AJP - Heart pressure measurements
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (November 24, 2004). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00415.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
288/4/H1668    most recent
00415.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tartas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tartas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, P.
Submitted on May 10, 2004
Accepted on November 18, 2004

THE EARLY VASODILATOR RESPONSE TO ANODAL CURRENT APPLICATION IN HUMAN IS NOT IMPAIRED BY CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 BLOCKADE

Maylis Tartas1, Yves Gallois2, Audrey Koitka3, Sylvain Durand1, Philippe Bouye1, Jean-louis Saumet3, and Pierre Abraham1*

1 Laboratory for Vascular Investigations, University Hospital, Angers, France
2 Laboratory of Biochemistry, University Hospital, Angers, France
3 Laboratory of Physiology, University Hospital, Angers, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: piabraham{at}chu-angers.fr.

It is generally acknowledged that the cutaneous vasodilatation to monopolar galvanic current application would result from an axon reflex in primary afferent fibres and to the neurogenic inflammation resulting from neuropeptide release. Previous papers have suggested a participation of prostaglandin (PG) in anodal current-induced cutaneous vasodilatation. Thus, the inducible cyclooxygenase isoform (COX-2), assumed to play a key role in inflammation, should be involved in the synthesis of the PG released. Skin blood flow (SkBF) variations induced by 5-min, 0.1-mA monopolar anodal current application was evaluated with laser-Doppler flowmetry on the forearm of healthy volunteers under indomethacin (COX-1&2 inhibitor), celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) or placebo treatment. SkBF was indexed as cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) expressed as percent of heatinduced maximal CVC (%MVC). Urinalyses were performed to test celecoxib treatment efficiency. No difference was found in CVC values at rest: 14.3 ± 4.0, 11.9 ± 3.2, 10.9 ± 2.0 %MVC after indomethacin, celecoxib or placebo treatment, respectively. At 10-min following the onset of anodal current application, CVC values were 22.2 ± 4.9 %MVC, (non-significant from rest) under indomethacin, 85.7 ± 15.3 %MVC (p<0.001 from rest) under celecoxib and 70.4 ± 13.1 %MVC (p<0.001 from rest) under placebo. Celecoxib treatment significantly depressed the urinary prostacyclin metabolite 6-keto PGF1alpha (p<0.05 from placebo). Indomethacin but not celecoxib treatment significantly inhibited the anodal current-induced vasodilatation. Thus, although assumed to result from an axon reflex in primary afferent fibres and neurogenic inflammation, these results suggest that the early anodal current-induced vasodilatation is mainly dependent on COX-1 prostaglandin synthesis.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. Rousseau, M. Tartas, B. Fromy, A. Godon, M.-A. Custaud, J. L. Saumet, and P. Abraham
Platelet inhibition by low-dose aspirin but not by clopidogrel reduces the axon-reflex current-induced vasodilation in humans
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): R1420 - R1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.