AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (October 17, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00690.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/6/H2436    most recent
00690.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ye, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Birnbaum, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ye, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Birnbaum, Y.
Submitted on July 3, 2008
Revised on September 20, 2008
Accepted on October 14, 2008

Pioglitazone Protects the Myocardium Against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in eNOS- and iNOS- Knockout Mice

Yumei Ye, Yu Lin, Saraswathy Manickavasagam1, J. Regino Perez-Polo1, Brian C Tieu1, and Yochai Birnbaum2*

1 University of Texas Medical Branch
2 Baylor College of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ybirnbau{at}bcm.edu.

Background: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activation with subsequent inducible NOS (iNOS), cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) activation is essential to statin inhibition of myocardial infarct size (IS). In the rat, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) agonist pioglitazone (PIO) limits IS, upregulates and activates cPLA2 and COX2, and increases myocardial 6-keto-PGF1{alpha} levels without activating eNOS and iNOS. We asked whether PIO also limits IS in eNOS-/- and iNOS-/- mice. Methods: Male C57BL/6 wild-type (WT), eNOS-/- and iNOS-/- mice received PIO 10 mg/kg/d (PIO+) or water alone (PIO-) for 3 days. Mice underwent 30min coronary artery occlusion and 4h reperfusion, or hearts were harvested and subjected to ELISA and immunoblotting. Results: PIO reduced IS in the WT (15.4±1.4% vs. 39.0±1.1%; p<0.001), as well as in the eNOS-/- (32.0±1.6% vs. 44.2±1.9%; p<0.001) and iNOS-/- (18.0±1.2% vs. 45.5±2.3%; p<0.001) mice. The protective effect of PIO in eNOS-/- mice was smaller than in the WT (p<0.001) and iNOS-/- (p<0.001) mice. PIO increased myocardial Ser-633 and Ser-1177 P-eNOS levels in the WT and iNOS-/- mice. iNOS was undetectable in all six groups. PIO increased cPLA2, COX2 and PGI2 synthase levels in the WT, as well as in the eNOS-/- and iNOS-/- mice. PIO increased myocardial 6-keto-PGF1{alpha} levels, cPLA2 and COX2 activity in the WT, eNOS-/- and iNOS-/- mice. Conclusions: The myocardial protective effect of PIO is iNOS independent and may be only partially dependent on eNOS. As eNOS activity decreases with age, diabetes and advanced atherosclerosis, this effect may be relevant in a clinical setting and should be further characterized.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.