|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Università "Tor Vergata," Roma, 2Medicina d'Urgenza Policlinico Tor Vergata, Roma, 3S. Raffaele Hospital, Velletri, 4Stazione per la Tecnologia Animale, Università "Tor Vergata," Roma, and 5Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Università La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
Submitted 5 April 2008 ; accepted in final form 5 November 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(n = 7)- and β (n = 8)-adrenergic blockade, and 4) parasympathetic blockade (n = 10). Nonbaroreflex sequences were defined as three or more beats in which SAP and PI of the following beat changed in the opposite direction. Complete autonomic blockade reduced the number of nonbaroreflex sequences (95.6 ± 9.0 vs. 45.2 ± 4.1, P < 0.001), as did sympathetic blockade (80.9 ± 12.6 vs. 30.9 ± 6.1, P < 0.001). The selective
-receptor blockade did not induce significant changes (80.9 ± 12.5 in baseline vs. 79.0 ± 14.7 after prazosin), whereas β-receptor blockade significantly reduced nonbaroreflex sequence occurrence (80.9 ± 12.5 in baseline vs. 48.9 ± 15.3 after propranolol). Parasympathetic blockade produced a significant increase of nonbaroreflex sequences (95.1 ± 6.9 vs. 136.0 ± 12.4, P < 0.01). These results demonstrate the physiological role of the nonbaroreflex sequences as an expression of a feedforward type of short-term cardiovascular regulation able to interact dynamically with the feedback mechanisms of baroreflex origin in the neural control of the sinus node.
feedforward mechanisms; negative feedback mechanisms; baroreceptors; nervous system autonomic; nervous system sympathetic
In contrast, sequences of consecutive beats in which SAP and RR interval (or PI) of the following beat change in the opposite direction [i.e., hypertensive/tachycardic (SAP+/RR–), and hypotensive/bradycardic (SAP–/RR+) sequences] have been reported. These sequences have been defined "nonbaroreflex," and their physiological meaning is not clear.
Based on the consideration that reflex cardiovascular mechanisms characterized by changes in the same direction of AP and heart rate (HR) (hypertension/tachycardia and hypotension/bradycardia) could contribute to the neural regulation of the cardiovascular system (9, 12, 15), our group performed an experimental study on anesthetized rabbits testing the hypothesis that nonbaroreflex sequences represent an expression of the cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms modulated by the autonomic nervous system and operating with feedforward characteristics (7). A complete autonomic blockade drastically and significantly reduced the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences, thus indicating that they were primarily mediated by the autonomic nervous system. In addition, the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences was significantly reduced in response to both sympathetic and parasympathetic blockades (7). Even though we concluded that nonbaroreflex sequences might be the expression of neural mechanisms regulating heart beats and operating with positive feedback characteristics, our results did not allow us to completely and definitively clarify the physiological modulation exerted by the autonomic nervous system on the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences.
The sympathetic contribution to the occurrence of the nonbaroreflex sequences was in line with the pivotal study of Pagani et al. (15) who showed the existence of positive feedback sympathetic cardiovascular reflexes causing hypertension and tachycardia, elicitable by mechanically stretching the thoracic aorta and reduced or abolished after pharmacological sympathetic blockade (15). Moreover, the existence of cardiac sympathetic reflexes characterized by changes of AP and HR in the same direction has been largely reported in anesthetized animals (9–11, 16). However, nonbaroreflex sequences appeared to be also under the control of the parasympathetic system, as shown by their significant reduction in response to atropine in anesthetized animals (7).
Even though the complex nature of neural cardiovascular regulation could in part explain these results, we also considered the possibility that the anesthetic agents could have abolished some neural traffic, thus interfering with the physiological modulation of the neural mechanisms of cardiovascular regulation. More importantly, the possible selective modulation of nonbaroreflex sequences exerted by an
- and β-adrenergic component of the sympathetic nervous system has not been studied.
Consequently, our aim was to study nonbaroreflex sequences in a more physiological setting. In the present study, we evaluated the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences in conscious, freely moving rats before and after autonomic blockades, and in particular after selective sympathetic blockades, to test their possible role as an expression of neurogenic cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms controlling the sinus node and operating with feedforward characteristics.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgical procedures. After having induced the anesthesia by ketamine (Ketavet 50, 60 mg/kg ip) and medetomidine (Domitor, 0.3 mg/kg ip), a telemetry transmitter (TA11PA-C40, Data Sciences, St. Paul, MN) was implanted for recordings of AP signals according to manufacturer specifications. The tip of the arterial catheter was inserted into the abdominal aorta previously exposed by a midline incision via a hole made by a 21-gauge needle below the bifurcation of the renal arteries just proximal to the iliac bifurcation and secured in place with tissue glue (Vetbond, 3M). The transmitter body was attached to the abdominal wall along the incision line with sutures as the incision was closed. A jugular vein was cannulated by a polyethylene cannula that was tunneled subcutaneously and exteriorized at the dorsal cervical region for the infusions of the drugs. The catheter was filled with heparinized saline and capped with an airtight plug. After surgery, the rats were given antibiotics (ceftriaxone) and housed individually in cages for 5–7 days of recovery before any experimental protocol began.
