AJP - Heart AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (January 9, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00496.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/3/H639    most recent
00496.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zierer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, M. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zierer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Moon, M. R
Submitted on May 12, 2008
Revised on October 6, 2008
Accepted on December 29, 2008

Interatrial Shunt for Chronic Pulmonary Hypertension: Differential Impact of Low-Flow versus High-Flow Shunting

Andreas Zierer1, Spencer J Melby, Rochus K Voeller2, and Marc R Moon2*

1 Hospital of the Johann Goethe University
2 Washington University School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: moonm{at}wustl.edu.

The purpose of the current study was to determine for the first time the qualitative and quantitative impact of varying degrees of interatrial shunting on right heart dynamics and systemic perfusion in subjects with chronic pulmonary hypertension (CPH). Eight dogs underwent three months of progressive pulmonary artery banding, following which right atrial and ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure volume relations were calculated using conductance catheters. An 8-mm shunt prosthesis was inserted between the superior vena cava and left atrium, yielding a controlled model of atrial septostomy. Data were obtained: 1) pre-shunt or "CPH", 2) "Low-Flow" shunt, and 3) "High-Flow" shunt (occluding superior vena cava forcing all flow through the shunt). With progressive shunting, right ventricular pressure fell from 72±19 mmHg (CPH) to 54±17 (Low-Flow) and 47±17 (High-Flow) (P<0.001). Cardiac output increased from 1.5±0.3 L/min at CPH to 1.8 ±0.4 L/min Low-Flow (286±105 ml/min, 15% of cardiac output) (P<0.001), but returned to 1.6±0.3 L/min at High-Flow (466±172 ml/min, 29% of cardiac output) (P=0.008 versus Low-Flow, p=0.21 versus CPH). There was a modest rise in systemic oxygen delivery from 252±46 ml/min at CPH to 276±50 Low-Flow (P=0.07), but substantial fall to 222±50 at High-Flow (P=0.005 versus CPH, P<0.001 versus Low-Flow). With progressive shunting, bichamber contractility did not change (P=0.98), but the slope of the right atrial end-diastolic pressure volume relation decreased (P<0.04) consistent with improved compliance. This study demonstrated that Low-Flow interatrial shunting consistently improved right atrial mechanics and systemic perfusion in subjects with CPH, while High-Flow exceeded an "ideal shunt fraction".







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.