AJP - Heart pressure measurements
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (July 10, 2003). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00282.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
285/5/H1864    most recent
00282.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faris, O. P.
Right arrow Articles by McVeigh, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faris, O. P.
Right arrow Articles by McVeigh, E. R.
Submitted on April 10, 2003
Accepted on July 2, 2003

Endocardial versus Epicardial Electrical Synchrony during LV-freewall Pacing

Owen P. Faris1*, Frank J. Evans2, Alexander J. Dick2, Venkatesh K. Raman2, Daniel B. Ennis1, David A. Kass3, and Elliot R. McVeigh1

1 Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
2 Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
3 Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fariso{at}nih.gov.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been most typically achieved by bi-ventricular (RV-LV) stimulation. However, left ventricular (LV) free-wall pacing appears equally effective in acute and chronic clinical studies. Recent data suggest electrical synchrony measured epicardially is not required to yield effective mechanical synchronization, whereas endocardial mapping data suggest synchrony (fusion with intrinsic conduction) is important. To better understand this disparity, we simultaneously mapped both endocardial and epicardial electrical activation during LV free-wall pacing at varying atrioventricular delays (AV-delay 0-150ms) in six normal dogs using a 64-electrode LV endocardial basket and a 128-electrode epicardial sock. The transition from dyssynchronous LV-paced activation to synchronous RA-paced activation was studied by constructing activation time maps for both endo- and epicardial surfaces as a function of increasing AV-delay. The AV-delay at the transition from dyssynchronous to synchronous activation was defined as the transition delay (AVt). AVt was variable among experiments, ranging 44-93 ms on the epicardium and 47-105 ms on the endocardium. Differences in endo- and epicardial AVt were smaller (-17 - +12ms) and not significant on average (-5.0±5.2ms). In no instance was the transition to synchrony complete on one surface without substantial concurrent transition on the other surface. We conclude that both epicardial and endocardial synchrony due to fusion of native with ventricular stimulation occur nearly concurrently. Assessment of electrical epicardial delay, as often used clinically during CRT lead placement, should provide adequate assessment of stimulation delay for inner wall layers as well.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
F. Regoli and A. Auricchio
The role of invasive mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory
Europace, November 1, 2009; 11(suppl_5): v40 - v45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
D. B. Ennis, T. C. Nguyen, A. Itoh, W. Bothe, D. H. Liang, N. B. Ingels, and D. C. Miller
Reduced Systolic Torsion in Chronic "Pure" Mitral Regurgitation
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 85 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
K. M. Kavanagh, I. Belenkie, and H. J. Duff
Transmural temporospatial left ventricular activation during pacing from different sites: potential implications for optimal pacing
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2008; 77(1): 81 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. W. Kimmel, N. D. Skadsberg, C. L. Byrd, D. J. Wright, T. G. Laske, and P. A. Iaizzo
Single-site ventricular and biventricular pacing: investigation of latest depolarization strategy
Europace, December 1, 2007; 9(12): 1163 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
B. A. Coppola, J. W. Covell, A. D. McCulloch, and J. H. Omens
Asynchrony of ventricular activation affects magnitude and timing of fiber stretch in late-activated regions of the canine heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H754 - H761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Ashikaga, B. A. Coppola, B. Hopenfeld, E. S. Leifer, E. R. McVeigh, and J. H. Omens
Transmural Dispersion of Myofiber Mechanics: Implications for Electrical Heterogeneity In Vivo
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 27, 2007; 49(8): 909 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. C. P. Kerckhoffs, O. P. Faris, P. H. M. Bovendeerd, F. W. Prinzen, K. Smits, E. R. McVeigh, and T. Arts
Electromechanics of paced left ventricle simulated by straightforward mathematical model: comparison with experiments
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): H1889 - H1897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Ashikaga, J. H. Omens, N. B. Ingels Jr., and J. W. Covell
Transmural mechanics at left ventricular epicardial pacing site
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): H2401 - H2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1976 by the American Physiological Society.