|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Biomolecular Science Center, Burnett College of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida; 2Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of North Dakota School of Medicine, Grand Forks, North Dakota; 3Kosair Children's Hospital Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, 4Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky; 5Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa; 6Department of Physiology, Loyola University, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
Submitted 14 October 2006 ; accepted in final form 21 March 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
nucleus ambiguus; obstructive sleep apnea; cardiac ganglia
Previously, we demonstrated that baroreflex control of the HR was significantly reduced following CIH in Fisher 344 (F344) young adult rats (29). In addition, we showed that vagal cardiac motor neurons in the nucleus ambiguus projecting to cardiac ganglia play an important role in the baroreflex control of the HR (10–12). More recently, we found that postnatal CIH exposures led to altered baroreflex function in adult rats, and that the associated reduction of vagal efferent axon projections to cardiac ganglia could contribute to the long-term modification in baroreflex function (46).
Although progress has occurred in the understanding of alterations in baroreceptor reflex function following intermittent hypoxia (24, 29, 30, 42, 46, 47, 49), very little is currently known about the structural and functional changes of sensory afferent, central and efferent components of the reflex, and their molecular underpinnings. Mice are particularly useful mammalian models that are not only susceptible to genetic manipulation but can also be used in physiological, anatomical, cellular, and molecular studies (5, 6). In the present study, we hypothesized that baroreflex control of the HR was reduced following CIH, and the reduction of vagal efferent control of the heart might account for the attenuated baroreflex sensitivity. Therefore, we aimed to characterize the changes in baroreceptor sensitivity in anesthetized mice following CIH and to test whether the vagal efferent control of the heart was accordingly modified by the CIH exposure paradigm. Our primary goal was to localize the functional and structural changes of neural components within the baroreflex circuitry and thereby provide a platform for future studies aiming to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms for reduced baroreflex function using transgenic approaches (48).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IH exposure. Animals were housed in Plexiglas chambers (30 x 20 x 20 in3; Oxycycler model A44XO; BioSpherix Instruments, Redfield, NY) in a room where light and dark cycles were set at 12-h:12-h (6:00 am to 6:00 pm). O2 concentration in chambers was continuously measured by an O2 analyzer and was controlled by a computerized system through a gas valve outlet. O2 concentration in chambers were programmed and adjusted automatically. Any deviation from desired concentration was corrected by adding pure N2 or O2 through solenoid valves. Ambient CO2 in the chamber was periodically monitored and maintained at 0.03% by adjusting overall chamber basal ventilation. Humidity was measured and maintained at 40–50%. Temperature was kept at 22–24°C. The IH profile consisted of alternating 21% and 5.7% O2 every 6 min for 12-h during the light cycle and was maintained at 21% for the night period, with an overall exposure duration of 3 mo. The RA control animals were housed in room air under the same conditions as those exposed in IH in the Oxycycler chambers, except that the concentration of O2 was maintained at 21%.
Surgical procedure.
Mice were anesthetized with Avertin (0.3 g/kg ip; RA: n = 24; CIH: n = 24). Supplemental doses of anesthetics ( of the initial dose) were administered every 30 min to prevent eye blink, withdrawal reflexes, and fluctuation in arterial blood pressure. The tips of plastic silicone catheters (polyethylene-50) were tapered to
0.3 mm in diameter, the femoral artery (left) and femoral vein (right) were exposed, and the tapered tips of two catheters were filled with heparinized saline and inserted into the femoral artery and vein, respectively. Measurement of blood pressure was through the femoral artery. Vasoactive drugs were infused into the femoral vein using a microinfusion pump. These mice were used for the measurement of baroreflex control of the HR, and for assessment of the cardiovascular responses to vagal nerve stimulation, all of which were conducted while the animals were in the anesthetized state.
To evaluate effect of Avertin anesthesia on suppression of baroreflex sensitivity, 12 conscious mice were used. These mice were anesthetized with ketamine (91.0 mg/kg ip) plus xylazine (9.1 mg/kg ip). Catheters were inserted into the left femoral artery and vein, and then they were tunneled underneath the skin and secured by sutures on the back of the mouse. The mice were then returned to their cages for recovery. The baroreflex control of the HR was tested 1 day after surgery in an isolated quiet room while the animals were in the conscious state.
