AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293: H2613-H2623, 2007. First published September 7, 2007; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00750.2007
0363-6135/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/5/H2613    most recent
00750.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baruscotti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baruscotti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. B.

INVITED REVIEW

Electrophysiology and pacemaker function of the developing sinoatrial node

Mirko Baruscotti1 and Richard B. Robinson2

1Laboratory of Molecular Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy; and 2Department of Pharmacology and Center for Molecular Therapeutics, Columbia University, New York, New York


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The sinoatrial node performs its task as a cardiac impulse generator throughout the life of the organism, but this important function is not a constant. Rather, there are significant developmental changes in the expression and function of ion channels and other cellular elements, which lead to a postnatal slowing of heart rate and may be crucial to the reliable functioning of the node during maturation. In this review, we provide an overview of current knowledge regarding these changes, with the main focus placed on maturation of the ion channel expression profile. Studies on Na+ and pacemaker currents have shown that their contribution to automaticity is greater in the newborn than in the adult, but this age-dependent decrease is at least partially opposed by an increased contribution of L-type Ca2+ current. Whereas information regarding age-dependent changes in other transmembrane currents within the sinoatrial node are lacking, there are data on other relevant parameters. These include an increase in the nodal content of fibroblasts and in the area of nonexpression of connexin43, considered a molecular marker of nodal tissue. Although much remains to be done before a comprehensive view of the developmental biology of the node is available, important evidence in support of a molecular interpretation of developmental slowing of the intrinsic sinoatrial rate is beginning to emerge.

cardiac pacemaker; development; sodium current; calcium current


THE ANATOMICAL IDENTIFICATION of the sinoauricular junction [now named the sinoatrial node (SAN)] was originally reported in 1907 by two physiologists/anatomists, Keith and Flack (58). This finding, together with the earlier identification of other structures of the cardiac conduction system (104, 110, 123), prompted further studies (70, 124) that soon yielded the concept that the heartbeat in mammals originates in the SAN and then spreads to the rest of the cardiac tissue in a temporally and anatomically orderly manner. The impact on the cardiac scientific community was immediate and led to continuing effort to unravel the working mechanisms of this biological impulse generator. As a result, automaticity mechanisms in the adult SAN have been extensively studied and have been the subject of numerous reviews (21, 31, 48, 98, 99, 120). Despite this, the basis of automaticity, and the issue of the relative importance of different currents to pacemaking, remains controversial. However, a few generalities can be stated. Pacemaking will depend on current flow during diastole as well as the presence and characteristics of the major depolarizing currents that take the cell to and beyond threshold. Multiple currents are likely to contribute to both diastolic depolarization and threshold, and the mix varies with species, with disease, and regionally within the node. In addition to the characteristics of the channels at the cellular level, pacemaking also will be influenced by characteristics of the tissue, including connections to surrounding atrial myocytes and fibroblasts.

Despite the extensive literature devoted to the ionic basis of automaticity in the adult SAN, and the fact that age-dependent differences in intrinsic heart rate have been recognized for some time (52, 53, 87, 114, 127, 128), there has been far less research on the basis of automaticity in the newborn or immature node. There is, however, sufficient evidence to state categorically that the ionic basis of automaticity in the newborn is distinct from that of the adult. These differences can have important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac rhythm disorders in the immature, adult, and aged individual. In this review, we focus specifically on the young versus adult SAN but include data on the aged heart where appropriate. We do not describe the adult characteristics in detail but do refer to published reviews and simply highlight key aspects for the purpose of comparison to the young node. Our intent is, in part, to educate the reader to the fact that the basis of SAN automaticity is quantitatively and qualitatively distinct in the newborn and adult. However, our additional purpose is to highlight how much remains to be determined in this field and thereby to encourage additional research on the topic.

General Properties of the SAN

In mammals, the pacemaker region of the heart (the SAN) is located in the wall of the right atrium, but its precise location can vary slightly in different species. In rabbits, a long-standing model for heart automaticity studies, it extends along its major axis between the ostii of the superior and inferior venae cavae and along its minor axis between the interatrial septum and crista terminalis (33), whereas in human, murine, and canine hearts, pacemaker cells are more concentrated in the proximity of the sinus node artery at the junction of the superior vena cava and right atrium (12, 94, 99). Studies on the cytological organization of the SAN have revealed a structure composed of a dense array of connective tissue in which a small number of specialized cells, all electrically connected, are sparsely but not homogeneously embedded. Although the SAN as a whole is normally recognized as a uniform functional pacemaker unit, only a small portion of it consists of primary pacemaker cells, which are the early generators of the excitatory depolarizing waves that first spread to the rest of the nodal tissue and then to the rest of the myocardium. Indeed, several studies (14, 118) at the single cell level have verified that the properties of SAN cells are not identical throughout the entire node but present noticeable differences that are relevant to their specific role in the context of generation, modulation, and early spread of the impulse. For example, isolated central nodal cells have a slower rate of contraction and are normally more depolarized than peripheral or secondary pacemaker cells. Furthermore, autonomic stimulation induces a shift in the position of the leading pacemaker, thus revealing an inherent lack of homogeneity within the central nodal region itself (88). The above observations suggest that understanding of intrinsic SAN function must proceed along two lines: one is the elucidation of the ionic and modulatory properties of a single pacemaker cell, and the other is the electrical interaction between nodal cells and nodal-atrial cells. A detailed analysis of the ionic mechanisms generating automaticity requires studies at the single cell level, but to fully understand the complexity of the SAN physiology, it is important to consider that each cell exists as an element of a complex network and that this network, in turn, strongly influences the functional characteristics of its component cells (13, 54, 133). For example, several reports (13, 55) have shown that central nodal cells must be adequately protected from the more hyperpolarized surrounding atrial tissue since the electrotonic influence of the atrium can profoundly influence SAN activity. This protection, on the other hand, must not be so extreme as to isolate the SAN cells, or the consequence would be that spontaneous activity would be confined within the node and fail to propagate to the rest of the heart.

Molecular Markers of the SAN

Until recently, the only way to precisely identify the SAN region was electrical mapping (26, 126). This technique continues to be utilized in basic and clinical research since it can be applied to both in vivo and in vitro preparations and permits a precise description of the progression of the depolarizing wave. More recently, molecular-based identifications have been suggested, based on comparative studies of adult sinoatrial and atrial myocytes that rely on the presence or absence of specific molecular markers. Combined efforts of several groups have determined that adult SAN cells express connexin (Cx)45 and neurofilament M (NF-M) but do not express Cx43 and atrial natriuretic peptide. This expression profile is completely reversed in atrial cells. Furthermore, crucial differences also exist at the level of ionic currents; for example, SAN cells are characterized by the pronounced expression of pacemaker current (If; see Ionic Channels in the Developing Node), whereas they express little or no inwardly rectifying K+ current (24, 32, 48, 85). These data have been largely collected in adult preparations; therefore, an important question that should be asked is whether the presence or absence of these molecular markers is stable during the entire lifetime of the organism. If not, this would raise the possibility that variations in the expression of these proteins could be linked to selective and specific age-dependent functional differences in the node that could eventually lead to the occurrence of aging-related pathologies. Furthermore, a strong developmental regulation of any of these proteins would impact their utility as markers in the young or perhaps aged SAN.

Expression of NF-M. Studies (39, 121) have explored the expression of NF-M in the conduction system of the adult heart as well as during embryonic development in rabbits. Positive staining for NF-M is considered an appropriate hallmark for the identification of this specialized tissue (33, 35). NF-M can be considered an early marker of the developing conduction system of the embryo since it is already detectable at embryonic day 9.5 (E9.5) just before heart looping has completed (121), and its expression profile is complete by birth (40). However, in considering the relevance of NF-M as a tool to identify and investigate the properties of the pacemaker region, it is important to note that there may be marked species differences, since there has been no evidence for the presence of NF-M in humans (121) and rats (5).