Measurement of AP using radiotelemetry. The system used to record AP consists of three basic elements: 1) a transmitter for monitoring blood pressure (TA11PAC40), 2) a receiver (RPC-1), and 3) an adapter (R11CPA) with an ambient pressure monitor (APR-1) that produces analog output signals of pulsatile AP. The telemetered AP signal was digitized using an analog I/O PC card (National Instrument 6024E, Austin, TX) at a rate of 2,000 Hz, displayed on the computer screen, and processed by an algorithm based on feature extraction to detect and measure the characteristics of AP cycles developed in our laboratory, based on a LabView platform software. PI was measured from the pressure pulses and used to calculate HR.
Experimental protocol. We tested three experimental animal groups. Animals were allowed to familiarize themselves with the laboratory environment for 30 min before starting the recording. The three sets consisted of 1) sympathetic blockade, 2) complete autonomic blockade, and 3) parasympathetic blockade.
Sympathetic autonomic blockades.
Ten rats were studied in baseline conditions and after sympathetic autonomic pharmacological blockade (propranolol, 2 mg/kg iv; plus prazosin, 1 mg/kg iv). In seven rats, we also studied the effect of the selective blockade of
-receptors by recording AP in the baseline condition and after the pharmacological blockade (prazosin, 1 mg/kg iv), whereas eight rats were studied in baseline conditions and after selective blockade of β-receptors (propranolol, 2 mg/kg iv). The effectiveness of the autonomic blockades was tested by measuring the hypertensive responses to phenylephrine (5 µg/kg iv) and the tachycardic response to isoproterenol (4 µg/kg iv), and only the rats in which the responses were abolished by the blocking drugs were accepted for the study (Fig. 1).
|
Parasympathetic blockades. Ten of the twelve rats used for complete autonomic blockade experiments (2 rats were discarded for the presence of artifacts in the AP recording) were studied before and after parasympathetic pharmacological blockade (atropine sulfate, 1.5 mg/kg iv). The effectiveness of parasympathetic blockade was tested by measuring the reflex tachycardic responses to acetylcholine (1 to 2 µg/kg iv), and only the rats in which the responses were abolished by the blocking drugs were accepted for the study (Fig. 1).
In each experimental condition, we recorded AP for 10 min while the animal was freely moving in the cage. The effectiveness of the autonomic blockade along the whole recording period is demonstrated by the stable cardiovascular values over the entire 10-min recording period (Table 1, and Fig. 2).
|
|
|
The engagement time was also calculated as the fractional occurrence of the sequences independently on recording time, HR, and the number of heart beats that composed each sequence, as previously reported (8). Briefly, this index has been obtained by dividing the sum of the RR organized in sequences, according to the criteria reported above, by the total recording duration and multiplying it by 100.
The beat-by-beat time series of SAP and PI were also searched for sequences of three or more consecutive beats in which SAP and PI of the same (i.e., lag 0), of the following (i.e., lag 1), and of the second (i.e., lag 2) beat changed in the opposite direction.
Data analysis and statistics. AP data were stored and analyzed by a computerized online system for biological data elaboration developed in our laboratory based on a LabView platform software.
Within-group changes in the reported variables were evaluated by a paired t-test for normally distributed variables and by a Wilcoxon signed rank test for non-normally distributed variables. Between-group changes in the reported variables were evaluated by a one-way ANOVA test. All data are presented as means ± SE. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Complete autonomic blockade induced a significant decrease in AP and a significant increase in the RR interval (Table 3).
|
Similarly, also the occurrence of lags 0, 1, and 2 nonbaroreflex sequences was decreased by complete autonomic blockade (Fig. 6).
|
Again the mean slope did not show significant changes for nonbaroreflex sequences (4.7 ± 1.1 vs. 4.6 ± 1.2 ms/mmHg).
Similarly, also the occurrence of lags 0, 1, and 2 nonbaroreflex sequences was decreased by selective sympathetic blockade (Fig. 6).