Baroreflex sensitivity.
The blood pressure catheter was connected to a blood pressure transducer (MlT0699, AD instruments). The transducer was positioned at heart level. ABP was measured using a Powerlab Data Acquisition System (PowerLab/8 SP) and displayed on the first channel. The HR was calculated from pulse pressures in the first channel using the Ratemeter function and displayed on the second channel. Mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and HR were recorded by averaging ABP values and pulses for 2 min. Microinfusion of phenylephrine (PE) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) lasted 60 s for each dose. Before the end of 60 s sustained microinfusion of PE or SNP at different doses (0.03, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 µg/min), the HR and MABP responses had reached a plateau. The maximal HR responses relative to the HR baseline level (
HR) to MABP change relative to the ABP baseline level (
MABP) induced by microinfusion of PE or SNP were averaged over 5 s at the end of 60 s sustained microinfusion of these vasoactive drugs for each dose. Application of the various doses of PE (or SNP) was in a random sequence. When compared with rats (46, 47), we found that more time was required to reestablish a steady baseline in the return to prestimulus values in mice. In our experiments, 45 min were used before the next microinfusion. During this interval, blood pressure and HR had already returned to their original baseline levels. We also noted that injections of PE and SNP in the same mouse frequently led to an unstable ABP in some animals. Thus PE and SNP were infused in different groups of mice during different days.
The ratio of the maximal change in HR over the change in MABP was then calculated and averaged at each dose for each drug in each animal group. The averaged ratio of HR change over MABP change (
HR/
MABP) was used as an indicator or estimate for baroreflex sensitivity. Dose-dependent curves of
HR/
MABP as functions of PE and SNP concentration were plotted for RA and CIH mice. In addition, curves of
HR-
MABP relationship were plotted to show the maximal HR responses induced by MABP changes after the responses had reached a steady plateau. Baroreflex sensitivity was also assessed during PE and SNP infusion at 0.4 µg/min. Changes in HR (
HR) were measured and averaged over 0.5 s at every 5-mmHg increase of MABP (
MABP = 5 mmHg).
HR was then plotted as a function of
MABP to show the transient HR responses as MABP changes.
HR and blood pressure responses to electrical stimulation of cervical vagal nerve.
A cervical midline incision was performed, and the trachea was cannulated with a catheter (polyethylene-50) to facilitate ventilation in spontaneously breathing mice. The left cervical vagal nerve was carefully dissected free from surrounding structures and was cut just caudal to the nodose ganglion. After the vagal nerve was cut, the caudal cut end was placed on a pair of bipolar, platinum hook electrodes and electrically stimulated with a Grass Stimulator (S48). The stimuli [square wave pulses (30 µA; 2 ms) at 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 Hz for 30 s] were delivered with an isolation unit (ISU 6). Maximal HR and blood pressure responses to electrical stimulation of the cervical vagal nerve were measured. The
HR and
MABP were plotted as a function of stimulation frequency.
After the onset of electrical stimulation at low frequencies, HR decreased, initially in a gradual manner and then at a more precipitous rate. We calculated the latter period, i.e., the period needed for HR responses to drop abruptly from the onset of electrical stimulation.
Data are expressed as means ± SE, unless stated otherwise. Differences between groups was determined using two-tailed t-tests (for paired and unpaired data) with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. To compare the differences of dose-dependent curves or baroreflex function curves between RA and CIH mice, two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc tests were used.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
HR) relative to the prestimulation baseline in response to the increased ABP (
MABP) was obtained at the level when
HR reached maximum along with the corresponding
MABP.
