AJP - Heart Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2176-H2182, 2005. First published July 8, 2005; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00124.2005
0363-6135/05 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
289/5/H2176    most recent
00124.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tchaicheeyan, O.
Right arrow Articles by Landesberg, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tchaicheeyan, O.
Right arrow Articles by Landesberg, A.

Regulation of energy liberation during steady sarcomere shortening

Oren Tchaicheeyan and Amir Landesberg

Department of Biomedical Engineering, TECHNION-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

Submitted 7 February 2005 ; accepted in final form 11 May 2005

Energy liberation rate () during steady muscle shortening is a monotonic increasing or biphasic function of the shortening velocity (V). The study examines three plausible hypotheses for explaining the biphasic -V relationship (EVR): 1) the cross-bridge (XB) turnover rate from non-force-generating (weak) to force-generating (strong) conformation decreases as V increases; 2) XB kinetics is determined by the number of strong XBs (XB-XB cooperativity); and 3) the affinity of troponin for calcium is modulated by the number of strong XBs (XB-Ca cooperativity). The relative role of the various energy-regulating mechanisms is not well defined. The hypotheses were tested by coupling calcium kinetics with XB cycling. All three hypotheses yield identical steady-state characteristics: 1) hyperbolic force-velocity relationship; 2) quasi-linear stiffness-force relationship; and 3) biphasic EVR, where declines at high V due to decrease in the number of cycling XBs or in the weak-to-strong transition rate. The hypotheses differ in the ability to describe the existence of both monotonic and biphasic EVRs and in the effect of intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) on the EVR peak. Monotonic and biphasic EVRs with a shift in EVR peak to higher velocity at higher [Ca2+]i are obtained only by XB-Ca cooperativity. XB-XB cooperativity provides only biphasic EVRs. A direct effect of V on XB kinetics predicts that EVR peak is obtained at the same velocity independently of [Ca2+]i. The study predicts that measuring the dependence of the EVR on [Ca2+]i allows us to test the hypotheses and to identify the dominant energy-regulating mechanism. The established XB-XB and XB-Ca mechanisms provide alternative explanations to the various reported EVRs.

muscle energetics; cross bridge; excitation-contraction coupling; cardiac mechanics; cooperativity



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. Landesberg, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, TECHNION-IIT, Haifa 32000, Israel (e-mail: amir{at}bm.technion.ac.il)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Physiological Society.