HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 294/4/H1514    most recent 01283.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bell, J. R. Articles by Delbridge, L. M. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bell, J. R. Articles by Delbridge, L. M. D.

CALL FOR PAPERS
Sex Steroids and Gender in Cardiovascular-Renal Physiology and Pathophysiology

The intrinsic resistance of female hearts to an ischemic insult is abrogated in primary cardiac hypertrophy

¹Cardiac Phenomics Laboratory and ²Genetic Physiology Laboratory, Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Submitted 2 November 2007 ; accepted in final form 29 January 2008

Important sex differences in cardiovascular disease outcomes exist, including conditions of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and cardiac ischemia. Studies of sex differences in the extent to which load-independent (primary) hypertrophy modulates the response to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) damage have not been characterized. We have previously described a model of primary genetic cardiac hypertrophy, the hypertrophic heart rat (HHR). In this study the sex differences in HHR cardiac function and responses to I/R [compared to control normal heart rat (NHR)] were investigated ex vivo. The ventricular weight index was markedly increased in HHR female (7.82 ± 0.49 vs. 4.80 ± 0.10 mg/g; P < 0.05) and male (5.76 ± 0.22 vs. 4.62 ± 0.07 mg/g; P < 0.05) hearts. Female hearts of both strains exhibited a reduced basal contractility compared with strain-matched males [maximum first derivative of pressure (dP/dt_max): NHR, 4,036 ± 171 vs. 4,258 ± 152 mmHg/s; and HHR, 3,974 ± 160 vs. 4,540 ± 259 mmHg/s; P < 0.05]. HHR hearts were more susceptible to I/R (I = 25 min, and R = 30 min) injury than NHR hearts (decreased functional recovery, and increased lactate dehydrogenase efflux). Female NHR hearts exhibited a significantly greater recovery (dP/dt_max) post-I/R relative to male NHR (95.0 ± 12.2% vs. 60.5 ± 9.4%), a resistance to postischemic dysfunction not evident in female HHR (29.0 ± 5.6% vs. 25.9 ± 6.3%). Ventricular fibrillation was suppressed, and expression levels of Akt and ERK1/2 were selectively elevated in female NHR hearts. Thus the occurrence of load-independent primary cardiac hypertrophy undermines the intrinsic resistance of female hearts to I/R insult, with the observed abrogation of endogenous cardioprotective signaling pathways consistent with a potential mechanistic role in this loss of protection.

sex differences; intracellular signaling; cardiac function; ischemia-reperfusion