HR and
MABP were averaged at each PE dose within animal groups. For instance, MABP reached to 145.5 ± 2.9 mmHg from the baseline value of 78.9 ± 1.4 mmHg with a reflex bradycardia response of 309.9 ± 36.5 beats/min for PE at 0.4 µg/min in RA mice (n = 6). In contrast, MABP increased to 141.7 ± 3.3 mmHg from the baseline value of 98.7 ± 2.5 mmHg with a bradycardia response of 36.5 ± 5.2 beats/min for PE at 0.4 µg/min in CIH mice (n = 6). Baroreflex sensitivity,
HR/
MABP, for RA and CIH mice were 5.41 ± 0.60 and 0.84 ± 0.05 beats·min–1·mmHg–1, respectively (P < 0.001). Figure 2, A (RA) and B (CIH), compares HR responses to MABP changes between RA and CIH mice at three different doses of PE. Figure 2C shows the dose-dependent curves for baroreflex function (
HR/
MABP). CIH significantly decreased baroreflex sensitivity ratios at all doses above 0.1 µg/min (ANOVA, P < 0.05). Of note, baroreflex sensitivity is the measure of the HR change in response to the blood pressure change, which was here induced by vasoactive drugs, rather than to the dose of drugs. At different doses, however, the rate of the blood pressure change is different and hence the baroreflex sensitivity is different. Figure 2D compares baroreflex sensitivity using a different approach and depicts maximal HR responses (steady state) to maximal ABP changes induced by different doses of PE.
HR was plotted as a function of
MABP. The maximal
HR and
MABP responses were first averaged at different PE doses within the group, and then curves were fitted using the Boltzmann equation (32, 35):
HR = (A1 – A2)/{1 + exp[
(
MABP – MABP50)]} + A2, where A1 and A2 are maximal and minimal bradycardic responses,
is the slope factor, and MABP50 is the MABP at one-half of the HR range. As with the previous methodological approach, CIH significantly attenuated baroreflex sensitivity (ANOVA, P < 0.01). As noted in Fig. 2D, CIH also significantly reduced the vascular response to PE injections. Figure 2E shows the dose-dependent curves such as to compare the effect of PE on maximal
MABP. CIH indeed significantly reduced the maximal
MABP to PE microinfusions (ANOVA, P < 0.05), which is consistent with recent reports (20, 40).
|
HR in response to
MABP during the steep rising portion of the MABP increases induced by PE infusion at 0.4 µg/min, which depicts transient HR responses to ABP changes (Fig. 2F). CIH shifted the curve to the right, once again indicating a significant reduction of baroreflex sensitivity (ANOVA, P < 0.001).
Previously, we injected PE and SNP in the same rats, and data (
HR/
MABP relationship) could be fitted into regression lines (46, 47). The slope of the regression line in a group was used as an indicator for the baroreflex sensitivity for that group. In the present study, we injected PE and SNP in different mice. Therefore, we had to characterize the baroreflex sensitivity during loading and unloading separately. In addition, the HR responses (
HR) to very small arterial pressure (AP) changes induced by PE at low doses were minimal, and the maximal HR responses to large AP changes induced by PE at high doses approached a plateau. Therefore, we used averaged
HR/
MABP values as estimates of baroreflex sensitivity at each dose, and the data were fitted using Bolzmann equation (sigmoid), as shown in Fig. 2D. However, for
MABP between 20 and 60 mmHg, data could be fitted using linear regression. Thus our current protocol for arterial pressure stimulation and data analysis was essentially identical to the approach we had previously used in rats, except that the HR responses to
MABP induced by PE at both the low end and high end of the response were similar to either the minimum or the maximum responses in mice.
Baroreflex control of the HR during SNP application.
HR increased in response to ABP decreases induced by intravenous microinfusion of SNP at different doses for 60 s. These changes were measured in RA and CIH mice.
HR relative to the prestimulation baseline values in response to ABP decreases (
MABP) were obtained at the level at which the MABP reached a plateau.
HR and
MABP were averaged at each SNP dose within the animal group. For example, MABP decreased to a nadir of 41.3 ± 1.9 mmHg from a baseline value of 78.9 ± 1.4 mmHg with a reflex-positive chronotropic response of 11.8 ± 4.4 beats/min (n = 6) for SNP at 0.4 µg/min in RA mice. In contrast, MABP decreased to 43.8 ± 1.6 mmHg from the baseline of 98.7 ± 2.5 mmHg with increased HR responses of 6.5 ± 2.9 beats/min (n = 6) for SNP at 0.4 µg/min in CIH mice. Baroreflex sensitivity ratios (
HR/
MABP) for RA and CIH mice were 0.31 ± 0.10 and 0.11 ± 0.10 beats·min–1·mmHg–1, respectively. Figure 3, A and B, compared HR responses to ABP changes between RA and CIH mice at three different doses of SNP. As shown in Fig. 3, A and B, HR responses to blood pressure decreases induced by intravenous infusion of SNP were very small and were almost abolished by the anesthetic Avertin in both RA and CIH animals. Notwithstanding, dose-dependent curves for baroreflex sensitivity (
HR/
MABP) were plotted in Fig. 3C. Except for at the dose of 0.3 µg/min, baroreflex sensitivity for RA and CIH mice was similar. Figure 3D compares the baroreflex sensitivity of RA and CIH mice by plotting
HR against
MABP, which depicts maximal HR responses (steady state) to ABP changes.
HR and
MABP were averaged at different SNP doses, and curves were again fitted using the Boltzmann equation. As with previous analytical methods, the baroreflex sensitivity was not different between RA and CIH mice (ANOVA, P > 0.10).
|
HR in response to
MABP during the steep slope of MABP decreases, which depicts transient HR responses to ABP changes (Fig. 3E) at the SNP dose of 0.4 µg/min. In this context, CIH slightly reduced baroreflex sensitivity compared with RA but not significantly (ANOVA, P > 0.10). Avertin anesthesia moderately reduced HR responses to ABP changes during PE injection and almost completely abolished the HR responses to ABP changes during SNP injection. Since the amplitude of HR responses during SNP application was quite small in both RA and CIH mice, we suspected that Avertin might have suppressed HR responses to ABP changes during SNP as well as PE infusions. We therefore measured HR responses to ABP changes induced by PE and SNP in 12 conscious (C) RA mice. Figure 4, A and B, represents typical examples of HR responses to ABP changes induced by PE and SNP infusions at three different doses (0.05, 0.1, and 0.3 µg/min), respectively. When compared with HR responses at the same PE doses in Figs. 2A and Fig. 4A, Avertin (A) dramatically reduced HR responses at the two lower doses [0.05 µg/min; –13.9 ± 9.0 beats/min (A) vs. –187.3 ± 9.0 beats/min (C); 0.1 µg/min: –46.8 ± 11.0 beats/min (A) vs. –249.4 ± 15.7 beats/min (C); P < 0.001] but not at the high PE dose [PE: 0.3 µg/min; –264.1 ± 32.6 beats/min (A) vs. –292.4 ± 16.6 beats/min (C); P > 0.05]. In contrast, Avertin almost completely abolished the HR responses to SNP infusion at all doses [0.05 µg/min: 2.2 ± 0.2 beats/min (A) vs. 199 ± 17.0 beats/min (C); 0.1 µg/min: 7.9 ± 2.3 beats/min (A) vs. –235.6 ± 18.9 beats/min (C); 0.3 µg/min: 10.9 ± 4.5 beats/min (A) vs. –258.2 ± 6.3 beats/min (C); P < 0.001].
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intermittent hypoxia induced hypertension and increased the HR.
Fletcher et al. (13–15) reported that CIH (8 h/day for 35 days) induced systemic hypertension in rats. This observation has been subsequently confirmed by many other laboratories. Recently, Campen et al. (3) confirmed this finding in the mouse model. Less reproducible findings have been reported for HR changes following CIH. Indeed, both significant increases or no changes of the HR in rats and mice have been described after intermittent hypoxia or sleep apnea (7, 17). Tachycardia is a frequent finding in OSA patients (38). These differences may reflect species differences or alternatively may result from the different protocols of intermittent hypoxia used in the experiments. In our current study, we found
20% increases in ABP and 12% increases in HR among CIH-exposed mice. Of note, the duration of our exposures was longer than those reported by others (3 mo). It is likely that the concurrence of hypertension and tachycardia may represent an imbalanced sympathetic and parasympathetic activity (15).
