|
|
||||||||
CALL FOR PAPERS
Oxygen Sensing: Life and Death of a Cell
1Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University; and 2National Centre for Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India
Submitted 6 July 2006 ; accepted in final form 27 October 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase; gene expression
B (4, 19), p53 (22), and subsequent gene expression. In the growing list of transcription factors influenced by cellular ROS generation, a recent addition is the hypoxia-induced oxygen sensing transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1. The HIF-1 is found to be consisting of a dimer of subunits HIF-1
and HIF-1
. In normoxia, the hydroxylation of HIF-1
at the proline residues (402 and 564) is catalyzed by proline hydroxylases using molecular oxygen as the substrate (1315). The tumor suppressor von Hippel-Lindau protein specifically binds with hydroxylated HIF-1
and promotes subsequent ubiquitinization and proteolysis (27), whereas HIF-1
is found to be constitutive. In response to hypoxia, HIF-1
is not hydroxylated at the proline residues and therefore is stabilized. The stabilized HIF-1
translocates into the nucleus and binds to HIF-1
and thus forms HIF-1 complex and binds to hypoxia response element (HRE, 5'-RCGTG-3') to increase the transcription of target genes like VEGF, GLUT1, erythropoietin (Epo), and others (13). For the last several years there have been contradictory reports on the participation of mitochondria-generated ROS in hypoxia-induced activation of HIF-1 (17). Initially, it was reported that mitochondria produced a burst of ROS in response to hypoxia and that this burst is necessary and sufficient to activate HIF-1 (6). The involvement of ROS, as well as any conventional signaling pathways, was the subject of concern because of the observation that, during hypoxia, decline in oxygen levels directly decreases the activity of the prolyl hydroxylases, thereby preventing hydroxylation of the HIF-1
protein (7). A series of articles published recently, however, reconfirms the participation of mitochondrial ROS in HIF-1 activation by hypoxia (5, 11, 26) using a p38 MAP kinase pathway (7), although exactly how ROS activates HIF-1 still remains to be understood. Besides hypoxia, HIF-1 is also activated in normoxic conditions by several important physiological stimuli like insulin (35, 38), IGF-I/II (38), EGF (30), PDGF, and angiotensin II (31). Incidentally, insulin is known to increase the intracellular ROS generation to regulate the posttranslational translocation of GLUT4 (23, 24). Insulin plays a crucial role in regulating the metabolic pathways associated with energy storage and utilization. It regulates expression of GLUT1 and phosphoglycerate kinase-1 and several other genes like VEGF, Epo, and endothelin-1 (13). Insulin increases the transcription of many of these target genes by activating HIF-1 (38). We also have demonstrated that insulin regulates iron homeostasis gene ceruloplasmin (Cp) by activating HIF-1 (35). The current study is aimed to investigate the role of insulin-induced ROS generation in HIF-1 activation and subsequent gene expression. Here we demonstrated that insulin-stimulated ROS generation by NADPH oxidase is essential for the activation of HIF-1 in insulin-sensitive hepatic cells HepG2 and cardiac myoblasts H9c2. To understand the mechanism, we found that, in HepG2 cells, the NADPH oxidase-generated ROS regulates phosphorylation of insulin receptor kinases as well as phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-kinase) activity, essential for HIF-1 activation and subsequent expression of genes like VEGF, GLUT1, and Cp.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit (IR-
), insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), were from Upstate Biotechnology. Antibodies to phosphorylated Akt (Ser473) and Akt protein (not isoform specific) were purchased from New England Biolabs. All cell culture reagents and other reagents were obtained from Sigma, unless otherwise mentioned. Cell lines and culture conditions. Human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells and cardiac myoblasts H9c2 cells (from ATCC) were cultured in DMEM, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Cells at 5060% confluence were used in all experiments and were treated with appropriate concentrations of insulin after serum deprivation. Cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2-95% air at 37°C (Forma-Scientific).
Intracellular ROS measurement in cell culture. Fluoresence microscopy and spectrophotometry were used to measure intracellular ROS with DCF-DA as the probe. Cells incubated with medium alone or cells treated with various compounds to induce ROS production as mentioned in respective experiments were incubated with 5 µM DCF-DA in DMEM for 30 min at 37°C in the dark. The cells were washed in PBS, trypsinized, and resuspended in 3 ml PBS, and the intensity of fluorescence was immediately read in a fluorescence spectrophotometer at 500 nm for excitation and at 530 nm for emission (6). Similarly, ROS production was also checked by fluorescence microscopy using the probe DCF-DA.
