AJP - Heart Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (February 11, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01265.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/1/H374    most recent
01265.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Waldo, A. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ryu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Waldo, A. L
Submitted on December 15, 2004
Accepted on February 9, 2005

Comparative Effects of Single and Linear Triple Site Rapid Bipolar Pacing on Atrial Activation in Canine Models

Kyungmoo Ryu1*, Raja N Ghanem2, Celeen M Khrestian3, Naomichi Matsumoto3, Robert N Goldstein3, Jayakumar Sahadevan3, Parvin C Dorostkar3, and Albert L Waldo1

1 Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
2 Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
3 Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kmr12{at}cwru.edu.

Nonuniform conduction may cause block/delay, providing a substrate for the onset and maintenance of reentrant atrial arrhythmias. We tested the hypothesis that linear, triple site, bipolar rapid pacing (LTSBRP) of the right atrium (RA) generates more uniform wave front propagation compared to single site bipolar rapid pacing (SSBRP), thereby reducing and/or eliminating conduction block/delay otherwise present. Methods: Five pericarditis and 3 normal dogs were studied. Three plunge wire electrode pairs were placed 5-7 mm apart in both a perpendicular and a parallel configuration at the superior aspect of the crista terminalis (CT), and used to pace at 200 and 300 ms cycle lengths for up to 6 sec. During pacing, 380 electrograms were recorded simultaneously from electrode arrays placed epicardially on the atria, producing activation sequence maps for each pacing episode. Local conduction velocity vectors were computed for each site during each episode. Histograms of absolute velocity vector angles from the x-axis (CT) were plotted to assess uniformity of wave front propagation, and the magnitude of each vector was computed to assess the local speed. Results: LTSBRP showed: (1) more uniform linear activation wave fronts compared to SSBRP; (2) velocity vectors with a more uniform magnitude and direction compared to SSBRP; (3) a predominant absolute velocity vector angle vs. a scattered angle distribution with SSBRP; and (4) shorter RA activation time and faster mean epicardial speed than SSBRP for each pacing CL. Conclusion: LTSBRP created a more uniform wave front propagation with less or no conduction block/delay compared to SSBRP.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.