AJP - Heart Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (May 8, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00256.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
297/1/H102    most recent
00256.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doisne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doisne, N.
Right arrow Articles by Findlay, I.
Submitted on March 16, 2009
Revised on April 21, 2009
Accepted on May 4, 2009

Catecholaminergic automatic activity in the rat pulmonary vein: electrophysiological differences between cardiac muscle in the left atrium and pulmonary vein

Nicolas Doisne1, Véronique Maupoil1, Pierre COSNAY, and Ian Findlay1*

1 University Francois-Rabelais Tours

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: findlay{at}univ-tours.fr.

Ectopic activity in cardiac muscle within pulmonary veins is associated with the onset and the maintenance of atrial fibrillation in man. The mechanism underlying this ectopic activity is unknown. Here we investigate automatic activity generated by catecholaminergic stimulation in the rat pulmonary vein. Intracellular microelectrodes were used to record electrical activity in isolated strips of rat pulmonary vein (PV) and left atrium (LA). The resting cardiac muscle membrane potential was lower in PV (-70±1 mV, mean ±SE, n=8) than in LA (-85±1 mV, n=8). No spontaneous activity was recorded in PV or LA under basal conditions. Norepinephrine (10-5M) induced first a hyperpolarisation (-8±1 mV in PV: -3±1 mV in LA: n=8 for both) then a slowly developing depolarisation (+21±2 mV after 15 min in PV: +1±2 mV in LA) of the resting membrane potential. Automatic activity occurred only in PV, it was triggered at ~-50 mV and it occurred as repetitive bursts of slow action potentials. The diastolic membrane potential increased during a burst and slowly depolarised between bursts. Automatic activity in the PV was blocked by either atenolol or prazosine and it could be generated with a mixture of cirazoline and isoprenaline. In both tissues cirazoline (10-6M) induced a depolarization (+37±2 mV in PV, n=5: +5±1 mV in LA, n=5) and isoprenaline (10-7M) evoked a hyperpolarisation (-11±3 mV in PV, n=7: -3±1 mV in LA, n=6). The differences in membrane potential and reaction to adrenergic stimulation lead to automatic electrical activity occurring specifically in cardiac muscle in the PV.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.