Expression of connexin isoforms. Connexins can serve both as molecular markers and as important contributors to the electrophysiological properties of the node. Connexins are proteins that, when properly assembled, give rise to gap junctions that allow the intercellular exchange of ions and small molecules. In the human and mouse genome, the family of connexins includes at least 20 members (106). For several years the isoforms known to be expressed in cardiac tissue were Cx40, Cx43, and Cx45. This list has been recently updated by Kreuzberg et al. (64), who also reported the presence of Cx30.2. The distribution of these isoforms is not uniform throughout all heart regions. Indeed, Cx40 and Cx43 are mostly present in working atrial and ventricular myocytes, whereas conduction tissue is characterized by the presence of Cx45 and Cx30.2 (the mouse homolog of human Cx31.9). In particular, Cx30.2 seems to be selectively expressed in the SAN and atrioventricular (AV) node (64). This pattern of expression has been particularly useful in studies of the SAN since the absence of Cx43, originally observed in several studies (28, 29, 86, 112, 116), has been utilized to identify the SAN region from the surrounding Cx43-rich atrial tissue. In terms of functionality, Cx45 has a somewhat lower unitary conductance than either Cx40 or Cx43 (17, 18). Furthermore, Cx30.2 has the lowest unitary conductance of all gap junctional proteins, and knocking out this connexin results in a 25% decrease in the PQ interval (63). Thus, the nodal-specific connexin expression pattern may be critical to its property of slow conduction.

Jones et al. (52) investigated the expression profile of Cx43 in the SAN throughout the lifetime of the guinea pig. They found Cx43 to be uniformly present throughout the node in newborn animals, but progression from youth to senescence was accompanied by a 14-fold increase in the nodal area lacking Cx43 and a corresponding decrease in the level of Cx43 protein expression (Fig. 1). Interestingly, and in agreement with previous data, the disappearance of Cx43 initiated in the central nodal area and then extended to more peripheral nodal regions with further aging. Furthermore, there were no increases in Cx40 and Cx45 to compensate for the loss of Cx43. Two key questions regarding this example of developmental regulation of Cx43 are 1) what is its influence on functional aspects of the pacemaker site (i.e., does the disappearance of Cx43 relate to the intrinsic heart rate and/or nodal propagation)? and 2) what are the modulatory signals that control Cx43 expression? While the latter is still unanswered, some work has been done regarding the former. In particular, Yamamoto et al. (126) reported that the nodal area in which Cx43 is absent is characterized by a fivefold decrease in conduction velocity, and this is consistent with the concept that a dependence solely on Cx45 and Cx30.2 would lead to slower conduction. Furthermore, Jones et al. (52) observed that the distance that the impulse generated at the center of the node must travel before reaching atrial tissue (identified by the crista terminalis) increases with age. Taken together, these findings provide a molecular correlation to the functional observation of a decrease in the overall intrinsic heart rate and conduction time with age.


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Sinoatrial node (SAN) development and aging are accompanied by a progressive reduction of connexin (Cx)43. The distribution (top) and expression (bottom) of the junctional protein Cx43 in the SAN of Duncan-Hartley guinea pigs of different ages (<1 day up to 38 mo) were evaluated by immunofluorescence analysis. The area lacking Cx43 signal, calculated from a two-dimensional reconstruction of the whole SAN obtained from sequential slices, increased linearly with the age of the animal. The quantification of the expression of Cx43 was accomplished by Western blot and densitometric analysis and normalized to desmin expression, which is not influenced by development or aging. [Modified, with permission, from Ref. 52.]

 
Fibroblast content of the developing node. The fibroblast component is one of many factors differentiating SAN structure from that of other cardiac regions. For example, in humans, the fibroblast content of the adult working myocardium is ~5–6% of the total volume, but this proportion is much higher in the SAN, where it reaches values of 45–75% (19, 27, 103). Studies (3, 19, 27, 103) on humans and lower mammals also have highlighted that the fibroblast, and therefore collagen, content of the heart is subject to strong developmental regulation: it is low during initial embryogenesis and increases during late embryogenesis and postnatal growth. After this period of expansion, the proliferation halts but can be triggered by the occurrence of pathological states. The apparent lack of a symmetrical organization of the myocellular component of the node is also true for the fibroblasts since they are found both adjacent to (and thus in contact with) sinoatrial myocytes and as isolated groups (20). It is interesting to note that these two separate populations also display different types of connexins. Fibroblasts interacting with nodal cells preferentially express Cx45, whereas those that do not contact SAN cells express Cx40; Cx43 has not been found in sinoatrial node fibroblasts (20). The contribution of the fibroblast population to the physiology of the node is complex, but important roles certainly include mechanical support and regulation of local inflammation (105). Since fibroblasts are nonexcitable, their dense presence in the SAN, and the observation that they are at least partially coupled via functional gap junctions to nodal cells, pose the intriguing question of a possible electrical consequence. In this regard, an interesting observation is that fibroblast resting potential is influenced by stretch as a direct consequence of the presence of stretch-activated ion channels on their cell membrane (56, 60). Whether changes in the membrane potential of fibroblasts directly influence the chronotropism of coupled nodal cells is an interesting question that awaits investigation.

In addition to the observations above concerning fibroblast distribution during early development, changes in the structural properties of the SAN associated with aging result in slow conduction and reduced voltage amplitude on eletroanatomic mapping (59, 95). Interestingly, these functional changes display some similarities with those observed in pathological states such as SAN dysfunction (43, 59, 95). Finally, besides their above-mentioned roles, it is possible that fibroblasts contribute to the metabolic homeostasis of the node (19).

Ionic Channels in the Developing Node

If. Pacemaker cells lack a stable resting potential, instead exhibiting a slowly rising depolarization that encompasses the interval from the end of action potential repolarization to the upstroke of the subsequent action potential. The events underlying this diastolic depolarization are the main determinants of cardiac pacemaker rate. Since its early discovery, If has been identified as a contributor to diastolic depolarization (15), and, indeed, its activation upon hyperpolarization and its inward and time-dependent Na+/K+ mixed nature are well suited to drive cell depolarization during the diastolic interval. The vast majority of information on the biophysical and molecular properties of this current derives from studies in single SAN myocytes isolated from adult animals (6, 25, 31, 93, 108). In addition to its contribution to basal pacemaking, If is a preferential target in the autonomic modulation of cardiac chronotropism due to the presence of a cAMP-binding domain on the channel's COOH terminus. The channels responsible for If (f channels) are modulated by both sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system; activation of the muscarinic cascade affects f channels by reducing cAMP bound to the channel, thereby inducing a hyperpolarizing shift of the activation curve, whereas the stimulation of beta-adrenoceptors elicits an increase in cAMP available for binding to the channel and thus increases If during diastole due to a depolarizing shift of the activation curve. To assess whether If undergoes developmental changes that could at least partially explain the slower heart rate observed in adult animals, Accili et al. (2) carried out comparative experiments of If in SAN myocytes isolated from newborn (9–10 day old) and adult rabbits. They found that newborn SAN cells had both a greater If density (newborn: 0.244 pS/pF and adult: 0.158 pS/pF) and a significantly steeper slope of the activation curve (slope factor: –9.6 mV in the newborn and –11.3 mV in the adult) compared with adult cells but no differences in the midpoint of activation (newborn: –66.7 mV and adult: –66.3 mV). These results, in addition to the observation that the capacitance of SAN cells does not vary with development (7), indicate that the amount of If that flows at pacemaker potentials is greater in newborn animals than in adults and thus could contribute to the higher intrinsic heart rate of the rabbit newborn SAN (114).

The intrinsic variation of the SAN rate during development has also been studied by Yang et al. (127, 128). These authors carried out radioimmunoassay experiments to evaluate age-dependent changes in the basal concentration of cAMP in sinoatrial cells and reported a marked decrease (0.31 µM at 2 wk vs. 0.025 µm at 12 wk). They also reported a negative shift of the If threshold potential (–45.5 vs. –51.1 mV in 2- vs. 4-wk-old hearts, respectively). Based on these findings, the authors proposed that heart rate slowing during development can be partially attributed to a reduced contribution of If secondary to a decrease in cellular cAMP content. The observation that cAMP levels change during development is interesting, but any extrapolation from these data must be done with caution since there is increasing evidence that membrane proteins such as ion channels exist in highly controlled microdomains where the concentration of cytoplasmic molecules such as cAMP can be different from those of the bulk cytoplasm. Furthermore, the data of Yang et al. (127, 128) differ from those of Accili et al. (2), who reported no differences in either the midpoint or acetylcholine- and isoproterenol-induced shifts of If activation curves between newborn and adult animals. Although Accili et al. (2) did not observe an age-dependent change in the cAMP responsiveness of f channels, this does not preclude an age-dependent difference in the modulation of If or heart rate. The developmental differences in the biophysical properties of the channels (higher conductance and steeper activation relation in the newborn) means that an identical shift in the position of the activation curve would per se lead to a greater current variation and thus to a more marked effect of autonomic control of heart rate in the newborn, as indeed has been observed both for vagal (30) and beta-adrenergic (44) stimulation. This is illustrated in Fig. 2, where the activation parameters of Accili et al. (2) have been used to plot the relative activation relations of newborn and adult SAN cells under basal conditions and under the influence of high concentrations of acetylcholine and isoproterenol to represent maximal vagal and sympathetic tone, respectively. As shown, at a potential of –55 mV, which is the approximate maximum diastolic potential in the SAN, the amount of current contributed by If under maximal vagal tone is approximately the same in the newborn and adult. However, with maximal sympathetic tone, If increases only 2.8-fold in the adult compared with 4.5-fold in the newborn, representing a 60% greater change in If at the younger age.


