|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Service de Physiologie EFCR, Hopitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France; UPRES, 2705Universite Paris Sud 11, Clamart, France
2 Service de Physiologie et d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hopitaux de Paris, Bondy, France
3 Service de Physiologie EFCR, Hopitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: denis.chemla{at}bct.ap-hop-paris.fr.
The respective contribution of systemic vascular resistance (R) and total arterial compliance (C) to the arterial load remains to be established in humans. Effective arterial elastance (Ea), i.e., the left ventricular end-systolic pressure (LVESP) over stroke volume ratio, is a reliable estimate of arterial load. It is widely accepted that Ea mainly relates to mean aortic pressure (MAP) and thus to R/T, where T is cycle length. We tested the contribution of R/T and 1/C to Ea in 20 normotensive and 46 hypertensive subjects (MAP range: 84-160 mmHg). The multilinear model applied (Ea=1.00R/T+0.42/C-0.04; r2=0.97). The R/T ratio contributed 2.5 times more to Ea than 1/C in both normotensive and hypertensive adults. The LVESP was more strongly related to systolic aortic pressure (SAP; r2=0.94) than to MAP (r2=0.83), and LVESP matched 90%SAP (bias=0±/-5mmHg). An alternative model of Ea is proposed in which Ea is proportional to the (heart rate x SAP) product over cardiac index ratio whatever the MAP.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. D. Chantler, E. G. Lakatta, and S. S. Najjar Arterial-ventricular coupling: mechanistic insights into cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1342 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Otsuki, S. Maeda, M. Iemitsu, Y. Saito, Y. Tanimura, R. Ajisaka, and T. Miyauchi Systemic arterial compliance, systemic vascular resistance, and effective arterial elastance during exercise in endurance-trained men Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): R228 - R235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chemla, I. Antony, K. Zamani, and A. Nitenberg Mean aortic pressure is the geometric mean of systolic and diastolic aortic pressure in resting humans J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2278 - 2284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Muthurangu, D. Atkinson, M. Sermesant, M. E. Miquel, S. Hegde, R. Johnson, R. Andriantsimiavona, A. M. Taylor, E. Baker, R. Tulloh, et al. Measurement of total pulmonary arterial compliance using invasive pressure monitoring and MR flow quantification during MR-guided cardiac catheterization Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H1301 - H1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Briand, J. G. Dumesnil, L. Kadem, A. G. Tongue, R. Rieu, D. Garcia, and P. Pibarot Reduced Systemic Arterial Compliance Impacts Significantly on Left Ventricular Afterload and Function in Aortic Stenosis: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 291 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Peterson Severe Calcific Aortic Stenosis: Left Ventricular Afterload and its Quantification J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 19, 2005; 46(2): 299 - 301. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Kadem, J G Dumesnil, R Rieu, L-G Durand, D Garcia, and P Pibarot Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis Heart, March 1, 2005; 91(3): 354 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |