AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (April 24, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00113.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
297/1/H233    most recent
00113.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gademan, M. G J
Right arrow Articles by Swenne, C. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gademan, M. G J
Right arrow Articles by Swenne, C. A
Submitted on February 2, 2009
Revised on April 9, 2009
Accepted on April 23, 2009

Biventricular pacing-induced acute response in baroreflex sensitivity has predictive value for mid-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Maaike G J Gademan1, Rutger J van Bommel1, C Jan Willem Borleffs1, Sum-Che Man1, Joris CW Haest1, Martin J Schalij1, Ernst E van der Wall1, Jeroen J Bax1, and Cees A Swenne1*

1 Leiden University Medical Center

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.a.swenne{at}lumc.nl.

Background In a previous study we demonstrated that institution of biventricular pacing in chronic heart failure (CHF) acutely facilitates the arterial baroreflex. The arterial baroreflex has important prognostic value in CHF. We hypothesized that the acute response in baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) after institution of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has predictive value for mid-term response. Methods One day after implantation of a CRT device in 33 CHF patients (27 male / 6 female, age 66.5 ± 9.5 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 28 ± 7%) we measured noninvasive BRS and heart rate variability (HRV) in two conditions: CRT device switched-on and switched-off (on/off order randomized). Echocardiography was performed prior to implantation (baseline) and 6 months after implantation (follow-up). CRT responders were defined as patients in whom left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) at follow-up had decreased by ≥ 15%. Results Responders (69.7%) and non-responders (30.3%) had similar baseline characteristics. In responders, CRT increased BRS by 30% (P=0.03); this differed significantly (P=0.02) from the average BRS change (-2%) in the non-responders. Also, CRT increased HRV by 30% in responders (P=0.02), but there was no significant difference found compared to the increase in HRV (8%) in the non-responders. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the percetage BRS increase had predictive value for the discrimination of responders and non-responders (area-under-the-curve 0.69; 95% confidence interval 0.51-0.87; maximal accuracy 0.70). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that a CRT-induced acute BRS increase has predictive value for the echocardiographic response to CRT. This finding suggests that the autonomic nervous system is actively involved in CRT-related reverse remodelling.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.