Immunoblot analysis.
After the treatment, as indicated in different experiments, cells were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 100 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM sodium vanadate (NaV), 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and a protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science). The lysates were briefly sonicated and centrifuged at 13,000 g for 10 min; 40 µg of protein of the cleared supernatant were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. PVDF membranes were subjected to immunoblotting with either monoclonal antibody for phosphotyrosine (4G10) to detect IR-
and IRS tyrosine phosphorylation; polyclonal antibody to detect phospho-Akt; or additional antibodies to detect total protein levels of the IR-
, IRS-1, and Akt, where indicated. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies, proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence, according to the manufacturer's protocol (Amersham Biosciences).
RNA blot analysis.
RNA was isolated from serum-deprived HepG2 cells using Tripure reagent (Roche Applied Science). Total RNA (20 µg) was denatured in formamide/formaldehyde, electrophoresed through 1% agarose gel containing 6% formaldehyde, and then blotted onto nylon membranes (Schleicher and Schuell). After being cross-linked by ultraviolet irradiation (Stratalinker, Stratagene), the membranes were hybridized to a 0.65-kb EcoRI fragment of VEGF165 (35), 646-base pair (bp) BstXI/BamHI restriction fragment (positions 9841,629 of the open reading frame) of a human Cp cDNA as described (35), or 0.6 kb-fragment of GLUT1 (generated by RT-PCR, cloned into pcDNA3 and confirmed by sequencing) as described before (38) and labeled by random priming with [
-32P]dCTP using a New England Biolab kit.
Preparation of nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts were prepared from HepG2 cells as described before (35). Briefly, 1 x 108 cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and then with a solution containing (in mM) 10 Tris·HCl (pH 7.8), 1.5 MgCl2, and 10 KCl, supplemented with a protease inhibitor mixture containing 0.5 DTT and 0.4 phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 2 µg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin, and aprotinin. After incubation on ice for 10 min, the cells were lysed by 10 strokes with a Dounce homogenizer, and the nuclei were pelleted. The pellet was resuspended in a solution containing (in mM) 420 KCl, 20 Tris·HCl (pH 7.8), and 1.5 MgCl2 and 20% glycerol, supplemented with the protease mixture described above and incubated at 4°C with gentle agitation. The nuclear extract was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min, and the supernatant was dialyzed twice against a solution containing (in mM) 20 Tris·HCl (pH 7.8), 100 KCl, and 0.2 EDTA and 20% glycerol. Protein concentration was determined by using the Bio-Rad reagent with bovine serum albumin as standard.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Sequences of the sense strands of the oligonucleotide probes used for EMSA were as follows: 5'-TCT GTA CGT GAC CAC ACT CAC CTC-3' (Cp-HRE) and 5'-GCC CTA CGT GCT GTC TCA CAC AGC-3' (Epo-HRE). The sense and antisense strands were annealed, gel purified, and end-labeled with [
32P]ATP using T4-polynucleotide kinase (Promega). Unincorporated nucleotide was removed by gel filtration using G-25 Sephadex columns (Quick Spin TE, Roche Applied Science). To measure DNA protein interaction, 1 x 105 counts/min of oligonucleotide probe were incubated with 5 µg of nuclear extract and 0.5 µg of sonicated, denatured salmon sperm DNA (Invitrogen) in 10 mM Tris·HCl (pH 7.8), 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, and 5% glycerol for 20 min at 4°C in a total volume of 20 µl. The reaction mixture was subjected to electrophoresis (200 V in 0.3x Tris-buffered EDTA solution at 4°C) using 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. Dried gels were subjected to autoradiography for up to 24 h.
Construction of vectors containing Cp-HRE. Cp promoter/enhancer construct containing hypoxia response element (Cp-HRE) between 3,639 and 3,544 nt from Cp translation initiation site was ligated into the SacI and XhoI sites of the pGL3prom vector (Promega) upstream of the SV40 promoter and luciferase gene as described before (28, 35). Site-directed mutagenesis of the Cp-HRE in this construct (from TACGTG to TAAAAG) was done by megaprimer method (28, 35). All constructs were verified by sequencing.
