AJP - Heart AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (April 27, 2007). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01340.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/2/H1183    most recent
01340.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venugopal, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Quick, C. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Venugopal, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Quick, C. M
Submitted on December 8, 2006
Accepted on April 25, 2007

Lymphangion coordination minimally affects mean flow in lymphatic vessels

Arun M. Venugopal1, Randolph H. Stewart1, Glen A. Laine1, Ranjeet M Dongaonkar2, and Christopher M Quick1*

1 Michael E. DeBakey Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States
2 Michael E. DeBakey Institute, Texas A&M University, 77843, Texas, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cquick{at}cvm.tamu.edu.

The lymphatic system returns interstitial fluid to the central venous circulation, in part, by the cyclical contraction of a series of "lymphangion pumps" in a lymphatic vessel. The dynamics of individual lymphangions have been well characterized in vitro-their frequencies and strengths of contraction are sensitive to both preload and afterload. However, lymphangion interaction within a lymphatic vessel has been poorly characterized, because it is difficult to experimentally alter properties of individual lymphangions, and the afterload of one lymphangion is coupled to the preload of another. To determine the effects of lymphangion interaction on lymph flow, we adapted an existing mathematical model of a lymphangion (characterizing lymphangion contractility, lymph viscosity and inertia), to create a new lymphatic vessel model consisting of several lymphangions in series. The lymphatic vessel model was validated with focused experiments on bovine mesenteric lymphatic vessels in vitro. The model was then used to predict changes in lymph flow with different time delays between onset of contraction of adjacent lymphangions (coordinated case) and with different relative lymphangion contraction frequencies (non-coordinated case). Coordination of contraction had little impact on mean flow. Furthermore, orthograde and retrograde propagation of contractile waves had similar effects on flow. Model results explain why neither retrograde propagation of contractile waves, nor the lack of electrical continuity between lymphangions, adversely impact flow. Because lymphangion coordination minimally affects mean flow in lymphatic vessels, lymphangions have flexibility to independently adapt to local conditions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.