AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (October 17, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00628.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/6/H2427    most recent
00628.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sundareswaran, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yoganathan, A. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sundareswaran, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yoganathan, A. P
Submitted on June 15, 2008
Revised on September 25, 2008
Accepted on October 11, 2008

The Total Cavopulmonary Connection Resistance: A Significant Impact on Single Ventricle Hemodynamics at Rest and Exercise

Kartik Sivaram Sundareswaran1, Kerem Pekkan2, Lakshmi Prasad Dasi1, Kevin Whitehead3, Shiva Sharma4, K. R. Kanter5, Mark A Fogel3, and Ajit P Yoganathan1*

1 Georgia Institute of Technology
2 Carnegie Mellon University
3 Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
4 Pediatric Cardiology Services
5 Emory University School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ajit.yoganathan{at}bme.gatech.edu.

Introduction: Little is known about the impact of the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) on resting and exercise hemodynamics in a single ventricle (SV) circulation. The aim of this study was to elucidate this mechanism using a lumped parameter model of the SV circulation. Methods: Pulmonary vascular resistance (1.96 ± 0.80 WU) and systemic vascular resistances (18.4 ± 7.2 WU) were obtained from catheterization data on 40 patients with a TCPC. TCPC resistances (0.39 ± 0.26 WU) were established using computational fluid dynamic simulations conducted on anatomically accurate 3D models reconstructed from CMR (n=16). These parameters were used in a lumped parameter model of the SV circulation to investigate the impact of TCPC resistance on SV hemodynamics under resting and exercise conditions. A biventricular model was used for comparison. Results: For a biventricular circulation, the cardiac output (CO) dependence on TCPC resistance was negligible (sensitivity = -0.064 L/Min/WU), but not for the SV circulation (sensitivity = -0.88 L/Min/WU). Capacity to increase CO with heart rate was also severely reduced for the SV. At a simulated heart rate of 150 beats per minute, the SV patient with the highest resistance (1.08 WU) had a significantly lower increase in cardiac output (20.5%) when compared to an SV patient with the lowest resistance (50%) and the normal circulation (119%). This was due to the increased afterload (+35%) and decreased preload (-12%) associated with the SV circulation. Conclusion: TCPC resistance has a significant impact on the resting hemodynamics and exercise capacity of patients with an SV physiology.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.