AJP - Heart Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 294: H134-H144, 2008. First published November 2, 2007; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00732.2007
0363-6135/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/1/H134    most recent
00732.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arora, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arora, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, A. H.

Neural substrate for atrial fibrillation: implications for targeted parasympathetic blockade in the posterior left atrium

Rishi Arora,* Joseph S. Ulphani,* Roger Villuendas, Jason Ng, Laura Harvey, Sarah Thordson, Firdous Inderyas, Yi Lu, David Gordon, Pablo Denes, Rodney Greene, Susan Crawford, Robert Decker, Alexander Morris, Jeffrey Goldberger, and Alan H. Kadish

Division of Cardiology and Department of Medicine, Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Submitted 22 June 2007 ; accepted in final form 31 October 2007


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The parasympathetic (P) nervous system is thought to contribute significantly to focal atrial fibrillation (AF). Thus we hypothesized that P nerve fibers [and related muscarinic (M2) receptors] are preferentially located in the posterior left atrium (PLA) and that selective cholinergic blockade in the PLA can be successfully performed to alter vagal AF substrate. The PLA, pulmonary veins (PVs), and left atrial appendage (LAA) from six dogs were immunostained for sympathetic (S) nerves, P nerves, and M2 receptors. Epicardial electrophysiological mapping was performed in seven additional dogs. The PLA was the most richly innervated, with nerve bundles containing P and S fibers (0.9 ± 1, 3.2 ± 2.5, and 0.17 ± 0.3/cm2 in the PV, PLA, and LAA, respectively, P < 0.001); nerve bundles were located in fibrofatty tissue as well as in surrounding myocardium. P fibers predominated over S fibers within bundles (P-to-S ratio = 4.4, 7.2, and 5.8 in PV, PLA, and LAA, respectively). M2 distribution was also most pronounced in the PLA (17.8 ± 8.3, 14.3 ± 7.3, and 14.5 ± 8 M2-stained cells/cm2 in the PLA, PV, and LAA, respectively, P = 0.012). Left cervical vagal stimulation (VS) caused significant effective refractory period shortening in all regions, with easily inducible AF. Topical application of 1% tropicamide to the PLA significantly attenuated VS-induced effective refractory period shortening in the PLA, PV, and LAA and decreased AF inducibility by 92% (P < 0.001). We conclude that 1) P fibers and M2 receptors are preferentially located in the PLA, suggesting an important role for this region in creation of vagal AF substrate and 2) targeted P blockade in the PLA is feasible and results in attenuation of vagal responses in the entire left atrium and, consequently, a change in AF substrate.

nervous system; autonomic; immunohistochemistry


ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF) occurs in a wide spectrum of patients, ranging from no anatomic structural heart disease to all varieties of heart disease with associated atrial pathology. It is therefore no surprise that the pathophysiology of AF is diverse.

Importantly, the role of the autonomic nervous system in the pathogenesis of AF has been demonstrated in multiple settings. Hou et al. (10) suggested the presence of an intricate, interconnecting neural network in the left atrium (LA) that may contribute to substrate for focal AF. A recent human study described heterogeneity of nerve distribution in the region of the pulmonary veins (PVs) and surrounding LA (3). Inasmuch as parasympathetic and sympathetic activation may have prominent effects on atrial conduction velocity and refractoriness, regional heterogeneities in nerve distribution could be responsible for the heterogeneities in conduction velocity and refractoriness that are necessary for the initiation and perpetuation of AF. Thus the distribution of autonomic nerves throughout the atrium could represent a substrate for AF, particularly in settings where there are no anatomic abnormalities.

In a recent study in normal canine hearts, we demonstrated that vagal responsiveness is more pronounced in the posterior LA (PLA) and PVs than in the rest of the LA (2). Clinical data suggest that focal "triggers" and "drivers" in the PV (even in structurally normal hearts) appear to be at least partially modified or regulated by the parasympathetic nervous system (11). In light of these prior studies, we hypothesized that the density of parasympathetic nerves and related muscarinic receptors is greater in the PLA than in the rest of the LA, with the parasympathetic innervation of the PLA playing an important role in the creation of AF substrate in structurally normal hearts. We also postulated that selective cholinergic blockade in this region can be attained by pharmacological methods, with a resulting decrease in vagal-induced AF. In this canine study, we have therefore compared the distribution and physiology of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves among the PVs, PLA, and LA appendage (LAA). We have also attempted targeted parasympathetic blockade in the PLA with a muscarinic receptor blocker and have studied in detail the resulting electrophysiological response of the LA.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The investigation conforms with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996). Approval for use of purpose-bred dogs (hounds) was obtained from the institutional Animal Use Committee.

Immunostaining

PVs were harvested from normal, healthy dogs. PVs were taken as the region extending from the antrum to the junction of the LA myocardium-PV smooth muscle. The adjoining PLA (defined as the confluence of the PVs) and the anterior LA (LAA) were also harvested. Regions containing fat were always incorporated in the tissue sections taken from the PLA. Control specimens were taken from the cervical vagus nerve and stellate ganglia. The tissue was frozen in liquid nitrogen. Serial circumferential cross sections were cut (proximal-to-distal) from the PVs (Fig. 1). Sections from the PLA and anterior LA were cut parallel to the plane of the mitral annulus to include the epicardial and endocardial aspect of the myocardium in each slice (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Sectioning planes for pulmonary vein (PV) and surrounding left atrium (LA) of an explanted dog heart. Schematics at right show respective planes in which PV and LA were sectioned. Circumferential sections were taken from PV, from proximal (i.e., close to the PV-LA junction) to distal. Anterior and posterior LA was sectioned parallel to the mitral annulus, so as to include epicardial and endocardial aspects of the myocardium in each slice.

