disease is increased three- to fourfold when compared with nondiabetic specimens (13, 29). It has also been found that there is a much higher risk of mortality following myocardial infarction in diabetics compared with nondiabetic patients (12, 23) and that this correlates strongly with an increase in myocardial infarction size (28). Despite the overwhelming evidence that diabetics suffer from larger myocardial infarction and have a greater risk of developing congestive heart failure (31), there have been very few basic science studies designed to examine the mechanisms involved in diabetic myocardial infarction. Our laboratory has previously reported that the extent of myocardial infarction is significantly increased in the db/db mouse (16). We have also recently reported that these animals have exacerbated injury in a model of heart failure with increased mortality and decreased cardiac function (14).

We found the potent protective effect of sildenafil was lost in this clinically relevant model. Diabetic mice receiving sildenafil just before reperfusion displayed no reduction in infarct compared with mice receiving vehicle. To further investigate whether protection could be conferred in the db/db mouse, we next analyzed the upstream signaling molecule NO·. Current dogma (1, 10, 19, 21, 25) suggests that the NO/cGMP pathway is prominent in NO·-mediated protection against MI/R injury. Delivery of the NO· donor DPTA 5 min before reperfusion yielded significant protection in both nondiabetic and diabetic mice. This clearly demonstrates that the db/db diabetic mouse can be pharmacologically protected against I/R injury and thus is a viable model to investigate cardioprotection. These results suggest that, whereas sildenafil has been shown to be protective in healthy animals, the translation of this therapy to the clinical setting, where patients present with preexisting conditions, may not prove beneficial. Clearly, additional translational studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of PDE-5 inhibition in myocardial infarction.

In conclusion, we have shown that low-dose sildenafil significantly reduces MI/R injury in an in vivo murine model. This protection was determined to be independent of both eNOS and iNOS through the use of null animals. Additionally, the dose used in the current study did not alter myocardial cGMP levels. The efficacy of sildenafil was not observed in diabetic mice subjected to MI/R injury. These results suggest that further research is needed to delineate the mechanisms involved in sildenafil-mediated cardioprotection allowing for translation to the clinical setting.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
These studies were supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (2RO1 HL-6049; to D. J. Lefer) and by a grant from the American Diabetes Association (7-04-RA-59; to D. J. Lefer).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Jeff Szot and Kyle Aaron for invaluable technical expertise in conducting these studies.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. J. Lefer, Dept. of Medicine-Div. of Cardiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461 (e-mail: dlefer{at}aecom.yu.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Abdallah Y, Gkatzoflia A, Pieper H, Zoga E, Walther S, Kasseckert S, Schafer M, Schluter KD, Piper HM, Schafer C. Mechanism of cGMP-mediated protection in a cellular model of myocardial reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res 66: 123–131, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Brownlee M. The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism. Diabetes 54: 1615–1625, 2005.[Free Full Text]
  3. Buchwalow IB, Minin EA, Samoilova VE, Boecker W, Wellner M, Schmitz W, Neumann J, Punkt K. Compartmentalization of NO signaling cascade in skeletal muscles. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 330: 615–621, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Caballero AE. Endothelial dysfunction in obesity and insulin resistance: a road to diabetes and heart disease. Obes Res 11: 1278–1289, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Castro LR, Verde I, Cooper DM, Fischmeister R. Cyclic guanosine monophosphate compartmentation in rat cardiac myocytes. Circulation 113: 2221–2228, 2006.
  6. Champion HC, Bivalacqua TJ, Takimoto E, Kass DA, Burnett AL. Phosphodiesterase-5A dysregulation in penile erectile tissue is a mechanism of priapism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 1661–1666, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Chen LY, Mehta JL. Downregulation of nitric oxide synthase activity in human platelets by nitroglycerin and authentic nitric oxide. J Investig Med 45: 69–74, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
  8. Das A, Ockaili R, Salloum F, Kukreja RC. Protein kinase C plays an essential role in sildenafil-induced cardioprotection in rabbits. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286: H1455–H1460, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Das A, Xi L, Kukreja RC. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil preconditions adult cardiac myocytes against necrosis and apoptosis. Essential role of nitric oxide signaling. J Biol Chem 280: 12944–12955, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Feil R, Lohmann SM, de Jonge H, Walter U, Hofmann F. Cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinases and the cardiovascular system: insights from genetically modified mice. Circ Res 93: 907–916, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Fisher PW, Salloum F, Das A, Hyder H, Kukreja RC. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition with sildenafil attenuates cardiomyocyte apoptosis and left ventricular dysfunction in a chronic model of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity. Circulation 111: 1601–1610, 2005.
