AJP - Heart Calcium Transients and Cell-Sarcomere
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (June 27, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpheart.91404.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/3/H1076    most recent
91404.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Segerson, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Hamdan, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Segerson, N. M
Right arrow Articles by Hamdan, M. H.
Submitted on December 5, 2007
Revised on May 16, 2008
Accepted on May 30, 2008

The Acute Effect of Atrio-Ventricular Pacing on Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Patients with Normal and Depressed Left Ventricular Function

Nathan M Segerson1*, Stephen L Wasmund1, Marcos Daccarett1, Manuel L Fabela2, Christopher H Hammond2, Gregory Stoddard1, Michael L. Smith3, and Mohamed H. Hamdan1

1 University of Utah
2 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT
3 University of North Texas Health Science Center

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nathan.segerson{at}hsc.utah.edu.

Background: While modest elevations in pacing rate improve cardiac output and induce reflex sympathoinhibition, the threshold rate above which hemodynamic perturbations induce reflex sympathoexcitation remains unknown. Methods: Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures (SBP, DBP, & MAP), and sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) were measured during normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and AV sequential pacing in 25 patients. Pacing was performed at 100, 120 and 140bpm with an AV interval of 100ms. Patients were divided into two groups based on normal or abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): Group 1 (n=11, mean LVEF=55%), Group 2 (n=14, mean LVEF=31%). Results: In Group 1, relative to NSR, SBP decreased an average of 2%, 3%, and 8% at 100, 120, and 140bpm (p<0.001). DBP and MAP increased 9%, 15%, 15% (p=0.001), and 3%, 6%, 5% (p=NS) respectively. In Group 2, SBP reductions were even greater, with an average decrease of 4%, 8%, and 16% (p<0.001). While DBP increased 9%, 9%, and 8% at 100, 120, and 140bpm, (p=NS), MAP increased 3% and 2% at 100 and 120bpm, but decreased 3% at 140bpm (p=0.001). SNA recordings were obtained in 11 patients (6 in Group 1, 5 in Group 2). In Group 1, SNA decreased during all rates, with a mean 21% reduction. In Group 2 however, SNA decreased at 100 and 120bpm (49% and 38%), but increased 24% at 140bpm. Conclusion: Patients with depressed LVEF exhibited altered hemodynamic and sympathetic responses to rapid sequential pacing. The implications of these findings in device programming await future studies.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.