 
Sections were air-dried and fixed in acetone for 10 min and then washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS). Hydrogen peroxidase block (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) was placed on the sections for 10 min, and the slides were washed in TBS. Protein block was placed on the sections for 30 min. Primary antibodies were then incubated overnight at 4°C. Antibodies for dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) were used to stain sympathetic nerves, whereas antibodies for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT; Chemicon) were used to stain parasympathetic nerves. The specificity of DBH for sympathetic nerve fibers was confirmed by the use of a sympathetic nerve marker, i.e., tyrosine hydroxylase (TH; Chemicon), which stained the same nerve elements that were stained by DBH (Fig. 2, A and B). Similarly, the specificity of parasympathetic staining was confirmed using a second parasympathetic nerve marker, i.e., acetylcholinesterase (AChE; Chemicon), which stained the same nerve elements that were stained by ChAT (data not shown). Some sections were double-stained for ChAT and DBH. After incubation, the slides were washed in TBS, and the appropriate secondary antibody (Chemicon) was placed on the sections for 30 min. The sections were again washed in TBS, and the appropriate chromagen was added to each specimen. Sympathetic nerves were stained blue with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (BCIP), and parasympathetic nerves were stained brown with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Cell nuclei were marked by placement of the specimens in methyl green (Dako) for 10 min. The specimens were then dehydrated in alcohol, mounted, and examined under light microscopy. Similar techniques have previously been used to successfully characterize the autonomic innervation of other tissues (13, 26).


Figure 2
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Nerve bundles and nerve fibers in a PV. A and B: staining of the same sympathetic elements by tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH), respectively. Nerve bundles contain parasympathetic (brown), as well as sympathetic (blue), fibers. C: discrete nerve bundles (arrows; brown stain) in fibrofatty tissue on the epicardial aspect of a PV. D: nerve bundles (arrows) in fibrofatty tissue (fat pad) overlying the posterior LA (PLA) as well as in underlying myocardium. E: 2 nerve bundles (1 shown by arrow) on the epicardial aspect of a PV, as well as a nerve fiber (arrow). Bundles and nerve are predominantly parasympathetic, as indicated by brown stain. F: perivascular distribution of nerve bundles and fibers in the vicinity of the blood vessel (V) in the center of the field.

 
Cardiac ganglia were defined as nerve bundles containing one or more neuronal cell bodies (26). The presence of neuronal cell bodies within nerve bundles was confirmed by staining these bundles for hematoxylin; all neuronal cell bodies stained positive for hematoxylin (data not shown), thereby excluding the presence of fat cells within these bundles.

Specimens taken from the cervical vagus nerve served as a positive control for parasympathetic nerve fibers but a negative control for sympathetic nerves. Specimens from the stellate ganglia served as a positive control for sympathetic fibers but a negative control for parasympathetic nerve fibers (control data not shown).

Separate slides were immunostained for muscarinic (M2) receptors (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). The staining technique was as described above for AChE and DBH. M2 receptors were stained brown with DAB.

Electrophysiological Studies

Electrophysiological studies were performed in seven additional animals to discover the physiological significance of the results obtained from the immunohistochemical studies. Immunostaining was not performed on animals undergoing electrophysiological testing, inasmuch as sufficient immunohistochemical data had been obtained from six dogs. In addition, two additional animals were used to assess any systemic absorption of tropicamide (see below).

In vivo experiments were performed under general anesthesia (2.5% inhaled isoflurane after preanesthesia with intravenous propofol at 4.5 mg/kg). The left cervical vagus was isolated in the neck. The chest was opened via a median thoracotomy. Epicardial, bipolar mapping was performed in the LA and PVs. All data was acquired by a 128-channel mapping system (Prucka Cardiolab, GE) at a sampling rate of 977 Hz. Multielectrode plaques were sutured on the PVs (2 x 2 electrodes), PLA (7 x 3 electrodes), and LAA (7 x 3 electrodes). Bipolar pacing was performed from multiple sites on the PLA and LAA plaques and from one site on each PV plaque. Effective refractory periods (ERPs) were obtained at each site where bipolar pacing was performed. ERPs were obtained at 11 ± 4 sites for each stage/intervention (see interventions below). ERPs were measured with a drive train of eight stimuli (S1 = 400 ms) at twice diastolic threshold followed by a single premature stimulus (S2) coupled with decrements of 10 ms until local ERP was reached. ERPs were obtained at baseline and in response to left cervical vagal stimulation (VS), which was performed at 20 Hz (15–20 V, 2–8 ms; Grass S44G, Astromed); a positive response consisted of 1) ≥25% sinus node slowing or 2) >25% PR prolongation or 2:1 atrioventricular block. Then 1% tropicamide (a cholinergic blocker) was applied topically to the epicardial aspect of the PLA. After 15 min of equilibration, ERPs were remeasured in the presence and absence of VS. The same number of extrastimuli was given at each site for each intervention (i.e., baseline, VS, tropicamide, and tropicamide + VS). AF induced during ERP testing was analyzed as described in Data Analysis.

To exclude the possibility of tropicamide diffusion from the PLA to the rest of the LA and PVs, a dye-diffusion study was performed in one animal. Food coloring dye was mixed in normal saline and applied to the PLA in this dog. The color remained confined to the PLA, even after several hours.

