AJP - Heart AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (March 4, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00622.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/1/H385    most recent
00622.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. E
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, C. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, T. E
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, C. G
Submitted on June 23, 2004
Accepted on February 25, 2005

Dynamic autoregulation of the cutaneous circulation: differential control in glabrous vs non-glabrous skin

Thad E Wilson1, Rong Zhang2, Benjamin D Levine2, and Craig G Crandall2*

1 Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
2 Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: CraigCrandall{at}texashealth.org.

The purpose of this project was to test the hypothesis that, independent of neural control, glabrous and nonglabrous cutaneous vasculature is capable of autoregulating blood flow. In 10 subjects spectral and transfer function analyses of arterial pressure and skin blood flow (laser-Doppler flowmetry) from glabrous (palm) and nonglabrous (forearm) regions were performed under 3 conditions: baseline, ganglionic blockade via IV trimethaphan administration, and trimethaphan + oscillatory lower body negative pressure (LBNP; -5 to -10 mmHg) from 0.05 to 0.07 Hz. Oscillatory LBNP was applied to regenerate mean arterial pressure variability that was abolished by ganglionic blockade. Ganglionic blockade was verified by an absence of a heart rate response to a Valsalva maneuver. Spectral power and transfer function gain between blood pressure and skin blood flow were calculated in this oscillatory frequency range (0.05-0.07 Hz). Within this frequency range ganglionic blockade significantly decreased spectral power of blood flow in both forearm and palm, while regeneration of arterial blood pressure oscillations significantly increased spectral power of forearm blood flow but not palm blood flow. During oscillatory LBNP, transfer function gain between blood pressure and skin blood flow was significantly elevated at the forearm (0.28±0.03 to 0.53±0.02 units/mmHg; P<0.05), but reduced at the palm (4.7±0.5 to 1.2±0.1 units/mmHg; P<0.05), during oscillatory LBNP. These data show that independent of neural control of blood flow, glabrous skin has the ability to buffer blood pressure oscillations and demonstrates a degree of dynamic autoregulation. Conversely, these data suggests that nonglabrous skin has diminished dynamic autoregulatory capabilities.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.