AJP - Heart Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (January 3, 2002). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00638.2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/5/H1739    most recent
00638.2001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjorstad, K. E
Right arrow Articles by Myrmel, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kjorstad, K. E
Right arrow Articles by Myrmel, T.

Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print January 3, 2002
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 10.1152/ajpheart.00638.2001
Submitted on July 23, 2001
Accepted on December 7, 2001

Pressure-volume based single-beat estimations are not able to predict left ventricular contractility in vivo

Knut E Kjorstad1*, Christian Korvald1, and Truls Myrmel1

1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital in Tromso, Tromso, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: knutek{at}fagmed.uit.no.

The end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (ESPVR) is regarded as a useful index for assessing the contractile state of the heart. However, the need for preload alterations has been a serious limitation to its clinical applications, and there has been numerous attempts to develop a method for calculating contractility based on one, single pressure-volume loop. We have evaluated four of these methods. Pressure and volume data were obtained by combined pressure and conductance catheters in 37 pigs. All four methods were applied to 88 steady state pressure/volume files, including 8 files sampled during dopamine infusions. Estimates of single-beat contractility (elastance) were compared to preload-varied multiple-beat elastance (Ees(MB)). All methods had a low average bias (-0.3 to 0.5 mmHg/ml) but limits of agreement (±2SD) were unacceptably high (±2.6 to ±3.8 mmHg/ml). In the dopamine group Ees(MB) showed an increase of 1.7±0.8 mmHg/ml (mean±SD) compared to baseline (p<0.001). None of the single-beat methods predicted this increase in contractility. It's therefore doubtful if any of the methods allow for single-beat assessment of contractility.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
H.-M. Cheng, W.-C. Yu, S.-H. Sung, K.-L. Wang, S.-Y. Chuang, and C.-H. Chen
Usefulness of systolic time intervals in the identification of abnormal ventriculo-arterial coupling in stable heart failure patients
Eur J Heart Fail, December 1, 2008; 10(12): 1192 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Osranek, J. H. Eisenach, B. K. Khandheria, K. Chandrasekaran, J. B. Seward, and M. Belohlavek
Arterioventricular Coupling and Ventricular Efficiency After Antihypertensive Therapy: A Noninvasive Prospective Study
Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 275 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. Jegger, A. S. Mallik, M. Nasratullah, X. Jeanrenaud, R. d. Silva, H. Tevaearai, L. K. von Segesser, and N. Stergiopulos
The effect of a myocardial infarction on the normalized time-varying elastance curve
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 1123 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. D. Thomas and Z. B. Popovic
Intraventricular Pressure Differences: A New Window Into Cardiac Function
Circulation, September 20, 2005; 112(12): 1684 - 1686.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Garcia, P. J. C. Barenbrug, P. Pibarot, A. L. A. J. Dekker, F. H. van der Veen, J. G. Maessen, J. G. Dumesnil, and L.-G. Durand
A ventricular-vascular coupling model in presence of aortic stenosis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1874 - H1884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. Segers, V. Tchana-Sato, H. A. Leather, B. Lambermont, A. Ghuysen, J.-M. Dogne, P. Benoit, P. Morimont, P. F. Wouters, P. Verdonck, et al.
Determinants of left ventricular preload-adjusted maximal power
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2003; 284(6): H2295 - H2301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z. B. Popovic', K. A. Mowrey, Y. Zhang, S. Zhuang, T. Tabata, D. W. Wallick, R. A. Grimm, J. D. Thomas, and T. N. Mazgalev
Slow rate during AF improves ventricular performance by reducing sensitivity to cycle length irregularity
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): H2706 - H2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1976 by the American Physiological Society.