For assessment of systemic absorption of tropicamide, the sinus rate was assessed in nine animals before and 5 and 30 min after tropicamide application. Vagal-induced sinus slowing was also measured at these time points. As a surrogate of systemic absorption of tropicamide, in two animals, we also examined the pupillary diameter before and 5 and 30 min after tropicamide application to the heart.

Data Analysis

Nerve count estimation. Nerve bundles, as well as individual nerve fibrils, were manually counted at x10 magnification for the entire section. Nerve bundles or trunks were defined as large collections of individual nerve fibers/fibrils with ≥0.025 cm diameter. Nerve fibrils were defined as thin nerve fibers with <20 µm diameter (26). Nerve bundle density was calculated as the number of nerve bundles per square centimeter. Since individual nerve fibrils were too numerous to be counted for the entire section, parasympathetic, as well as sympathetic, nerve fibrils were counted in five, evenly spaced grid (10 x 10 mm) fields within each section; the average of these five fields was taken as a measure of the nerve fibril density (per cm2) for the section. Quantification was separately performed for the epicardial vs. endocardial half of the section.

In addition, the number of cholinergic and adrenergic fibers was counted manually within several, randomly selected nerve bundles that demonstrated colocalization of parasympathetic and sympathetic fibers; at least five bundles were selected from each region. To account for variation in nerve/nerve bundle size, the ratio of cholinergic to adrenergic nerve fibers (averaged for the randomly selected bundles from each region) was taken as an estimate of the relative distribution of cholinergic vs. adrenergic nerve fibers in each region.

M2 receptors. To quantify M2 receptor distribution, the number of tissue elements (myocytes, nerves, and blood vessels) stained for M2 receptors at x40 magnification was manually counted. The number of positively stained elements in each section was averaged for five grid fields (each at x40 magnification).

Electrophysiological studies. For each location, the average ERP for all sites was determined. In each region, ERP changes in response to VS were compared with baseline ERP. Similarly, ERP changes in response to VS were compared within each region in the presence and absence of tropicamide. ERP changes with VS (with and without tropicamide) were also compared between the different regions, i.e., PV, PLA, and LAA.

As with ERP, AF inducibility was measured before and after VS (in the absence, as well as the presence, of tropicamide). AF inducibility was measured as the number and duration of AF episodes after a single extrastimulus. The inducibility index was defined as the number of AF episodes lasting >5 s induced by a single atrial extrastimulus divided by the total number of single atrial extrastimuli delivered to measure each ERP (≥3 for each site). The inducibility index was compared for each maneuver.

Statistical analysis. Continuous data are presented as means ± SD. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Paired comparisons were made by a t-test, multiple comparisons by ANOVA, and atrial inducibility index by {chi}2 test.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Tissue from six normal, healthy dogs was studied. Sections from PVs (n = 22), adjoining PLA (n = 6), and LAA (n = 6) were stained with AChE and DBH. Separate sections from the PV (n = 5), PLA (n = 5), and LAA (n = 5) were stained for M2 receptors.

Large nerve bundles (trunks, ≥0.025 cm diameter) and thin nerve fibrils (<20 µm diameter) were seen in the PV and atrial myocardium (Fig. 2). Although nerve bundles were located predominantly in fibrofatty tissue overlying the epicardium (Fig. 2, see GoFig. 4), 36% of all nerve bundles were located away from surface fibrofatty tissue in underlying and surrounding myocardium (P = 0.001; Fig. 2D). On the other hand, thin nerve fibrils were located almost entirely in the myocardium, extending between and parallel to myocardial fibers (Fig. 2E). Nerve bundles, as well as thin nerve fibrils branching out from larger nerve bundles, were close to the vasculature in all the regions that were studied (Fig. 2F).


Figure 3
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Regional distribution of nerve bundles. A: relative predominance of nerve bundles in the PLA. Density of nerve bundles was significantly higher in the PLA than PV or LA appendage (LAA). B: epicardial vs. endocardial distribution of nerve bundles. Note epicardial predominance of nerve bundles in PV, PLA, and LAA.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Colocalization of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves within a single nerve bundle in the PV. A and C: single large nerve bundle stained only with hematoxylin. B and D: samples double-stained for sympathetic (blue) and parasympathetic (brown) nerve elements. In A and B, nerve bundle (arrows) is located in fibrofatty tissue on the epicardial aspect of the PV. C and D: higher magnification of A and B, respectively. Note sympathetic-parasympathetic colocalization. Bundle is predominantly parasympathetic nerve fibers (brown), with occasional sympathetic nerve fibers (blue; arrows). E: parasympathetic predominance within individual nerve bundles. In each region, within individual nerve bundles that demonstrate sympathetic and parasympathetic colocalization, proportion of parasympathetic fibers is much greater than number of sympathetic fibers. Error bars, SE.

