AJP - Heart AJP: Endocrinology and Metabolism
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (November 9, 2007). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00962.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/1/H421    most recent
00962.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hale, S. L
Right arrow Articles by Kloner, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hale, S. L
Right arrow Articles by Kloner, R. A.
Submitted on August 20, 2007
Accepted on November 8, 2007

Postconditioning fails to improve no reflow or alter infarct size in an open-chest rabbit model of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion

Sharon L Hale1*, Ankur Mehra2, Justin Leeka1, and Robert A. Kloner2

1 Heart Instutute, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, United States
2 Heart Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sharon.hale{at}netscape.com.

Postconditioning (PoC) with brief intermittent ischemia after myocardial reperfusion has been shown to lessen some elements of post-ischemic injury including arrhythmias and in some studies the size of myocardial infarction. We hypothesized that PoC could improve reflow to the risk zone after reperfusion. Anesthetized, open-chest rabbits were subjected to 30 minutes of coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 hours of reperfusion. In protocol 1 rabbits were randomly assigned to control (n=10, no further intervention after reperfusion) or to PoC consisting of four cycles of 30-second re-occlusions with 30 seconds of reperfusion in between starting at 30 seconds after the initial reperfusion (4 x 30/30, n=10). In protocol 2, rabbits were assigned to control (n=7) or received PoC consisting of four cycles of 60-second intervals of ischemia and reperfusion starting at 30 seconds after initial reperfusion (4 x 60/60, n=7). No reflow was determined by injecting thioflavine S, a fluorescent marker of capillary perfusion, risk zone by blue dye and infarct size by triphenyltetrazolium chloride. In protocol 1, there were no statistical differences in hemodynamics, ischemic risk zone or infarct size (35±6% of the risk zone PoC vs. 29±4% C, p = 0.38) between the groups. Similarly in protocol 2 PoC failed to reduce infarct size compared with control (45±4% of the risk zone PoC vs. 42±6% C, p = 0.75). There was a strong correlation in both protocols between the size of the necrotic zone and the portion of the necrotic zone that contained an area of no reflow. However postconditioning did not affect this relationship. PoC did not reduce infarct size in this model nor did it reduce the extent of the anatomic zone of no reflow, suggesting that this intervention may not impact post-reperfusion microvascular damage due to ischemia.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.