Functional and anatomical implications of augmented HR responses to vagal stimulation. In anesthetized F344 rats, we observed a reduction of baroreflex control of the HR following CIH compared with RA controls (29). More recently, decreased baroreflex sensitivity was found in conscious rats (24). Our present data show that CIH leads to reduced baroreflex control of the HR in anesthetized mice. However, contrary to our original assumptions, the magnitude of HR was significantly increased, and the latency of the response (the time to peak) of HR upon vagal efferent stimulation was significantly decreased at low frequencies following CIH. At high frequency vagal stimulation, however, the HR responses were similar in both groups. Therefore, the control of vagal efferent axons over the heart may not be the source of the reduced baroreflex control of the HR. Since baroreflex circuitry also includes baroreceptor afferent, central interneurons, and vagal motor neurons, we hypothesize that these other components in the brain-heart circuitry might be responsible for the reduced baroreflex function induced by CIH. Interestingly, significant reductions in glutamate receptor expression (NMDA and AMPA) in the region of nucleus ambiguus occur in rats after CIH exposures, and the HR responses to microinjection of L-glutamate into the nucleus ambiguus following CIH in F344 rats are significantly reduced compared with RA control rats (29). These findings lend credence to the possibility that other relays may be affected by CIH.
To identify the anatomical basis for enhanced vagal efferent control, we recently used anterograde tracing to study vagal efferent axons and terminals in cardiac ganglia of mice (28). Our anatomical data suggest that vagal efferent synaptic-like terminals around cardiac principal neurons following CIH were significantly larger than those of RA control mice. Therefore, it is conceivable that hypertrophy of vagal efferent terminals around cardiac ganglionic neurons underlies the anatomical substrate for the enhanced control of vagal efferent axons over the heart. Based on the physiological and anatomical findings, we propose that vagal efferent axons and terminals in cardiac ganglia may undergo structural reorganization as an attempt to compensate for the overall attenuation of baroreflex function.
CIH reduced pulse pressure. During PE application, the pulse pressure was increased in both RA and CIH mice. The PE-induced decrease of the HR might underlie the enhanced pulse pressure, since the slower HR induced by PE would result in an increased ventricular filling, which in turn would increase the force of contraction via the intrinsic Frank-Starling mechanism. However, CIH significantly reduced the increase of pulse pressure when compared with RA controls. As noted above, CIH reduced the increase in HR, which would have decreased the augmented filling time seen in RA mice. During SNP application, the pulse pressure was decreased equally in both RA and CIH mice. Since the reflex, positive chronotropic responses followed the decreased MABP. The reduced ventricular filling and subsequent stroke volume would then result in decreased force of contraction and eventual pulse pressure.
Sleep apnea, and more particularly, intermittent hypoxia during sleep, are associated with left ventricle hypertrophy and increased peripheral resistance of blood vessels (more stiffness and less distensibility) (23), along with increased pulmonary artery pressures. Similarly, CIH induces right and left ventricle hypertrophy in mice. At high frequency vagal stimulation, blood pressure and HR were comparable and very low in both CIH and RA mice. During this extreme challenge, the pulse pressure became much smaller in CIH mice than that of control mice. Stimulation of the vagal efferent nerve would result in a negative inotropic state of the left ventricle and produce a reduction in aortic blood pressure. Since the aorta stiffness (3) should cause high systolic pressure, we speculate that contraction of the left ventricle in CIH animals was reduced. This may diminish the pulse pressure or cardiac output in CIH rats. Consistent with such reasoning, Chen et al. (7) found that CIH attenuated left ventricle performance.
It has to be pointed out that the pulse pressure is determined by multiple factors, such as stroke volume, vascular resistance, and ventricular contractility. CIH significantly reduces the baroreflex control of the HR, increases aortic vascular stiffness, and causes ventricular hypertrophy, all of which may in turn change stroke volume, vascular resistance, and ventricular contractility. How these factors exactly interplay to determine the pulse pressure during different vasoactive drug applications following CIH is an interesting issue that deserves further investigation.
Barosensitive neurons in the brain: one or two pathways? Application of PE and SNP activates many areas in the brain that may be directly involved in mediating baroreflex control. Our data indicated that Avertin anesthesia almost completely abolished baroreflex control of the HR during SNP infusion but not during PE infusion at high doses. This observation raises the question as to whether the brain may contain two populations of neurons or pathways; namely, one that mediates depressor responses during increases in blood pressure and another one that underlies pressor responses during the decrease of blood pressure. Using Fos-like immunoreactivity, Murphy et al. (36, 37) demonstrated that Fos-like proteins are differentially expressed in regionally and neurochemically specific neural populations in the brain stem following selective increases or decreases in ABP. Therefore, it is conceivable that neurons responsive to specific directional changes in ABP are segregated in brain stem regions. Recently, Henderson et al. (21) used functional magnetic resonance imaging procedures to visualize neural responses during pressor (PE) and depressor (SNP) challenges in anesthetized adult cats. Depressor challenges produced signal-intensity declines in multiple cardiovascular-related sites in the medulla, including the nucleus tractus solitarius and caudal and rostral ventrolateral medulla. Signal decreases also emerged in the cerebellar vermis, inferior olive, dorsolateral pons, and right insula. Rostral sites, such as the amygdala and hypothalamus, increased signal intensity as arterial pressure declined. In contrast, arterial pressure elevation elicited smaller signal increases in medullary regions, including the dorsolateral pons and the right insula, and signal declines in regions of the hypothalamus. Therefore, responses to pressor and depressor challenges may not topographically overlap, and pressor and depressor challenges could in fact activate some different populations of neurons in the brain stem.
Another aspect of this study may support the concept that anesthetic agents may have different effects on reflex pathways. Previously, Ma et al. (31) found that pentobarbital sodium selectively impaired reflex control of the HR and did not exert a major effect on reflex control of peripheral sympathetic nerve activity or vascular resistance in mice. Furthermore, the baroreflex response (sympathoexcitation) of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) during hypotension is largely attenuated, but baroreflex RSNA response (sympathoinhibition) during PE injection is rather complete in pentobarbital-anesthetized mice (31). Consistent with these observations, sympathoexcitation of RSNA during MABP decrease is dramatically blunted in inactin-anesthetized rats, but sympathoinhibition of RSNA to the increase of MABP seems similar to that in conscious rats (33, 34). Taken together, these data indicate that an anesthetic agent may differently impact on distinct aspects of reflex circuitries, and that the baroreflex circuitry of RSNA during arterial pressure decreases is apparently more sensitive to anesthesia than the pathway for baroreceptor activation of sympathoinhibition.
| SUMMARY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been shown that baroreflex control of HR is depressed in the patients with OSA (1, 2, 4). The mechanisms underlying the link between OSA and autonomic dysfunction are not well established (38, 39). The successful extension of previous studies from rats to anesthetized and conscious mice should provide the opportunity to simultaneously assess functional and anatomical alterations of baroreflex function within different locations in the brain-heart axis and allow for exploration of CIH-induced cellular and molecular changes in barosensitive neurons in transgenic mice (48).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Yan, L. Li, S. W. Harden, D. Gozal, Y. Lin, W. B. Wead, R. D. Wurster, and Z. Cheng Chronic intermittent hypoxia impairs heart rate responses to AMPA and NMDA and induces loss of glutamate receptor neurons in nucleus ambiguus of F344 rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2009; 296(2): R299 - R308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Gu, M. Lin, J. Liu, D. Gozal, K. E. Scrogin, R. Wurster, M. W. Chapleau, X. Ma, and Z. Cheng Selective impairment of central mediation of baroreflex in anesthetized young adult Fischer 344 rats after chronic intermittent hypoxia Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2809 - H2818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |