AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (July 8, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00124.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/5/H2176    most recent
00124.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tchaicheeyan, O.
Right arrow Articles by Landesberg, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tchaicheeyan, O.
Right arrow Articles by Landesberg, A.
Submitted on February 7, 2005
Accepted on May 11, 2005

Regulation of Energy Liberation during Steady Sarcomere Shortening

Oren Tchaicheeyan1 and Amir Landesberg1*

1 Biomedical Engineering, Technion-Israel institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: amir{at}bm.technion.ac.il.

Energy liberation rate (E) during steady muscle shortening is a monotonic increasing or biphasic function of the shortening velocity (V). The study examines three plausible hypotheses for explaining the biphasic E-V relationship (EVR): (i) The cross-bridge (XB) turnover rate from non force-generating (weak) to force-generating (strong) conformation decreases as V increases; (ii) XB kinetics is determined by the number of strong XBs (XB-XB cooperativity); (iii) The affinity of troponin for calcium is modulated by the number of strong XBs (XB-Ca cooperativity). The relative role of the various energy regulating mechanisms is not well defined. The hypotheses were tested by coupling calcium kinetics with XB cycling. All three hypotheses yield identical steady-state characteristics: (i) Hyperbolic Force-Velocity relationship; (ii) Quasi-linear Stiffness-Force relationship; and (iii) Biphasic EVR, where E declines at high V due to decrease in the number of cycling XBs or in the weak-to-strong transition rate. The hypotheses differ in the ability to describe the existence of both monotonic and biphasic EVRs and in the effect of [Ca2+]i on the EVR peak. Monotonic and biphasic EVRs with a shift in EVR peak to higher velocity at higher [Ca2+]i are obtained only by XB-Ca Cooperativity. XB-XB cooperativity provides only biphasic EVRs. A direct effect of V on XB kinetics predicts that EVR-peak is obtained at the same velocity independently of [Ca2+]i. The study predicts that measuring the dependence of the EVR on [Ca2+]i allows to test the hypotheses and to identify the dominant energy regulating mechanism. The established XB-XB and XB-Ca mechanisms provide alternative explanations to the various reported EVRs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.