Transient transfection of cells and reporter gene assays.
To measure transcriptional efficiency of chimeric Cp-HRE construct, HepG2 or H9c2 cells at
50% confluence in 35-mm dishes were transiently transfected for 6 h with a reporter plasmid (2 µg) using Lipofectamin 2000 (Invitrogen). To monitor transfection efficiency, a reporter gene construct (0.25 µg) containing
-galactosidase behind an SV40 promoter was cotransfected as described earlier. Transfected cells were allowed to recover for 6 h in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and, after serum deprivation, were incubated with insulin or other treatments in serum-free medium for 16 h as described elsewhere (35). Luciferase (Promega) and
-galactosidase (Invitrogen) activities in cell extracts were determined as described in the manufacturer's protocol.
Statistical analysis. All experiments have been performed at least three times with similar results, and representative experiments are shown. Results from estimation of ROS and reporter experiments are expressed as means ± SE (n = 3 individual experiments).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
100% was found by 10 nM insulin. The generation of ROS was optimal at
10 min, and, after 30 min of stimulation, the fluorescence by ROS generation was almost undetectable (data not shown). Pretreatment of the cells with 5 µM DPI or apocynin (300 µM), inhibitors of NADPH oxidase before insulin treatment, completely blocked the increase in DCF fluorescence, indicating the involvement of NADPH oxidase in ROS generation by insulin (Fig. 1B). A similar result was also found by the pretreatment of antioxidant PDTC, whereas a specific scavenger of superoxide radical SOD failed to show any effect, indicating that either superoxide is not involved in the process or the addition of SOD from outside the cell could not block intracellular ROS generation. Similar effects of DPI and apocynin were also obtained by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1C). Cardiac myoblasts H9c2 also showed similar results in response to insulin, although induction of ROS was found faster than in HepG2 cells (data not shown).
|
3.3-fold luciferase activity was detected by 10 nM of insulin, whereas mutated HRE failed to show any considerable induction (Fig. 2A). To find out whether insulin-stimulated ROS generation is involved in HIF-1 activation, HepG2 cells were pretreated with DPI (5 µM) or apocynin (300 µM) before insulin treatment (10 nM) and, after 8 h, nuclear extracts were prepared for EMSA. Insulin-induced DNA binding complex of HIF-1 was completely blocked either by DPI or apocynin pretreatment (Fig. 2B). The identity of the HIF-1-DNA complex was confirmed by supershift analysis using HIF-1
antibody (Fig. 2C). Similarly, when serum-deprived H9c2 cells were pretreated with antioxidant PDTC (100 µM), insulin-stimulated Epo-HRE-HIF-1 complex formation was also completely blocked (Fig. 2D). The involvement of ROS in insulin-stimulated HIF-1 activation was further confirmed by HRE-driven reporter luciferase assay. Pretreatment of antioxidants, like DPI, apocynin, or PDTC, were found to block insulin-stimulated ROS generation and to completely block the insulin-dependent increase in luciferase reporter activity in HepG2 (Fig. 2E) and H9c2 (data not shown) cells. The SOD, which failed to block insulin-dependent ROS generation, also failed to inhibit the increased insulin-stimulated expression of luciferase gene (Fig. 2E). Generation of reactive nitrogen species, particularly, nitric oxide, was reported as a mediator of HIF-1 activation (33). The nitric oxide had also been reported to attenuate aortic smooth muscle cell motility stimulated by insulin by decreasing H2O2 levels (39). To find out whether nitric oxide has any influence on insulin-stimulated HIF-1 activation initially, we examined nitric oxide generation in insulin-stimulated HepG2 cells. No induced generation of nitric oxide was detected by insulin stimulation (data not shown). Similarly, a specific inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, did not inhibit insulin-mediated HIF-1-DNA complex formation (data not shown), suggesting that nitric oxide has no influence in insulin-stimulated HIF-1 activation.
|
1.7-fold luciferase activity. Addition of H2O2 (10100 µM) with 2 nM of insulin increased the HIF-1-mediated luciferase activity by >2 nM insulin treatment (Fig. 3C), whereas only H2O2 had no effect on HIF-1 activation (data not shown).
|
50% less than the maximum generation found by insulin (10 nM). While 25 µM NADPH was added along with 3 nM insulin, the generation of H2O2 was found comparable with 10 nM insulin-stimulated H2O2 generation (Fig. 4A). When Cp-HRE-luciferase chimera was transfected into subconfluent HepG2 cells and was treated with either insulin (3 nM) or NADPH (25 µM) or both together, the increase in luciferase activity was higher with simultaneous addition of insulin and NADPH compared with insulin alone (Fig. 4B). The addition of only NADPH did not show any increase in luciferase activity. When NADH (25 µM) was added simultaneously with insulin (3 nM), no further induction of luciferase activity, than with only insulin (3 nM), was detected (data not shown). Since DPI also can block mitochondrial NADH oxidase activity, the possibility of participation of NADH oxidase-induced ROS generation was ruled out by this experiment.
|
6070% compared with only insulin treatment (Fig. 4C, inset). When we repeated the same treatment in Cp-HRE-luciferase chimera transfected HepG2 cells, about 60% increase in luciferase activity in MnCl2 pretreated cells were detected in presence of insulin (Fig. 4C). The blocking of increased generation of H2O2 and luciferase activity by DPI confirmed the role of NADPH oxidase.
Insulin-induced H2O2 modulates receptor kinase activity to activate HIF-1.
Protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases) are known targets for H2O2 generated by insulin and other growth factors by a mechanism that involved oxidation of the catalytic PTPase thiol residue (8). Inactivation of PTPase leads to activation of receptor-linked protein tyrosine kinases (pY) and subsequent signaling pathways. We hypothesized that blocking of insulin-stimulated H2O2 generation by DPI would keep specific PTPase active so that insulin receptor-linked tyrosine kinases could not be phosphorylated and so that subsequent signaling pathways and target proteins (like HIF-1
) would not be activated. In that case, treatment with a specific inhibitor of PTPase could reverse the result. To investigate whether insulin-stimulated H2O2 generation is activating HIF-1 by involving similar mechanism, a specific inhibitor of tyrosine phosphatase NaV was added in DPI-treated HepG2 cells to check whether NaV compensates the lack of H2O2 generation and reverses activation of HIF-1. Fig. 5A shows that NaV can restore the DPI-mediated inhibition of HIF-1 activation in the presence of insulin, whereas Ser-Thr phosphatase inhibitor sodium fluoride failed to do so. To further confirm the role of H2O2 as a PTPase blocker, increasing concentrations of NaV were added along with suboptimal concentration of insulin (2 nM), which generates lower levels of H2O2 than the maximal dose of insulin (10 nM). The results showed that treatment of NaV simultaneous with insulin (2 nM) activated HIF-1 more than twofold in a concentration-dependent manner compared with only insulin (2 nM) (Fig. 5B). To confirm that insulin receptor-linked tyrosine kinases are regulated by ROS, the tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor and IRS-1/2 were then tested by measuring the insulin-stimulated autophosphorylation of its receptor and its high Mr substrate proteins in the HepG2 cells in the presence and absence of DPI or PDTC. Western blot analysis with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (Fig. 6) revealed that the treatment of the cells with DPI before insulin treatment reduced the tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS and IR-
significantly after 5 min of insulin treatment. Similar findings were detected when cells were pretreated with PDTC (100 µM) (data not shown). These findings strongly suggest that insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation receptor and related proteins are regulated by NADPH-linked ROS generation and are also responsible for subsequent activation of HIF-1.
|
|
80% activation of Akt phosphorylation as found by immunoblotting analysis with phospho-Akt antibody (Fig. 7B), suggesting the role of oxidant in insulin-stimulated signaling pathways to activate HIF-1.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
i2 in adipocytes. Our finding of increased NADPH-dependent H2O2 generation by Mn2+ and insulin in HepG2 cells (Fig. 4C, inset) is consistent with their finding with a purified in vitro system. As a result of increased generation of ROS, the activation of HIF-1 was found to be greater by Mn2+ and insulin cotreatment, providing further evidence of membrane-bound NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS as an essential component for the process (Fig. 4C). So far it is also not very clear from any studies on how insulin activates NADPH oxidase in living cells, although the specific isoform involved in the process has been identified as NADPH oxidase 4 (Nox-4) in adipocytes, and HepG2 cells were shown to contain a greater amount of Nox-4 than other subunits of NADPH oxidase (27). The identification of the subunit responsible for ROS generation in response to insulin still remains an open question in HepG2 or H9c2 cells and needs further study. As a mechanism we found that insulin-induced NADPH oxidase-linked generation of ROS activated insulin receptor tyrosine kinase by apparently inhibiting tyrosine phosphatase. Similar findings were reported previously for insulin in 3T3 adipocytes (24). In the present work we have demonstrated that the loss of the capacity of H2O2 generation by DPI in insulin-stimulated cells can be compensated by the addition of PTPase inhibitor NaV, indicating the role of H2O2 as a transient inhibitor of PTPase. PTPase is known to be inactivated by H2O2 in vivo (3) and thus is a widely known target for insulin-resistance diabetes (16). This model of insulin-stimulated ROS-mediated inactivation of PTPases and subsequent activation of receptor tyrosine kinases is consistent with other growth factors like EGF-mediated PTPase inactivation (21). If extrapolated, our result may also explain the mechanism of HIF-1 activation by other growth factors that are capable of ROS generation.
