|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles in PresS, published online ahead of print September 26, 2002
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 10.1152/ajpheart.00742.2002
Submitted on August 27, 2002
Accepted on September 17, 2002
1 Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: karagueuzian{at}cshs.org.
The probabilistic nature of ventricular defibrillation threshold (DFT) remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that shock outcome is a function of the amount of myocardium in its vulnerable period (VP). The endocardial surface of five isolated and perfused swine right ventricles (RV) was mapped with 477 bipolar electrodes during ventricular fibrillation (VF). Shock parameters and VF cycle length were not significantly different in the successful (S) (N=26) and failed (F) (N=26) trials. At the instant of the shock, the number of sites with 45-55 ms recovery was significantly smaller in the S than the F trials (P<0.04). No significant difference in the number of sites with recovery intervals outside the 45 to 55 ms range was seen in the S and F shocks. Endocardial action potential showed that a recovery time of 45 to 55 ms corresponded to the VP spanning -15 to -60 mV in 92% of the regenerative action potentials. We conclude that the probabilistic nature of the DFT is related to the amount of myocardium in its VP.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Huang, K.-A. Cheng, D. J. Dosdall, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker Role of maximum rate of depolarization in predicting action potential duration during ventricular fibrillation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2530 - H2536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Day, R. N. Doshi, P. Belott, U. Birgersdotter-Green, M. Behboodikhah, P. Ott, K. A. Glatter, S. Tobias, H. Frumin, B. K. Lee, et al. Inductionless or Limited Shock Testing Is Possible in Most Patients With Implantable Cardioverter- Defibrillators/Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators: Results of the Multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations) Circulation, May 8, 2007; 115(18): 2382 - 2389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. White 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Physiologic and Educational Rationale for Changes Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 736 - 740. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |