AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (January 23, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01075.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/3/H854    most recent
01075.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Momen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Leuenberger, U. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Momen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Leuenberger, U. A.
Submitted on September 17, 2007
Accepted on January 21, 2009

Coronary Blood Flow Responses to Physiological Stress in Humans

Afsana Momen1, Vernon Mascarenhas1, Amir Gahremanpour1, Zhaohui Gao1, Raman Moradkhan1, Allen Kunselman2, John P. Boehmer1, Lawrence I. Sinoway1*, and Urs A. Leuenberger1

1 Medicine/Cardiology, Penn State Heart & Vascular Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
2 Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lsinoway{at}psu.edu.

Animal reports suggest that reflex activation of cardiac sympathetic nerves can evoke coronary vasoconstriction. Conversely, physiologic stress may induce coronary vasodilation to meet an increased metabolic demand. Whether the sympathetic nervous system can modulate coronary vasomotor tone in response to stress in humans is unclear. Coronary blood velocity (CBV), an index of coronary blood flow, can be measured in humans by noninvasive duplex ultrasound. We studied 11 healthy volunteers and measured beat-by-beat changes in CBV, blood pressure, and heart rate during: a) static handgrip for 20 s at 10% and 70% of maximal voluntary contraction; b) lower body negative pressure at -10 and -30 mmHg for 3 min each; c) cold pressor test for 90 s; d) hypoxia (10% O2), hyperoxia (100% O2) and hypercapnia (5% CO2) for 5 min each. At the higher level of handgrip, mean blood pressure increased (P < 0.001) while CBV did not change (P = NS). In addition, during lower body negative pressure CBV decreased (P < 0.02; and P < 0.01, for -10 and -30 mmHg, respectively) while blood pressure did not change (P = NS). The dissociation between the responses of CBV and blood pressure to handgrip and lower body negative pressure is consistent with coronary vasoconstriction. During hypoxia CBV increased (P < 0.02) and decreased during hyperoxia (P < 0.01) although blood pressure did not change (P = NS), suggesting coronary vasodilation during hypoxia and vasoconstriction during hyperoxia. In contrast, concordant increases in CBV and blood pressure were noted during the cold pressor test, and hypercapnia had no effects on either parameter. Thus, physiologic stress known to be associated with sympathetic activation can produce coronary vasoconstriction in humans. Contrasting responses were noted during systemic hypoxia and hyperoxia where mechanisms independent of autonomic influences appear to dominate the vascular end organ effects.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.