Insulin-stimulated H2O2 generation thus starts a signaling cascade to activate PI3-kinase (Fig. 7A), which was also reported before to be involved in HIF-1 activation by insulin (36). Now, in this study, we demonstrated that the insulin-induced PI3-kinase is also dependent on NADPH oxidase-mediated ROS generation as the downstream phosphorylation of Akt is blocked by DPI and PDTC (Fig. 7B). The PI3-kinase-Akt pathway has been shown to regulate HIF-1 activity in response to oncogenic signals and growth factors (1, 9), but how phosphorylation of Akt influences HIF-1 activation is not clear so far.
ROS were recognized for several years to have a regulatory role on insulin signal transduction (8), mainly on the translocation of GLUT4, but were never shown to take part in the process of gene regulation like transcription. Thus our finding of involvement of ROS in insulin-induced HIF-1 activation and subsequent expression of genes indicates that ROS may be crucial for general insulin action in responsive cells. The exposure of cells to exogenous H2O2 has been shown to modulate cellular insulin responsiveness differentially, depending to some extent on the concentration of oxidant, the duration of exposure, and cell type (2, 12). The exposure of 3T3-L1 adipocytes for several hours to micromolar concentration of H2O2 disrupts insulin-induced subcellular redistribution of IRS-1 and PI3-kinase between the cytosol and the low-density microsomal fraction and impairs the insulin-stimulated translocation of GLUT4 (32, 37), which may explain our observation that the addition of H2O2 alone cannot activate the HIF-1.
Insulin-induced activation of HIF-1 results in the induction of many genes, including VEGF, which plays an important role in developing several pathogenic conditions including angiogenesis and diabetic retinopathy (10, 29, 34). Since inhibition of increased VEGF expression is one of the probable ways to control these pathogenic situations, our finding of inhibition of VEGF synthesis in response to insulin by antioxidants, particularly those that can block NADPH oxidase activity, may be useful in this regard.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
by oxidative stress. EMBO J 21: 493503, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
during hypoxia A mechanism of O2 sensing. J Biol Chem 275: 2513025138, 2000.
-mediated insulin resistance. J Biol Chem 274: 2507825084, 1999.
by prolyl and asparaginyl hydroxylases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 338: 610615, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
i2. J Biol Chem 272: 1013510143, 1997.
activation. Cell Metab 1: 393399, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
by insulin and interleukin-1
involves the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. FEBS Lett 512: 157162, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. H. Lee, Y. W. Kim, J. H. Choi, S. C. Brooks III, M.-O. Lee, and S. G. Kim Oltipraz and dithiolethione congeners inhibit hypoxia-inducible factor-1{alpha} activity through p70 ribosomal S6 kinase-1 inhibition and H2O2-scavenging effect Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2009; 8(10): 2791 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Guo, G. Scicli, J. Sheng, J. C. Falck, P. A. Edwards, and A. G. Scicli 20-HETE can act as a nonhypoxic regulator of HIF-1{alpha} in human microvascular endothelial cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2009; 297(2): H602 - H613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Qutub and A. S. Popel Reactive Oxygen Species Regulate Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1{alpha} Differentially in Cancer and Ischemia Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2008; 28(16): 5106 - 5119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Xia, H. Wang, S. Munk, H. Frecker, H. J. Goldberg, I. G. Fantus, and C. I. Whiteside Reactive oxygen species, PKC-beta1, and PKC-{zeta} mediate high-glucose-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression in mesangial cells Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1280 - E1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |