AJP - Heart AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (July 15, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00411.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/6/H2497    most recent
00411.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hope, S. A
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, J. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hope, S. A
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, J. D
Submitted on April 25, 2005
Accepted on July 13, 2005

Waveform Dispersion, Not Reflection May Be The Major Determinant Of Aortic Pressure Wave Morphology

Sarah A Hope1, David B Tay2, Ian T Meredith1, and James D Cameron1*

1 Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2 Electronic Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: james.cameron{at}med.monash.edu.au.

Objective. To investigate the determinants of aortic pressure waveform morphology in the thoracoabdominal aorta with specific reference to features of potential prognostic value for cardiovascular disease. In particular we aimed to determine the location of major pressure wave reflection sites within the aorta. Methods and Results. Aortic pressure waveforms were acquired using 2F Millar Mikro-tip® catheter transducers in 40 subjects (26 male), and repeated in 10, at 5 pre-determined points within the aorta: aortic root, transverse arch, at the levels of the diaphragm, renal arteries and aortic bifurcation. Waveforms were analysed for augmentation index (AI), time to inflection point (Ti) and pressure parameters. AI decreased progressively between the aortic root and bifurcation (P < 0.001), and Ti increased (P < 0.01). There was the expected progressive peripheral amplification of systolic and pulse pressures and fall in time to peak pressure (all P < 0.001). There was no difference on repeat pullback, or between genders. Conclusion. These data are at variance with the concept that central AI results solely from pressure wave reflection, when Ti would be expected to decrease and AI increase with distal progression. Pressure wave propagation phenomena may contribute, and the potential role of frequency dispersion merits investigation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. D. Cameron
Wave Intensity Analysis and Central Blood Pressure
Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): 958 - 959.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.