AJP - Heart Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (December 6, 2001). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00364.2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/4/H1248    most recent
00364.2001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chabert, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taber, L. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chabert, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taber, L. A

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print December 6, 2001
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 10.1152/ajpheart.00364.2001
Submitted on May 2, 2001
Accepted on December 3, 2001

Intramyocardial Pressure Measurements in the Stage-18 Embryonic Chick Heart

Steren Chabert1 and Larry A Taber1*

1 Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lat{at}biomed.wustl.edu.

Intramyocardial pressure (IMP) and ventricular pressure (VP) were measured in the trabeculating heart of the stage-18 chick embryo (three days of incubation). Pressure was measured at several locations across the ventricle using a fluid-filled servo-null system. Maximum systolic and minimum diastolic IMP tended to be greater in the dorsal wall than in the ventral wall, but transmural distributions of peak active (maximum minus minimum) IMP were similar in both walls. Peak active IMP near midwall was similar to peak active VP, but peak active IMP in the subepicardial and subendocardial layers was 4 to 5 times larger. These results suggest that the passive stiffness of the dorsal wall is greater than that of the ventral wall and that, during contraction, the inner and outer layers of both walls generate more contractile force and/or become less permeable to flow than the middle part of the wall. The measured pressures likely correspond to regional variations in wall stress that may influence morphogenesis and function in the embryonic heart.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. E. Miller, C. L. Wong, and D. Sedmera
Pressure overload alters stress-strain properties of the developing chick heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): H1849 - H1856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1976 by the American Physiological Society.