  12. Garcia MJ, McNamara PM, Gordon T, Kannel WB. Morbidity and mortality in diabetics in the Framingham population. Sixteen year follow-up study. Diabetes 23: 105–111, 1974.[Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Goldenberg S, Alex M, Blumenthal HT. Sequelae of arteriosclerosis of the aorta and coronary arteries: a statistical study in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 7: 98–108, 1958.[Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Greer JJ, Ware DP, Lefer DJ. Myocardial infarction and heart failure in the db/db diabetic mouse. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290: H146–H153, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hassan MA, Ketat AF. Sildenafil citrate increases myocardial cGMP content in rat heart, decreases its hypertrophic response to isoproterenol and decreases myocardial leak of creatine kinase and troponin T. BMC Pharmacol 5: 10, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Jones SP, Girod WG, Granger DN, Palazzo AJ, Lefer DJ. Reperfusion injury is not affected by blockade of P-selectin in the diabetic mouse heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 277: H763–H769, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jones SP, Girod WG, Palazzo AJ, Granger DN, Grisham MB, Jourd'Heuil D, Huang PL, Lefer DJ. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury is exacerbated in absence of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H1567–H1573, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Jones SP, Trocha SD, Lefer DJ. Pretreatment with simvastatin attenuates myocardial dysfunction after ischemia and chronic reperfusion. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21: 2059–2064, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kodani E, Xuan YT, Takano H, Shinmura K, Tang XL, Bolli R. Role of cyclic guanosine monophosphate in late preconditioning in conscious rabbits. Circulation 105: 3046–3052, 2002.
  20. Kukreja RC, Ockaili R, Salloum F, Yin C, Hawkins J, Das A, Xi L. Cardioprotection with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition—a novel preconditioning strategy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 36: 165–173, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Kukreja RC, Salloum F, Das A, Ockaili R, Yin C, Bremer YA, Fisher PW, Wittkamp M, Hawkins J, Chou E, Kukreja AK, Wang X, Marwaha VR, Xi L. Pharmacological preconditioning with sildenafil: basic mechanisms and clinical implications. Vascul Pharmacol 42: 219–232, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Low SY. Application of pharmaceuticals to nitric oxide. Mol Aspects Med 26: 97–138, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Miettinen H, Lehto S, Salomaa V, Mahonen M, Niemela M, Haffner SM, Pyorala K, Tuomilehto J. Impact of diabetes on mortality after the first myocardial infarction. The FINMONICA Myocardial Infarction Register Study Group. Diabetes Care 21: 69–75, 1998.[Abstract]
  24. Ockaili R, Salloum F, Hawkins J, Kukreja RC. Sildenafil (Viagra) induces powerful cardioprotective effect via opening of mitochondrial KATP channels in rabbits. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283: H1263–H1269, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Qin Q, Yang XM, Cui L, Critz SD, Cohen MV, Browner NC, Lincoln TM, Downey JM. Exogenous NO triggers preconditioning via a cGMP- and mitoKATP-dependent mechanism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287: H712–H718, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Reffelmann T, Kloner RA. Effects of sildenafil on myocardial infarct size, microvascular function, and acute ischemic left ventricular dilation. Cardiovasc Res 59: 441–449, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Reffelmann T, Kloner RA. Therapeutic potential of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibition for cardiovascular disease. Circulation 108: 239–244, 2003.
  28. Regan TJ. Congestive heart failure in the diabetic. Annu Rev Med 34: 161–168, 1983.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  29. Root HF, West KM. The increasing incidence of coronary arteriosclerosis in diabetes mellitus; preliminary manuscript. J Okla State Med Assoc 46: 6–11, 1953.[Medline]
  30. Salloum F, Yin C, Xi L, Kukreja RC. Sildenafil induces delayed preconditioning through inducible nitric oxide synthase-dependent pathway in mouse heart. Circ Res 92: 595–597, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Savage MP, Krolewski AS, Kenien GG, Lebeis MP, Christlieb AR, Lewis SM. Acute myocardial infarction in diabetes mellitus and significance of congestive heart failure as a prognostic factor. Am J Cardiol 62: 665–669, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Sharp BR, Jones SP, Rimmer DM, Lefer DJ. Differential response to myocardial reperfusion injury in eNOS-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H2422–H2426, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Takimoto E, Champion HC, Belardi D, Moslehi J, Mongillo M, Mergia E, Montrose DC, Isoda T, Aufiero K, Zaccolo M, Dostmann WR, Smith CJ, Kass DA. cGMP catabolism by phosphodiesterase 5A regulates cardiac adrenergic stimulation by NOS3-dependent mechanism. Circ Res 96: 100–109, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Takimoto E, Champion HC, Li M, Belardi D, Ren S, Rodriguez ER, Bedja D, Gabrielson KL, Wang Y, Kass DA. Chronic inhibition of cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase 5A prevents and reverses cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Med 11: 214–222, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. W. Calvert and D. J. Lefer
Myocardial protection by nitrite
Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2009; 83(2): 195 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Reffelmann and R. A. Kloner
Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: are they cardioprotective?
Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2009; 83(2): 204 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Heart FailHome page
M. Guazzi
Clinical Use of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors in Chronic Heart Failure
Circ Heart Fail, November 1, 2008; 1(4): 272 - 280.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
F. N. Salloum, A. Abbate, A. Das, J.-E. Houser, C. A. Mudrick, I. Z. Qureshi, N. N. Hoke, S. K. Roy, W. R. Brown, S. Prabhakar, et al.
Sildenafil (Viagra) attenuates ischemic cardiomyopathy and improves left ventricular function in mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): H1398 - H1406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. W. Calvert, S. Gundewar, M. Yamakuchi, P. C. Park, W. M. Baldwin III, D. J. Lefer, and C. J. Lowenstein
Inhibition of N-Ethylmaleimide Sensitive Factor Protects Against Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury
Circ. Res., December 7, 2007; 101(12): 1247 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/H342    most recent
00306.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elrod, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lefer, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elrod, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lefer, D. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.