AJP - Heart Myographs and Tissue organ baths
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (March 24, 2006). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01176.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/3/H1193    most recent
01176.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, G.
Submitted on November 7, 2005
Accepted on March 17, 2006

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHANGES IN BRACHIAL ARTERY FLOW-MEDIATED DILATION AND BASAL RELEASE OF NITRIC OXIDE IN TYPE II DIABETIC SUBJECTS

Daniel John Green1*, Andrew J. Maiorana2, Michael E. Tschakovsky3, Kyra E Pyke3, Cara J Weisbrod2, and Gerry O'Driscoll2

1 School of Sport and Exercise Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Western Australia, United Kingdom
2 Royal Perth Hospital, Cardiac Transplant Unit, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
3 School of Physical and Health Education, Queens University, Kingston, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: brevis{at}cyllene.uwa.edu.au.

Assessment of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) following forearm ischemia is widely used as a non-invasive bioassay of "stimulated" nitric oxide (NO) mediated conduit artery vasodilator function in vivo. Whether this "stimulated" endothelial NO function reflects basal endothelial NO function is unknown. To test this hypothesis, retrospective analysis of randomised cross-over studies was undertaken in 17 subjects with type 2 diabetes; 9 subjects undertook an exercise training or control period, whilst the remaining 8 subjects were administered an angiotensin II receptor blocker or placebo. FMD was assessed using wall-tracking of high-resolution brachial artery ultrasound images in response to reactive hyperemia. Resistance vessel basal endothelium-dependent NO function was assessed using intra-brachial administration of monomethyl arginine (LNMMA) and plethysmographic assessment of forearm blood flow (FBF). FMD was higher following intervention compared to control/placebo (6.15 ± 0.53 vs 3.81 ± 0.72%, P<0.001). There were no significant changes in the FBF responses to LNMMA. Regression analysis between FMD and LNMMA responses at entry to the study revealed an insignificant correlation (r=-0.10, P=0.7), and improvements in FMD with the interventions were not associated with changes in the LNMMA responses (r=-0.04, P=0.9). We conclude that conduit artery "stimulated" endothelial NO function (FMD) does not reflect basal resistance vessel endothelial NO function in Type 2 diabetics.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.