 
Nerve Bundles

Significant differences in nerve bundle density were noted among the PV, PLA, and LAA, with the PLA having the greatest density of nerve bundles (PLA >> PV >> LAA, P < 0.001; Fig. 3A). Nerve bundles were predominantly localized to the epicardial half of the PVs, PLA, and LAA (Fig. 3B). The total number of nerve bundles was significantly greater in the superior than inferior veins (0.96 ± 0.9/cm2 vs. 0.80 ± 0.8/cm2, P = 0.04). The density of nerve bundles tended to be higher in the proximal than distal segments of the PVs (Table 1). The bundles tended to be larger in the PLA than the other regions (0.12 ± 0.15, 0.05 ± 0.06, and 0.025 ± 0.01 cm2 in PLA, PV, and LAA, respectively, P = 0.058).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Nerve bundle and fiber distribution in PVs

 
Sympathetic vs. Parasympathetic Nerve Distribution Within Nerve Bundles

Sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibers were colocalized within a large majority of nerve bundles in each region [67, 87, and 67% of bundles demonstrating colocalization in PV, PLA, and LAA, respectively, P = not significant (NS)]. The remainder of the nerve bundles was composed purely of parasympathetic fibers. No nerve bundles composed of sympathetic fibers alone were noted in any of the three regions. Figure 4, A–D, shows colocalization of sympathetic and parasympathetic fibers within an individual nerve bundle in the PV.

The proportion of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves within the colocalized bundles did not significantly differ among regions, with a predominance of parasympathetic elements being noted in all the regions [parasympathetic (P) > sympathetic (S) in PV, PLA, and LAA (P < 0.005 for each region) and P-to-S ratio = 4.4, 7.2, and 5.8 in PV, PLA, and LAA, respectively (P = NS); Fig. 4E]. Figures 2 and 4 demonstrate other examples of parasympathetic fiber predominance in individual nerve bundles.

Thin Nerve Fibrils

As opposed to nerve bundles, parasympathetic and sympathetic nerve fibrils appeared to be equally distributed between the epi- and endocardium of the PLA and LAA (Table 2). This homogeneity was not observed within the PV, where the sympathetic nerve fibrils were more concentrated on the endocardium (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Relative distribution of sympathetic and parasympathetic fibers in PV, PLA, and LAA

 
Parasympathetic fibrils were most abundant in the PLA, followed by the LAA and PV (PLA > LAA > PV, P = 0.013; Fig. 5). In contrast, sympathetic nerve fibril density was greatest in the LAA, followed by the PV and PLA (LAA > PV {cong} PLA, P < 0.001; Fig. 5). The density of parasympathetic fibrils was significantly greater than the density of sympathetic fibrils in the PLA (P > S, P = 0.034; Fig. 5). No significant difference was noted between the density of parasympathetic and sympathetic fibrils in the LAA and PV (Fig. 5, Table 2).


Figure 5
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Relative distribution of parasympathetic and sympathetic fibrils in PV, PLA, and LAA. Parasympathetic fibril density was greatest in the PLA, whereas sympathetic fibril density was greatest in the LAA. Parasympathetic fibrils significantly outnumbered sympathetic fibrils in the PLA. Error bars, SE.

 
The density of sympathetic, as well as parasympathetic, fibers tended to be greater in the proximal than distal segments of the PVs (Table 1). There were no significant differences among the PVs with respect to the density of sympathetic or parasympathetic nerve fibrils (Table 1).

Cardiac Ganglia

Cardiac ganglia containing parasympathetic neuronal cell bodies (Fig. 6) were found in the PLA and PV, but not the LAA (PV {cong} PLA > LAA, P = 0.04; Fig. 6C). Ganglia consisting of neuronal cell bodies were juxtaposed with bundles of parasympathetic nerve fibers that appeared to arise from the neuronal cell bodies (Fig. 6A).


Figure 6
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Presence of neuronal cell bodies inside cardiac ganglia. A: cardiac ganglion in the PLA double-stained for sympathetic (blue) and parasympathetic (brown) nerve elements. Magnification x10. Note browned-stained, vacuolated neuronal cell bodies (ganglion cells) in the interior of the bundle. Parasympathetic fibers arise from a ganglion cell at top right (arrow). B: colocalization of ganglion cells and sympathetic fibers in a nerve bundle in the PLA. Magnification x40. C: relative distribution of cardiac ganglia (containing parasympathetic neuronal cell bodies) in PV, PLA, and LAA. Cardiac ganglia were observed in the PV and PLA, but not LAA. Error bars, SE.

 
Even though the majority (86%) of cardiac ganglia containing parasympathetic neuronal cell bodies also contained sympathetic nerve fibers, the proportion of neuronal cell bodies was significantly greater than the proportion of sympathetic fibers (P-to-S ratio = 1.65, P = 0.004).

M2 Receptor Distribution

Since cholinergic nerve fibers exert their downstream effects principally via M2 receptors, M2 receptor distribution in the LA was assessed. M2 receptors were localized in and around the following structures: 1) nerve bundles and fibers, 2) perivascularly, and 3) in individual cardiomyocytes. Figure 7, A and B, shows M2 receptors tracking along the distribution of autonomic nerve bundles and fibers in the PLA, as well as perivascular distribution of M2 receptors. Figure 7, C and D, shows M2 receptor localization at the level of single cardiomyocytes in the PLA and LAA, respectively; the number of M2 receptor-stained cells is clearly greater in the PLA than LAA. M2 receptor density was greatest in the PLA (17.8 ± 8.3, 14.3 ± 7.3, and 14.5 ± 8 M2 receptor-stained elements/cm2 in PLA, PV, and LAA, respectively, P = 0.012; Fig. 7E).


Figure 7
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 7. Muscarinic (M2) receptor distribution in the PLA, PV, and LAA. A–D: immunostaining for M2 receptors (brown). A: M2 receptor localization along autonomic nerve bundles and perivascularly (arrows). Magnification x10. B: individual nerve bundle in the PLA stained for M2 receptor (arrow). Magnification x40. C and D: M2 receptor localization within single cardiomyocytes in the PLA and LAA, respectively (arrows). Magnification x40. Number of M2 receptor-stained cells is clearly greater in the PLA than LAA. E: predominance of M2 receptors in the PLA. Error bars, SE.

 
Effect of Selective Cholinergic Blockade in the PLA on LA Electrophysiology and AF Inducibility

VS led to ERP shortening in the PV, PLA, and LAA, with more pronounced ERP shortening in the PV and PLA than in the LAA (overall shortening 16%, P = 0.009; Fig. 8A). Then 1% tropicamide was applied to the PLA.


Figure 8
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 8. Effect of tropicamide (Trop) on vagal-induced effective refractory period (ERP) shortening and atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility. A: left cervical vagal stimulation (VS) significantly shortened ERP in PV, PLA, and LAA. Topical application of tropicamide to the PLA attenuated vagal-induced ERP shortening in all regions. B: inducibility of AF before and after topical cholinergic blockade in the PLA. Cervical VS significantly increased AF inducibility. VS + tropicamide did not significantly increase AF inducibility in PLA. Error bars, SE.

 
The sinus rate did not change significantly from before to 5 and 30 min after tropicamide application (sinus cycle length = 618 ± 56, 608 ± 67, and 606 ± 77 ms, respectively, P = NS). The sinus cycle length increased significantly during VS compared with baseline, from 611 ± 64 ms at baseline to 682 ± 91 ms with VS (P = 0.02). The sinus cycle length during VS did not change significantly from before to 5 and 30 min after tropicamide application (P = NS). No significant changes in papillary diameter were noted before and after tropicamide-induced constriction. Light-induced pupillary constriction (miosis) was the same before and after tropicamide application.

After tropicamide application, the VS-induced ERP shortening was attenuated not just in the PLA but also in the PV and LAA (3.9% overall shortening, P = NS; Fig. 8A).

At baseline, AF was rarely induced using single atrial extrastimuli (inducibility index = 0.018). However, AF was more easily inducible in the presence of VS; 22 episodes of >5-s duration were induced in the presence of VS with single atrial extrastimuli (inducibility index = 0.12, i.e., 6.6 times the baseline ratio, P < 0.01; Fig. 8B). After tropicamide application, AF inducibility was significantly decreased in the presence of VS. Only one episode lasting >5 s could be induced; the inducibility index was 0.02, which represents a 92% reduction in AF inducibility (tropicamide + VS vs. VS alone, P < 0.001; Fig. 8B).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
The major findings of this study are as follows: 1) parasympathetic nerve trunks and fibers in the LA are preferentially located in the PLA, with nerve trunks being located in the fat pads as well as in surrounding myocardium, 2) M2 receptor density is also significantly more pronounced in the PLA than in the rest of the LA, and 3) since the majority of parasympathetic fibers and M2 receptors in the LA are located in the PLA, selective parasympathetic blockade in the PLA significantly alters vagal responsiveness in the entire LA, with a near-complete elimination of vagal-induced AF. These results indicate a potentially important role for the parasympathetic innervation of the PLA in the creation of substrate for AF (at least in structurally normal hearts). Furthermore, our results suggest that a targeted disruption of parasympathetic elements in the PLA may help successfully modify this substrate.

This study is unique for its therapeutic implications. Since the PLA contains a larger number of parasympathetic fibers and M2 receptors than the rest of the LA, our results indicate that a topical strategy targeted to the PLA can be successfully employed to achieve functional parasympathetic blockade in the entire LA.

Role of Parasympathetic Innervation of the PLA in the Genesis of AF

The role of the autonomic nervous system in the genesis of atrial arrhythmias has been extensively studied (12, 17). VS and/or administration of ACh have also been shown to decrease refractoriness in the LA and enhance inducibility of AF (15).

Recent clinical studies have shown that several cases of AF can be caused by a rapidly firing focus in the atrium (57, 11, 24). Clinical and animal data suggest that these PV triggers and drivers appear to be at least partially modulated by the autonomic nervous system (11, 24), with different studies implicating the sympathetic or parasympathetic nervous system in the genesis and/or maintenance of focal AF. More recent studies postulate a dominant role for the parasympathetic nervous system (in focal AF) (25), in large part on account of the Bezold-Jarisch-like reflexes noted during radio-frequency ablation of the PV tissues in patients with paroxysmal focal AF. Pappone et al. (19) suggested that altering vagal input to the LA and PVs may improve efficacy of ablation procedures for AF.

Despite these initial studies, the complete autonomic profile of the PVs and the precise role of the autonomic nervous system in the genesis of focal AF are just beginning to be systematically investigated in clinical and animal models. Recent data from our laboratory suggest a differential electrophysiological response of the PVs/PLA from that in the rest of the LA in response to autonomic maneuvers (2). In our physiological study (2), we demonstrated a greater decrease in refractory periods in the PVs and PLA than in the rest of the LA in response to VS. The heterogeneity of vagal responses in the LA in this study correlated with differences in the pattern of distribution of ACh-activated K+ current in the PV, PLA, and LAA. The structure and distribution of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves within the PV and PLA, as well as their contribution to the electrophysiological profile of these regions, were not examined in our earlier study.

In a recent clinical study, Tan et al. (26) demonstrated colocalization of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibers in nerve trunks in the LA. Although Tan et al. showed a relative predominance of sympathetic (compared with parasympathetic) fibers, electrophysiological studies were not performed to assess the physiological significance of this nerve distribution pattern. In addition, a relative comparison of nerve distribution was not performed between different regions of the LA; more specifically, the autonomic innervation of the PLA and PVs was not compared with the rest of the LA. The present study confirms the findings of Tan et al., in that colocalization of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerve elements was noted in the LA. In contrast, however, our study demonstrates a predominance of parasympathetic fibers in the LA, with the PLA having the highest nerve concentration within the LA. To our knowledge, systematic studies examining differences in parasympathetic vs. sympathetic innervation/tone have not been performed in other species, e.g., in animals such as horses, that are known to have frequent AF. Regardless of the difference in P-to-S ratio between the two studies (which may be accounted for by interspecies differences in neural innervation between humans and dogs or by the sparser sampling in the study by Tan et al.), the parasympathetic nervous system appears to be a major player in clinical, as well as canine, AF (19, 25).

Detailed, in vivo electrophysiological experiments were also performed as part of the present study. Topical cholinergic blockade in the PLA resulted in a significant change in vagal responsiveness in the LA, confirming the importance of the parasympathetic innervation of the PLA in the genesis of vagal-induced AF.

The diminution of vagal reflexes in the entire LA in response to topical cholinergic blockade in the PLA alone suggests that the majority of the parasympathetic fibers innervating the LA originate or at least pass through the PLA before innervating the rest of the LA. In fact, studies recently performed by Hou et al. (9, 10) indicate the presence of interconnections between ganglionated plexi (GP) in the atria. It therefore appears likely that the remote effects of tropicamide in the rest of the LA are due to the functional disruption of an intricate and interactive neural network in the LA. This hypothesis is further supported by the following observations from the present study: 1) cardiac ganglia containing neuronal cell bodies are present only in the PLA and PVs but were completely absent in the rest of the atrium, 2) the majority of nerve trunks in the LA are located in the PLA, and 3) nerve trunks in the PLA are larger than in the rest of the LA. The remote effects of tropicamide on vagal responsiveness in the PVs and LAA can therefore be best explained by a positive-feedback mechanism that involves muscarinic receptors on cholinergic neurons (18, 27), which are known to participate in negative- as well as positive-feedback mechanisms that modulate ACh release from neuronal cells (18, 27). We postulate that tropicamide, by inhibiting muscarinic receptors on ganglion cells and nerve trunks in the PLA, decreases ACh release more distally from neuronal synapses in the PVs and LAA.

Selective Parasympathetic Denervation of the PLA: A New Therapeutic Target for AF?

Elimination of vagal reflexes during ablation lesions has been shown in some studies to be correlated with improved PV ablation outcomes (19). However, other attempts at parasympathetic ablation for AF have been less successful (4, 8). Endocardial ablation strategies that target the parasympathetic nervous system of the LA are largely empirical, being guided by nonspecific electrophysiological responses such as sinus bradycardia and AV block (19, 23). More "anatomic" approaches that surgically target atrial fat pads have also met with somewhat mixed success (4, 28). An added disadvantage of an anatomic approach is that it inevitably causes transmural atrial tissue damage (16). In addition, the LA is innervated by several fat pads, all of which may not be responsible for the innervation of the PLA and PVs.

An ideal therapeutic strategy would be more precise in targeting the nerves involved in the genesis of AF without causing significant damage to surrounding tissue (14). Development of such a targeted approach to focal AF hinges on a better understanding of the complexities of neural innervation of the atria. Electrophysiological data reported by Hou et al. (10) suggest the presence of an intricate, interconnecting neural network in the LA that may contribute to substrate for focal AF. However, no attempt was made to correlate electrophysiological responses with the structure, function, and distribution of the underlying nerve fibers. A recent human study quantified autonomic nerve distribution in the PVs and surrounding LA and described heterogeneity of nerve distribution in this region (3), but the composition of these nerves, i.e., sympathetic vs. parasympathetic, was not reported.

In the present study, we have demonstrated that the PLA is the most richly innervated region of the LA, with parasympathetic fibers comprising a majority of the nerves supplying this area. Importantly, the present study shows that even though a majority of nerve bundles are located within the fat/fibrofatty tissue, up to one-third of nerve bundles in the PLA can be located away from the fat in adjoining/underlying myocardium. This finding suggests that ablation strategies directed at atrial fat pads would not be expected to result in complete denervation of the PLA. Since vagal nerve fibers and M2 receptors are preferentially localized in the PLA, we postulated that topical, pharmacological disruption of cholinergic function in the PLA would alter vagal responsiveness in the entire LA. Our experiments demonstrate that it is indeed feasible to attain selective cholinergic blockade in this region with a nonablative, pharmacological approach, with a resulting change in vagal-induced AF substrate.

It is important to realize that focal sources of AF been described elsewhere in the atria, e.g., in the superior vena cava and coronary sinus. In the present study, we chose to study/target the PLA, inasmuch as a large majority of ectopic foci have been found to be localized to the PVs and PLA. Although an approach targeted to the PLA would help attenuate/eliminate focal AF sources in the LA, it would not be expected to affect other, more distant focal sources in the heart.

Study Limitations

This was a canine study, the results of which cannot be directly extrapolated to the human LA. Moreover, the present study was conducted in normal dogs, and the extent to which autonomic remodeling occurs in the setting of AF is not known. Further studies are therefore needed to assess neural innervation in more "pathological" settings.