Selective
-receptor blockade did not induce significant changes in the occurrence (80.9 ± 12.5 in baseline vs. 79.0 ± 14.7 after prazosin) and in the mean slope (4.7 ± 1.1 in baseline vs. 5.6 ± 1.0 ms/mmHg after prazosin) of nonbaroreflex sequences. On the contrary, β-receptors blockade induced a significant reduction in the occurrence (80.9 ± 12.5 in baseline vs. 48.9 ± 15.3 after propranolol) but not in the mean slope (4.7 ± 1.1 in baseline vs. 4.2 ± 1.0 ms/mmHg after propranolol) of nonbaroreflex sequences.
Following the parasympathetic blockade, the RR interval significantly decreased, whereas AP slightly increased (Table 3) and the occurrence of lag 5 nonbaroreflex sequences significantly increased (Fig. 5). The mean slope of the nonbaroreflex sequences significantly decreased (Fig. 7).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present experiments performed in unanesthetized, conscious, freely moving rats, the nonbaroreflex sequences showed a significant and substantial decrease in response to sympathetic and complete autonomic blockade, whereas atropine induced a significant increase in the occurrence of hypertensive/tachycardic and hypotensive/bradycardic sequences.
These results must be considered in the context of previous reports to evaluate the possible physiological meaning of nonbaroreflex sequences.
We have hypothesized in a previous study (7) that nonbaroreflex sequences could be the expression of feedforward neural mechanisms controlling heart beat because of their similarity with sympathetic reflexes originating from cardiac, pulmonary, and central vessels receptors and characterized by changes of AP and HR going in the same direction. Accordingly, our findings of a sympathetic contribution (7 and present data) to the occurrence of the nonbaroreflex sequences are consistent with those reported by Pagani et al. (15) who showed the existence of positive feedback sympathetic reflexes elicitable in conscious dogs by mechanically stretching the thoracic aorta.
The new finding of the present study, compared with previous reports (7), is the significant and substantial increase in the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences following parasympathetic blockades.
In particular, our data show that when only the sympathetic nervous system is operative, as occurring after an experimental pharmacological blockade of the parasympathetic nervous system, the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences greatly increased. This unopposed predominance strongly suggests that nonbaroreflex sequences are mainly under the control of the sympathetic nervous system as previously reported for the sympathetic pressor reflexes mediated by positive feedback mechanisms (15).
At variance with the present results, we have reported in anesthetized rabbits that in response to parasympathetic blockade, the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences showed a similar decrease as in response to sympathetic blockade. Consequently, we concluded that both the branches of the autonomic nervous system contributed to the modulation of feedforward neural mechanisms regulating heart beat (7). Species differences might explain the different results. However, both rabbits and rats are rodents, thus sharing, for example, the autonomic pattern regulating the cardiovascular system.
Alternatively, it is possible that anesthetic agents, used in the previous experimental setting (7), abolished, at least in part, the vagal traffic, such that by the time atropine was injected, there was not much efferent vagal activity to oppose. The possible effect of anesthetic agents is also supported by the observation that in conscious rats, a greater number of cardiac beats (about 8%) are organized in nonbaroreflex sequences (Figs. 4 and 5) compared with that in previous studies in anesthetized animals (7).
Our experiments following selective sympathetic blockade give further insights into the physiological modulation of the nonbaroreflex sequences. Indeed, the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences seems to be modulated mainly by β-adrenergic receptors as shown by their significant reduction in response to propranol. These results are in line with those obtained by Pagani et al. (15) in conscious dogs in which the tachycardic reflex response following the activation of mechanoreceptors induced by aortic distension was abolished by β-adrenergic receptor blockade. On the contrary,
-adrenergic receptor blockade does not seem to influence the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences as shown by the fact that prazosin did not significantly affect the number of nonbaroreflex sequences. However, our model defines a priori AP as an input and HR as an output variable in the extrapolation of nonbaroreflex sequences. Therefore, it is conceivable that in response to spontaneous AP fluctuations, still existing after having blocked
-adrenergic receptors, the nonbaroreflex sequences can occur as a consequence of a HR modulation, possibly due to a β-adrenergic stimulation. On the contrary, when the output variable is blocked, as in response to β-adrenergic blockade, the spontaneous heart beat fluctuations seem to miss the possibility to be organized in nonbaroreflex sequences.
As previously reported (7), the mean slope of the nonbaroreflex sequences would represent the approximate gain of the feedforward mechanisms responsible for their occurrence, as the baroreflex sensitivity reflects the mean slope of the baroreflex sequences, even though its real physiological significance cannot be elucidated with the sequences technique, and more complex methodologies are needed to clarify this point.
Whereas the mean slope behavior in response to sympathetic and complete autonomic blockade is in line with previous reports (7), showing no significant changes, it is noteworthy that the nonbaroreflex slope, in the present study, was significantly and substantially reduced by atropine.