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. The range of pacemaker current (If) availability under autonomic control is greater in the newborn than in the adult. Activation curves of If obtained in control and in the presence of maximal sympathetic (isoproterenol, ISO) or vagal (acetylcholine, ACH) activation are shown. The range of fractional activation at –55 mV, a voltage near the maximal diastolic potential, is 60% greater in the newborn than in the adult. The parameters of the activation curves were taken from Accili et al. (2).

 
Molecular identification of pacemaker channels, either at the message or protein level, has been carried out in several species, including rabbits, mice, rats, and dogs (38, 46, 49, 7173, 96, 97, 100, 102, 115, 135). There are convincing indications that in the adult SAN, each functional channel is composed of four subunits belonging to the family of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels. The major component of the native SAN If is generally the HCN4 isoform (49, 71, 79, 81, 102), although a recent study (46) using laser capture and RT-PCR unexpectedly found that in the rat SAN, the major isoform at the message level is HCN2. While these data on transcript expression need to be extended to the protein level, this same study also reported changes in message as a function of age. Both HCN2 and HCN4 transcript expression progressively decreased with development, and, consistent with this observation, the nonselective f channel blocker cesium became less effective in slowing rate with development (46). To our knowledge, this is the only study of If in the developing rat SAN, and so the results await confirmation by other groups and extension to other species.

The presence of HCN4 signal is generally considered a marker for the early identification of the SAN region during embryonic development (80). Although when singularly expressed in a heterologous system all members of the HCN family display similar properties, the most distinguishing characteristic of HCN4 is its slow kinetics (typical time constants of activation at –95 mV are 0.11, 1.13, and 2.52 s for HCN1, HCN2, and HCN4, respectively) (1, 4). These kinetics can be modified by specific interactions with physiological modulators such as phosphoinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate or MinK-related protein 1, which profoundly increase the current density and speed up the activation process of some HCN isoforms (89, 92, 131). Although to our knowledge no specific data are available on the molecular identification of the newborn If in the rabbit heart, the observation by Accili et al. (2), that its properties are similar to those of adult animals, would tend to suggest a similar molecular assembly. Further evidence in support of a prevalent HCN4 composition of newborn pacemaker channels comes from embryological data in mice. In a pivotal study, Stieber et al. (107) generated both global and cardiac-specific HCN4 knockout mice and showed that these mice die at about E9.5-E11.5 due to severe functional anomalies of the cardiac conduction system. Analysis carried out in this period confirmed that mice lacking HCN4 were characterized by a severe bradycardia (88 beats/min for HCN4–/– mice vs. 139 beats/min for wild-type HCN4+/+ mice), likely caused by a 75–90% reduction in If. Interestingly, the cardiac rate of knockout mice could not be modulated by a cAMP-dependent mechanism, thus strengthening the evidence that cAMP-dependent rate modulation is mostly induced by an If-dependent mechanism. Given the molecular composition and biophysical properties of If during embryological and postnatal development, it is reasonable to conclude that HCN4 subunits are central elements of cardiac pacemaker myocytes at all ages. Thus, an important aspect of future studies will be the analysis of the genetic mechanisms that regionally and temporally control or repress HCN4 channel expression. In this respect, Kuratomi et al. (65) recently investigated some aspects of the molecular mechanism controlling the expression of HCN4 and identified both the promoter region responsible for basal activity and the presence within the first intron of a conserved neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE) sequence. NRSE is a sequence that, when bound to neuron-restrictive silencing factor (NRSF), inhibits the transcriptional processing of neural genes in non-neuronal cells. Interestingly, Kuratomi et al. (65) found that the NRSE-NRSF system plays a crucial role in controlling the known progressive decrease of HCN4 channels during embryological development of the working myocardium (129). Indeed, the levels of NRSF signal increase during embryological development, thus leading to a substantial inhibition of the transcriptional activity of the HCN4 gene. It is worth noting that the same mechanism operating in the opposite direction controls the increased expression of HCN4 channels induced by cardiac hypertrophy (36, 65, 66). Finally, the role of the NRSF-NRSE system in controlling channel expression is not limited to HCN4 but is also believed to control transcription of T-type Ca2+ channels (66, 130). The extent to which these regulatory mechanisms are active in the developing SAN remains to be determined.

Information on the mechanism controlling the differential fate determination of cardiac embryonic cells bound to become SAN or atrial cells are also currently becoming available. As shown by Hoogaars et al. (45), the transcriptional repressor Tbx3 seems to be the key element inducing the formation of the SAN from the rest of the (Tbx3-free) future working atrial myocardium. Whether or not the presence of Tbx3 is directly involved in the expression of HCN4 channels is not known. However, it is likely that the elucidation of the molecular events controlling the expression of the pacemaker phenotype will have practical implications for understanding arrhythmogenic cardiac diseases and innovative therapeutic strategies.

Na+ currents. Until a decade ago, it was commonly accepted that there was little or no functional contribution of Na+ current (INa) to the activity of primary sinoatrial pacemaker cells. This conclusion was mostly derived from the observation that the Na+ channel blocker TTX did not affect the spontaneous rate of either the intact SAN (61, 62, 69, 125) or single cells from adult rabbits (82, 83). In more recent years, the view that INa is irrelevant to pacemaker activity has been profoundly modified by developmental studies in the rabbit and by studies of the adult SAN in other species (7, 24, 34, 68, 75).

In 1996, we (7) reported that an INa was present in rabbit primary nodal cells at birth. Its developmental regulation was evident from the observation that by the 40th postnatal day, the current had fully disappeared (7). The functional role of the current was assessed by challenging the spontaneous activity of newborn cells with the Na+ channel blocker TTX (3 µM). Somewhat unexpectedly, TTX modified all action potential parameters rather than only the upstroke velocity. Particularly intriguing was the decrease in the slope of the diastolic depolarization (from 0.035 to 0.015 V/s) and the consequent slowing of spontaneous rate from 90 to 33 beats/min. Similar investigations of adult SAN cells failed to demonstrate INa, and, as expected, TTX did not affect rate. This marked age-dependent difference in the effect of TTX on spontaneous rate is shown in Fig. 3. Whole cell and single channel kinetic analyses demonstrated that a slow inactivation process due to multiple single channel reopenings at pacemaker potentials was the cause for the small but significant inward current that, in addition to If, contributed to diastolic depolarization (8, 9). The contribution of this current to diastolic depolarization is best seen under ramp-clamp conditions, where the membrane potential is slowly depolarized and the net current recorded. When TTX is used to block the contribution of any INa, one can determine the TTX-difference current. As shown in Fig. 4, A and B, there is a marked TTX-sensitive inward current during this membrane depolarization in a newborn SAN but not in an adult SAN cell.


Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. The contribution of Na+ current to spontaneous activity decreases with postnatal development. Action potentials recorded in single cells isolated from an adult and a newborn rabbit SAN exhibited different sensitivities to the Na+ channel blocker TTX (3 µM). Drug perfusion induced no significant effect (–10.6%, n = 5, P > 0.05) on the spontaneous rate in the adult animal, whereas it profoundly (–66.7%, n = 5) altered the rate in the newborn. [Modified from Ref. 7.]

 

Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. TTX- and nifedipine-sensitive currents elicited by ramp depolarization differ in newborn and adult SAN cells. A and B: whole cell current traces obtained in control and in the presence of TTX (3 µM) by applying a voltage ramp (from –60 to –20 mV) to single SAN cells at a depolarizing rate (35 ms/s) similar to that of spontaneous diastolic depolarization (top). TTX-sensitive current (A and B, bottom) was present in the newborn but not in the adult. C and D: similar protocols allowed the identification of nifedipine-sensitive currents (bottom) both in the newborn and adult. On average, the threshold of the nifedipine-sensitive current was 4 mV less negative in the newborn.

 
A further characterization of this developmentally regulated newborn SAN Na+ channel unexpectedly revealed a pharmacological profile (i.e., high TTX and low cadmium sensitivity) that did not correspond to that of the cardiac Na+ channel isoform (Nav1.5) but was rather more typical of a neuronal isoform. The neuronal character of the Na+ channel in the newborn SAN was confirmed by in situ hybridization experiments that revealed the expression of Nav1.1 in the newborn SAN (10). This explained the functional contribution of the channel, since inactivation of neuronal Na+ channel isoforms typically requires greater depolarization than the cardiac isoform. Thus, INa derived from neuronal channel isoforms would have greater availability at the typical diastolic potentials of the SAN.

The results with TTX also made it apparent that INa could not provide the only difference between newborn and adult pacemaker activity. As evident in Fig. 3, the Na+-independent automaticity of newborn cells unveiled by the use of TTX (33 beats/min) was significantly slower than that of adult cells (68 beats/min). Based on these results, it appears that the presence of a INa during early postnatal development is a consequence of the immature state of other sinoatrial currents, which alone are not sufficient to maintain a cardiac rate compatible with metabolic requirements. This critical situation resolves during the first 40 days of life in the rabbit, thus removing the necessity for the current. It is noteworthy that while most currents contributing to pacemaker activity in the adult, such as If, Ca2+ current, and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger current, are highly modulated by autonomic agonists, with cAMP-dependent processes enhancing the currents (11, 16, 119, 132), this is less true for INa. Modulation of Na+ channels is isoform specific, and protein kinase A can be associated with either an increase or decrease in current (22, 122). For this reason, understanding of the functional contribution of Na+ channel modulation to the control of pacemaker mechanisms is still unclear. However, when taken together, these observations lead to the highly speculative hypothesis that during the early postnatal period, the contribution of INa ensures a failsafe mechanism protecting the animal from a potential parasympathetic/sympathetic imbalance and that the necessity for this fades during development as the autonomic nervous system reaches its mature state.

Investigation of the presence of Nav1.1 and Nav1.5 transcripts in the adult rabbit by Tellez et al. (111) found Nav1.5 in the periphery and low levels of Nav1.1 in the center, compatible with the almost negligible contribution of INa to adult automaticity, as previously suggested by Baruscotti et al. (7). Interpretation of these data together with those obtained in the newborn rabbit could suggest that the expression of Na+ channels in the center of the node is regulated differently than the expression in the periphery. In fact, it would be expected that Nav1.5 channels could only participate in peripheral regions due to the more negative inactivation relation of this isoform and thus are more involved in the propagation of the impulse out of the node rather than to determination of rate. These conclusions were further validated by experiments in mice having a targeted disruption of the SCN5A genre (Scn5a+/– mice). Peripheral SAN cells isolated from these animals displayed a reduced presence of INa and reduced spontaneous rate; furthermore, experiments on intact SAN preparations confirmed that in Scn5a+/– mice, there was a significant slowing of sinoatrial conduction time and a propensity to sinoatrial block (67).

To our knowledge, thorough comparative studies of SAN INa in newborn and adult animals have not been carried out in any other species, and thus the progressive disappearance of INa during development could be a process typical of some but not all species. Indeed, studies carried out in adult mice showed significant differences with those from rabbits. Recordings from single SAN cells revealed that the pacemaking rate in adult mice is extremely sensitive to TTX, and, in fact, INa was recorded in almost all cells investigated (68, 75). In 2004, Lei et al. (68) concluded that although INa is common throughout the whole node of adult mice, the molecular substrates are not the same in all regions. Cardiac Nav1.5 channels are absent from the center of the SAN but densely populate the periphery, whereas Nav1.1 channels are homogeneously distributed throughout the node. It is possible that the persistence of Nav1.1 expression in the adult mouse SAN, compared with the rabbit, reflects the need to maintain a markedly higher heart rate in the adult mouse heart. While the mechanism(s) controlling the differential regulation of Nav1.1 and Nav1.5 channels are unknown, a report (101) of developmentally regulated splice variants of the murine SCN5a gene with distinct cardiac specific enhancer regions, and the presence of homologous human splicing, suggests a direction for future research.

Ca2+ currents. Two types of Ca2+ currents are expressed in SAN cells: low voltage-activated (L-type) Ca2+ channel current (ICa,L) and high voltage-activated (T-type) Ca2+ channel current (ICa,T) (42, 117). The relative abundance of these two currents seems to be species specific since, for example, in rabbits ICa,L is the predominant current, whereas in mice the opposite situation occurs. Although several details still need to be fully understood, there is general agreement that ICa,L sustains the action potential upstroke (phase 0), either alone or in combination with INa, and contributes to the later part of diastolic depolarization (76, 117, 132). The specific role of ICa,T is more controversial since original electrophysiological studies on pacemaker cells were carried out in rabbits, a species in which ICa,T is poorly expressed. With the more recent focus on pacemaking mechanisms in mice, studies have revealed that in this species, ICa,T participates in diastolic depolarization (78). A further role for ICa,T has been associated with its ability to locally trigger Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in atrial cells (47), although this specific action has not yet been proved in primary pacemaker cells (77).

Given their importance, the obvious question is whether Ca2+ currents are subjected to developmental regulation in the SAN. As mentioned earlier, when the contribution of INa in rabbit newborn cells is removed by TTX, the remaining automaticity is slower than that of the adult [33 vs. 68 beats/min (7)]. A logical explanation for this observation is that other ionic components crucial for nodal automaticity are still not fully mature in the newborn, and Ca2+ currents are obvious candidates. Protas et al. (91) carried out a detailed investigation of developmental changes in nodal ICa,L and ICa,T. A comparative analysis of ICa,T in newborn and adult rabbit SAN cells did not show any differences, thus excluding it as a major player in the developmental regulation of the SAN rate in the rabbit. Taken at face value, the absence of differences in newborn and adult ICa,T, despite the differences in the rate in the presence of TTX, might indicate that in rabbits ICa,T is not a critical determinant of rate. However, the only conclusion that can be definitively drawn from these data is that, to the extent that ICa,T contributes to automaticity in the rabbit SAN, it is a developmental constant. Again, this may reflect species differences since it has been shown that the spontaneous rate of Cav3.1 (one of three T-type Ca2+ channel isoforms) knockout mice is significantly slower (~10%) than that of control animals (78). In contrast, when Cav3.2 knockout mice were investigated for chronotropic performance and AV conduction of the impulse, no alterations were observed (23). Interestingly, Niwa et al. (84) showed that, in the mouse heart, Cav3.2 expression is high during embryogenesis. Opposite to Cav3.2, Cav3.1 increases during late embryogenesis and at birth to become the only expressed isoform found in the heart after birth and during adulthood (37, 84). These molecular data are consistent with the observation by Protas et al. (91) that in the rabbit, the properties of newborn and adult sinoatrial ICa,T are not different.

More interesting are the results comparing ICa,L in the adult and newborn (91). In particular, development acts on ICa,L by inducing a decrease in current density (newborn: 17.6 pA/pF and adult: 12.1 pA/pF), a rightward shift of the inactivation curve (midpoint: –33.4 mV in the newborn and –28.3 mV in the adult), and a leftward shift of the activation curve (midpoint: –17.3 mV in the newborn and –22.3 mV in the adult). Recovery from inactivation was also slower in the newborn. The decreased density of the current observed in the adult would suggest a diminished contribution of this current during diastole, but the opposite is likely true when one considers that the overlapping area delimited by the activation/inactivation curves is increased in the adult due to the opposite shift of the curves. This is shown in Fig. 4, C and D, where the nifedipine-sensitive current is shown during a slow ramp clamp to mimic diastolic depolarization. While the use of nifedipine during a ramp clamp can isolate currents in addition to ICa,L, such as a sustained inward current (Ist; see Other currents and Refs. 24 and 41), it is evident that the threshold of the nifedipine-sensitive current is more negative in the adult, so that it contributes earlier in diastole. Mean data confirm this, with the measured threshold shifted 4 mV negative in the adult (n = 6–8, P < 0.05). To the extent that this reflects ICa,L, it is thus likely that even though maximal current is higher in the newborn, the more negative activation threshold and the faster recovery from inactivation observed in the adult could explain why in the presence of TTX the rate of newborn cells is slower than that of adult cells.

