AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (September 15, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00748.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/H510    most recent
00748.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legramante, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Galante, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legramante, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Galante, A.
Submitted on July 12, 2006
Accepted on August 25, 2006

Effects of residential exercise training on Heart Rate Recovery in coronary artery patients

Jacopo M. Legramante1*, Ferdinando Iellamo1, Michele C. Massaro1, Sergio Sacco1, and Alberto Galante1

1 Cardiac Rehabilitation S. Raffaele Hospital, Velletri, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Department of Internal Medicine, ROME, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: legramante{at}med.uniroma2.it.

The aims of the present study are twofold: 1) to investigate whether HRR after a cycle ergometry test is affected by exercise training 2) to test the ability of HRR to replicate the BRS changes occurring in response to an exercise training program in coronary artery patients. We randomized 82 coronary artery patients undergoing a residential Cardiac Rehabilitation Program to an exercise training group (TR, n=43) and an untrained (UTR, n=39) group. All the patients underwent an exercise test before and after the rehabilitation program. HRR was recorded at the end of the first (HRR1) and second minute (HRR2) after exercise. BRS was determined at rest before and after treatment. HRR2 was significantly improved in TR (-21.4 ± 0.9 b/min) as compared to UTR (-17.8 ± 1.2 b/min) patients at the end of the training program. Improvement in HRR paralleled that in BRS (from 3.2 ±0.3 to 5.3 ± 0.8 msec/mmHg in TR, p < 0.001) in TR whereas no significant change was evident in UTR patients (from 3.5 ± 0 to 4.0 ±0.4 msec/mmHg, p = 0.230). Our data show that HRR in the 2nd minute after the cessation of a cycle ergometer exercise test increased in coronary artery patients after an exercise training period. This result confirms the positive effect induced by exercise training on HRR and extends the conclusions of previous studies to different modalities of exercise (i.e., cycle ergometer). HRR might provide an additional simple marker of the effectiveness of physical training programs in cardiac patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. S. Heffernan, C. A. Fahs, K. K. Shinsako, S. Y. Jae, and B. Fernhall
Heart rate recovery and heart rate complexity following resistance exercise training and detraining in young men
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H3180 - H3186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.