AJP - Heart Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283: H102-H109, 2002. First published February 28, 2002; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00038.2002
0363-6135/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/1/H102    most recent
00038.2002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emerson, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Segal, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emerson, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Segal, S. S.
Vol. 283, Issue 1, H102-H109, July 2002

Conduction of hyperpolarization along hamster feed arteries: augmentation by acetylcholine

Geoffrey G. Emerson1, Timothy O. Neild2, and Steven S. Segal1

1 The John B. Pierce Laboratory and Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519; and 2 Department of Human Physiology, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, South Australia

The conduction of vasodilation along resistance vessels has been presumed to reflect the electrotonic spread of hyperpolarization from cell to cell along the vessel wall through gap junction channels. However, the vasomotor response to acetylcholine (ACh) encompasses greater distances than can be explained by passive decay. To investigate the underlying mechanism for this behavior, we tested the hypothesis that ACh augments the conduction of hyperpolarization. Feed arteries (n = 23; diameter, 58 ± 4 µm; segment length, 2-8 mm) were isolated from the hamster retractor muscle, cannulated at each end, and pressurized to 75 mmHg (at 37°C). Vessels were impaled with one or two dye-containing microelectrodes simultaneously (separation distance, 50 µm to 3.5 mm). Membrane potential (Em) (rest, approximately -30 mV) and electrical responses were similar between endothelium and smooth muscle, as predicted for robust myoendothelial coupling. Current injection (-0.8 nA, 1.5 s) evoked hyperpolarization (-10 ± 1 mV; membrane time constant, 240 ms) that conducted along the vessel with a length constant (lambda ) = 1.2 ± 0.1 mm; spontaneous Em oscillations (~1 Hz) decayed with lambda  = 1.2 + 0.1 mm. In contrast, ACh microiontophoresis (500 nA, 500 ms, 1 µm tip) evoked hyperpolarization (-14 ± 2 mV) that conducted with lambda  = 1.9 ± 0.1 mm, 60% further (P < 0.05) than responses evoked by purely electrical stimuli. These findings indicate that ACh augments the conduction of hyperpolarization along the vessel wall.

cable theory; length constant; microcirculation; endothelium; smooth muscle





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online