The nerve distribution in the LA and PVs is complex, as shown by previous anatomic studies (1, 3). The present study does not provide detailed functional-anatomical information of the distribution of bundles and ganglia into specifically localized plexuses. Armour et al. (1) demonstrated the presence of at least five major atrial fad pads, most of which were located on the posterior surface of the atria. Of these five fat pads, two were located on 1) the posterior medial surface of the LA and 2) the inferior and lateral aspect of the PLA, respectively. In addition, in the study of Armour et al., the posteromedial GP had one of the largest numbers of gangia among the atrial GPs. Although we did not perform a gross anatomic dissection in the present study, the site of tropicamide application (at the confluence of PVs) corresponds to the location of these two fat pads. We did see fat in the PLA, likely corresponding to at least one of the above-mentioned fat pads, even though formal confirmation was not obtained using gross anatomic dissection of these collections of fibrofatty tissue. The absence of a formal correlative study comparing the previously defined GP locations with our immunohistochemical/functional data is a limitation of the present study. However, our primary objective was to assess the underlying functional composition of the autonomic nervous system in each major region of the LA and to assess the significance of the PLA as a therapeutic target for selective vagal denervation.

Although our study demonstrates a substantial reduction of AF inducibility by attenuation of the electrophysiological effects of vagal stimulation on refractory periods, other potential mechanisms of AF as spontaneously triggered activity in the PVs may not be covered with this therapeutic approach.

In the present study, we did not assess the relative importance of ganglion cells vs. nerve fiber bundles/trunks in the creation of vagal AF substrate. Although it would seem appropriate that the preferential target for ablation should be ganglion cells, we discovered that neuronal cell bodies and nerve fibers were colocalized in several nerve bundles (Figs. 4 and 6). We also discovered that although large collections of neuronal cell bodies (i.e., ganglia) are relatively sparsely located, the nerve fiber bundles that arise from these ganglion cells are frequently seen. Despite their greater number, nerve fiber bundles/trunks were always found to be in the vicinity of (or found to arise from/juxtaposed to) the neuronal cell bodies. This suggests that large nerve bundles/trunks may be a good surrogate for the presence of nerve cell bodies and, therefore, provide a suitable ablation target. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to assess the relative contribution of nerve cell bodies vs. nerve bundle/trunks to the autonomic physiology of the LA.

The contribution of the sympathetic innervation of the PLA and PVs to AF substrate was not examined in the present study. Even though vagal innervation may be the more important "player" in the genesis of focal AF (2022), the sympathetic nervous system may be playing an important "modulatory" role in the genesis of AF, helping provide a "catalyst" for the emergence of focal triggers/drivers in the presence of an increased vagal tone. In fact, even though the relative number of sympathetic fibers within nerve trunks/bundles was small and we did not find any bundles that were composed entirely of sympathetic fibers, parasympathetic and sympathetic fibrils were present in near-equal proportions in the PVs and LAA. It is therefore possible that several single sympathetic fibrils travel singly in the atria outside the bundles/nerve trunks. The detailed interactions between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems within the LA, especially as they relate to the genesis of AF, need to be addressed in more detail in future studies.


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant 5K08 HL-074192, the Department of Medicine, Northwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, and the Everett O'Connor Trust.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. H. Kadish, Div. of Cardiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, 251 East Huron, Feinberg 8-542, Chicago, IL 60611 (e-mail: a-kadish{at}northwestern.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

