AJP - Heart Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (July 25, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00569.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/3/H1341    most recent
00569.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szasz, T.
Right arrow Articles by Watts, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szasz, T.
Right arrow Articles by Watts, S. W.
Submitted on May 28, 2008
Revised on July 14, 2008
Accepted on July 24, 2008

A comparison of reactive oxygen species metabolism in the rat aorta and vena cava: focus on xanthine oxidase

Theodora Szasz1*, Janice M. Thompson, and Stephanie W. Watts2

1 Michigan State Univeristy
2 Michigan State University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: szasziri{at}msu.edu.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important mediators in vascular biology. Venous function, although relevant to cardiovascular disease, is still understudied. We compared aspects of ROS metabolism between a major artery (the aorta) and a major vein (the vena cava, VC) of the rat, with the hypothesis that venous ROS metabolism would be overall increased compared to its arterial counterpart. Superoxide and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) release in basal conditions was higher in VC compared to aorta. The antioxidant capacity for H2O2 was also higher in VC than in aorta. Exogenous superoxide induced a higher contraction in VC compared to aorta. Protein expression of three major ROS metabolizing enzymes, xanthine oxidase (XO), CuZn SOD and catalase was higher in VC compared to aorta. As XO seemed a likely source of the higher VC ROS levels, we examined it further and found higher mRNA expression and activity of XO in VC compared to aorta. We also investigated the impact of XO inhibition by allopurinol on aorta and VC functional responses to norepinephrine, angiotensin II, endothelin-1 and acetylcholine. Maximal endothelin-1-mediated contraction was decreased by allopurinol in VC, but not in the aorta. Our results suggest that there are overall differences in ROS metabolism between aorta and VC, with the latter operating normally at a higher setpoint, releasing but also being able to handle higher ROS levels. We propose XO to be an important source for these differences. The result of this particular comparison may be reflective of a general arterio-venous contrast.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.