The mechanisms underlying the differences observed in newborn and adult ICa,L could arise from a developmental switch between channel isoforms. Four {alpha}-subunits of L-type Ca2+ channels have been identified, and those expressed in the heart are Cav1.2 and Cav1.3, with the latter being mainly expressed in the atrium, SAN, and conduction system (12, 76, 79, 109). When Cav1.3 knockout mice were generated, SAN dysfunction and disturbances of AV conduction were observed (76, 90, 134). Analysis of sinoatrial ICa,L in Cav1.3 knockout mice revealed significant differences with those recorded in wild type; in particular, in the absence of Cav1.3, the voltage dependence is shifted ~5 mV positive [midpoint from –16.6 to –11.4 mV (134)], and this shift demonstrates that in the SAN, two different isoforms of L-type Ca2+ channels coexist. In particular, since Cav1.3 is selectively present in supraventricular regions, and since the cardiac rate is slower when this isoform is absent, it is possible that Cav1.3 in the SAN mostly contributes to diastolic depolarization, whereas contractility is contributed to by the Cav1.2 isoform. Interestingly, when the derivative of the action potential was measured at three different potentials (–50, –45, and –40 mV) during diastolic depolarization in wild-type and Cav1.3-deficient mice, differences were observed only for the two more positive voltages (134). These data indicate that the contribution of Cav1.3 is indeed critical during the pacemaker phase but not in early diastole, where other currents contribute. Whether Cav1.2 and Cav1.3 are subjected to developmental regulation remains to be established. Based on the 5-mV developmental leftward shift in activation observed by Protas et al. (91) and the 4-mV shift in threshold of the nifedipine-sensitive current reported above, when considered compared with the 5-mV shift in the activation relation in Cav1.3 knockout animals (134), it could be speculated that the immature SAN expresses a prevalence of Cav1.2 channels, and postnatal development favors the expression of Cav1.3. This hypothesis also agrees with the evidence that, whereas Cav1.3 is not necessary during heart embryogenesis, the lack of Cav1.2 is lethal. Additional support for this hypothesis comes from the finding of Jones et al. (51) of a progressive loss of Cav1.2 with aging in the guinea pig SAN; however, it was not reported if a concomitant increase in Cav1.3 occurred.

Other currents. Other currents have been suggested to contribute to SAN pacemaking in the adult by various researchers, including the deactivation of the delayed rectifier K+ current (48), a nifedipine-sensitive sustained cation current called Ist (24, 41), and Na+/Ca2+ exchange current (74). We are not aware of any studies in the immature SAN that indicate that any of these currents vary developmentally, but this is clearly a relevant question. In particular, the Na+/Ca2+ exchange mechanism merits study, as this is intimately associated with other components of Ca2+ homeostasis such as sarcoplasmic reticular Ca2+ stores and release mechanisms, both of which change with postnatal development in other cardiac regions (50, 57, 113).

Conclusions

We have attempted to provide a framework for considering the developmental maturation of the SAN in mammals. While any conclusions must be qualified because of the possibility of substantive differences among species, it appears the SAN undergoes substantial rearrangements both in its anatomical extension, as shown by the decrease in the Cx43 area, and in its electrical aspects, as shown by profound modifications of the ionic channel expression profile. All these aspects combine to determine an age-dependent slowing of intrinsic heart rate and conduction time. Interestingly, we observed that, whereas the contribution of If and INa to pacemaking are downregulated during postnatal life in the rabbit SAN, the opposite is true for ICa,L. Certainly, these events are controlled by an overall homeostatic developmental plan, but identification of the common regulators is a goal that remains for future investigations, as is extension to other species including humans. What can be stated at this time is that although some aspects are beginning to be clarified, much remains to be done before a comprehensive view of the developmental biology of SAN function will be complete.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-28958.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. Dario DiFrancesco and Michael R. Rosen for helpful comments on the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. B. Robinson, Dept. of Pharmacology, Columbia Univ., 630 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032 (e-mail: rbr1{at}columbia.edu)