* R. Arora and J. S. Ulphani contributed equally to this work. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Armour JA, Murphy DA, Yuan BX, Macdonald S, Hopkins DA. Gross and microscopic anatomy of the human intrinsic cardiac nervous system. Anat Rec 247: 289–298, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Arora R, Ng J, Ulphani J, Mylonas I, Subacius H, Shade G, Gordon D, Morris A, He X, Lu Y, Belin R, Goldberger JJ, Kadish AH. Unique autonomic profile of the pulmonary veins and posterior left atrium. J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 1340–1348, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Chevalier P, Tabib A, Meyronnet D, Chalabreysse L, Restier L, Ludman V, Alies A, Adeleine P, Thivolet F, Burri H, Loire R, Francois L, Fanton L. Quantitative study of nerves of the human left atrium. Heart Rhythm 2: 518–522, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Cummings JE, Gill I, Akhrass R, Dery M, Biblo LA, Quan KJ. Preservation of the anterior fat pad paradoxically decreases the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 994–1000, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Haissaguerre M, Hocini M, Sanders P, Takahashi Y, Rotter M, Sacher F, Rostock T, Hsu LF, Jonsson A, O'Neill MD, Bordachar P, Reuter S, Roudaut R, Clementy J, Jais P. Localized sources maintaining atrial fibrillation organized by prior ablation. Circulation 113: 616–625, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Metayer P, Clementy J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 339: 659–666, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Haissaguerre M, Sanders P, Hocini M, Jais P, Clementy J. Pulmonary veins in the substrate for atrial fibrillation: the "venous wave" hypothesis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 2290–2292, 2004.[Free Full Text]
  8. Hirose M, Leatmanoratn Z, Laurita KR, Carlson MD. Partial vagal denervation increases vulnerability to vagally induced atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 13: 1272–1279, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  9. Hou Y, Scherlag BJ, Lin J, Zhang Y, Lu Z, Truong K, Patterson E, Lazzara R, Jackman WM, Po SS. Ganglionated plexi modulate extrinsic cardiac autonomic nerve input: effects on sinus rate, atrioventricular conduction, refractoriness, and inducibility of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 61–68, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Hou Y, Scherlag BJ, Lin J, Zhou J, Song J, Zhang Y, Patterson E, Lazzara R, Jackman WM, Po SS. Interactive atrial neural network: determining the connections between ganglionated plexi. Heart Rhythm 4: 56–63, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Hsieh MH, Chiou CW, Wen ZC, Wu CH, Tai CT, Tsai CF, Ding YA, Chang MS, Chen SA. Alterations of heart rate variability after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation originating from pulmonary veins. Circulation 100: 2237–2243, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jayachandran JV, Sih HJ, Winkle W, Zipes DP, Hutchins GD, Olgin JE. Atrial fibrillation produced by prolonged rapid atrial pacing is associated with heterogeneous changes in atrial sympathetic innervation. Circulation 101: 1185–1191, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kim DT, Lai AC, Hwang C, Fan LT, Karagueuzian HS, Chen PS, Fishbein MC. The ligament of Marshall: a structural analysis in human hearts with implications for atrial arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 36: 1324–1327, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kuo JY, Chen SA. Is vagal denervation a good alternative or just adjunctive to pulmonary vein isolation in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation? J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 1349–1351, 2007.[Free Full Text]
  15. Mandapati R, Skanes A, Chen J, Berenfeld O, Jalife J. Stable microreentrant sources as a mechanism of atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. Circulation 101: 194–199, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Oh S, Zhang Y, Bibevski S, Marrouche NF, Natale A, Mazgalev TN. Vagal denervation and atrial fibrillation inducibility: epicardial fat pad ablation does not have long-term effects. Heart Rhythm 3: 701–708, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  17. Olgin JE, Sih HJ, Hanish S, Jayachandran JV, Wu J, Zheng QH, Winkle W, Mulholland GK, Zipes DP, Hutchins G. Heterogeneous atrial denervation creates substrate for sustained atrial fibrillation. Circulation 98: 2608–2614, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Oliveira L, Timoteo MA, Correia-de-Sa P. Modulation by adenosine of both muscarinic M1-facilitation and M2-inhibition of [3H]acetylcholine release from the rat motor nerve terminals. Eur J Neurosci 15: 1728–1736, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  19. Pappone C, Santinelli V, Manguso F, Vicedomini G, Gugliotta F, Augello G, Mazzone P, Tortoriello V, Landoni G, Zangrillo A, Lang C, Tomita T, Mesas C, Mastella E, Alfieri O. Pulmonary vein denervation enhances long-term benefit after circumferential ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 109: 327–334, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Patterson E, Po SS, Scherlag BJ, Lazzara R. Triggered firing in pulmonary veins initiated by in vitro autonomic nerve stimulation. Heart Rhythm 2: 624–631, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  21. Patterson E, Yu X, Huang S, Garrett M, Kem DC. Suppression of autonomic-mediated triggered firing in pulmonary vein preparations, 24 hours postcoronary artery ligation in dogs. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 17: 763–770, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  22. Po SS, Scherlag BJ, Yamanashi WS, Edwards J, Zhou J, Wu R, Geng N, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Experimental model for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation arising at the pulmonary vein-atrial junctions. Heart Rhythm 3: 201–208, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  23. Scanavacca M, Pisani CF, Hachul D, Lara S, Hardy C, Darrieux F, Trombetta I, Negrao CE, Sosa E. Selective atrial vagal denervation guided by evoked vagal reflex to treat patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 114: 876–885, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Schauerte P, Scherlag BJ, Patterson E, Scherlag MA, Matsudaria K, Nakagawa H, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Focal atrial fibrillation: experimental evidence for a pathophysiologic role of the autonomic nervous system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 12: 592–599, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  25. Sharifov OF, Fedorov VV, Beloshapko GG, Glukhov AV, Yushmanova AV, Rosenshtraukh LV. Roles of adrenergic and cholinergic stimulation in spontaneous atrial fibrillation in dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 483–490, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tan AY, Li H, Wachsmann-Hogiu S, Chen LS, Chen PS, Fishbein MC. Autonomic innervation and segmental muscular disconnections at the human pulmonary vein-atrial junction: implications for catheter ablation of atrial-pulmonary vein junction. J Am Coll Cardiol 48: 132–143, 2006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Wetzel GT, Brown JH. Presynaptic modulation of acetylcholine release from cardiac parasympathetic neurons. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 248: H33–H39, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. White CM, Sander S, Coleman CI, Gallagher R, Takata H, Humphrey C, Henyan N, Gillespie EL, Kluger J. Impact of epicardial anterior fat pad retention on postcardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation incidence: the AFIST-III Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 298–303, 2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
G. L. Aistrup, R. Villuendas, J. Ng, A. Gilchrist, T. W. Lynch, D. Gordon, I. Cokic, S. Mottl, R. Zhou, D. A. Dean, et al.
Targeted G-protein inhibition as a novel approach to decrease vagal atrial fibrillation by selective parasympathetic attenuation
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2009; 83(3): 481 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Stollberger, E. Gatterer, and J. Finsterer
Central and peripheral vagal nerve involvement in atrial fibrillation
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2009; 30(8): 1012 - 1012.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. Liang, Q. Pan, Y. Liu, H. Chen, J. Li, R. Brugada, P. Brugada, K. Hong, G. J. Perez, C. Zhao, et al.
High sensitivity of the sheep pulmonary vein antrum to acetylcholine stimulation
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2008; 105(1): 293 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/1/H134    most recent
00732.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arora, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arora, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, A. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.