AJP - Heart Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (October 21, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00649.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/3/H959    most recent
00649.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, T.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Lucchesi, B. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hong, T.-T.
Right arrow Articles by Lucchesi, B. R
Submitted on June 16, 2005
Accepted on September 25, 2005

Effect of Thrombolysis on Myocardial Injury,Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator vs Alfimeprase

Ting-Ting Hong1, Jinbao Huang1, and Benedict R Lucchesi1*

1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: benluc{at}umich.edu.

Background - Plasmin dependent thrombolytic agents are potentially pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory. Alfimeprase, a zinc containing metalloproteinase, degrades fibrin directly and achieves thrombolysis independent of plasmin formation. This study examines the hypothesis that thrombolysis in the absence of plasmin generation results in improved myocardial salvage upon reperfusion. Methods and Results - The thrombolytic effects of rt-PA (0.022mg/kg, 1/10 of which was administered as a loading dose and the rest 9/10 was infused over 60 min by intra-coronary (i.c.) administration) or alfimeprase (0.5 mg/kg over 1 min i.c.) were evaluated in a canine model of arterial thrombosis involving electrolytic injury of the left circumflex (LCX) coronary artery. Both agents induced thrombolysis, onset of reperfusion being more rapid after alfimeprase compared to rt-PA (1.5±0.6 vs. 10.1±2.1 min). In the absence of adjunctive therapy, time to reocclusion after alfimeprase was 3.2±0.5 min, compared to rt-PA 77.5±31.9 min. The GPIIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonist, CRL42796, prolonged reperfusion time after thrombolysis with alfimeprase or rt-PA. The effect of each lytic agent on myocardial infarct size was examined in a separate group of dogs subjected to 60 min of LCX coronary artery ligation and 4 hrs of reperfusion. Myocardial infarct size, expressed as percent of the risk region, was larger (32.16±3.95%) after rt-PA compared to alfimeprase (19.85±3.61%) or that of the saline control group (18.46±3.34%). Conclusions - rt-PA in contrast to alfimeprase, a direct acting fibrinolytic agent, is associated with an increase in myocyte reperfusion injury.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.