Our experimental design was not directly focused to study this issue in detail. Nonetheless, we can speculate that in a situation in which feedforward neural mechanisms are mainly operative, as during parasympathetic blockade, the feedforward gain tends to decrease to buffer the possible trend to exaggerated and unopposed AP changes. Even though we have no direct experimental data, we can hypothesize that these modifications of gain are modulated at the central integration level.
We have also studied the possible physiological differences due to different lags used to pair SAP and PI in the study of nonbaroreflex sequences.
Because of the high HR in rats and to exclude the possible interferences linked to acetylcholine kinetics (3), we have used longer lag (lag 5) to pair SAP and PI, according to previous reports (14).
In line with previous reports (7), our data indicate that the lag used significantly affects the physiological meaning of sequences of spontaneously occurring consecutive heart beats. In fact, similarly to lags 5, 0, 1, and 2 nonbaroreflex sequences appear to be neurally modulated because of their significant decrease after complete autonomic and sympathetic blockade (see Fig. 6). However, lag 0 nonbaroreflex sequences seem to be, at least in part, modulated by the arterial baroreflexes as shown by their reduction in response to vagal blockade (see Fig. 6) and as supported by previous studies (2). Therefore, according to the present and previous results (2, 14), we conclude that lag 1 and 2 sequences can be considered as an expression of the feedforward neural mechanisms regulating the cardiovascular function, even though when HR is particularly high, as in conscious rats, the use of lag 5 sequences is reliable.
It is noteworthy that both the hypertensive/tachycardic and the hypotensive/bradycardic sequences appear to be modulated by the sympathetic nervous system, inasmuch as both decreased significantly after sympathetic blockade. Even though the complex nature of the neural cardiovascular regulation limits our attempts to offer a simple schematic view of the physiological mechanisms, we can suggest the following speculation.
As reported in previous studies (11, 16), the activation of sympathetic afferents elicits mainly excitatory but also inhibitory cardiovascular effects likely depending on the type and location of the receptors. It is possible to speculate that the occurrence of hypertensive/tachycardic or hypotensive/bradycardic sequences represents the expression of the dynamic activation of these sympathetic reflexes, respectively excitatory or inhibitory in nature, within the spontaneous fluctuations of AP and HR, as the baroreflex sequences, characterized both by hypotension/tachycardia and by hypertension/bradycardia, represent the expression of the dynamic activation and deactivation of the arterial baroreflexes.
In conclusion, our present results confirm and extend the previous studies showing that the continuous relationship between spontaneous fluctuations in arterial blood pressure and heart period is neurally modulated not only through negative feedback coupling mechanisms, as reflected by the baroreflex sequences, but also through feedforward mechanisms, as it would be reflected by the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences characterized by linearly related changes in SAP and HR both increasing and decreasing. In addition to previous studies, the present results clearly show that nonbaroreflex sequences are mainly under the control of the sympathetic nervous system and strongly suggest that sympathetic reflexes might represent the main physiological source of their occurrence as the arterial baroreflexes represent the main source for the baroreflex sequences.
Limitation of the study. We have no direct evidence showing the exact physiological sources modulating the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences. Therefore, we cannot exclude a contribution of the central nervous system (CNS) through the modulation activity of centers directly involved in the control of sympathetic outflow (e.g., the posterior hypothalamus). In particular, due to the continuous and sudden changes in HR within the spontaneous fluctuations (i.e., HR slowing and speeding), it would also be possible to hypothesize a role for some CNS oscillator mechanisms dependent by acetylcholine kinetics. Even though we have no direct evidence on this very complex issue, we can try some speculations. It is widely accepted that atropine sulfate, used in our experiments (see MATERIALS AND METHODS), crosses the blood-brain barrier, thus being effective also at the CNS sites. If this is the case, it seems unlikely that acetylcholine effects in the CNS could play some role in the occurrence of nonbaroreflex sequences, since after atropine, the occurrence of these sequences is substantially increased.
Clinical perspectives. The possibility to evaluate the possible role played by negative feedback and feedforward mechanisms in the neural cardiovascular regulation in an unobtrusive way within the spontaneous fluctuations of AP and HR might allow one to test the fascinating hypothesis that feedforward mechanisms as the expression of sympathetic reflexes might contribute to the cardiovascular instability of some pathophysiological conditions, as suggested by Malliani et al. (13).
In this context, further studies are needed to elucidate the possible role played by feedforward mechanisms in some pathological conditions in which exaggerated autonomic responses have been reported, i.e., acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and arterial hypertension.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |