|
|
||||||||
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106; and 2Institut Non Linéaire de Nice, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 06560 Valbonne, France
Submitted 24 July 2003 ; accepted in final form 25 September 2003
The outcome of defibrillation shocks is determined by the nonlinear transmembrane potential (
Vm) response induced by a strong external electrical field in cardiac cells. We investigated the contribution of electroporation to
Vm transients during high-intensity shocks using optical mapping. Rectangular and ramp stimuli (1020 ms) of different polarities and intensities were applied to the rabbit heart epicardium during the plateau phase of the action potential (AP).
Vm were optically recorded under a custom 6-mm-diameter electrode using a voltage-sensitive dye. A gradual increase of cathodal and well as anodal stimulus strength was associated with 1) saturation and subsequent reduction of
Vm; 2) postshock diastolic resting potential (RP) elevation; and 3) postshock AP amplitude (APA) reduction. Weak stimuli induced a monotonic
Vm response and did not affect the RP level. Strong shocks produced a nonmonotonic
Vm response and caused RP elevation and a reduction of postshock APA. The maximum positive and maximum negative
Vm were recorded at 170 ± 20 mA/cm2 for cathodal stimuli and at 240 ± 30 mA/cm2 for anodal stimuli, respectively (means ± SE, n = 8, P = 0.003). RP elevation reached 10% of APA at a stimulus strength of 320 ± 40 mA/cm2 for both polarities. Strong ramp stimuli (20 ms, 600 mA/cm2) induced a nonmonotonic
Vm response, reaching the same largest positive and negative values as for rectangular shocks. The transition from monotonic to nonmonotonic morphology correlates with RP elevation and APA reduction, which is consistent with cell membrane electroporation. Strong shocks resulted in propidium iodide uptake, suggesting sarcolemma electroporation. In conclusion, electroporation is a likely explanation of the saturation and nonmonotonic nature of cellular responses reported for strong electric stimuli.
defibrillation; arrhythmia; electrophysiology; cardiac tissue electrical damage
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. G. Tereshchenko, M. N. Faddis, B. J. Fetics, K. E. Zelik, I. R. Efimov, and R. D. Berger Transient local injury current in right ventricular electrogram after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock predicts heart failure progression. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 25, 2009; 54(9): 822 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. P. Nikolski and I. R. Efimov Electroporation of the heart Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(s2): S146 - S154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ashihara and N. A. Trayanova Cell and tissue responses to electric shocks Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(s2): S155 - S165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Sambelashvili, V. P. Nikolski, and I. R. Efimov Virtual electrode theory explains pacing threshold increase caused by cardiac tissue damage Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): H2183 - H2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |