AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (October 14, 2004). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00899.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
288/3/H1165    most recent
00899.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liem, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Duncker, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liem, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Duncker, D. J.
Submitted on August 31, 2004
Accepted on October 11, 2004

Myocardium tolerant to an adenosine-dependent ischemic preconditioning stimulus can still be protected by stimuli that employ alternative signaling pathways

David A. Liem1, Maaike te Lintel Hekkert1, Olivier C. Manintveld1, Frans Boomsma1, Pieter D. Verdouw1, and Dirk J. Duncker1*

1 Department of Experimental Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.duncker{at}erasmusmc.nl.

David A. Liem, Maaike te Lintel Hekkert, Olivier C. Manintveld, Frans Boomsma, Pieter D. Verdouw, Dirk J. Duncker. Myocardium tolerant to an adenosine-dependent ischemic preconditioning stimulus can still be protected by stimuli that employ alternative signaling pathways. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 000:H0000-H0000, 0000. Clinical studies on cardioprotection by pre-infarct angina are ambiguous, which may involve development of tolerance to repeated episodes of ischemia. However, not all preconditioning stimuli use identical signaling pathways, and since patients likely experience varying numbers of episodes of different degree and duration of pre-infarct angina, it is important to know whether myocardium tolerant to a particular preconditioning stimulus can still be protected by stimuli employing alternative signaling pathways. Consequently, we tested the hypothesis that development of tolerance to a particular stimulus does not affect cardioprotection by stimuli that employ different signaling pathways. Anesthetized rats underwent classical, remote or pharmacological preconditioning. Infarct size (IS), produced by a 60-min coronary artery occlusion (CAO), was determined after 120 min of reperfusion. Preconditioning by two 15-min periods of CAO, (2CAO15, an adenosine-dependent stimulus) limited IS from 69±2% to 37±6%, but when 2CAO15 was preceded by 4CAO15, protection by 2CAO15 was absent (IS=68±1%). This development of tolerance coincided with a loss of cardiac interstitial adenosine release, whereas two 15-min episodes of 200 µg/min intravenous adenosine infusion still elicited cardioprotection (IS=40±4%). Furthermore, cardioprotection was still produced when 4CAO15 was followed by either the adenosine-independent stimulus 3CAO3 (IS=50±8%), or the remote preconditioning stimulus of two 15-min periods of mesenteric artery occlusion (IS=49±6%). In conclusion, the development of tolerance to cardioprotection by an adenosine-dependent preconditioning stimulus still allows protection by ischemic stimuli or pharmacological intervention employing different signaling pathways.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
O. C. Manintveld, P. D. Verdouw, and D. J. Duncker
The RISK of ROCK
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2563 - H2565.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.