AJP - Heart BIOPAC complete lab solutions
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (August 15, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00692.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/4/H1649    most recent
00692.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, M. D
Right arrow Articles by Butler, K. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, M. D
Right arrow Articles by Butler, K. L
Submitted on July 3, 2008
Revised on August 11, 2008
Accepted on August 14, 2008

REGULATING RISK: A ROLE FOR JAK-STAT SIGNALING IN POSTCONDITIONING?

Michael D Goodman1*, Sheryl E Koch1, Geraldine A Fuller-Bicer1, and Karyn L Butler2

1 University of Cincinnati
2 University of Cinncinati

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: goodmamd{at}email.uc.edu.

Objective: Postconditioning (POC), a novel strategy of cardioprotection against ischemia/reperfusion injury, is clinically attractive because of its therapeutic application at the predictable onset of reperfusion. POC activates several intracellular kinase signaling pathways, including PI3K-Akt (RISK). The regulation of POC-induced survival kinase signaling, however, has not been fully characterized. JAK-STAT activation is integral to cardiac ischemic tolerance and may provide upstream regulation of RISK. We hypothesized that postconditioning requires the activation of both JAK-STAT and RISK signaling. Methods: Langendorff perfused mouse hearts were subjected to 30 minutes global ischemia and 40 minutes reperfusion, with or without POC immediately after ischemia. A separate group of POC hearts was treated with AG490, a JAK-2 inhibitor, Stattic, a specific STAT-3 inhibitor, or LY294002 (LY), a PI3K inhibitor, at the onset of reperfusion. Cardiomyocyte-specific STAT-3 knockout (KO) hearts were also subjected to non-POC or POC protocols. Myocardial performance (+dP/dtmax, mmHg/s) was assessed throughout each perfusion protocol. Phosphorylated STAT-3 and Akt expression was analyzed by Western immunoblotting. Results: Postconditioning enhanced myocardial functional recovery and increased expression of pSTAT-3 and p-Akt. JAK-STAT inhibition abrogated POC-induced functional protection. STAT-3 inhibition decreased expression of both pSTAT-3 and p-Akt. PI3K inhibition also attenuated POC-induced cardioprotection and reduced p-Akt expression but had no effect on STAT-3 phosphorylation. Interestingly, STAT-3 KO hearts undergoing POC exhibited improved ischemic tolerance compared to KO non-POC hearts. Conclusions: Postconditioning induces myocardial functional protection by activating the RISK pathway. JAK-STAT signaling, however, is insufficient for effective postconditioning without PI3K-Akt activation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.