AJP - Heart AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (February 25, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01001.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/1/H57    most recent
01001.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makale, M. T
Right arrow Articles by Gough, D. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makale, M. T
Right arrow Articles by Gough, D. A
Submitted on October 1, 2004
Accepted on February 22, 2005

Variants of the Tissue-Sensor Array Window Chamber

Milan T Makale1, Peter C Chen1, and David A Gough1*

1 Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dgough{at}bioeng.ucsd.edu.

Sensors are being developed that can be implanted in tissues for continuous monitoring of oxygen, glucose and other metabolites. However, there have been difficulties in inferring metabolite concentrations in blood from the signals of tissue sensors due to the properties of tissues at the implant site and local physiologic phenomena that can affect sensor responses. A multi-sensor array has been previously developed for implantation in a hamster skinfold window chamber preparation to study these effects. The preparation allows recording of concentration-dependent signals from multiple sensors while non-destructively visualizing the adjacent tissue and microvascular function. Variants of the tissue-sensor array window chamber described here have respective advantages over the original chamber design, including improved tissue visualization and reduced surgical intervention, and allow exposure of the sensor to different tissues. Results indicate that mass transfer within tissues is heterogeneous and sensor signals are affected by variable perfusion of local microvasculature, in addition to vascular metabolite concentration. These observations suggest new strategies for sensor design and operation. Window chamber variants are important tools for validation of implanted sensors.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.