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Accili EA, Proenza C, Baruscotti M, DiFrancesco D. From funny current to HCN channels: 20 years of excitation. News Physiol Sci 17: 32–37, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Accili EA, Robinson RB, DiFrancesco D. Properties and modulation of If in newborn versus adult cardiac SA node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H1549–H1552, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Alings AM, Abbas RF, Bouman LN. Age-related changes in structure and relative collagen content of the human and feline sinoatrial node. A comparative study. Eur Heart J 16: 1655–1667, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Altomare C, Bucchi A, Camatini E, Baruscotti M, Viscomi C, Moroni A, DiFrancesco D. Integrated allosteric model of voltage gating of HCN channels. J Gen Physiol 117: 519–532, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Aoyama N, Kikawada R, Yamashina S. Immunohistochemical study on the development of the rat heart conduction system using anti-Leu-7 antibody. Arch Histol Cytol 56: 303–315, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Baruscotti M, Bucchi A, DiFrancesco D. Physiology and pharmacology of the cardiac pacemaker ("funny") current. Pharmacol Ther 107: 59–79, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Baruscotti M, DiFrancesco D, Robinson RB. A TTX-sensitive inward sodium current contributes to spontaneous activity in newborn rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 492: 21–30, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Baruscotti M, DiFrancesco D, Robinson RB. Na+ current contribution to the diastolic depolarization in newborn rabbit SA node cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279: H2303–H2309, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Baruscotti M, DiFrancesco D, Robinson RB. Single-channel properties of the sinoatrial node Na+ current in the newborn rabbit. Pflügers Arch 442: 192–196, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Baruscotti M, Westenbroek R, Catterall WA, DiFrancesco D, Robinson RB. The newborn rabbit sino-atrial node expresses a neuronal type I-like Na+ channel. J Physiol 498: 641–648, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Biel M, Schneider A, Wahl C. Cardiac HCN channels: structure, function, and modulation. Trends Cardiovasc Med 12: 206–212, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Bohn G, Moosmang S, Conrad H, Ludwig A, Hofmann F, Klugbauer N. Expression of T- and L-type calcium channel mRNA in murine sinoatrial node. FEBS Lett 481: 73–76, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Boyett MR, Dobrzynski H, Lancaster MK, Jones SA, Honjo H, Kodama I. Sophisticated architecture is required for the sinoatrial node to perform its normal pacemaker function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 14: 104–106, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  14. Boyett MR, Honjo H, Kodama I. The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure. Cardiovasc Res 47: 658–687, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Brown HF, DiFrancesco D, Noble SJ. How does adrenaline accelerate the heart? Nature 280: 235–236, 1979.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Bucchi A, Baruscotti M, Robinson RB, DiFrancesco D. If-dependent modulation of pacemaker rate mediated by cAMP in the presence of ryanodine in rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 35: 905–913, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Bukauskas FF, Elfgang C, Willecke K, Weingart R. Biophysical properties of gap junction channels formed by mouse connexin40 in induced pairs of transfected human HeLa cells. Biophys J 68: 2289–2298, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  18. Bukauskas FF, Verselis VK. Gap junction channel gating. Biochim Biophys Acta 1662: 42–60, 2004.[Medline]
  19. Camelliti P, Borg TK, Kohl P. Structural and functional characterisation of cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiovasc Res 65: 40–51, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Camelliti P, Green CR, LeGrice I, Kohl P. Fibroblast network in rabbit sinoatrial node: structural and functional identification of homogeneous and heterogeneous cell coupling. Circ Res 94: 828–835, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Campbell DL, Rasmusson RL, Strauss HC. Ionic current mechanisms generating vertebrate primary cardiac pacemaker activity at the single cell level: an integrative view. Annu Rev Physiol 54: 279–302, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Catterall WA, Hulme JT, Jiang X, Few WP. Regulation of sodium and calcium channels by signaling complexes. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 26: 577–598, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Chen CC, Lamping KG, Nuno DW, Barresi R, Prouty SJ, Lavoie JL, Cribbs LL, England SK, Sigmund CD, Weiss RM, Williamson RA, Hill JA, Campbell KP. Abnormal coronary function in mice deficient in alpha1H T-type Ca2+ channels. Science 302: 1416–1418, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cho HS, Takano M, Noma A. The electrophysiological properties of spontaneously beating pacemaker cells isolated from mouse sinoatrial node. J Physiol 550: 169–180, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Cohen IS, Robinson RB. Pacemaker current and automatic rhythms: toward a molecular understanding. Handb Exp Pharmacol: 41–71, 2006.
  26. Cramer M, Siegal M, Bigger JT Jr, Hoffman BF. Characteristics of extracellular potentials recorded from the sinoatrial pacemaker of the rabbit. Circ Res 41: 292–300, 1977.[Free Full Text]
  27. Davies MJ, Pomerance A. Quantitative study of ageing changes in the human sinoatrial node and internodal tracts. Br Heart J 34: 150–152, 1972.[Free Full Text]
  28. Davis LM, Kanter HL, Beyer EC, Saffitz JE. Distinct gap junction protein phenotypes in cardiac tissues with disparate conduction properties. J Am Coll Cardiol 24: 1124–1132, 1994.[Abstract]
  29. Davis LM, Rodefeld ME, Green K, Beyer EC, Saffitz JE. Gap junction protein phenotypes of the human heart and conduction system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 6: 813–822, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
  30. de Neef KJ, Versprille A, Wise ME, Jansen JR. Functional development of the parasympathetic innervation of the sino-auricular node in newborn rabbits, cats and guinea pigs. Pflügers Arch 398: 73–77, 1983.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  31. DiFrancesco D. Pacemaker mechanisms in cardiac tissue. Annu Rev Physiol 55: 455–472, 1993.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  32. Dobrzynski H, Billeter R, Greener ID, Tellez JO, Chandler NJ, Flagg TP, Nichols CG, Lopatin AN, Boyett MR. Expression of Kir2.1 and Kir6.2 transgenes under the control of the alpha-MHC promoter in the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes in transgenic mice. J Mol Cell Cardiol 41: 855–867, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  33. Dobrzynski H, Li J, Tellez J, Greener ID, Nikolski VP, Wright SE, Parson SH, Jones SA, Lancaster MK, Yamamoto M, Honjo H, Takagishi Y, Kodama I, Efimov IR, Billeter R, Boyett MR. Computer three-dimensional reconstruction of the sinoatrial node. Circulation 111: 846–854, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Du Y, Huang X, Wang T, Han K, Zhang J, Xi Y, Wu G, Ma A. Downregulation of neuronal sodium channel subunits Nav1.1 and Nav1.6 in the sinoatrial node from volume-overloaded heart failure rat. Pflügers Arch 454: 451–459, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  35. Fedorov VV, Hucker WJ, Dobrzynski H, Rosenshtraukh LV, Efimov IR. Postganglionic nerve stimulation induces temporal inhibition of excitability in rabbit sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291: H612–H623, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Fernandez-Velasco M, Goren N, Benito G, Blanco-Rivero J, Bosca L, Delgado C. Regional distribution of hyperpolarization-activated current (If) and hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel mRNA expression in ventricular cells from control and hypertrophied rat hearts. J Physiol 553: 395–405, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ferron L, Capuano V, Deroubaix E, Coulombe A, Renaud JF. Functional and molecular characterization of a T-type Ca2+ channel during fetal and postnatal rat heart development. J Mol Cell Cardiol 34: 533–546, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  38. Gauss R, Seifert R, Kaupp UB. Molecular identification of a hyperpolarization-activated channel in sea urchin sperm. Nature 393: 583–587, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Gorza L, Schiaffino S, Vitadello M. Heart conduction system: a neural crest derivative? Brain Res 457: 360–366, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  40. Gorza L, Vitadello M. Distribution of conduction system fibers in the developing and adult rabbit heart revealed by an antineurofilament antibody. Circ Res 65: 360–369, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Guo J, Ono K, Noma A. A sustained inward current activated at the diastolic potential range in rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 483: 1–13, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hagiwara N, Irisawa H, Kameyama M. Contribution of two types of calcium currents to the pacemaker potentials of rabbit sino-atrial node cells. J Physiol 395: 233–253, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Haqqani HM, Kalman JM. Aging and sinoatrial node dysfunction: musings on the not-so-funny side. Circulation 115: 1178–1179, 2007.[Free Full Text]
  44. Hewett KW, Rosen MR. Developmental changes in the rabbit sinus node action potential and its response to adrenergic agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 235: 308–312, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hoogaars WM, Engel A, Brons JF, Verkerk AO, de Lange FJ, Wong LY, Bakker ML, Clout DE, Wakker V, Barnett P, Ravesloot JH, Moorman AF, Verheijck EE, Christoffels VM. Tbx3 controls the sinoatrial node gene program and imposes pacemaker function on the atria. Genes Dev 21: 1098–1112, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Huang X, Yang P, Du Y, Zhang J, Ma A. Age-related down-regulation of HCN channels in rat sinoatrial node. Basic Res Cardiol 102: 429–435, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  47. Huser J, Blatter LA, Lipsius SL. Intracellular Ca2+ release contributes to automaticity in cat atrial pacemaker cells. J Physiol 524: 415–422, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Irisawa H, Brown HF, Giles W. Cardiac pacemaking in the sinoatrial node. Physiol Rev 73: 197–227, 1993.[Free Full Text]
  49. Ishii TM, Takano M, Xie LH, Noma A, Ohmori H. Molecular characterization of the hyperpolarization-activated cation channel in rabbit heart sinoatrial node. J Biol Chem 274: 12835–12839, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Janowski E, Cleemann L, Sasse P, Morad M. Diversity of Ca2+ signaling in developing cardiac cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 1080: 154–164, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  51. Jones SA, Boyett MR, Lancaster MK. Declining into failure: the age-dependent loss of the L-type calcium channel within the sinoatrial node. Circulation 115: 1183–1190, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Jones SA, Lancaster MK, Boyett MR. Ageing-related changes of connexins and conduction within the sinoatrial node. J Physiol 560: 429–437, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Jose AD, Collison D. The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man. Cardiovasc Res 4: 160–167, 1970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Joyner RW, Kumar R, Golod DA, Wilders R, Jongsma HJ, Verheijck EE, Bouman L, Goolsby WN, van Ginneken AC. Electrical interactions between a rabbit atrial cell and a nodal cell model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 274: H2152–H2162, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Joyner RW, van Capelle FJ. Propagation through electrically coupled cells. How a small SA node drives a large atrium. Biophys J 50: 1157–1164, 1986.[Web of Science][Medline]
  56. Kamkin A, Kiseleva I, Isenberg G, Wagner KD, Gunther J, Theres H, Scholz H. Cardiac fibroblasts and the mechano-electric feedback mechanism in healthy and diseased hearts. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 82: 111–120, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  57. Kaplan P, Jurkovicova D, Babusikova E, Hudecova S, Racay P, Sirova M, Lehotsky J, Drgova A, Dobrota D, Krizanova O. Effect of aging on the expression of intracellular Ca2+ transport proteins in a rat heart. Mol Cell Biochem 301: 219–226, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  58. Keith A, Flack M. The form and nature of the muscular connections between the primary divisions of the vertebrate heart. J Anat Physiol 41: 172–189, 1907.[Medline]
  59. Kistler PM, Sanders P, Fynn SP, Stevenson IH, Spence SJ, Vohra JK, Sparks PB, Kalman JM. Electrophysiologic and electroanatomic changes in the human atrium associated with age. J Am Coll Cardiol 44: 109–116, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Kohl P, Kamkin AG, Kiseleva IS, Streubel T. Mechanosensitive cells in the atrium of frog heart. Exp Physiol 77: 213–216, 1992.[Abstract]
  61. Kreitner D. Evidence for the existence of a rapid sodium channel in the membrane of rabbit sinoatrial cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 7: 655–662, 1975.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  62. Kreitner D. Electrophysiological study of the two main pacemaker mechanisms in the rabbit sinus node. Cardiovasc Res 19: 304–318, 1985.[Web of Science][Medline]
  63. Kreuzberg MM, Schrickel JW, Ghanem A, Kim JS, Degen J, Janssen-Bienhold U, Lewalter T, Tiemann K, Willecke K. Connexin30.2 containing gap junction channels decelerate impulse propagation through the atrioventricular node. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 5959–5964, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Kreuzberg MM, Sohl G, Kim JS, Verselis VK, Willecke K, Bukauskas FF. Functional properties of mouse connexin30.2 expressed in the conduction system of the heart. Circ Res 96: 1169–1177, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Kuratomi S, Kuratomi A, Kuwahara K, Ishii TM, Nakao K, Saito Y, Takano M. NRSF regulates the developmental and hypertrophic changes of HCN4 transcription in rat cardiac myocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 353: 67–73, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  66. Kuwahara K, Saito Y, Takano M, Arai Y, Yasuno S, Nakagawa Y, Takahashi N, Adachi Y, Takemura G, Horie M, Miyamoto Y, Morisaki T, Kuratomi S, Noma A, Fujiwara H, Yoshimasa Y, Kinoshita H, Kawakami R, Kishimoto I, Nakanishi M, Usami S, Saito Y, Harada M, Nakao K. NRSF regulates the fetal cardiac gene program and maintains normal cardiac structure and function. EMBO J 22: 6310–6321, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  67. Lei M, Goddard C, Liu J, Leoni AL, Royer A, Fung SS, Xiao G, Ma A, Zhang H, Charpentier F, Vandenberg JI, Colledge WH, Grace AA, Huang CL. Sinus node dysfunction following targeted disruption of the murine cardiac sodium channel gene Scn5a. J Physiol 567: 387–400, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Lei M, Jones SA, Liu J, Lancaster MK, Fung SS, Dobrzynski H, Camelliti P, Maier SK, Noble D, Boyett MR. Requirement of neuronal- and cardiac-type sodium channels for murine sinoatrial node pacemaking. J Physiol 559: 835–848, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Lenfant L, Mironneau J, Gargouil YM, Galand G. Analyse de l'activité électrique spontanée du centre de l'automatisme cardiaque de lapin par les inhibiteurs de perméabilités membranaires. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires de Sceances de l'Academie des Sciences D 226: 901–904, 1968.
  70. Lewis T, Oppenheimer BS, Oppenheimer A. The site of origin of the mammalian heart beat: the pacemaker in the dog. Heart 2: 147–169, 1910.[Web of Science]
  71. Liu J, Dobrzynski H, Yanni J, Boyett MR, Lei M. Organisation of the mouse sinoatrial node: structure and expression of HCN channels. Cardiovasc Res 73: 729–738, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Ludwig A, Zong X, Jeglitsch M, Hofmann F, Biel M. A family of hyperpolarization-activated mammalian cation channels. Nature 393: 587–591, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  73. Ludwig A, Zong X, Stieber J, Hullin R, Hofmann F, Biel M. Two pacemaker channels from human heart with profoundly different activation kinetics. EMBO J 18: 2323–2329, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  74. Lyashkov AE, Juhaszova M, Dobrzynski H, Vinogradova TM, Maltsev VA, Juhasz O, Spurgeon HA, Sollott SJ, Lakatta EG. Calcium cycling protein density and functional importance to automaticity of isolated sinoatrial nodal cells are independent of cell size. Circ Res 100: 1723–1731, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Maier SK, Westenbroek RE, Yamanushi TT, Dobrzynski H, Boyett MR, Catterall WA, Scheuer T. An unexpected requirement for brain-type sodium channels for control of heart rate in the mouse sinoatrial node. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 3507–3512, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Mangoni ME, Couette B, Bourinet E, Platzer J, Reimer D, Striessnig J, Nargeot J. Functional role of L-type Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels in cardiac pacemaker activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 5543–5548, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Mangoni ME, Couette B, Marger L, Bourinet E, Striessnig J, Nargeot J. Voltage-dependent calcium channels and cardiac pacemaker activity: from ionic currents to genes. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 90: 38–63, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  78. Mangoni ME, Traboulsie A, Leoni AL, Couette B, Marger L, Le Quang K, Kupfer E, Cohen-Solal A, Vilar J, Shin HS, Escande D, Charpentier F, Nargeot J, Lory P. Bradycardia and slowing of the atrioventricular conduction in mice lacking CaV3.1/alpha1G T-type calcium channels. Circ Res 98: 1422–1430, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Marionneau C, Couette B, Liu J, Li H, Mangoni ME, Nargeot J, Lei M, Escande D, Demolombe S. Specific pattern of ionic channel gene expression associated with pacemaker activity in the mouse heart. J Physiol 562: 223–234, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Mommersteeg MT, Hoogaars WM, Prall OW, Gier-de Vries C, Wiese C, Clout DE, Papaioannou VE, Brown NA, Harvey RP, Moorman AF, Christoffels VM. Molecular pathway for the localized formation of the sinoatrial node. Circ Res 100: 354–362, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Moosmang S, Stieber J, Zong X, Biel M, Hofmann F, Ludwig A. Cellular expression and functional characterization of four hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channels in cardiac and neuronal tissues. Eur J Biochem 268: 1646–1652, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
  82. Nakayama T, Kurachi Y, Noma A, Irisawa H. Action potential and membrane currents of single pacemaker cells of the rabbit heart. Pflügers Arch 402: 248–257, 1984.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  83. Nathan RD. Two electrophysiologically distinct types of cultured pacemaker cells from rabbit sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 250: H325–H329, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Niwa N, Yasui K, Opthof T, Takemura H, Shimizu A, Horiba M, Lee JK, Honjo H, Kamiya K, Kodama I. Cav3.2 subunit underlies the functional T-type Ca2+ channel in murine hearts during the embryonic period. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286: H2257–H2263, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  85. Noma A, Nakayama T, Kurachi Y, Irisawa H. Resting K conductances in pacemaker and non-pacemaker heart cells of the rabbit. Jpn J Physiol 34: 245–254, 1984.[Web of Science][Medline]
  86. Oosthoek PW, Viragh S, Mayen AE, van Kempen MJ, Lamers WH, Moorman AF. Immunohistochemical delineation of the conduction system. I: the sinoatrial node. Circ Res 73: 473–481, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  87. Opthof T. The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man. Cardiovasc Res 45: 177–184, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Opthof T. Embryological development of pacemaker hierarchy and membrane currents related to the function of the adult sinus node: implications for autonomic modulation of biopacemakers. Med Biol Eng Comput 45: 119–132, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  89. Pian P, Bucchi A, Robinson RB, Siegelbaum SA. Regulation of gating and rundown of HCN hyperpolarization-activated channels by exogenous and endogenous PIP2. J Gen Physiol 128: 593–604, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  90. Platzer J, Engel J, Schrott-Fischer A, Stephan K, Bova S, Chen H, Zheng H, Striessnig J. Congenital deafness and sinoatrial node dysfunction in mice lacking class D L-type Ca2+ channels. Cell 102: 89–97, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  91. Protas L, DiFrancesco D, Robinson RB. L-type but not T-type calcium current changes during postnatal development in rabbit sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H1252–H1259, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  92. Qu J, Kryukova Y, Potapova IA, Doronin SV, Larsen M, Krishnamurthy G, Cohen IS, Robinson RB. MiRP1 modulates HCN2 channel expression and gating in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem 279: 43497–43502, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  93. Robinson RB, Siegelbaum SA. Hyperpolarization-activated cation currents: from molecules to physiological function. Annu Rev Physiol 65: 453–480, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  94. Sanchez-Quintana D, Cabrera JA, Farre J, Climent V, Anderson RH, Ho SY. Sinus node revisited in the era of electroanatomical mapping and catheter ablation. Heart 91: 189–194, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  95. Sanders P, Morton JB, Kistler PM, Spence SJ, Davidson NC, Hussin A, Vohra JK, Sparks PB, Kalman JM. Electrophysiological and electroanatomic characterization of the atria in sinus node disease: evidence of diffuse atrial remodeling. Circulation 109: 1514–1522, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. Santoro B, Grant SG, Bartsch D, Kandel ER. Interactive cloning with the SH3 domain of N-src identifies a new brain specific ion channel protein, with homology to eag and cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 14815–14820, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  97. Santoro B, Liu DT, Yao H, Bartsch D, Kandel ER, Siegelbaum SA, Tibbs GR. Identification of a gene encoding a hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channel of brain. Cell 93: 717–729, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  98. Satoh H. Sino-atrial nodal cells of mammalian hearts: ionic currents and gene expression of pacemaker ionic channels. J Smooth Muscle Res 39: 175–193, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  99. Schuessler RB, Boineau JP, Bromberg BI. Origin of the sinus impulse. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 7: 263–274, 1996.[Web of Science][Medline]
  100. Seifert R, Scholten A, Gauss R, Mincheva A, Lichter P, Kaupp UB. Molecular characterization of a slowly gating human hyperpolarization-activated channel predominantly expressed in thalamus, heart, and testis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 9391–9396, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  101. Shang LL, Dudley SC Jr. Tandem promoters and developmentally regulated 5'- and 3'-mRNA untranslated regions of the mouse Scn5a cardiac sodium channel. J Biol Chem 280: 933–940, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  102. Shi W, Wymore R, Yu H, Wu J, Wymore RT, Pan Z, Robinson RB, Dixon JE, McKinnon D, Cohen IS. Distribution and prevalence of hyperpolarization-activated cation channel (HCN) mRNA expression in cardiac tissues. Circ Res 85: e1–e6, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  103. Shiraishi I, Takamatsu T, Minamikawa T, Onouchi Z, Fujita S. Quantitative histological analysis of the human sinoatrial node during growth and aging. Circulation 85: 2176–2184, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  104. Silverman ME, Grove D, Upshaw CB Jr. Why does the heart beat? The discovery of the electrical system of the heart. Circulation 113: 2775–2781, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  105. Smith RS, Smith TJ, Blieden TM, Phipps RP. Fibroblasts as sentinel cells. Synthesis of chemokines and regulation of inflammation. Am J Pathol 151: 317–322, 1997.[Abstract]
  106. Sohl G, Willecke K. Gap junctions and the connexin protein family. Cardiovasc Res 62: 228–232, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  107. Stieber J, Herrmann S, Feil S, Loster J, Feil R, Biel M, Hofmann F, Ludwig A. The hyperpolarization-activated channel HCN4 is required for the generation of pacemaker action potentials in the embryonic heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 15235–15240, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  108. Stieber J, Hofmann F, Ludwig A. Pacemaker channels and sinus node arrhythmia. Trends Cardiovasc Med 14: 23–28, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  109. Takimoto K, Li D, Nerbonne JM, Levitan ES. Distribution, splicing and glucocorticoid-induced expression of cardiac alpha 1C and alpha 1D voltage-gated Ca2+ channel mRNAs. J Mol Cell Cardiol 29: 3035–3042, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  110. Tawara S. Das Reizleitungssystem Des Säugetierherzens [The Conduction System of the Mammalian Heart]. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1906. Suma K, Shimada M, trans. London, UK: Imperial College Press, 2000.
  111. Tellez JO, Dobrzynski H, Greener ID, Graham GM, Laing E, Honjo H, Hubbard SJ, Boyett MR, Billeter R. Differential expression of ion channel transcripts in atrial muscle and sinoatrial node in rabbit. Circ Res 99: 1384–1393, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  112. ten Velde I, de Jonge B, Verheijck EE, van Kempen MJ, Analbers L, Gros D, Jongsma HJ. Spatial distribution of connexin43, the major cardiac gap junction protein, visualizes the cellular network for impulse propagation from sinoatrial node to atrium. Circ Res 76: 802–811, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  113. Tibbits GF, Xu L, Sedarat F. Ontogeny of excitation-contraction coupling in the mammalian heart. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 132: 691–698, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  114. Toda N. Age-related changes in the transmembrane potential of isolated sino-atrial nodes and atria. Cardiovasc Res 1: 58–63, 1980.
  115. Vaccari T, Moroni A, Rocchi M, Gorza L, Bianchi ME, Beltrame M, DiFrancesco D. The human gene coding for HCN2, a pacemaker channel of the heart. Biochim Biophys Acta 1446: 419–425, 1999.[Medline]
  116. van Kempen MJ, Fromaget C, Gros D, Moorman AF, Lamers WH. Spatial distribution of connexin43, the major cardiac gap junction protein, in the developing and adult rat heart. Circ Res 68: 1638–1651, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  117. Verheijck EE, van Ginneken ACG, Wilders R, Bouman LN. Contribution of L-type Ca2+ current to electrical activity in sinoatrial nodal myocytes of rabbits. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 276: H1064–H1077, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  118. Verheijck EE, Wessels A, van Ginneken AC, Bourier J, Markman MW, Vermeulen JL, de Bakker JM, Lamers WH, Opthof T, Bouman LN. Distribution of atrial and nodal cells within the rabbit sinoatrial node: models of sinoatrial transition. Circulation 97: 1623–1631, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  119. Vinogradova TM, Bogdanov KY, Lakatta EG. beta-Adrenergic stimulation modulates ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release during diastolic depolarization to accelerate pacemaker activity in rabbit sinoatrial nodal cells. Circ Res 90: 73–79, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  120. Vinogradova TM, Maltsev VA, Bogdanov KY, Lyashkov AE, Lakatta EG. Rhythmic Ca2+ oscillations drive sinoatrial nodal cell pacemaker function to make the heart tick. Ann NY Acad Sci 1047: 138–156, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  121. Vittadello M, Vettore S, Lamar E, Chien KR, Gorza L. Neurofilament M mRNA is expressed in conduction system myocytes of the developing and adult rabbit heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 28: 1833–1844, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  122. Wagner S, Maier LS. Modulation of cardiac Na+ and Ca2+ currents by CaM and CaMKII. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 17, Suppl 1: S26–S33, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]
  123. Willius F, Dry T. A history of the Heart and the Circulation. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1948.
  124. Wybauw R. Sur le point d'origine de la systole cardiaque dans l'oreillette droite. Arch Internat d Physiol 10: 78–90, 1910.
  125. Yamagishi S, Sano T. Effect of tetrodotoxin on the pacemaker action potential of the sinus node. Proc Jpn Acad 42: 1194–1196, 1966.[Medline]
  126. Yamamoto M, Honjo H, Niwa R, Kodama I. Low-frequency extracellular potentials recorded from the sinoatrial node. Cardiovasc Res 39: 360–372, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  127. Yang ZF, Li CZ, Li Q, Wang XJ, Liu YM. The sinus node itself also plays a role in heart rate slowing down during postnatal development. Sheng Li Xue Bao 54: 282–286, 2002.[Medline]
  128. Yang ZF, Sun Y, Li CZ, Wang HW, Wang XJ, Zheng YQ, Liu K, Liu YM. Reduced sinoatrial cAMP content plays a role in postnatal heart rate slowing in the rabbit. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 33: 757–762, 2006.[Web of Science][Medline]
  129. Yasui K, Liu W, Opthof T, Kada K, Lee JK, Kamiya K, Kodama I. If current and spontaneous activity in mouse embryonic ventricular myocytes. Circ Res 88: 536–542, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  130. Yasui K, Niwa N, Takemura H, Opthof T, Muto T, Horiba M, Shimizu A, Lee JK, Honjo H, Kamiya K, Kodama I. Pathophysiological significance of T-type Ca2+ channels: expression of T-type Ca2+ channels in fetal and diseased heart. J Pharmacol Sci 99: 205–210, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  131. Yu H, Wu J, Potapova I, Wymore RT, Holmes B, Zuckerman J, Pan Z, Wang H, Shi W, Robinson RB, El Maghrabi MR, Benjamin W, Dixon J, McKinnon D, Cohen IS, Wymore R. MinK-related peptide 1: a beta subunit for the HCN ion channel subunit family enhances expression and speeds activation. Circ Res 88: E84–E87, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
  132. Zaza A, Robinson RB, DiFrancesco D. Basal response of the L-type Ca2+ and hyperpolarization-activated currents to autonomic agonists in the rabbit sino-atrial node. J Physiol 419: 347–355, 1996.
  133. Zhang H, Zhao Y, Lei M, Dobrzynski H, Liu JH, Holden AV, Boyett MR. Computational evaluation of the roles of Na+ current, iNa, and cell death in cardiac pacemaking and driving. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292: H165–H174, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  134. Zhang Z, Xu Y, Song H, Rodriguez J, Tuteja D, Namkung Y, Shin HS, Chiamvimonvat N. Functional roles of Cav1.3 ({alpha}1D) calcium channel in sinoatrial nodes: insight gained using gene-targeted null mutant mice. Circ Res 90: 981–987, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  135. Zicha S, Fernandez-Velasco M, Lonardo G, L'Heureux N, Nattel S. Sinus node dysfunction and hyperpolarization-activated (HCN) channel subunit remodeling in a canine heart failure model. Cardiovasc Res 66: 472–481, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
M. R. Boyett
\#8216;And the beat goes on' The cardiac conduction system: the wiring system of the heart
Exp Physiol, October 1, 2009; 94(10): 1035 - 1049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/5/H2613    most recent
00750.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baruscotti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baruscotti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, R. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.